About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Malkin, writer of "mean-spirited rantings," accused Edwards bloggers of "foul-mouthed nutroots diatribes"

February 07, 2007 7:28 pm ET
image

30 Comments

As Media Matters for America has noted, The New York Times and the Associated Press have both reported criticism by Catholic League president Bill Donohue of two bloggers hired by John Edwards' presidential campaign; Donohue contends that the bloggers are "anti-Catholic, vulgar, trash-talking bigots." Much of the controversy surrounding the hiring of the bloggers, Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan, began on conservative weblogs, including that of Michelle Malkin, who wrote about the hiring starting as early as February 3.

An article on Salon's War Room weblog, which asserted that the Edwards campaign has fired the bloggers, directly connected Malkin to the hyping of the controversy:

Leading the charge against Marcotte -- and to a lesser extent McEwan -- have been bloggers like the National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez and Michelle Malkin. Malkin originally accused Marcotte of trying to scrub Pandagon's archives of material that could be embarrassing to the Edwards campaign. When that proved untrue, Malkin posted a correction, but said that the fact that she had been wrong was "even worse for the Edwards campaign" because "its blogmaster left crackpot posts like that one up and hired her anyway."

Also, a post on The New York Times' political weblog titled "Edwards's Blogger Blooper" provided a link to Malkin's video weblog, Hot Air, stating: "We can't repeat here some of their [Marcotte and McEwan's] writings; they are quite frequently profane. Michelle Malkin has catalogued some posts here."

Malkin, who wrote about the Edwards campaign's hires here, here, here, and here, described Marcotte's writing as "foul-mouthed nutroots diatribes," "lunatic blogging," and the product of the "warped mind of John Edwards' blogmaster." As Media Matters has noted, in a column describing why the Norfolk Virginian-Pilot was dropping Malkin's column in 2004, that paper's editor, Marvin Lake, described Malkin's writings as "seemingly mean-spirited rantings." The column also quoted another Virginian-Pilot columnist as saying that Malkin "habitually mistakes shrill for thought-provoking and substitutes screaming for discussion." That columnist also said that Malkin represents "the worst of what's wrong with punditry today" and "adds absolutely nothing to genuine political discourse."

Media Matters has noted numerous examples of Malkin displaying the qualities that caused the Pilot to cease publication of her column:

  • In media appearances on August 9, 2004, promoting her book In Defense of Internment (Regnery, 2004), Malkin advocated racial profiling; defended the internment of Japanese-Americans (and other ethnic minorities) during World War II; and called for the removal of then-Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, claiming that he couldn't be objective on the issue of racial profiling because of his personal experience as an interned Japanese-American.
  • On the August 19, 2004, edition of MSNBC's Hardball, speaking about false allegations against Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth regarding the injuries he suffered while serving in the Vietnam War, Malkin alleged, "They are [sic] legitimate questions about whether or not it was a self-inflicted wound." Host Chris Matthews called the allegations "complete nonsense."
  • In her March 29, 2006, nationally syndicated column, Malkin referred to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and then-California Lt. Gov. Cruz M. Bustamante -- both Democrats -- as "Latino supremacists."
  • On the March 30, 2006, edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, Malkin declared that Latinos protesting a House bill aimed at cracking down on illegal immigration believe in "reconquista," or the theory that "the American Southwest belongs to Mexico" -- which, in the words of one writer, "aren't, for the most part, ideas held by Mexicans: they're ideas held by white supremacists and neo-Nazis."
  • On the August 23, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, in a discussion of illegal immigration with O'Reilly, Malkin said that the idea of reconquista is "mainstream" among immigrants.
  • During the May 8, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Malkin agreed with host Bill O'Reilly's claim that, under a California state bill that would require textbooks to recognize the accomplishments of historical lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender [LGBT] figures, "if you are a teacher ... you're not going to be able to say bad things about [convicted mass murderer] Jeffrey Dahmer," because Dahmer was "a gay cannibal."
  • On the June 1, 2006, edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson, Malkin blasted the media coverage of alleged killings of Iraqi civilians by U.S. troops in Haditha, claiming that there are "puddles of drool in the offices of the L.A. Times and The New York Times."

Additional instances of extreme rhetoric and insensitive behavior by Malkin have been documented by the weblog Think Progress:

  • On the June 12, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Malkin mocked the suicides of three prisoners at a U.S. detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, saying "the reaction to the suicides should be, 'Boo-freakin-hoo.'"
  • On December 4, 2006, Think Progress noted that a video was being propagated on Malkin's Hot Air website of an anonymous C-SPAN viewer who called former President Jimmy Carter "a bigot and a racist and an anti-Semite," and accused him of "cozying up with every dictator, thug, Islamic terrorist there is." Like the story on the Edwards campaign bloggers, that story was picked up by the mainstream media, being aired MSNBC.

Additionally, the War Room article that connected Malkin to the hyping of the controversy noted that Malkin "has long maintained ties to VDARE," which publishes her columns on their website. As Colorado Media Matters has noted, a July 15 Rocky Mountain News investigative article described VDARE.com as a "white nationalist Web site." Peter Brimelow, who operates the site through his nonprofit organization, the Center for American Unity, responded in an op-ed in the Rocky Mountain News, saying that "the merest glance [at VDARE.com] would show that we are not 'white nationalist.' " Brimelow added, "We also publish on VDARE.com a few writers -- for example, Jared Taylor -- whom I would regard as 'white nationalist,' in the sense that they aim to defend the interests of American whites." Similarly, as Media Matters has noted, Brimelow asserted in response to a letter to VDARE.com that "VDARE.COM is obviously not a 'White Supremacist' site, if for no other reason than that it publishes non-whites. We do publish writers who could fairly be described as 'white nationalists,' in that they explicitly defend the interests of American whites." According to an article by Brimelow on the website, VDARE is named for Virginia Dare, the first child of English descent born in the New World in the 16th century.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by proudatheist (February 07, 2007 7:34 pm ET)
         

      You know, for someone complaining about "meanness," Malkin's pretty mean herself. It's a shame none of these people can see the breadth of their own hypocrisy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (February 07, 2007 8:03 pm ET)
         

      Malkin calling out someone for "mean-spirited rantings" is just too rich to believe. But in the wingnut blogosphere, black is white, night is day, fire-bombed mosques are "still standing" thusly not "destroyed" and Jamil Hussein exists one day but not the next. Then, he magically exists the following day or so. 

       

      Malkin's ranting over these two bloggers reminds me of a joke.

       "Why did Hitler quit drinking gin?"

      "It made him mean."

       And no, trolls. I wasn't comparing Michelle to Hitler. 

       

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (February 07, 2007 8:50 pm ET)
         

    • On the June 12, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Malkin [link to thinkprogress.org] color="#0052a3">mocked the suicides of three prisoners at a U.S. detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, saying "the reaction to the suicides should be, 'Boo-freakin-hoo.'"
    • The suicides were part of a jihad on the United States of America.

      Once again, Media Matters shows its ignorance in supporting the enemy.

Report Abuse
  • Author by roundhouse (February 07, 2007 9:18 pm ET)
       

    Opposing Malkin and her smear thug buddies in their efforts to intimidate the Edwards campaign is....supporting the enemy?

    So, by that stellar logic, since I oppose sex without foreplay...I support rape?

    Report Abuse
  • Author by bingvangorden (February 07, 2007 9:26 pm ET)
       

    leatherhelmet or tinfoilhat? You aren't serious. You can't possibly be. It was a jihad! It's media matters concpiracy tpo aid the enemy! That is so far out of rightie field. Paranoid and nonsensical! You can't be serious! Sadly, you probably are.

    Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (February 07, 2007 11:36 pm ET)
         

      If you study Mr. Leather's M.O., its the usual hit and run. It must have him giggling proudly in his parent's basement.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sasami (February 08, 2007 2:35 am ET)
         

      I've lost any and all respect I had for LeatherHelmet. I think he went off the deep end when the Dems took over or something.

      Report Abuse
  • Author by mefirst (February 07, 2007 8:51 pm ET)
       

    malkin seems to struggle with the truth at times. completely off topic, but sweet jesus i believe. thom hartmann taking over for al franken. one of the best talkers out there. franken's problem, in my opinion: too many boring interviews with local mayors, etc, and way too predictable.

    Report Abuse
    • Author by roundhouse (February 07, 2007 8:58 pm ET)
         

      That is the best news I've heard today. Hartman is arguably the best lefty talker out there.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (February 07, 2007 9:29 pm ET)
           

        I concur. He is truly a scholar and a gentleman. He knows American history better than most, is polite and genuinely believes and practices in good political dialogue. I like Franken, specifically his regulars like Conason and Oliphant but this is a home run for Air America Radio.

        Report Abuse
  • Author by marco21 (February 07, 2007 8:54 pm ET)
       

    Media Matters is supporting the enemy? 

     Who knew?

    Report Abuse
  • Author by roundhouse (February 07, 2007 8:56 pm ET)
       

    Damned republican thugs might get what they want, Edwards may have fired the two bloggers. It just pisses me off. These wingnut smear gangs don't give a tinkers damn about offending anyone, they simply lust to control the debate.

    If Edwards caves and fires these girls, I'll be very disappointed.

    Report Abuse
    • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (February 08, 2007 12:17 am ET)
         

      Malkin : "if you are a teacher ... you're not going to be able to say bad things about [convicted mass murderer] Jeffrey Dahmer," because Dahmer was "a gay cannibal."

      Well, if you can't say anything nice...

      Seriously, do the Malkinite followers have such malfunctioning BS detectors that the possibility of teachers being restrained from criticizing psychopaths is a real threat?

      Report Abuse
  • Author by publius (February 08, 2007 7:31 am ET)
       

    I caught some of Malkin on The O'Reilly Factor the other night. The best way do describe her is she's a 'Ann Coulter wannabe'. I agree with the Virginia-Pilot columnist who said, "(she) adds absolutely nothing to genuine political discourse." In fact, that probably describes Sean Hannity.

    Report Abuse
  • Author by anyfreedomleft (February 08, 2007 8:52 am ET)
       

    I wonder if Malkin would have supported the interment if she was a teenager in 1942 ... I would believe that the people rounding up "the japanese" wouldn't have been too discriminating in verifying a person's ethnic background ...  I wonder also if she would have enjoyed being robbed of her property, her possessions, and being r a p e d, which probably also went on as they were "being transported to an area for their own protection" ... remember, back then, you didn't talk about sexual issues and R A P E ...

    Report Abuse
  • Author by magnolialover (February 08, 2007 8:55 am ET)
       

    I believe the old saying is, "Hello Pot. Meet Kettle..." This applies so completely in this case that it is crazy.

    Report Abuse
  • Author by Nostalgic_for_the_Future (February 08, 2007 9:38 am ET)
       

    Wow,

    what venom for a women who dares to express an opinion.

    Maybe Edwards has lost touch with the "other" America, I can see that happening in a 24k sqft house.

    why did he fire the two bloggers? Maybe Malkin is correct in her assesment.

    Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (February 08, 2007 10:09 am ET)
         

      Why are you prejudiced against rich people?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Nostalgic_for_the_Future (February 08, 2007 10:19 am ET)
           

        Crusty,

        Because they have an unfair advantage in life garnered by their fathers theft of OUR natural resources while exploiting indigenous peoples.

        And anyway, malkin is way hotter than Edwards Bloggies.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (February 08, 2007 12:30 pm ET)
             

          Call me old fashioned, but I get more turned on by what's between someone's ears and what comes out of their mouths, not by the way they're made to appear on TV.

          That's just me though. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Nostalgic_for_the_Future (February 08, 2007 1:57 pm ET)
               

            Thats why you worry too much my friend, and the nose just kind of gets in the way - don't you think?

            Report Abuse
  • Author by bkboase3653 (February 08, 2007 11:16 am ET)
       

    "And anyway, malkin is way hotter than Edwards Bloggies."

    She looks like a 12 year old...hot she's not.

    Report Abuse
  • Author by sportsguydave (February 08, 2007 12:09 pm ET)
       

    Malkin looks like she's had too much plastic surgery.

    Report Abuse
  • Author by tombaker66 (February 08, 2007 1:33 pm ET)
       

    Real reason Malkin and other wingnut celebs are bashing the bloggers? They don't want the competition. If their erstwhile readers start spending their free time doing what we're doing here (albeit at their own, creepy freeper sites), then how will they have the time or the desire to tune in to the radio show, or head down to Borders to get the latest "book"?

    Report Abuse
  • Author by the crapture (February 08, 2007 4:42 pm ET)
       

    When it comes to nuttiness, Malkin is the embodiment of the concept of "it takes one to know one".God knows having seen her ravings during the immigrant rallies last spring you'd have thought we were in the midst of a Mexi-pocalypse the way she was going on about it.  Her "brown peril" schtick should be a permanent disqualifier for her to run that sewer she calls a mouth when it comes to "habitually mistaking shrill for thought provoking"

    Report Abuse
  • Author by manndan (February 08, 2007 5:35 pm ET)
       

    Pot, meet kettle.

    Report Abuse

  • my.MediaMatters.org

    Login  Sign Up

    Push Back

    Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

    Feed IconRSS Feeds

    Get personalized rss or email alerts

    Connect & Share

    Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace