Tapper again referred to 'Barack Hussein Obama'
ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper ended a February 9 post on his ABC News weblog Political Punch by asking: "What do you all think of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama?" Previously, as Media Matters for America has noted, on the January 16 edition of ABC's Nightline, during a report on the Illinois senator's decision to form a presidential exploratory committee, Tapper referred to Obama as "Barack Hussein Obama" and asked: "Just who the hell is Barack Obama? And why, in these dangerous times, should he be entrusted with the most powerful job on Earth?"
In a January 24 post, Tapper had criticized what he called the "sliming" of Obama in connection with the now-debunked InsightMag.com article that alleged Obama attended a madrassa in Indonesia. Yet Tapper continued to use Obama's middle name, even after a January 28 Washington Post editorial described it as a "sleazy tactic." The Post noted that Obama does not use his middle name and argued that people "who take pains to insert it when referring to him are trying, none too subtly, to stir up scary images of menacing terrorists and evil dictators." The editorial stated that using Obama's middle name "would be merely juvenile if it weren't so contemptible," adding that those who employ it "embarrass only themselves."
Media Matters has documented numerous instances of media figures referring to Obama using his middle name. Most recently, MSNBC's Imus in the Morning executive producer Bernard McGuirk, apparently in reference to "Hussein," said Obama has a "Jew-hating name."
Tapper has referred to Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards as "Johnny" (and did so again in his Feb. 9 post; "Johnny" is apparently Edwards' given name) and to Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), also a presidential candidate, as "the Kooch." He frequently ends his posts by asking some variation of the question, "What do you think?"
From Tapper's February 9 post on ABC News' Political Punch:
On a United flight to Chicago right now, then a quick hop to Springfield, Illinois, where Saturday morning Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., will formally declare his presidential candidacy. (Hasn't he already done that? a friend recently asked. Answer: No. The way this kabuki is now performer, for superstar candidates, is: a) tease, b) explore, c) milk the new explore status, d) declare.
On Saturday, Obama does (d) at the Historic Old State Capitol in Springfield at 10:00 am local time.
Why? This is where he served in the state legislature for eigh [sic] years, so it's a defensive reminder that he's not as inexperienced as some may portray him as (I'm talking to you, Johnny Edwards!).
Plus there is that whole Abe Lincoln come let us heal this nation thing.
The event will be outside. The forecast states the temperature will be in the teens.
Intended Projection: Youth! Vigor!
And hopefully no mucous.
Obama then will fly, press corps in tow, to first-in-the-nation caucus state Iowa.
Specifically to Kennedy High School in Cedar Rapids for a 5:00 pm ET town hall meeting. He will then have an 8:30 pm ET meet-and-greet at the Central Middle School Gymnasium in Waterloo. After overnighting in Iowa Falls, on Sunday he'll hold a 1:00 pm ET rally at Iowa State University in Ames.
Then the self-described "skinny guy with a funny name" heads to his hometown, Chicago, the city with shoulders, for a 6:30 pm ET rally at the University of Illinois-Chicago Pavilion. Then a fundraiser, I think. We in the press corps won't see much of that.
Ahem.
And then a hard-hitting profile or big wet kiss will run on CBS' "60 Minutes," which has demanded -- and I'm speculating here -- that Obama not do any other TV interviews until its profile of him runs. (Pretty par for the course for a big splashy show.)
More later.... What do you all think of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama?

















What did we think of J. Danforth Quayle?
Not much.
Smarter than Bush.
Roy...
Is so bad for his own cause that sometimes I think he’s a Liberal hiding in a Conservative costume. If he’s truly a Conservative, I’m wondering what the other Righties here make of him. Roy, are you there....
Why are you going to vote for Hillary in 2008?
whats the problem here? I didnt realize it was MISINFORMATION or a SMEAR to say someones FULL name, even with the intention of exploiting it to play off of people's hatred of muslims. its a good political move. if he doesnt like it he can changehis name
You're a character from a video game. Why did you change your name?
...and that's how I want to choose my representatives - by the propaganda and non-issues and lies which make the other guy sound worse, regardless of his intellect, character, or ability.
Is that what we've become?
A nation that exploits something to play off the hatred of it's citizens?
I think we need to keep in mind the words of our first Republican President.
"We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth."
-Abraham Lincoln
I still think Lincoln was wrong....we'd be far better off without all those far-right Bible Belt states in the Union. They just make us look bad and drag our politics down.
The issue Col, is the use in a degrading way his middle name, that is the way I see it.
Come on Cpl. the only time anyone uses a person's full name is when discussing serial killers or trying to smear an opposition candidate. And if he DID change his name for that very reason, you wingnuts would be screaming that he is "hiding" or "running from his past".
Doesn't get much more shallow than this comment.
Please keep in mind his audience - apparently they're still simple enough to fall for his tactics.
whats the problem here? I didnt realize it was MISINFORMATION or a SMEAR to say someones FULL name, even with the intention of exploiting it to play off of people's hatred of muslims. its a good political move. if he doesnt like it he can changehis name
- col.roycampbell
------------------------------------------------
Wow, it doesn't get much whiter than this.
I actually agree with Roy here. It is NOT misinformation to simply state someone's full name, no matter how nasty it is in this particular case.
"Tapper again referred to 'Barack Hussein Obama"
Isn't that his full name? Is it now an attack to say someone's full name?
When we hear about Patrick Joseph Buchanan, John Reid Edwards, or Colin Luther Powell at the same time, you might have a valid question.
Unfortunately (as you damn well know) the ONLY reason they emphasize Obama's middle name and no one else's is to underhandedly point out it's "Muslim-ness". We would not even hear about his middle name if it wasn't "Hussein". I would have had to look it up.
Why is it that I had to look up Buchannan, Edwards, and Powell's middle names, but not Obama's? What's special about Obama's?
Oh, it "sounds furr'n'".
Right on, man.
Not to diminish your insight, but it doesn't really take a genius to realize that when certain media refer to Obama by his full name, but don't do other politicians the same formality, something is amiss here. Yet some people still don't get it. The fact that Hussein has a definite "Muslim" and/or "dictator" ring to it is no coincidence. It reminds me of the Harold Ford "Call me" ad in that those who employ such tactics are relying on the fundamental racist and paranoid tendancies of their constituency. If you ask me, pinning your hopes on racism to win elections is about as dispicable as you can get.
I'm also reminded of the whole "Democrat Party" talking point that was circulated about 6 months ago. They're just little verbal jabs, which doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that they actually think this crap has a place in politics. Somewhere Frank Luntz is stroking a hairless feline and laughing deviously. If you have to rely on the bigotry and stupidity of your voting constituency to win elections, then that really isn't democracy.
Although desperate and unethical, invoking white racism in a campaign works because we live in a white racist society.
Well deeznuts...
They [media & others] often referred to John Kennedy as John Fitzgerald Kennedy when they spoke of him. In fact they still do.
Sooooooo IF you wanna look at this from a different angle you could say it's because Obama has already been described by some as Kennedyesque.
Of course that's only if you wanna judge this including of Obama's middle-name as a positive.
But I agree with others here that it's more than likely being done in some quarters for all the wrong reasons.
A "positive"?
That's weak tea and you know it.
Hey Deeznuts,
That stuff about looking at it from a positive angle was supposed to be tongue & cheek...guess I should have added a ;-) to get that point across.
The Republo-zombie 500;
And it's Kernel Kornholio across the line with a ridiculous right wing talking point, and coming in a distant second, Rino with the exact same talking point , just much more slowly.
The checkered bars & stars goes to the Kernel!
I dunno. I'm kind of liking this middle name thing. I think we should encourage the use of middle names.And if you don't have one we could assign one. How about Rino Fact-Free Hunter? Or maybe Colonel Roy Gameboy Campbell?And I always thought the "W" in George W. Bush really stood for Wingnut. I'm beginning to see how the use of middle names could clarify everything--with all due respect... I'm sure y'all could come up with even better ones.