About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

USA Today hailed Giuliani as "hero of 9/11," omitted Kerik controversy

February 02, 2007 12:57 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A USA Today article referred to former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani as a "hero of 9/11." But, while mentioning a leaked memo in which Giuliani's campaign staff set out potential areas of vulnerability, the USA Today article did not note the memo's reference to a particular scandal relating to terrorism preparedness.

25 Comments

On February 1, USA Today reported on former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's (R) potential presidential candidacy in a front-page article that bore the headline "Giuliani: Can hero of 9/11 win over his own party?" The article, which said that Giuliani was "[d]ubbed 'America's mayor' after he led New York City's response to the Sept. 11 attacks," discussed a leaked memo that details Giuliani's campaign plans, but omitted the memo's mention of a scandal relating to preparedness for terrorism.

The article noted that the memo included "questions about [Giuliani's] private-sector businesses," "his current and former wives," and "[h]is stance on social issues." However, the memo also included the word "Kerik" as a "prob[lem]," presumably referring to Giuliani's former police commissioner Bernard Kerik, whom the USA Today article did not mention. Giuliani had pushed President Bush to nominate Kerik as homeland security secretary, but Kerik withdrew because, he said, he had failed to make "required tax payments and related filings" for a housekeeper. As Media Matters for America noted, Columbia Journalism Review's Campaign Desk weblog (now known as CJR Daily) suggested the so-called "nanny problem" was given as the reason to draw attention away from Kerik's alleged misdeeds, including various lawsuits, allegations of corruption, and potential conflicts of interest.

In the book Grand Illusion: The Untold Story of Rudy Giuliani and 9/11 (HarperCollins, 2006), Village Voice senior editor Wayne Barrett and CBSNews.com senior producer Dan Collins documented Kerik's history as part of a pattern of security-related cronyism in Giuliani's administration. On 9-11, "Giuliani's preference for the comfort of a huge entourage had disconnected the city's management and its fighting force at a crucial moment," Barrett and Collins concluded (Page 350). They added that Kerik was "a prime example of this managerial dysfunction all morning" because in the 102 minutes between the first impact of a plane into the World Trade Center and the collapse of the North Tower, "Kerik became Giuliani's bodyguard, just as he had been in the 1993 mayoral campaign," rather than leading the police's efforts (Page 350).

In 1993, when Kerik met Giuliani, Kerik was "the lowest rank above patrol. ... He'd never passed a promotional exam. He was 24 credits short of a college degree in a department where you couldn't become a lieutenant without one" (Page 317). Barrett and Collins described Kerik as "a man whose personal, financial, and social life was a mess, and whose concern for following the rules and avoiding ethical conflicts appeared close to nonexistent" (Page 321). Nevertheless, Giuliani made Kerik police commissioner and supported Kerik's nomination for secretary of homeland security, "conclud[ing] that Kerik was competent to lead one of the nation's largest and most critically important bureaucracies" (Page 321).

In addition to Kerik, Giuliani's first-responder leadership included fire commissioner Thomas Von Essen and emergency management commissioner Richard J. Sheirer. On Page 353 of Grand Illusion, Barrett and Collins described their background:

All three had no real management credentials until Giuliani promoted them. Von Essen and Kerik went from the lowest ranks of their departments to the very top without ever passing a promotional exam. Giuliani had begun his mayoralty with a circle of managers, like [former Boston police commissioner Bill] Bratton and [former Office of Emergency Management director Jerome M.] Hauer, with track records elsewhere. He was ending it with a cult of personality.

A September 9, 2002, New York Times article (subscription required) described Hauer as "by all accounts among the nation's quintessential emergency professionals." Barrett and Collins claimed that Hauer's replacement, Sheirer, was a "Giuliani loyalist who had spent most of his career as a fire alarm dispatcher and a leader of one of the few unions to endorse Giuliani's 1993 candidacy, the dispatchers' union" (Page 31). Similarly, prior to Von Essen's nomination for fire commissioner, he had "never moved up the promotional ranks a single step [but] delivered his union to Rudy Giuliani in the 1993 election" (Page 60).

The USA Today article did not analyze Giuliani's performance on 9-11 or his record on preparedness for terrorism. Several media figures have noted that Giuliani's ties to Kerik could reflect badly on Giuliani during a campaign. As Media Matters noted, on the July 16, 2006, edition of the NBC-syndicated Chris Matthews Show, NBC News chief foreign correspondent Andrea Mitchell attempted to bring up the criticism Giuliani received for pushing Bush to nominate Kerik as a possible setback to Giuliani's candidacy. As Media Matters also noted, on the May 2, 2006, edition of MSNBC's Hardball, Chuck Todd, editor in chief of National Journal's The Hotline, also cited Giuliani's association with Kerik as an obstacle to Giuliani's presidential ambitions.

Media Matters has documented the media's seeming reluctance to look past Giuliani's reputation as "America's Mayor" despite the numerous controversies marking Giuliani's political career.

From the February 1 USA Today article "Giuliani: Can hero of 9/11 win over his own party?"

Rudy Giuliani would seem to have all the credentials a candidate for president could want: A hero of 9/11, a crime-busting federal prosecutor, a two-term Republican mayor in an overwhelmingly Democratic city and one of the most admired politicians in the country.

He's got a big problem, though. First, he has to be nominated by Republicans who don't yet know his views on social issues.

"People remember how he provided leadership at a time the city needed it and the country needed it," says coin-company executive Jeff Marsh, 41, as he waits to greet Giuliani at the annual dinner of the Littleton (N.H.) Chamber of Commerce. While Marsh's admiration of Giuliani the man is evident, however, his support for Giuliani the presidential candidate is no sure thing. Giuliani's advocacy of abortion rights gives him "some pause," Marsh says ruefully.

[...]

Giuliani, who declined to be interviewed for this story, also shows appeal beyond the GOP.

Dubbed "America's mayor" after he led New York City's response to the Sept. 11 attacks, Giuliani had a nearly 4-1 favorable rating among all those polled. McCain had a 2-1 favorable rating, and the rating for Democratic hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton was only a bit more positive than negative.

[...]

Giuliani's strategists recognize his vulnerabilities. A campaign memo leaked to the New York Daily News last month and acknowledged as authentic by spokeswoman Sunny Mindel listed some of them: questions about his private-sector businesses, which have made him a millionaire and entangled him with clients from thoroughbred racing to the energy industry. Controversies around his current and former wives, a soap-opera saga played out in public. His stance on social issues, to the left of any major GOP contender since the party adopted an unyielding anti-abortion line in its 1980 platform.

"Probs (problems) that are insurm (insurmountable)?" asks the memo. "Does any of it cause RWG (Giuliani) to lose his lustre?"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by fawltylogic (February 02, 2007 1:33 pm ET)
         

      How history can be rewritten... does nobody remember what a reviled joke of a mayor Giuliani was before 9/11?

      And what made him a "hero of 9/11"? Talking to the press?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DorisRussell (February 02, 2007 1:47 pm ET)
           

        I dont think he was a joke. He was a good mayor of a City that was in desperate needs of repair in 1994. It has become a wonderful place to live , work and visit.

         That being said , I think he is a decent person but will not be able to get the votes needed to win the nomination. Republicans wont elect him. Even the disgusting Ann Coulter said she would vote for Senator Clinton over Rudy on the O'Reilly show.

        Howard Dean said some of the similar things in the New York Daily News.

         

        http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/494088p-416103c.html

         

        www.foxnews.com/video2/launchPage.h... - 1k - 2007-01-31

        Report Abuse
    • Author by monknj80 (February 02, 2007 1:51 pm ET)
         

      I'm indifferent about the guy, I disagraee with him on somethings that are deal breakers for me.

      There is a large segment of the New York populace that isn't to happy with Giuliani. To be frank I don't think he did anything above and beyond after 9/11 that any mayor wouldn't do, but I hope we never have to find out again if that's the case.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (February 02, 2007 4:59 pm ET)
           

        Rudy did a competent job as Mayor during 9/11, but I would hardly describe him as a hero. And while his term as Mayor during 9/11 should be included on his resume...it alone doesn't qualify him to be President.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (February 02, 2007 2:25 pm ET)
         

      Remember when Rudy ran into the burning WTC at great risk to himself to rescue people?  Hell yeah he's a hero of 9/11!

      Oh wait, that was cops and firefighters.  Never mind. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 02, 2007 3:04 pm ET)
           

        I remember when pres Carter went inside Three Mile Island. Guess one must ask the definition of a hero, as opposed to " doing your job ". Giulianni is not, for his incessant attacks on democrats. Real heroes rise above the petty stuff. Besides, what happened to these titles being bestowed only agter death, when the life works are done and history has examined the record? I regarded Randy Cunningham as a hero for a while.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by archae (February 02, 2007 2:33 pm ET)
         

      What did you expect from the McPaper?

      Facts?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Susie (February 02, 2007 2:34 pm ET)
         

      I believe he was running away from the buildings...

      His career was dead in NYC before 9/11. 

      Believe me the firemen don't like him.  My brother-in-law basically spits at the mention of his name.  As a note my b-in-l does not spit at anti-anti war protestors. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by JLyons (February 02, 2007 2:54 pm ET)
           

        Sorry, but I know 2 NYC Firemen very well that love the guy. The issue of whether NYC Firemen like the former Mayor is irrelevant however. The guy is the best the Republicans have to offer and thats why they wont nominate him. He is pro choice, pro gun control and pro gay rights.  He drives Conservatives crazy, thats why I like him.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by bruce1ace (February 02, 2007 2:57 pm ET)
         

      I'm not sure if MMFA is aware of this, but USA today doesn't do a lot of in-depth articles.  They are more into splashy color and fashion and the latest from Britney Spears pathetic life.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jfm5447 (February 02, 2007 4:52 pm ET)
         

      The "hero" of 9/11 became that way largely because he went to ground zero while Dubya was flying around and going into bunkers even though the only airplane in the air was AF One (well and the private jets rounding up the Saudi Royal family).  The contrast of the two men stood out!

      That being said, his policies as mayor, his popularity as mayor (Very low on 9/10) and Kerick, disqualifies him (in my opinion) from being a good choice as president.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (February 02, 2007 5:03 pm ET)
         

      I cant believe how long Rudy has been able to ride this "hero of 9/11" garbage.  He's made millions in speaking engagement fees and book royalties.  In fact, there's probably no one outside the boardroom of Halliburton who has cashed in so heavily on 9/11.

      Guliani is a "hero" because-- um, well, he didnt wet himself that day?  Because he didnt jump into a plane and fly around the country, like Bush did?  

      I suppose that if the terrorists had hit Boston, Thomas Menino would be a Presidential contender and "America's Mayor" today?  How about if they had hit Baltimore?  Would Martin O'Malley have skipped running for Gov of Maryland to seek the Presidency solely on the fact that he happened to be Mayor of a city that was attacked by terrorists?

      This garbage has gone  on long enough.  Please run, Rudy, so that you can finally be exposed for the shallow straw man you really are. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Oceania (February 02, 2007 10:02 pm ET)
         

      Guliani places the NYC emergency command center at the WTC (a known terrorist target that was bombed in 1993) and supplied the FDNY with inoperable Motorola radios, and now he is the "hero of 9/11."  Only in America....

       [link to www.huffingtonpost.com]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by FootballFan (February 03, 2007 3:45 am ET)
         

      I guess then everytime they do a story about BARAK OBAMA they should say he use to be a 'crackhead'.  And every story about HILLARY CLINTON should mention she was friends of the McDougals.

      Maybe USA Today doesn't be just like all of the liberal smear sites on the web.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ssteffin (February 03, 2007 9:31 am ET)
         

      If corruption and cronyism are indeed the chief elements of  his biography, then Giuliani stands a great chance of getting the support of the Republican party. 

      Dishonesty, greed, personal scandal, and an insatiable appetite for power are not only characteristic of politicians in general, but a prerequisite to  their success. 

      Why will any of these facts make the slightest difference  when it comes to electability?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Genghiz (February 03, 2007 1:48 pm ET)
         

      Using Media Matters' logic, every story on Algore needs to contain mentions of his close connections with Fred Phelps - the homophobic moron who passes off as the "Pastor" of Westboro Baptist Church.Phelps was even a delegate of Gore's to the DNC convention.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by arglebargle (February 03, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
           

        A couple of fundraisers in the 1980s (when Gore was not pro-gay, and when Phelps was not the public wingnut he is now) does not a "close connection" make.

        Fred Phelps JUNIOR was a DNC delegate. His views mirror his father's, but he was (then) much more quiet and misleading about them.

        If you have more data on this that establishes a current and closer connection, please provide a link to something other than Wikipedia or WorldNet Daily.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bobby_c_506632 (February 03, 2007 7:16 pm ET)
           

        I don't remember Al Gore appointing Fred Phelps to a position as powerful as police commisssioner of the nation's largest city, or any position for that matter.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by info8508 (February 03, 2007 1:52 pm ET)
         

      9-11-2001 has to be the biggest photo op ever.  Bin-Laden didn't need to be there of course since everyone had another way to find out who he is.  Osama was there in spirit.

      We were attacked by a God named Allah.  12-7-1941 we were attacked by a God named Hirohito.   Had the country been Buddaist instead of Christian then we would have invaded Brazil.  This accounts for why we invaded Iraq.

      9-11-2001 and 12-7-1941 are identical events.  The country was attacked by a God.  To win the war on terror the God that attacked must be destroyed.  Instead we are appeasing it by sacrificing people in Iraq to it.  Allah is a hungry God that eats Americans. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (February 03, 2007 9:55 pm ET)
         

      Mr. Giuliani was a supporter of Dick Santorum...that's enough to make him non-existent in the political arena. Not to mention he cheated on his wife. Not to "Radical Religious Right" (RRR) in my book. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by calendarsago.com (February 04, 2007 3:21 pm ET)
         

      Indeed, it is about time that someone refresh the memory of America's collective subconscious with regard to Rudy Giuliani's ties to Bernard Kerik.  While I have great sympathy for the latter's early youth (you can google for those parts of his bio which specifically pertain to his mom) and while it matters not to me how many marriages, divorces, and/or affairs that the former has entertained, neither heart strings nor absence of prudishnness eclipse all the allegations that surfaced during Kerik's homeland security secretary candidacy regarding involvement with corruption.  Nor do these eclipse how poorly equipped were those on the frontlines on 9/11. Specifically, state-of-the-art communication devices were NOT in the hands of New York's finest and bravest on that day.  In short, before stumbling upon your post, I kept wondering why polls and news commentators presenting Giuliani as a leading 2008 Republican contender for the presidency failed to remind Americans what they likely would be getting were he to be the next to put up curtains in the White House.  Unfortunately, those who might benefit from this refresher material are probably not as apt to stumble upon the same post.  More importantly though, even if they did, they are probably just as apt to blindly vote for the next president as they did for the current one . . . TWICE.

      Diane

      calendarsago.com

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • USA Today
    USA Today
    USA TODAY / USATODAY.com
    7950 Jones Branch Drive
    McLean, VA 22108-0605