AP omitted Bush's track record in use of "Democrat" smear
A January 29 Associated Press article by Ben Feller reported President Bush's claim during an interview that his use of the word "Democrat" as an adjective during his January 23 State of the Union address, when he congratulated the new "Democrat majority," was an "oversight." But like a January 30 New York Times article on the same subject noted by Media Matters for America, the AP ignored Bush's frequent use of the word "Democrat" as an adjective -- an oft-used Republican slur.
Unlike the Times, the AP article noted that Bush deviated from the prepared text of the speech and that Republicans, such as former President Reagan, have a history of using the slur, but the AP did not note Bush's own history of using the term. In contrast to the AP article, a January 31 article in The Hill noted Bush has used "Democrat" as an adjective at least 10 times since November 7, 2006:
The president has a habit of muffing the Democratic Party's chosen name -- one that he hasn't kicked since he called for bipartisan unity after his party's defeat in the midterm elections.
A quick search on the White House website yields at least 10 instances in which Bush used "Democrat" as an adjective since Nov. 7.
For example, on the morning after Election Day, he declared, "It is clear the Democrat Party had a good night last night, and I congratulate them on their victories. This morning I spoke with Republican and Democrat leadership in the House and Senate."
The Hill article also noted that while "many Republicans deny that they are intentionally insulting the other party," others do not. In the article, Shannon Flaherty, communications director to former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX), defended the practice. The article quoted her stating, "A gathering of Democrats is the Democrat Party, and a gathering of Republicans is called the Republican Party." Flaherty also asserted that the Democrats' "incessant whining and attempts to adjective-ize their identity is another way to fool people into associating democratic principles with the modern Democrat Party." She continued, "Looks like our refusal to adopt their self-absorbed political syntax is giving them a post-election identity crisis."
The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times have also both noted Bush's history of using the slur, as Media Matters has documented. In a January 30 article, The Washington Post noted that Bush "frequently uses the formulation" and the Los Angeles Times, in a January 30 article, noted "Bush's usage of the term increased dramatically last year; according to the American Presidency Project, based at UC Santa Barbara, the president was recorded using the term 22 times in 2006 -- more than in the previous five years of his presidency combined." Blogger and media critic Greg Sargent chronicled six instances in which Bush used "Democrat" as an adjective, four of which took place as he stumped for Republicans before the 2006 midterm elections. The Los Angeles Times article also noted that "experts on political locution say it's a deliberate, if ungrammatical, linguistic strategy."
At the end of Feller's article, the AP documented an instance of the Bush administration, but not Bush himself, using the slur. It noted "Bush plans to speak to the House Democratic Caucus at its conference this weekend in Virginia. On the president's schedule, that event is referred to as the 'House Democrat Conference.' " The New York Times noted in a January 30 article that the administration subsequently changed its schedule to read "Democratic conference."
From a January 29 Associated Press article:
This one has gotten a little ic-ky for the White House. President Bush said Monday he wasn't trying to disparage the party now running Congress by referring to it as the "Democrat majority," as opposed to the "Democratic majority," in his State of the Union speech.
"That was an oversight," Bush said in an interview with National Public Radio. "I mean, I'm not trying to needle."
Bush's dropping of the "ic" at the end of the word prompted grumbling by Democrats that he purposely got their name wrong.
This is not a new charge. President Reagan used to refer to the "Democrat Party." Democratic leaders have long considered it demeaning when their suffix is omitted, and some of them figured it was no accident in a speech as highly choreographed and rehearsed as Bush's State of the Union.
Bush said he wasn't even aware that he had done it.
"I meant to be saying, why don't we show the American people we can actually work together?" Bush said.
The verbal shot came in the same breath as the president was congratulating Democrats for winning the House and Senate in the November election.
In the language the president was supposed to read, the reference was "Democratic," not "Democrat."
[...]
The next chapter will come this weekend.
Bush plans to speak to the House Democratic Caucus at its conference this weekend in Virginia.
On the president's schedule, that event is referred to as the "House Democrat Conference."















Bush's excuse...
BUSH (shrugging shoulders):"Hey... ever'body knows I don't talk so good."
Sadly, in his case that would almost be believable.
I'm going to get hell for this...
But, I think this whole 'democrat smear' biz gets way too much play. Yes, it is likely intentional... and, yes, Bush is an idiot who can barely put two words together... But, the whole idea of mispronouncing a name as a smear is so... uh, puerile... it's getting to the point of absurdity talking about it so much, no? Gives it way too much credit if you ask me. Who'll look worse now? Bush for continuing it....Or, the Dems for whining about it?
Yes, I said 'whining'.
It's not whining to insist that your political party's name be pronounced correctly. I think the best approach is for the Democratic Party to more frequently use their name, own it proudly and politely correct the Repubs whenever possible.
But... it'll be perceived by whining, or be called whining by these smearing idiots. Then there's more for them to smear with... You got it. Correct them, quietly move on.
I meant, perceived as whining... Damn it! If MMFA would only bring back the 'preview' function, I... oh. Damn.
Works here. Are you whining?
So Bush does something wrong and it's OUR fault? Sorry, but no.
I’m not a Whining Wimp...
The word Liberal has been successfully trashed, to the extent that a new word (Progressive ) had to be invoked. Is this a small issue? I say it’s a very important issue to defend.
If the practice of dropping the "IC" from "Democratic Party" doesn't face a TOUGH fight right here and now, then it will Stick. The Docile, Nice, Democrats will once again allow Republicants to define them. That’s right:
Republican’t Party
Indeed, You are allowing the Republicants to deliver a sorry insult directly into our Dictionary. If you don't make your stand now to fight for "Democrat-ic," then you cannot fight for the Democratic Party.
It’s about the intention of the word. It’s about what the victim feels and hears when the word is said. Nothing at all to do with grammatical usage or correctness. I’ts about intent and perseption.
I hope that wasn’t hell, as you said you’d get.
No...that's cool
And, I understand all that. You're prob right. Just exhausting to play on such a ridiculously low playing field. Bush is the bullhorn for petty foolishness gone horribly wrong. He's the schoolyard bully who actually graduated to the uber-role of Death's salesman. I think he should/must be impeached. Let him say what he wants... his so-called legacy will be just that... a string of calamities, destruction, wasted life...all punctuated by inane, petty slurs.
I'm glad I know about the 'slur'...but, as Rasotis says above. Correct them and quietly move on to more important biz. That's my piece.
On the other side of the coin, it bugs me to think the Rove-ateers are smugly congratulating themselves for getting that namby-pambiness into the dialog. I'd love to know which Rove bully came up with it.
Greek, I have the same feeling about it, sort of mixed.
I realize it's done deliberately, so I don't like to get too riled about it, I would rather point out their ignorance than pretend to be bothered by it.
Bill O'Reilly and that disgusting Michelle Malkin are doing it also!
Check it out!
Once again MM vastly underestimates the number of times that Bush has used Democrat as an adjective. There are many more occurrences of this than even what the L.A. Times mentions, so I will repeat the comment I made to the other MM article.
Here are some of the more recent instances of Bush doing this. These account for 36 such uses, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.
A Google search of whitehouse.gov for "democrat party" finds many more such occurrences. You will find more occurrences with similar searches such as "democrat majority," "democrat leader," "democrat leaders," "democrat leadership," "democrat chairman," "democrat senator," "democrat senators," "democrat member," "democrat members," "democrat congress," "democrat congressman," "democrat president," "democrat presidents," "democrat vote," "democrat votes," "democrat plan," "democrat approach," "democrat goal," "democrat idea," "democrat ideas," and "democrat colleagues."
I have now recorded 356 times that Bush has done this in 190 appearances as president. For the full list, see my diary entry at Daily Kos.
"a gathering of democrats is the democrat party" not even close. the official title is the "democratic" party
I've always said Democratic Party. I never noticed that others weren't saying it correctly. Apparently I didn't get the memo. I want to thank MMfA and the posters for letting me know what gets them all get ticked off and whiney.
DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY
DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY
DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY
Hey this is fun
DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY DEMOCRAT PARTY
Taz, one of the most substantial posts I've seen from you. Congrats.
Thanks HBL I am pretty proud of that post too.
Next to piss you off I'm going to run my fingernails across a blackboard
Come closer
Running your fingernails across a blackboard is sort of like voting Republican.
It's annoying to everyone around you, but you have to live with the results too.
Unless you enjoy the sound.
I don't know HBL, I'd think for a lot of us nails dragged across a blackboard and a chorus of Democrats whining might be difficult to differentiate.
"difficult to differentiate"
Like OBL and Iraq
Great analogy HBL (bet you weren't expecting me to say that)
The problem most of you have here is that you assume that all Republicans or Conservatives think alike. Bush may have an R by his name but he's not a Conservative, compassionate or otherwise. He's a dunderhead being controlled by Darth "Cheney" Vader and the NeoCons.
Also not all Republicans or Conservatives supported Bush's invasion of Iraq.
So what if a small group of petty minded Republicans insist on saying Democrat Party instead of Democratic Party. Why let them get to you? You only sound as petty as them when you whine continually about it.
where was I whining?
Well for most of us your incredible ignorance is annoying enough. Your posts border on pathological moronity
Wierdly enough there is no sound I find annoying except bad singing. I used to have a teacher that would run his fingernails across a blackboard and I thought it funny that most of the class would groan and shiver, has no effect on me at all. On the other hand I absoluty cannot write with a felt pen on paper. It sends shivers down my spine. I guess its a related phenomena.
Taz,
How did you get past the parental control?
Mom and Dad went to bed and I know how to disconnect it
thank you. you have proved the point. because it is proven that the republicans adopted this as an official policy because they did want to characterize the party as "democratic". the quote about "a gathering of democrats is the democrat party" is from an aide to tom delay. what actually makes it a deal is that even after the usage is pointed out, the republicans still make a point of using it. i quoted a story the other day about a book written by republican pollster frank luntz in which his editor had gone through the book and changed democrat to democratic where it was appropriate. luntz changed them all back. not the biggest thing in the world, but who is childish and petty?
make that, did not want to characterize the party as "democratic"
You missed my point mefirst. I've always said Democratic Party. I'd no idea it was being said incorrectly, by mistake or on purpose till I read it here.
Maybe if you guys would stop publicizing it fewer people would know.
Of course now that i know it bugs you. Well.
it doesn't bug me. the point is that this was something that the republicans adopted as a strategy. it just simply shows how lame and pathetic they are that they go out of their way to do this, like bush saying the republican and democrat leadership. if you wish to join the lame and pathetic camp also, feel free. no one will be surprised.
Or maybe it indicts how lame and pathetic you and other Democrats are to whine about it?
Food for thought.
well one side whines and the other side goes out of it's way to actually plan this as a strategy. i find the latter more lame, because according to you, it's nothing to bother with. shows what the republicans spend their time doing
No it shows how lame and pathetic Republicans are that they stoop to such petty nonsense. It shows how ignorant YOU are that you show up and snivel like a little girl that we complain about an obvious insult. It shows you are a complete moron that you think it is whining to demand the respect the Democratic party deserves instead of saying thank you GOP can we have another.
Knock yourself out. It's a nice indicator that everything you say can be discarded as completely ignorant.
Bittermarv your name says it all. It's a nice indicator that everything you say can be discarded as nothing more than the moanings of a humorless morose petty little man.
This from a poster so incredibly stupid, so utterly inane and ignorant that he has never produced a post that five monkeys on five typewriters in absolute darkness couldnt improve upon at random.
Here is a new memo. ReNAMBLAcan party, that is ReNAMBLAcan party. Say it twenty times, its descriptive it fits, its the new thing. I think we ought to go with it. Until the ReNAMBLAcans can learn to pronounce DemocratIC
To know the truth, simply check for Bungle's denial. Of course this peabrain attempted to slur the Democratic Party, in his limited capacity.
No Repugnant has ever been caught voluntarily telling the truth - the closest any have been, is when the facts on the ground change between accepting the draft from the speechwriters, and reading it from the telepromters.
Everyone professes to be in favor of democracy, right? But hardly anyone even knows what a republic is. So, the Repugnacans don't want to let stand the impression that only one party is democratic (as opposed to Democratic). So, get over it. Make fun of their apparent illiteracy (especially the "Decider in Chief's"), then move on. I can't believe how many articles about this MMFA has run!
Don't forget to check The Google on The Internets...
It's too late! The term is on Wiki!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_party
It has made it to the governing body and final say of cyberspace...
It has now become a man law...
It can never be changed...
Gonna have to find a new term for the party...
Much hand wringing and teeth gnashing will follow...
No problem everyone in the new Democrat party will just now label the GOP as the ReNAMBLAcan party and we will be even
Yeah, but will you be able to get Franken on board? He's leaving his mike to throw his hat in the ring. If you get him...the rest will surely follow!
We dont need him just Barbra Striesand
In concert or does she have show now?
OK I admit, I'm a closet Babs fan...don't agree with her politics...love her voice, and a couple of movies she did.
Wikipedia has an excellent entry on the history and use of the phrase 'Democrat Party'. See [link to en.wikipedia.org]