About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media that reported on Edwards blogger flap ignored criticism of Romney's announcement venue

February 14, 2007 5:51 pm ET

SUMMARY: Numerous media outlets that previously highlighted the controversy surrounding the hiring of two bloggers by the presidential campaign of John Edwards failed to note the criticism by the National Jewish Democratic Council of Mitt Romney's choice of venue for his presidential announcement.

102 Comments

On February 13, Media Matters for America noted that The New York Times -- one of the first news outlets to report on the controversy surrounding the purportedly "vulgar" and "anti-Catholic" writings of two bloggers hired by the presidential campaign of former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) -- ignored a Jewish group's criticism of former Gov. Mitt Romney's (R-MA) decision to announce his 2008 presidential candidacy at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan. In its February 14 article on Romney's announcement, however, the Times did report that "Ford's history of anti-Semitism was seized on by the National Jewish Democratic Council [NJDC], which criticized Mr. Romney for his choice" of venue. But numerous other outlets that previously highlighted the Edwards flap -- including The Washington Post, CNN's The Situation Room, and Fox News' Special Report -- failed to note the Romney controversy in their coverage of his presidential announcement.

In a February 12 article, the Associated Press reported the NJDC's criticism of Romney's decision to hold his presidential announcement at the Ford Museum on February 13:

The former Massachusetts governor, who is scheduled to formally launch his presidential candidacy from the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan, on Tuesday, was taken to task by The National Jewish Democratic Council.

The council "is deeply troubled by Governor Romney's choice of locations to announce his presidential campaign," executive director Ira Forman said Monday in a statement.

"Romney has been traveling the country talking about inclusiveness and understanding of people from all walks of life," Forman said. "Yet he chooses to kick (off) his presidential campaign on the former estate of a well-known and outspoken anti-Semite and xenophobe."

In its February 14 article, the Times also noted the NJDC's criticism of Romney's choice of venue:

Mr. Romney's decision to come to this state -- a place where the Romney name remains famous because his father, George, served three terms as governor -- was one notable thing about his announcement. The other was holding it at the Henry Ford Museum; Ford's history of anti-Semitism was seized on by the National Jewish Democratic Council, which criticized Mr. Romney for his choice.

Mr. Romney's press secretary, Kevin Madden, dismissed that as "absurd criticism. The venue is a museum, a center of learning and technological innovation."

In its article on the announcement, meanwhile, the Post reported that Romney chose the Ford Museum "to underscore his faith in American ingenuity" but did not inform readers of the NJDC's objections. By contrast, the paper previously published several articles noting the criticism of the Edwards bloggers by Catholic League president Bill Donohue and others.

CNN's The Situation Room also omitted mention of the controversy in its February 13 reports (here and here) on the Romney announcement, despite covering the Edwards flap during the same broadcast. Indeed, on the February 13 edition of the show, CNN Internet reporter Abbi Tatton reported on the resignation of one of the Edwards bloggers, Amanda Marcotte of Pandagon, noting that Donohue had labeled Marcotte "and another blogger hired by the Edwards campaign 'trash-talking bigots.' " The February 7 and February 9 editions of The Situation Room also included reports on the Edwards controversy.

Likewise, on February 13, MSNBC's Tucker covered Romney's announcement without noting the NJDC's criticism. The previous week, Donohue had appeared alone on Tucker to attack the Edwards bloggers, whom he described as "two little brats."

Further, the February 13 edition of Fox News' Special Report featured a lengthy report on Romney's announcement, during which Fox News chief political correspondent Carl Cameron stated that Romney "picked the Henry Ford museum of American industry as backdrop to underscore his commitment to new and innovative thinking." The report included no mention of the controversy surrounding his choice of venue. Yet, on the February 9 edition of Special Report, guest anchor Chris Wallace had highlighted the Edwards bloggers controversy during the show's "Political Grapevine" segment.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 5:53 pm ET)
         

      if this was a democrat, we would already be hearing: so and so made a major gaffe in his first foray into presidential waters.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (February 14, 2007 6:07 pm ET)
         

      One has nothing to do with the other - this is a ridiculous stretch.

      Totally unrelated...........Did the same media outlets mention Biden's gaffe?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (February 14, 2007 6:08 pm ET)
           

        Ad nauseum if I remember correctly... I must have heard Biden's quote every 5 minutes for several days...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by greekfurnace (February 14, 2007 6:10 pm ET)
           

        Well, Magnolia has a point. Biden's remarks were inescapable for at least a week.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (February 14, 2007 6:12 pm ET)
             

          What does Edward's bloggers have to do with Romney's announcement?  Nothing.  

          Report Abuse
          • Author by greekfurnace (February 14, 2007 6:17 pm ET)
               

            Oh. If you're just talking about the blogs...then, sure. I get confused since the blogs have been put on notice by MMFA.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (February 14, 2007 7:10 pm ET)
               

            They were both criticized.  It's a double-standard when Donohue's criticism is reported but this one isn't.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 7:17 pm ET)
               

            Both were accused of bigotry.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 7:49 pm ET)
               

            tommy makes a statement about biden, he's answered, and then he goes right on like he never even mentioned that to begin with.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 6:20 pm ET)
         

      Show me any Media

      That spent as much time talking about the Biden issue or the Edwards bogus blogger story vs. the criticism by the National Jewish Democratic Council of Mitt Romney's choice of venue for his presidential announcement. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (February 14, 2007 6:26 pm ET)
           

        Doris,

        The point is it's irrelevant.  There is no correlation, or relevancy, or comparison, or link, or similarity, or anything between the two unrelated stories.  So to compare one's media coverage vs. another is a complete head-scratcher.  They stand on their own.  Show me one media programmer who thought that one should be even considered when thinking about the other?  I can't imagine why.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (February 14, 2007 6:27 pm ET)
           

        Not only that, but these are basically inside the beltway stories for political junkies.......when the primaries come around next year I would eat my monitor if they are even mentioned, at all.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 6:56 pm ET)
             

          The point is the disproportionate media coverage favoring the Republik over the Democrats, again. Not the content or merit of the complaints lodged against them. 

          How many Jews have you seen on TV criticizing this? How many people attacked Edwards and Biden ad nauseum? Like it or not, these stories are very much in common.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 6:31 pm ET)
           

        Doris sweety

        Usually I love your posts, but that point is irrelevant.  They are two different issues. I also dont think the Romney issue of where he had his announcement is a big deal. I love how we are now attacking Henry Ford a man who is an icon and Dead. If he offends Jewish groups they need to boycott Ford, ask the Lions to change the name of Ford Field and change Detroit and Michigan history.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 7:39 pm ET)
             

          Please do not call me "sweety". It is condescending.  I try and be respectful to everyone one here (even the ones who hate me). Please do the same.

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 6:52 pm ET)
           

        They are totally relevant because they are both examples of religion. the Republican who stands in front of America's most vocal anti-semite is just as much a non-story as Biden's remarks or Edward's bloggers. But the so called liberal media ran with the DemocratIC percieved bigotry and ignored the Republicans. That's the correlation here.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (February 14, 2007 6:53 pm ET)
             

          That's even more of a gigantic stretch than I could have ever dreamed.  Nice work.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 6:58 pm ET)
               

            Are you kidding me or do you really not get that? You have to be kidding me. C'mon, stop fooling?

            It's obvious and you do this all the time. This is no stretch. You just don't want to see it because it conflicts with your ideology. I can't explain this posting by MMfA any plainer than they have. As plain as the nose on  your face.  

            Report Abuse
            • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 7:11 pm ET)
                 

              want to see tommy say black? you say white. that is, when he's not arguing with his fake assistants.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 7:19 pm ET)
                   

                Yes I know. I wonder if the connection has struck him yet or if he's still in denial.

                Report Abuse
    • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 7:05 pm ET)
         

      Those "brats" Donahue refers to were writing against bigotry that existed in the Catholic church. It is no longer a taboo to criticize faith especially if it involves bigotry.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bunnygit (February 14, 2007 7:17 pm ET)
         

      Can you imagine if Hillary Clinton had chosen the Ford museum to announce her candidacy ?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (February 14, 2007 7:20 pm ET)
           

        OY!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 7:41 pm ET)
           

        Oh the "outrage".  We would be hearing how "anti-semetic" she. Hannity and Colmes and BO would be leading the nightly headlines. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 7:57 pm ET)
             

          but doris, you don't trust hillary anyway. you said "it's not like her people are not capable of smearing people". sounds like you have a little in common with the people you're talking about.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:01 pm ET)
               

            Sorry, I do trust Hillary and think she is the best person to lead America.  Looking to start trouble again? Also , any way you can correctly type? I know someone else mentioned that. Sentences do start with Capital letters. Did you learn that in school?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:03 pm ET)
                 

              can you square your statements then? they seem contradictory to me.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:06 pm ET)
                   

                Can you type correctly? I can point you to some self learning web sites on proper writing if you want? Please let me know.

                 

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:09 pm ET)
                     

                  in other words, you cannot square those statements. i think that is the obvious answer everyone can see.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:11 pm ET)
                       

                    mefirst- hopefully this will help "Square" your problem?

                     

                    http://www.sideroad.com/Netiquette/email-etiquette-business.html

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:13 pm ET)
                         

                      there goes your credibility again.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 8:13 pm ET)
                         

                      Doris (sweety)

                      This MEFIRST seems to have a thing for you, are you married?

                       

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:16 pm ET)
                           

                        Still calling me sweety?

                        I am married. I am not sure if mefirst has a "thing" for me. mefirst obviously does not like me supporting Senator Clinton. Also mefirst does need to use Capital letters when starting a sentence. Pretty basic is it not?

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:18 pm ET)
                             

                          when will you address the issue?

                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 8:21 pm ET)
                             

                          alot of us have problems with writing. I have not decided fully who would be the best candidate in 2008. Now I may touch a nerve here but is your support of Hillary due to her being a women?

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:24 pm ET)
                               

                            why don't you ask why she thinks hillary's "people" are capable of smearing others?

                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:27 pm ET)
                               

                            Casey

                            I feel Senator Clinton has withstood 8 years of right wing hate as first lady, and 6 years as a Senator. She is tough, smart and experienced. The fact that she is a women is good but not the ultimate decision.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:29 pm ET)
                                 

                              but her "people" are capable of smearing other people?

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 8:31 pm ET)
                                   

                                MEFIRST- Please stop trolling. You are being reported.

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:34 pm ET)
                                     

                                  did you report yourself first?

                                  Report Abuse
                                • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:36 pm ET)
                                     

                                  Casey, he has an opinion and agenda , I do not like the world troll.

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
                                       

                                    you notice doris has not one time denied or explained her remark, she trusts hillary, but thinks she employs people who will "smear" others.

                                    Report Abuse
                                  • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 8:41 pm ET)
                                       

                                    He is a troll Doris, stop trying to be polite.

                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:42 pm ET)
                                         

                                      said the troll to the troll

                                      Report Abuse
                                    • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:45 pm ET)
                                         

                                      Get off the troll kick...mefirst is a lot of things...but a troll he is not.

                                      State your opinions and let them stand on their own. Calling a dissenter a troll is really weak. 

                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:46 pm ET)
                                           

                                        Wesley, I agree . I doi not like the troll word either. It is weak.

                                        Report Abuse
                                      • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 8:50 pm ET)
                                           

                                        MEFIRST and I agree politically, he is just trying to disrupt the board with trolling questions. He has been reported, I hope others follow suit.

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 9:48 pm ET)
                                             

                                          Casey--

                                          I have observed mefirst he has a real hardon for Doris. My advice is to ignore him , thats the best way to deal with trolls or troublemakers.

                                           

                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 10:11 pm ET)
                                               

                                            didn't you two show up last sunday on another discussion between doris and me? casey, in fact, demanded an apology to doris from easy to refute wingnuts. seems to be a tight little circle you run in, if you know what i mean.

                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:15 pm ET)
                                                 

                                              As tight as you and Brabatino?

                                               

                                               

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 10:26 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                brab is not on here to do what you are doing. deflect attention away from a statement doris can't explain.

                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:30 pm ET)
                                                     

                                                  doris is not a troll, and anyone who supports Hillary Clinton is fine with me. You are the one trying to deflect and be off topic. This whole thread was about Romney and Ford and his choice of picking an anti-semites museum to launch his campaign. Why would you turn this into a Doris attack? My thinking is you do not want to discuss Ford?

                                                  Henry Ford, a notorious anti-Semite and xenophobe whose belief that Jews were second-class, inferior citizens were expressed in detail in his writings on his theory of Americanization. Ford was also bestowed with the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle by Adolf Hitler.

                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 10:44 pm ET)
                                                       

                                                    "she" supports clinton? odd way of showing it. and she commented on hillary before me. and both you and "doris" use the phrase "anti-semites museum". a rather odd usage, if you know what i mean...

                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:48 pm ET)
                                                         

                                                      You and Bra seem to show up at the same time, odd way to if you know what I mean.

                                                      I find it very odd  you do not want to discuss Henry Ford and Mitt Romney.

                                                      Remember

                                                      Henry Ford, a notorious anti-Semite and xenophobe whose belief that Jews were second-class, inferior citizens were expressed in detail in his writings on his theory of Americanization. Ford was also bestowed with the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle by Adolf Hitler.

                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 10:59 pm ET)
                                                           

                                                        actually the first post on this thread is mine. i said if a democrat did this, it would be called a gaffe.  and i commented on the two romney threads yesterday. i called ford a "rabid anti-semite".  so the only thing "odd" is the ability of your little "group"  to read or answer a question.

                                                        Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by Brabantio (February 14, 2007 11:00 pm ET)
                                                           

                                                        I'm on here a lot.  There's no similarity between his writing style and mine, as far as I've ever seen.  Contact MMfA if you like, but I don't have any alternative names on here.

                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 11:02 pm ET)
                                                             

                                                          he's blowing smoke.

                                                          Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 11:06 pm ET)
                                                             

                                                          I take your word on it. I find it amazing that Mefirst wanted to change the agenda of the thread.  I find this topic very imporant, It again shows how the media will go out of their way like they did with Biden but they give a pass to Romney and ignore an imporant Jewish group.  Jewish people are represented by other groups besides Lieberman and his war criminal acts.

                                                           

                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by Brabantio (February 14, 2007 11:24 pm ET)
                                                               

                                                            Topics get changed all the time, especially when someone makes a comment that seems to contradict their previously stated views.  If everyone who engaged in off-topic conversation was a troll then we wouldn't have any posters left.

                                                            For those who have been here awhile, the effort to establish the credibility and consistency of newer posters outweighs the need to stay on-topic.  The posts may disappear in a day, but the fleshing-out process, the attempt to define the character and views of a poster, that will always be part of this atmosphere.

                                                            Report Abuse
                                              • Author by Brabantio (February 14, 2007 10:50 pm ET)
                                                   

                                                I haven't said anything about mefirst or Doris.  Since you brought it up, I'm not sure her two comments are completely irreconcilable, but if they are then she should be able to explain where she stands.  "Are you trying to pick a fight?" is not a response.  Calling people on on their hypocrisy is valid behavior;it speaks to the person's credibility and that doesn't change because Doris acts like she's above that or refuses to respond because of a grudge.  This isn't the first time she's seemed to contradict herself and then responded with mere defensiveness when it's pointed out.  That's something she needs to work on if she wants to be seen as credible.

                                                Incidentally, we used to have a great way of telling who posts were in response to, but we don't have it anymore.  It helps to read quotes and look for context clues.  If those aren't there, try holding your cursor at the left edge of a post and scrolling up (page up if you don't have a mousewheel) and look for the first post that goes to its left.  Unless the other post is on a previous page, that will help.

                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:55 pm ET)
                                                     

                                                  Thank you for the technical advise. I apologize if you are not related to mefirst. My point is this is about Henry Ford /Mitt Romney , mefirst seems to be deflecting this into a debate about another poster "Doris" who has stated she likes Hillary Clinton.  Mefirst will not discuss the Romney issue but takes over 20 threads about something off topic. That alerts me to a troll. Maybe I am wrong but seems odd to me.

                                                  Thanks again for the info.

                                                   

                                                  Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Brabantio (February 14, 2007 9:45 pm ET)
                                           

                                        As opposed to someone who repeatedly brings up a reading error on irrelevant threads.

                                        "State your opinions and let them stand on their own".  Heal thyself...

                                        Report Abuse
                            • Author by CaseySpring (February 14, 2007 8:32 pm ET)
                                 

                              I agree wiith you that she is tough, but I do think it is still too early to endorse.

                              Report Abuse
                            • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 9:39 pm ET)
                                 

                              Doris - I believe you hit the nail on the head.

                              Hillary is someone who has withstood all that the right wing haters have thrown at her. She is tough and will not put up with attacks.

                               

                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:17 pm ET)
                           

                        nice try at deflecting. we all await doris's answer.

                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:13 pm ET)
                         

                      Doris, you are the funny. Great Link for those who do not know how to write.

                      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (February 14, 2007 7:58 pm ET)
           

        Problem for Hill (and all the Dems) is that they don't ALREADY run to gain the support of the 27% of current voters willing to support whatever the "religious"-right thieves and liars claim is true. No basis there for any attempt to "wink & nod" to them.

        OTOH, Romney DOES aspire to rally those poor benighted souls to his cause, and thus his choice of venue - and the significance of that choice.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:02 pm ET)
         

      The NJDC is a partisan democrat operation. There mission statement  says that the "National Jewish Democratic Council is the national voice of Jewish Democrats. Informed by our commitment to those values shared by the Democratic Party and the vast majority of American Jews".

      Other notable goals:

      Educating Jewish voters about the very real differences between their Democratic and Republican candidates.

      Advocating on behalf of Jewish and Democratic ideals

      Fighting the radical right agenda at every turn.

      Engaging and cultivating a new generation of young Jewish Democratic leaders

      Also according to their website...Jews voted 87%-12% in the last national election...in favor of the democrat party.

      American Jews remain solidly Democratic - and that's not changing anytime soon. - NJDC

      No wonder they attacked Romney...they are a bunch of democrats that happen to be jewish...no wonder the media ignored this partisan effort. 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (February 14, 2007 8:12 pm ET)
           

        and this means ford was not a bigot?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (February 14, 2007 8:22 pm ET)
           

        Your point?  I mean, it's not as though Donohue is not acting as a partisan - and I wonder if the mission statement of the Catholic League (even the Catholic Church, a bastion of reaction, urgently distances itself from his organization, stressing that the League is unaffiliated with the Church) might reveal some nuggets to allow proper assessment of the lies told by Donohue?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:28 pm ET)
             

          What is the Catholic League... the Catholic League defends the right of Catholics – lay and clergy alike – to participate in American public life without defamation or discrimination.   Motivated by the letter and the spirit of the First Amendment, the Catholic League works to safeguard both the religious freedom rights and the free speech rights of Catholics whenever and wherever they are threatened. Now if you're concerned about "nuggets"...then do a little research and decide for yourself...instead of blathering. And no, I'm not catholic. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (February 14, 2007 9:12 pm ET)
               

            You forgot to add violations of 501C laws in that list of things the Catholic League does for a living.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by conleytgwinn (February 14, 2007 9:31 pm ET)
               

            Thanks for the excuse to drag a little something from the Catholic League site into plainer view (for discussion on it's merits, of course):

            (Lead article February 14, 2007): O'Reilly Is Right: Olbermann Is A Smear Merchant  Catholic League president Bill Donohue responded to MSNBC talk-show host Keith Olbermann’s comment last night that Donohue made a bigoted statement when he once said,  “Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular.” Here is Donohue’s rejoinder: "Bill O’Reilly was right when he referred to Keith Olbermann as a ‘notorious smear merchant.'"

            Donohue is really on top of "defending the religious freedom of all", what with his own cited bigotry, and that tactical defense of same, eh?

            Report Abuse
      • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:25 pm ET)
           

        Wesley- Ford's anti -semtism has been established. They are legitimate issues. Why would Romney pick that place and seem to honor an anti-semite to launch is campaign.

        Why did the media not report this?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:33 pm ET)
             

          C'mon Doris...the article is perfectly clear why Romney chose the location:

          Mr. Romney's press secretary, Kevin Madden, dismissed that as "absurd criticism. The venue is a museum, a center of learning and technological innovation."

          The media does not report on every issue that partisan organizations air...and the NJDC is definitely partisan. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:37 pm ET)
               

            Wesley, if a Democrat spoke at an anti-semites museum the outrage. Remember the attacks on Rev. Jackson.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:41 pm ET)
                 

              OK...help me out.

              I'll be glad to look at any info you have that paints Romney as an anti-semite...until then...I'll believe he announced at a museum and ignore the partisan hackery of the NJDC. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:45 pm ET)
                   

                Wesley, i did not say Romney was an anti-semite did I? I said he spoke at an anti-semites museum.

                Are you also mefirst?  No sorry you can write correctly.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:47 pm ET)
                     

                  Ok...you don't think Romney is an anti-semite.

                  He announced his plans at a museum...what's your point? 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by DorisRussell (February 14, 2007 8:53 pm ET)
                       

                    It is a legitimate issue to report. The Media did not report it.  Why?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by wesley (February 14, 2007 8:57 pm ET)
                         

                      It's a complaint from a partisan democrat organization. The media does not report everything that a partisan conservative group like the Heritage Foundation airs.

                      This thread is a real stretch in connecting the dots between Edwards and Romney...just a strawman set up by mmfa to sling political mud. 

                       

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 9:37 pm ET)
                     

                  I also do not think that Romney is an anti-Semite but it shows poor judgement and typical Republican attitude that they can do whatever they want. These people are going down in 2008. They have lied and cheated long enough. The real question on Romney is why has he flip flopped?

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (February 14, 2007 10:00 pm ET)
         

      What a difference a day makes...

      I wish you'd all go read the thread from yesterday about this topic:

      Despite breaking Edwards blogger "controversy," NY Times ignored Jewish group's criticism of Romney's nod to Henry Ford--Tue, Feb 13, 2007

      Your compadres had a very different take on this subject.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:21 pm ET)
         

      Fact on Henry Ford

       Henry Ford, a notorious anti-Semite and xenophobe whose belief that Jews were second-class, inferior citizens were expressed in detail in his writings on his theory of Americanization.

      Ford was also bestowed with the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle by Adolf Hitler.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by west1 (February 14, 2007 10:25 pm ET)
         

      Apparently MMFA doesn't read its own reader's comments.  Otherwise it would drop this attempt to smear and associate Romney with anti-semitism.  If the Ford museum is such a bad place, go after the museum and get it closed down, or attack everyone that goes there, not just one politician.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 10:27 pm ET)
           

        The point is why does he invoke the name of an anti-semite? Why did he choose an Anti-Semites museum to launch is 2008 campaign?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (February 14, 2007 11:06 pm ET)
             

          Should we all boycott Ford cars, SUV's & trucks?

          Seriously go read the other thread from yesterday on this subject...the Democrat/Liberals that posted there didn't see the big deal.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 11:08 pm ET)
               

            The big deal is the media ignoring the entire issue.

            I was not calling for a boycott of Ford, do not put words in my mouth.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (February 14, 2007 11:17 pm ET)
                 

              There is no issue.

              And IF you have a problem with the venue Romney chose because Ford was an Anti-Semite, then why stop there? Why not boycott Ford's products? Why would you buy anything with an anti-Semite's name attached to it?

              Please go read the other thread. Not one Democratic/Liberal poster thought it was anything to get worked up over.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (February 14, 2007 11:21 pm ET)
                   

                You still do not get it. The media did not feel the need to report it but went after Edwards. It has nothing to do with a boycott, Stop trying to change the subject.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jeter2 (February 14, 2007 11:30 pm ET)
                     

                  Report what?

                  There is nothing to report except an organization whining about a ridiculous non-issue.

                  Why aren't they calling for a boycott of Ford products IF they find anything associated with Henry Ford is so repugnant?

                  Romney announcing his candidacy at the Ford estate is in no way comparable to what Edward's bloggers wrote.

                  Apples & oranges.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by conleytgwinn (February 15, 2007 2:58 am ET)
                       

                    Jeter: You are most certainly correct that there is no equivalence!

                    The Edwards bloggers attacked the reactionary policies of the Church as regards women, and did so in language far less hate-filled than that  directed at them by Donohue's pack of "religious"-righty nuts. When Donohue's official organ, the highly partisan Catholic League, raised an official outcry, the MSM - the S.C.U.M.* - breathlessly iterated that outcry as though Donohue himself were not the author of the most bigoted statements on record from any supposed "religious spokesperson" in the nation.

                    When, in comparison, the (admittedly partisan, but relatively benign - no history of attacks based solely on the religion or ethnicity of the target) Jewish group complains about the venue of another candidate's announcement . . . [silence] . . . "let's take a look at all the heat on the Edwards campaign due to the anti-Catholic postings of his bloggers . . . "

                    Never saw a more cogent, concise argument for abolition of the S.C.U.M.* oligopoly!

                    *Thanks to Easy To Refute Wingnuts for the So-Called Unbiased Media usage!

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by conleytgwinn (February 15, 2007 3:16 am ET)
                   

                why do you lie about the content of the other (two) threads? I was there, and there were plenty of Lib/Dem posters who expressed outrage at the difference in coverage of the subjects (although there were several who did not).

                Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (February 15, 2007 7:32 pm ET)
         

      Well, I tried to read this thread....

      but it's hopeless. All that wasted white space is very annoying.

      That said, it's pretty obvious that attacking Democrats and not Republicans for similar gaffes is the corporate media's mission. The MSM will go the way of the dinosaur. It can't happen too soon for me.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.