About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN and Hotline on McCain: Is the "maverick" back?

February 23, 2007 11:21 am ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

31 Comments

During a discussion about Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) positions on global warming and Iraq on the February 22 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, on-screen graphics repeatedly asked: "McCain: A Maverick Again?" suggesting both that McCain may currently be a "maverick" and that the media had stopped calling him a "maverick" at some point. Similarly, National Journal's The Hotline asked, "The Maverick's Back?" and asserted that "McCain's dustup with [Vice President Dick] Cheney and his beating up of [President] Bush on global warming show he's the same McCain" -- presumably a "maverick." However, CNN and other media outlets have never stopped calling McCain a "maverick."

As Media Matters for America noted, on the February 1 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN senior Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre referred to McCain as "maverick Republican John McCain." Also, a February 4 New York Times headline described McCain and Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) as "Mavericks Both." On the February 13 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews said that "there are a lot of people there ... who like the cut of John McCain's jib, his independence, his maverick reputation." Similarly, on the February 20 edition of The Situation Room, CNN political editor Mark Preston asserted without evidence that McCain has an "image as an independent thinker not beholden to any political party."

Media Matters has also noted that Hotline editor-in-chief Chuck Todd, former New York Times reporter Anne E. Kornblut, and Wall Street Journal national political editor John Harwood labeled McCain a "maverick" during 2006, as well as another example of Matthews doing so.

Media Matters has documented numerous instances in which McCain has fallen in line with the Bush administration or the Republican Party establishment on issues large and small.

On the February 22 Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer said there is "an interesting phenomenon" regarding McCain because McCain is "critical of the vice president [and] the former defense secretary," Donald H. Rumsfeld, and has criticized "the administration's record on global warming." Blitzer then asked former Rep. J.C. Watts (R-OK) and Democratic strategist Donna Brazile to "[e]xplain John McCain and his current stance to our viewers." Later, Blitzer noted that Cheney "did say that when he did run into John McCain, John McCain apologized to him for having" criticized Cheney.

Additionally, Watts said: "I don't necessarily agree with him [McCain] on the global warming issue. I think, you know, you can make arguments on both sides of that debate." Brazile responded that she would "get J.C. Watts a copy of the Inconvenient Truth right after [former Vice President] Al Gore wins the Oscar this weekend because the science is very conclusive on that."

From the 4 p.m. hour of the February 22 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: John McCain -- it's an interesting phenomenon. I want to start with you, J.C. -- he's critical of the vice president, the former defense secretary. Here's what he said recently on the administration's record on global warming. He says, "I would asses this administration's record on global warming as terrible." He did say it's improving, but it's basically the record has been terrible. Explain John McCain and his current stance to our viewers.

WATTS: You know, the reason I like John McCain is because John McCain's going to be John McCain. I think he calls it the way he sees it, and I kind of like that independence. I -- you know, we talk a lot about saying that we want people that will be independent in Washington. That usually means we want someone that agrees with us. And John McCain, I think, on environmental issues -- I don't necessarily agree with him on the global warming issue. I think, you know, you can make arguments on both sides of that debate. But John is being John.

BLITZER: He's very supportive of the president when it comes to the war in Iraq. The surge -- he supports that. But he also said this a couple of weeks back. He said, "The president listened too much to the vice president. Of course, the president bears the ultimate responsibility, but he was very badly served by both the vice president and, most of all, the secretary of defense." And in response to ABC News, he said this, the vice president, "I think if --" Well, that's another matter. But he did say that when he did run into John McCain, John McCain apologized to him for having said that.

BRAZILE: Well, first of all, looks like I'm going to have to get J.C. Watts a copy of the Inconvenient Truth right after Al Gore wins the Oscar this weekend because the science is very conclusive on that. But look, I think John McCain is trying to regain his title as the maverick, as the straight shooter, the one who could -- can talk directly to the American people. He's lost a lot of credibility over the last couple of months as he's defended the president's position on escalation of the troops in Iraq. And I think what McCain is trying to do is to regain that maverick label where he can go out there, speaks the truth, talk about difficult issues, and try to distinguish himself from the White House. At the same time, he's bending that right knee to the religious right.

WATTS: But, Donna, we can disagree, or you might be able to disagree with Senator McCain on the surge. But people need to know that was John McCain's position from Day One: We needed more troops. So this isn't new. This is actually the administration following John McCain's lead -- following his lead in terms of the troop surge.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rusty shackleford (February 23, 2007 11:29 am ET)
         

      Even if they are furthering this tired meme, I'm not sure it helps McCain.  How many Americans would feel comfortable voting for a "maverick" to have his finger on the button?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DorisRussell (February 23, 2007 11:40 am ET)
           

        In my view McCain is worse than Bush. Because Mccain has the potential to continue the war criminal behavior that we do have a chance to end in less than 2 years. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by rusty shackleford (February 23, 2007 11:46 am ET)
             

          You may be right, Doris.  Although given a choice between the two I would trust McCain more because he seems to be relatively well-grounded in reality.  I also doubt he'd let somebody like Dick Cheney control him.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by DorisRussell (February 23, 2007 11:52 am ET)
               

            True

             Seeing that horrible , freaky Dick Cheney being interviewed in Australia this morning by ABC gave me the creeps. This is a man who is really running our government and he is worse than Stalin.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (February 23, 2007 11:45 am ET)
         

      The ridiculous nick-name is well-crafted enough... it has two edges to it:

      The one I guess is supposed to make this dim-witted, hot-headed, unstable pandering humorless sell-out of a Senator, into someone "independent" and "on the outside", specifically "outside the Beltway"... you know, one of us.

      The other edge to the nick-name is supposed to hail the man as a Naval Aviator, by appropriating the nick-name given to the fictional flyer played by Tom Cruise in the movie "Top Gun".

      Yeah sure, we should all start stealing the names of fictional characters in movies, and applying those names to ourselves, as Sen. McCain does... to make up for the lack of character and identity he suffers from.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by lindenbully (February 23, 2007 12:11 pm ET)
           

        Jester's dead...

        The movie I really want to see is GOP Gun starring; "Maverick"McCain and John "The Goose" Warner as the devil-may-care duo that flouts authority at every turn, with Wolf[Ice]man Blitzer and J.C. "Sundown" Watts as their faithful wingmen. Talk about a highway to the "Danger Zone."

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dem02020 (February 23, 2007 12:30 pm ET)
             

          I kind of like the idea that the candidates should all adopt the nick-names of fictional movie characters (as Sen. McCain has done) in order to make them more... real?

          Does that make sense, going around under the guise of fictional characters (fictional Naval Aviators) in order to seem more real?

          Sure, it makes sense.

          I nominate rudy giuliani as "Inspector Clouseau"...

          ...from that movie where terrorists murdered 3,000 Parisians on Clouseau's watch...

          ...and then he went proudly about for the rest of his career, acting as though he were a hero and that he had actually done something.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by webprogrammer (February 23, 2007 1:31 pm ET)
             

          Top Gun is good, but I can't help thinking about how old this McCain creature is. He probably hasn't seen a movie since John Wayne.

          I always thought the word "Maverick" referred to the title character played by James Garner in the 60's TV series by the same name. He was a likable Old West con man and a card shark who kept his head out of the hangman's noose mainly by not staying in one place any longer than it took to cheat someone, while charming the womenfolk with schmooze. That seems more appropriate, although McCain is no James Garner, and the only card trick he knows is starting to wear a little thin.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (February 23, 2007 1:50 pm ET)
               

            I'm showing my age, here.  The Tom Cruise character never entered my mind, even though I've seen Top Gun several times...I just assumed it was in reference to the James Garner character, too.

             

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Dem02020 (February 23, 2007 2:21 pm ET)
               

            I'm sure you know that Sen. McCain is a former Naval Aviator, as is the fictional "Maverick" played by Tom Cruise in "Top Gun".

            And it just occurs to me: You know who else appropriated their nickname from that movie, in order to promote what little "persona" they had, especially among the younger guys (who liked "Maverick") and girls (who liked Tom Cruise)?

            The criminal Republican Randall 'Duke' Cunningham, that's who...

            ...he and his people went around calling him by the nick-name "Top Gun" on the Hill, he having been a former Navy flyer also.

            True.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by christopher howard (February 23, 2007 2:40 pm ET)
                 

              If you are going to name politicians for aviator positions, who could forget Tailgunner Joe?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by lindenbully (February 23, 2007 3:19 pm ET)
                   

                On the subject of nicknames, I'm sure the RNC will issue a press release laying out the nicknames of all the Democrats... with the press sure to repeat them verbatim.

                We'll have:

                "Hollywood" Hillary Clinton "Breck" John Edwards "Osama" Barack Obama "Mex" Bill Richardson

                To be fair, the nickname "Mex" is probably still in a republican focus group to determine its level of offensiveness. It's just that simple...

                Report Abuse
              • Author by roundhouse (February 23, 2007 6:32 pm ET)
                   

                How can you forget the "Gipper"...?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by roundhouse (February 23, 2007 6:34 pm ET)
                     

                  Just realized why. Aviators, grid iron legends...not in the same ballpark.

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2007 11:48 am ET)
         

      Stating the obvious about Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld makes one a MAVERICK? Jeeeez....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (February 23, 2007 12:08 pm ET)
         

      Would a maverick grovel before the knuckledragging evangelicals the way McCain has?  I think not.  I really admired him years ago when he spoke out against the Theofascists who have the GOP by the short hairs, but now that he's turned around and kissed their butts,  I can't stand the man.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (February 23, 2007 12:22 pm ET)
         

      Maverick my ass!

       But he[Cheney] did say that when he did run into John McCain, John McCain apologized to him for having said that.

      No, what Cheney said was that McCain came running to him to apologize. Like the wimp he really is. Just like when Bush smeared McCain in the 2000 primaries...then we see McCain hugging Bush during the 2004 campaign.

      Gutless wonder.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by greekfurnace (February 23, 2007 1:06 pm ET)
           

        100%. Totally agree.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (February 23, 2007 6:40 pm ET)
           

        Spineless politician, yes.

        Gutless wonder?

        He did survive being tortured. As much as I dislike his politics I still empathize with him on a human level. Not enough to vote for him but still......torture is a horrible indignity to suffer.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by the crapture (February 23, 2007 12:34 pm ET)
         

      If By Maverick you mean...

      opportunistic, finger-in-the-wind, media ho who once referred to a retirement community called Liesure World as "Seizure World" even though he'd now be pandering to that same audience of seniors, then yeah, i guess Flip-Flop McTool is every bit the Maverick that the fawning twits in the press like Wolf "did he get any in my beard" Blitzer make him out to be

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 23, 2007 1:01 pm ET)
         

      I see nothing preventing a reemergence of Cheney-Rumsfeld  after the 2008 election if McCain gets in. Specially if the GOP trumpets a ficticious requirement of " smooth transition ".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2007 1:04 pm ET)
         

      Aside from all the obvious specific things I could criticize (and have criticized) about the "new" John McCain, and his alterations of previously firm positions, his kissing up to Jerry Falwell, his pandering to the "creationists" (oh, excuse me... that's "intelligent design") and other recent McCain offenses, there is something more fundamental that now bothers me about McCain.

      Like some others have also expressed from time to time, I respected John McCain. I admired what he did with John Kerry in fighting for Viet Nam veterans benefits and for working to re-establish relations with Viet Nam; his work on campaign reform; boxing reform; and other things as well. And even though I knew he was deep-down a conservative and that I disagreed with some of his positions, I sincerely believed he had INTEGRITY... and I admired him a lot for that. Washington, unfortunately, neither breeds nor cultivates integrity.

      But the John McCain I see now makes me sick... it appears to me that he has become so ambitious, that he wants the White House so badly, that he will do or say practically anything, although in a very calculating way, to become President. If he could, I suspect he would hire Karl Rove to manage his campaign.

      There's even a different look about now, his demeanor, if you watch clips of him closely. He looks... well, cold and calculating. (Sorry, Hillary...) Watching how he is operating now to gain the Presidency, with his ambition in overdrive, he strikes me as a man who lost the integrity that was his strongest suit. Sad... but I hope he gets his butt kicked, because it concerns me what kinds of deals he's making now and how the loss of his integrity will affect his actions as President. Don't trust him anymore...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (February 23, 2007 1:13 pm ET)
         

      "suggesting...that the media had stopped calling him a 'maverick' at some point."

      I was about to make that point, but MM did it so much better.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (February 23, 2007 1:47 pm ET)
         

      Why is it when McCain criticizes Bush and Co (TM) he's called a Maverick. But when any democrat does it, we're called American hating communist ultra liberal Bush bashers.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (February 23, 2007 1:53 pm ET)
           

        Good point.  I've also noticed that when Darth Cheney makes his idiotic remarks, he only says that Democrats who oppose the Troop Surge are aiding Al Queda;  I guess Republicans who oppose it are standing on principle?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2007 3:02 pm ET)
           

        WHY...?

        Because he's a MAVERICK!  Here... drink this and quit asking so many damn questions.  ;>)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by halfaworldaway (February 23, 2007 1:56 pm ET)
         

      im sorry what did mcain say about cheney?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 23, 2007 3:06 pm ET)
           

        "what did mcain say about cheney?"

        He said that Cheney had a cute smile...   ;>)

        No... actually (and I don't have the exact quote) McCain said something to the effect that Bush had not been well-served by the Vice-President... presumably about the war in Iraq.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (February 23, 2007 6:46 pm ET)
           

        BLITZER: He's very supportive of the president when it comes to the war in Iraq. The surge -- he supports that. But he also said this a couple of weeks back. He said, "The president listened too much to the vice president. Of course, the president bears the ultimate responsibility, but he was very badly served by both the vice president and, most of all, the secretary of defense." And in response to ABC News, he said this, the vice president, "I think if --" Well, that's another matter. But he did say that when he did run into John McCain, John McCain apologized to him for having said that.

        [link to mediamatters.org]

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sfcretired (February 24, 2007 8:50 pm ET)
         

      I heard the sound bite where (Darth)Cheney said that McCain "ran" up and apologized to him.  "John said some nasty things about me the other day, and then next time he saw me, ran over to me and apologized," Cheney said. "Maybe he'll apologize to Rumsfeld."

      http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/02/cheney-mccain-may-apologize-to.html

      What Cheney insinuated was that McCain couldn't wait to apologize for what he said about him (Cheney).  If he apologizes about what he said about Rummy, which in my opinion is the truth, then he should not be running for President.  He will have no creditability then.   

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.