About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN asserted McCain has "image as an independent thinker," aired Roe comments without context

February 22, 2007 1:06 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

18 Comments

On the February 20 edition of The Situation Room, CNN correspondent Brianna Keilar uncritically aired Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) statement that Roe v. Wade "should be overturned," without noting that McCain has taken a variety of positions on Roe since 1999. Moments later, CNN political editor Mark Preston asserted without evidence that McCain currently has an "image as an independent thinker not beholden to any political party."

Keilar aired McCain's February 18 quote "I do not support Roe v. Wade. It should be overturned," without noting that McCain has previously said he "would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade." As Media Matters for America noted, on August 25, 1999, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that McCain had told its editorial board:

"I'd love to see a point where it is irrelevant and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. ... But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to (undergo) illegal and dangerous operations."

Several days later, he issued what the San Francisco Chronicle called a "clarification," reportedly saying: "I have always believed in the importance of the repeal of Roe vs. Wade, and as president, I would work toward its repeal." He added:

"If Roe v. Wade were repealed tomorrow, it would force thousands of young women to undergo dangerous and illegal operations. I will continue to work with both pro-life and pro-choice Americans so that we can eliminate the need for abortions to be performed in this country."

On the January 21, 2001, edition of NBC's Meet the Press, McCain said "[y]ou can't" overturn Roe v. Wade without "get[ting] a majority of the American citizens to be convinced that there's great validity to your point of view" because "then it goes back to the states and then the debate and discussion would take place in the respective 50 states:"

TIM RUSSERT (host): You heard [first lady] Laura Bush say that Roe v. Wade should not be overturned. [then-Attorney General nominee] John Ashcroft said it's settled law and that the new president would not seek to overturn it. Is that a good result? Should people across the country say, "We're not going to overturn Roe v. Wade"?

McCAIN: Well, I think it's a recognition of reality, number one, and number two is, a lot of us have said for a long time, "We have to change the hearts and minds of the American people. We have to convince them about the sanctity of human life." That's the way you win. You've got to get a majority of the American citizens to be convinced that there's great validity to your point of view.

RUSSERT: If you tried to overturn Roe v. Wade without doing that, it would --

McCAIN: You can't do it. And if you did overturn Roe v. Wade, then it goes back to the states and then the debate and discussion would take place in the respective 50 states.

And as Media Matters noted, according to CNN, when asked in January 2000 what he would do if his daughter became pregnant McCain said: "The final decision would be made by [daughter] Meghan with our advice and counsel."

As the weblog Think Progress noted, on November 19, 2006, McCain told ABC This Week host George Stephanopoulos that he would "support" a Supreme Court decision overruling Roe, saying that "it's very likely or possible that a Supreme Court should -- could overturn Roe v. Wade, which would then return these decisions to the states, which I support. ... [B]ecause I'm a federalist." Further, on February 28, 2006, McCain issued a statement indicating that if he were the governor of South Dakota, he "would have signed" a controversial bill outlawing all abortions except when the life of the woman is threatened, but that he "would also take the appropriate steps under state law -- in whatever state -- to ensure that the exceptions of rape, incest or life of the mother were included." As New York Times columnist Paul Krugman noted: "But that attempt at qualification makes no sense: the South Dakota law has produced national shockwaves precisely because it prohibits abortions even for victims of rape or incest."

Preston asserted that McCain currently has an image "as an independent thinker not beholden to any political party," but did not provide any evidence that McCain actually was an "independent thinker." Nor did he mention polls showing that independent voters have soured on McCain over the last year. In a December 11, 2006, Newsweek article, an anonymous McCain "campaign adviser" was quoted saying: "We lost independents. ... McCain will have to get them back to win, or at least convince them to trust him." Boston Herald columnist Brett Arends reported on January 18 (subscription required) that American Research Group (ARG) president Dick Bennett said McCain "is tanking. ... That's the big thing [we're finding]. In New Hampshire a year ago he got 49 percent among independent voters. That number's way down, to 29 percent now.'' Bennett added that the trend extended to other states that ARG polled: "We're finding this everywhere." Additionally, a January 13-16 Los Angeles Times poll found 43 percent of independent respondents said they were "[l]ess likely" (37 percent "[m]uch less likely") to vote for McCain because of his support for increasing the number of troops in Iraq. By contrast, 13 percent said they were "[m]ore likely" (8 percent "[m]uch more likely"). Preston did note that McCain was on a "tightrope" trying to "appeal to social conservatives" and that support for the war might be McCain's "biggest obstacle," but still asserted McCain's image as an "independent" was notable.

From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the February 20 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

KEILAR: Both Georgia and South Carolina are Southern states where conservative voters have a big say in the Republican primaries. But John McCain defends his outreach and says he's not pandering to win the GOP nomination.

[begin video clip]

McCAIN: I do not support Roe v. Wade. It should be overturned.

KEILAR: John McCain on the campaign trail in South Carolina, where Christian conservatives are a major force, and meeting with religious broadcasters at their convention in Florida.

McCAIN: I respect the work of the religious broadcasters, and I was glad to have the opportunity to meet with them.

KEILAR: The senator from Arizona seems to be saying the right things to make some social conservatives happy. Today, McCain won the endorsement of a past star on the right, former Texas Senator Phil Gramm [R]. This follows former Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating's [R] endorsement over the weekend.

But many on the right are suspicious of McCain, who had no kind words for the Reverends Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson during his 2000 presidential run. He's trying to extend the olive branch this time around, but when it comes to courting conservatives, McCain's work is far from over.

PATRICK MAHONEY (Christian Defense Coalition director): I think Senator McCain has a long way to go in rebuilding a bridge to the faith community.

PRESTON: Senator McCain is walking a tightrope as he tries to appeal to social conservatives who vote in the Republican primaries. At the same time, he's trying to maintain his image as an independent thinker not beholden to any political party. But perhaps what might be his biggest obstacle in this presidential race is Senator McCain's unabashed support for the Iraq war.

KEILAR: That's the issue that could damage his White House run. McCain's a strong supporter of the president's recent build-up of troops -- necessary, he says, because the war was so poorly managed.

McCAIN: I think that Donald Rumsfeld will go down in history as one of the worst secretaries of defense in history and I --

[end video clip]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by AshenShard (February 22, 2007 1:10 pm ET)
         

      The only way McCain is going to maintain his image as an independent thinker is by having media poodles repeat over and over again that he is an independent thinker.  He has already thrown his maverick status out the window ... now we just have to wait for the media to begin to realize this.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by greekfurnace (February 22, 2007 1:13 pm ET)
           

        That's right. We'll be hearing 'independent thinker' ad nauseum now by the MSM for weeks.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (February 22, 2007 1:11 pm ET)
         

      McCain is toast.  His "Linda Blair-ish" twisting towards whatever political winds are blowing up his skirt at the moment have exhausted the public by now.  And most likely him.  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by therick (February 22, 2007 7:35 pm ET)
           

        Throw JMc's age into the mix, and he will be most likely for the public to vote in a Democrat.  Any Democrat.  (I hpe he wins the nomination)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by buyavowel (February 22, 2007 1:11 pm ET)
         

      I was for Roe v Wade before I was against it.

      John McCain - independent thinker

      John Kerry - flip-flopper 

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (February 22, 2007 1:27 pm ET)
         

      McCain - A Goner

      He will even lose credibility with the Republicans.  I am an advocate of the elderly but we do not need a 73 year old President, we went through this with Reagan. The media better wake up and smell the coffee.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by clsn_lx1315 (February 22, 2007 6:57 pm ET)
           

        John "Keating 5" McCain never had credibility with conservatives. Why do you think the LeftWing media loves him?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2007 1:36 pm ET)
         

      Independent thinker... John McCain?

      The new John McCain? I guess if you define "independent thinker" as an overly-ambitious, pandering politician who will do a 180 degree turn on his integrity because he wants to be elected President that badly. I'm just wondering how long it will be before McCain hires Karl Rove...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (February 22, 2007 2:05 pm ET)
         

      McCain currently has an "image as an independent thinker not beholden to any political party."

      He has that "image" because the media keeps repeating that myth,  without evidence or justification.

      The man may have deserved the "image" of an independent thinker & maverick once upon a time, BUT certainly not recently.

      But a great many politicians have images they've never quite lived up to....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (February 22, 2007 2:53 pm ET)
         

      John McCain, Maverick no more.

       He has been blatantly pandering to the people he has battled with before, and it appears he doesn't have too many independent thoughts any longer (marching lock step with Bush and Co.). He might as well retire, because as this campaign moves forward, I think he's going to lose more support. More and more, I'm thinking Romney for the republicans.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (February 22, 2007 6:31 pm ET)
         

      McCain seems to be losing a little bit of steam each passing month or so.  He might be completely deflated by the time Iowa and New Hampshire come around.  Although the media still seems intent on propping him up as an independent maverick.  Maybe they are just nostalgic for the old days again--Y2K, George Bush's son, Al Gore fighting off Bill Bradley, Clinton avoiding impeachment and conviction from the National Legislature, and it was pre-9/11, obviously a different time in at least some ways. 

      I never thought I would agree with someone who shares DNA with George Bush, but one of George Bush's brothers, Marvin Bush, said in late 1999 or early 2000 that "the giant sucking sound you hear is the media kissing McCain" or something to that effect.  Romney and Guiliani might not play well with the Republican base for a variety of reasons which have been discussed ad nauseum here and elsewhere, and that might be the opening for Gingrich to jump in as a late entry and appeal to the Republican base. 

      Gingrich could do that around Labor Day, when, by then, the major Republican candidates will already have burned each other out with all of the debates, on top of what I just said before.  He could enter as a fresh face.  That could be what Gingrich is calculating here.  Of course, that could happen with Mike Huckabee as well.  Another unknown Governor from Arkansas.

      Of course, the opposite could happen and McCain would get the nomination because Romney and Guiliani would collapse and the others would just never get above a certain percent no matter what, even Gingrich.  Republicans usually nominate the "next man in line", and McCain is that.  He could end up being the Bob Dole of 2008.  He has paid his dues, he is old, and the cycle that he is running in is a bad one for the Party, so let him have it and lose and well start fresh with the next Presidential election cycle with someone else who will be a fresh face and new blood, just like George Bush was considered in 1999 and 2000, perhaps ironically for a variety of different reasons.

      THANK YOU.

      njguy93@yahoo.com

      Report Abuse
    • Author by clsn_lx1315 (February 22, 2007 7:04 pm ET)
         

      McCain just came to California for a photo op with our worthless "governator" Ah-nold and declared his intentions to "stop global warming". Don't worry folks, McCain will be a media darling for a long, long time if he keeps this garbage up.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by deeznuts (February 22, 2007 7:13 pm ET)
         

      "independent"

      "thinker"

      Sorry.

      Neither of those words describes McCain. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 22, 2007 8:41 pm ET)
         

      Independent thinker ?   HAHAHAHAHA.................

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (February 23, 2007 10:01 am ET)
         

      C'mon, be fair. McCain IS an "independent thinker".

      Each new day, he wakes up and forms his opinions, checks his deeply rooted principles, and makes NEW independent decisions ... INDEPENDENT from anything he might have said YESTERDAY, or the day before.

      McCain is now totally free ... of his own record. He is independent of consistency, and is not held to any standards he might have set in days past. In short, he is independent, which is to say NOT DEPENDENT, on any need to appear rational, principled, or consistent.

      Politicians have nothing to offer except their views on issues, and they ask for votes based on the assurance that they will consistently ACT in a manner consistent with the positions they state. It is reasonable, and SANE, to expect a politician who garners your vote to remain true to the policy positions he or she has stated.

      McCain is now INDEPENDENT ... from SANITY. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by clsn_lx1315 (February 23, 2007 12:37 pm ET)
           

        "In short, he is independent, which is to say NOT DEPENDENT, on any need to appear rational, principled, or consistent."- Tex

        You got that right, tex. His recent attempts to hitch his wagon to the hysteria that the earth is an hour away from melting is a prime example.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by olivelawyers (February 23, 2007 4:13 pm ET)
           

        Maybe he'll keep on rollin' on the river until he revolves back to his beginnngs once again. As fast as he's spinning, it shouldn't take too long. I have an image of Linda Blair just before the green pea puke, stabbing at her own genitals with a crucifix ... the man's pitiful excuse for thinking has me believing that he is derranged. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by edgarfield (February 23, 2007 12:26 pm ET)
         

      I'm sorry but are we taking Brianna Keilar seriously.  She worked for MTV and a had almost nude shot of herself on her blog a year ago. Please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To be honest it is McCain who is the duplicitous bastard and not the anchor. Best eye candy CNN has to offer at this time.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • CNN
    CNN
    One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
    Phone: 404-827-1500
    Fax: 404-827-1906