About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hume used baseless claim to attack straw-man version of Wash. Post article on Libby trial

February 02, 2007 6:46 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Brit Hume mischaracterized a Washington Post report as asserting that former Ambassador Joseph Wilson's 2002 report had debunked allegations that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Niger. Hume then attempted to refute the Post's purported assertion -- which the article did not make. Hume baselessly claimed, contrary to the CIA's report on Wilson's findings, that Wilson told the CIA he interpreted talk of a meeting about "commercial relations" between the then-Nigerien prime minister and Iraqis as being about uranium.

14 Comments

During the "Grapevine" segment on the January 30 edition of Fox News' Special Report, host Brit Hume criticized "mainstream media outlets" for their reporting on the trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby Jr., former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney. Hume falsely attacked a January 30 Washington Post article as a purported example of media reports that "continue to say" that President Bush's claim in the 2003 State of the Union address that Iraq had sought uranium in Africa "was contradicted by the findings" reported by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV "following his CIA mission to Niger ... to investigate the matter" in 2002. But the Post did not report that Wilson's findings contradicted Bush's claim. The Post reported that the reports prompting Wilson's mission -- that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Niger -- were "ultimately proved false." The article did not ascribe this to Wilson's findings.

Having set up the straw man -- that the Post reported that Wilson's findings proved Bush's claim wrong -- Hume then purported to debunk it:

HUME: But Wilson's report to the CIA actually confirmed that the former prime minister of Niger had met with Iraqis to discuss what was called "commercial relations," which Wilson interpreted as meaning sales of yellowcake uranium.

But according to a March 8, 2002, report by a CIA agent describing Wilson's findings, it was a former Nigerien prime minister who had interpreted "commercial relations" to mean sales of uranium -- not Wilson. The report said that the former prime minister of Niger, Ibrahim Mayaki, had "interpreted" an offer to meet with Iraqis on "expanding commercial relations" to mean that "Iraq wanted to discuss uranium yellowcake sales." From the report, which was declassified as evidence in the Libby trial:

2. Former Nigerien prime minister Ibrahim ((Mayaki)), who was Niger's foreign minister from 1996-1997 and Niger's prime minister from 1997-1999 and who maintained close ties to the current Nigerien government, stated he was unaware of any contracts being signed between Niger and rogue states for the sale of yellowcake during his tenure as both foreign minister and prime minister. Mayaki however, did relate that in June 1999 Barka ((Tefridj)), a Nigerien/Algerian businessman, approached him and insisted that Mayaki meet with an Iraqi delegation to discuss "expanding commercial relations" between Niger and Iraq. Although the meeting took place, Mayaki let the matter drop due to the United Nations (UN) sanctions against Iraq and the fact that he opposed doing business with Iraq. Mayaki said that he interpreted the phrase "expanding commercial relations" to mean that Iraq wanted to discuss uranium yellowcake sales. Mayaki said he understood rogue states would like to exploit Niger's resources, specifically uranium, but he believed the Nigerien government's regard for the United States (U.S.) as a close ally would prevent sales to these states from taking place despite Niger's economic woes. Mayaki claimed that if there had been any contracts for yellowcake between Niger and any rogue state during his tenure, he would have seen the contract.

As Media Matters for America has noted, according to the July 2004 Senate Intelligence Committee report about prewar intelligence on Iraq, Wilson said that Mayaki never confirmed the meaning of "expanding commercial relations":

In an interview with Committee staff, the former ambassador [Wilson] was able to provide more information about the meeting between former Prime Minister Mayaki and the Iraqi delegation. The former ambassador said that Mayaki did meet with the Iraqi delegation but never discussed what was meant by "expanding commercial relations." The former ambassador said that because Mayaki was wary of discussing any trade issues with a country under United Nations (UN) sanctions, he made a successful effort to steer the conversation away from a discussion of trade with the Iraqi delegation. [Page 44]

Furthermore, contrary to Hume's claim, the Post article did not assert that Wilson's findings contradicted reports that Iraq had attempted to obtain uranium from Niger. In fact, the article simply stated that reports "that Iraq had tried to buy nuclear material in Niger" were "ultimately proved false." From the January 30 Post article:

Though a series of government officials have told the jury that Libby eagerly sought information about a prominent critic of the Iraq war, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, Fleischer was the first witness to say Libby then passed on what he learned: that Wilson's wife was a CIA officer who had sent him on a trip to Africa. Wilson's mission there was to explore reports, ultimately proved false, that Iraq had tried to buy nuclear material in Niger.

That statement is fully supported. The "reports" that Wilson was sent to check out were based on forgeries, and the CIA Iraq Survey Group's (ISG) 2004 final report on Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction stated that:

  • "ISG has not found evidence to show that Iraq sought uranium from abroad after 1991 or renewed indigenous production of such material -- activities that we believe would have constituted an Iraqi effort to reconstitute a nuclear weapons program."
  • "Regarding specific allegations of uranium pursuits from Niger, [Ja'far Diya'] Ja'far [head of Iraq's pre-1991 nuclear weapons program] claims that after 1998 Iraq had only two contacts with Niamey [the capital of Niger] -- neither of which involved uranium.
  • "So far, ISG has found only one offer of uranium to Baghdad since 1991 -- an approach Iraq appears to have turned down." The approach was, according to the report, from a Ugandan businessman offering to sell uranium, supposedly from the Congo.

From the January 30 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

HUME: Mainstream news outlets covering the Scooter Libby trial continue to say that President Bush's contention that Iraq had tried to buy weapons-grade uranium in Africa was contradicted by the findings of Joe Wilson following his CIA mission to Niger, down in Africa, to investigate the matter. The Washington Post today said, quote, "Wilson's mission there was to explore reports, ultimately proved false, that Iraq had tried to buy nuclear material in Niger."

But Wilson's report to the CIA actually confirmed that the former prime minister of Niger had met with Iraqis to discuss what was called "commercial relations," which Wilson interpreted as meaning sales of yellowcake uranium. Wilson told the CIA he had found no evidence of a successful deal, but not that there had been no attempts to broker a deal. Wilson later wrote an op-ed piece in The New York Times which, to say the least, differed from his CIA report.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (February 02, 2007 6:54 pm ET)
         

      the right wing is simply unable to stop lying about joe wilson's findings and plame's outing. hume does it every week on fox news sunday.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tabkhan (February 02, 2007 7:16 pm ET)
           

        The so-called "right wing" is unable to stop lying, period.  Indeed, it boggles the mind to think how addicted they are to manufacturing their own facts and how, without cover of lies, their entire creepy ideology would wither.  These people, sad creatures that they are, are pathological liars, as are the weird and bin-Laden loving political party they service.As to Hume, I recall him from his days at "This Week," many years ago, and I recall a producer friend at ABC saying they had a devil of a time keeping that nut from going off the rails every blessed show.  Icky people, crappy network, that's our Fox.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Kaleun (February 02, 2007 10:06 pm ET)
         

      Man, all this is so depressing. When will it stop...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (February 02, 2007 11:30 pm ET)
           

        "Man, all this is so depressing. When will it stop..."

        Sorry - it won't!

        So long as we allow a Corporate Media Oligopoly, we will have only a Corporate Media's version of content.  If we were to force divestiture of broadcast outlets in excess of 25% of the nation, and separation of broadcast (including satellite) from cable, and limitation of other media types in combination with broadcast, we might stand a chance. There might then be sufficient access for varied POVs to allow actual service to the consumer, and some balance against the establishment propaganda, puerile entertainment pap, and pervasive pandering to mindlessness that currently prevail unchallenged.

        I am waiting for Rep. Hinchley to re-introduce MORA (Media Ownership Reform Act [of 2007]) so that I can see whether he has stitched up the few loopholes to which I have objected in versions of 2004, 2005, and 2006. Of course, with Repugnants in charge, you could predict that it would not go far, but (like the Energizer Bunny), he just keeps on going. Perhaps this year, we can force Bungle to veto (or signing-statement a wholly different bill?) this useful effort to restore the concept of "public" in "airwaves".

        MORA! MORA! MORA!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by redking75687 (February 04, 2007 1:02 pm ET)
             

          You know the media corps will pull the rug out from any legislation that tries to regulate them, no matter which party they have to pay off to do it. It's the internet that's destroying the mainstream crap we call "news". While they're all playing celebrity arse-kisser, the real news is coming in on independent websites and foreign news sources.

          I'm of the opinion that the USA is done as any form of liberal democracy. We are in the fascist stage of empire, our media is total garbage, all they care about is celebrity and hawking the next war crime. The Duopoly of Dems and Repubs are just fronts for the same Master Plan, of AIPAC and Wall Street total domination of both the US and the world. Iran will be bombed soon, they'll demand a draft when that happens, and the Dems will rush to "support the President in a time of war" (with AIPAC pulling all the strings behind the scenes) and we will see a real clampdown on political dissent internally.

          I see a bad moon rising over the USA. Things are just going to get worse.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (February 03, 2007 2:22 pm ET)
         

      And this is news???

      Fox Propaganda Channel: we make it up and some of you are vacuous enough to believe it.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by corkcol6005 (February 03, 2007 2:46 pm ET)
         

      Brit Hume is notorious for twisting the facts to favor the Bush administration.  The Swift-boating of John Kerry never would have happened if Hume and Fox News didn't constantly take misinformation from the Swift Boaters and present it as fact. Much of what Hume stated as fact about Kerry's war record was later debunked by the Navy Department, but Hume continued to present ONLY the Swift Boat point of view.

      Most people who monitor Fox News call Hume's "grapevine" segment as "two minutes of hate." 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by arebeeo (February 03, 2007 5:38 pm ET)
         

      If Hume was honest he would have to admit he should no longer call himself a journalist.  He should be referred to as an announcer for the Republican National Committee.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (February 04, 2007 2:05 am ET)
           

        I've always seen Hume as a guy who "plays an anchorman on TV".

        The jowly, gruff voiced, central-casting version of a trusted reporter, without any of the facts or principles.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (February 05, 2007 12:39 pm ET)
             

          That's spot on! He does the facial expressions, the voice, the manners, the looks, everything that signals "gravitas".... everything except actual journalism.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 04, 2007 1:43 pm ET)
         

      Basically a shell game...

      What's interesting is how the right wing media constantly shifts attention from issues in order to distract its viewers from basic, elementary truths.  What is lost in much reporting about the entire Joe Wilson/Valerie Plame affair is that when you go back and look at not only what prompted Wilson's trip to Niger (It was indeed Cheney's inquiry.), but study exactly what Wilson said in his now infamous New York Times piece and what he has said since then, you discover that his statements withstand the the test for accuracy and truthfulness. The opposition may argue about what they perceive as inconsistencies (which are insonsequential) or they may apply arguably different interpretations to some things, but when you look closely again at what Joe Wilson has been saying it is extremely difficult to conclude that Wilson has not been truthful and accurate. But bring up Joe Wilson's name to any regular FOX viewer and I would bet you a dollar that more likely than not the first response you will get will be something like,  "Joe Wilson... you mean that liar?"  I am stating the obvious, and beating the proverbial dead horse when I say hoe disconcerting it is that FOX News can be so influential in formulating a body of public opinion that is divorced from reality and driven by a protectionist agenda towards the Bush administration.  That ain't healthy in a democracy...

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace