Will media ask Gingrich to explain apparent change of heart on Sen. Clinton?
SUMMARY: The March 1 New York Post reported that "[f]ormer House Speaker Newt Gingrich yesterday called Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton 'a nasty woman' who runs an 'endlessly ruthless' campaign." But Gingrich has repeatedly praised Clinton in the past, as recently as January 2007. Will the media question his apparent reversal?
In a March 1 article in the New York Post, reporter Maggie Haberman wrote that "[f]ormer House Speaker Newt Gingrich [R-GA] yesterday called Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton [D-NY] 'a nasty woman' who runs an 'endlessly ruthless' campaign" during a "wide-ranging New York Post editorial-board interview." Haberman observed that "Gingrich's harsh comments about Clinton were surprising because he has complimented her abilities and worked with her last year on a health care initiative." But will the media question Gingrich about his apparent reversal?
On the January 21 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, in a discussion with host Chris Wallace about Sen. Clinton's announcement declaring her bid for the presidency, Gingrich said of Clinton: "Now, she's still -- and I don't care what anyone else says -- she and her husband are the most formidable pair of politicians in America. He is the smartest politician in America. She is a hard-working, disciplined person. She has won the Senate race in New York twice by very large margins." Other examples of Gingrich's positive commentary on Sen. Clinton include:
- In a July 22, 2005, "Washington Sketch" column, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank wrote that Gingrich had told a panel at the National Press Club "that 'to a greater extent than we would have guessed,' the former speaker and the former first lady have discovered that 'we have the same instinct.' " Gingrich and Clinton appeared together at the meeting to discuss health care policy. At the event, Gingrich said, "We may be at the end of a 40-year cycle of bitterness. ... I've spent enough of my life fighting. It would be nice to spend some time constructing, and I think that there's a feel in the country that's very similar."
- According to a May 11, 2005, USA Today article, Gingrich described Clinton as "very competent, very professional, very intelligently moving toward the center."
- During a January 20, 2005, interview with Charlie Rose on the Public Broadcasting Service, Gingrich said: "Hillary Clinton is an extraordinarily professional person, very, very smart and works very hard. And any Republican who thinks she's going to be easy to beat in 2008 is just very foolish." He later added: "I think Senator Clinton is positioning herself very intelligently as a centrist Democrat. That makes conservatives gag; they can't believe it. But she's the first New Yorker to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee since it was created. She does a superb job working with America's military. She has been, frankly pretty solidly in support of the president on some very tough foreign policy issues."
Additionally, on the March 1 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer called Gingrich's comments an "ugly incident in the presidential race" Later, CNN correspondent Mary Snow reported: "Well, Wolf, the zingers aimed at Senator Hillary Clinton are a change in tone for former Republican leader Newt Gingrich."
Gingrich is a Fox News political contributor and, according to a Nexis search, has appeared on Fox News 15 times since the beginning of 2007. Gingrich also occasionally appears on Sunday news talk shows and most recently appeared on NBC's Meet the Press on December 17, 2006.
From the March 1 New York Post article:
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich yesterday called Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton "a nasty woman" who runs an "endlessly ruthless" campaign machine.
The conservative Republican made the surprising comments -- after months of taking care not to trash the Democratic presidential front-runner -- in a wide-ranging New York Post editorial-board interview.
Asked whether Americans are ready to elect Rudy Giuliani -- a leader, the questioner noted, whom [former New York City Mayor] Ed Koch had called a "nasty man" - Gingrich shot back, "As opposed to a nasty woman?"
Gingrich added that he thinks she'll be the nominee, and cited the battle between Clinton's camp and Sen. Barack Obama's [D-IL] team last week over Obama donor David Geffen bashing the former first couple.
"Nobody will out-mud the Clintons," said Gingrich, who added that he'll decide in the coming months whether to run for the White House.
He called Clinton's political team one of the most "talented" in U.S. history, but "endlessly ruthless."
"You can't beat them tactically . . . They're too relentless, they're too well-organized, they have too big a machine and they'll just grind you down," he said.
"If they think [Obama] is a real threat, they'll just grind him up."
Gingrich's harsh comments about Clinton were surprising because he has complimented her abilities and worked with her last year on a health-care initiative.
From the January 21 edition of Fox News Sunday:
WALLACE: All right, let's talk some politics. With Senator Clinton now officially in the race, how do you assess the Democratic field?
GINGRICH: Well, first of all, I think you have to give Barack Obama a tremendous amount of credit. And I think he forced Senator Clinton's hand by weeks. I mean, he has gained ground so rapidly that I think she sort of thought she had to remind her friends she was around.
Now, she's still -- and I don't care what anyone else says -- she and her husband are the most formidable pair of politicians in America. He is the smartest politician in America. She is a hard-working, disciplined person. She has won the Senate race in New York twice by very large margins.
She is ahead in every poll. She can raise far more resources than any other Democrat, probably raise more resources than all the other Democrats combined. And you'd have to say, given those assets, that she has a 6-out-of-10 chance or better of being the Democratic nominee.
From Milbank's July 22, 2005, column in The Washington Post:
Clinton sent the first valentine. She said appearing with Gingrich was "a great thing to do" despite the critical calls she got. "Underneath Newt's great political skills is a policy wonk," Clinton gushed, alternating between respectful references to "the speaker" and familiar references to "Newt and I."
Gingrich returned the affection, calling his old foe "Hillary." He said that "to a greater extent than we would have guessed," the former speaker and the former first lady have discovered that "we have the same instinct."
From the May 11, 2005, USA Today article:
Since arriving in the Senate in 2001, Clinton has worked with Republicans, even when she "disagrees profoundly with them on other matters," Brookings Institution political analyst Thomas Mann says. She has formed alliances with conservative Republicans: House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas on foster care, and Sens. Sam Brownback of Kansas and Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania on electronic media's effect on children's behavior. The thaw with Gingrich was clear at a newspaper editors meeting last month. He praised Clinton, who has risen in polls as a leading Democratic presidential candidate for 2008. "Sen. Clinton is very competent, very professional, very intelligently moving toward the center," said Gingrich, who is contemplating a White House bid. "Any Republican who thinks she's going to be easy to beat has a total amnesia about the history of the Clintons."
But if it seemed Wednesday that it was Clinton who had forgotten history when she declared, "We have a lot in common," Gingrich apparently has not.
Asked where else they agreed, he said: "Let's keep it to" health care. "Otherwise that becomes the story."
From the January 20, 2005, edition of PBS' Charlie Rose:
ROSE: Would Bill Clinton have done well against George Bush?
GINGRICH: Sure, Bill Clinton would do well against anybody. I mean, anyone who underestimates either Bill or Hillary Clinton is just very foolish. These are two of the smartest, most professional, hardest working people in modern America. And I mean, you have to say, given all the battering President Clinton took, he has an enormous capacity to rebound, and while most of us conservatives may not like that, you have to take your hat off to his sheer ability to take the beating and keep coming.
Hillary Clinton is an extraordinarily professional person, very, very smart, works very hard. And any Republican who thinks she's going to be easy to beat in 2008 is just very foolish.
ROSE: Yes, but you just criticized the left in the Democratic Party as being out of touch -- and wait a minute, let me finish the question. And in denial. Are you suggesting, therefore, that any Republican who perceives her as sort of being the candidate of the left has got it wrong, because she, like her husband, will come at America from the center and therefore will be a formidable candidate?
GINGRICH: I think Senator Clinton is positioning herself very intelligently as a centrist Democrat. That makes conservatives gag; they can't believe it. But she's the first New Yorker to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee since it was created. She does a superb job working with America's military. She has been, frankly, pretty solidly in support of the president on some very tough foreign policy issues.
From the 7 p.m. hour of the March 1 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: Meanwhile, another ugly incident in the presidential race. The former House Speaker Newt Gingrich reportedly describing Senator Hillary Clinton as, quote, "a nasty woman." So much for the truce between the Republican and the Democrat, who have teamed up on various political projects in the past.
Now, many people are wondering, once again, about Newt Gingrich's presidential plans. Let's turn to CNN's Mary Snow. She's watching this story for us -- Mary.
SNOW: Well, Wolf, the zingers aimed at Senator Hillary Clinton are a change in tone for former Republican leader Newt Gingrich. And some political observers say it's very telling.















i've seen him praise her myself. and he's said no one should underestimate her becoming president. gingrich must have been looking in the mirror when he used the word ruthless. that's all the republicans know.
No,
If he looked in the mirror, he would have used the words "Creepy Dirtbag."
Gingrich's comments are just another sign that he is considering a run for president. He has double-digit poll numbers and he's not even a candidate. To be sure, I've never been able to stomach the guy ever since 1994. However, he would make an interesting opponent against an intelligent Democratic candidate. Maybe then we would see real debates...
Whether or not he plans a run (and that may happen), it's unmistakable the guy has signaled his intention to campaign AGAINST the Senator from NY...
And I don't know if this guy truly has the popularity for the office (the presidency) nationally, or even within his own Party... maybe.
Whichever the case, he runs or no, it still makes him now offially campaigning against the Former First Lady.
And it's official: They, the Republican side of the aisle, have commenced campaigning against Mrs. Clinton...
She is officially the RNC's greatest fear... they have signaled an immediate (pre-General Election!) campaign against the woman...
It's as though they're nominated her.
And it's further a signal of what to do now for those Democrats intent on capturing the Federal Government from the private interests that have siezed it...
They need to get together and fire back across the aisle, together and in a concerted effort, at Mr. McCain and Mr. Gingrich et al... if the General Election campaign has commenced, then start campaigning all....
Why fire at one another Democrats, when the RNC machine is doing enough of that all by themselves?
All of the announced Democratic candidates should be addressing questions across the "media" at Mr. McCain, about his "wasted" comment, and all other things Iraq.
If they're going to fire shots so early at Democratic candidates (instead of their own... why should they chew themselves up... why should Democrats chew themselves up for the RNC)...
...then fire away all Democrats, at Mr. McCain!
"It's as though they're nominated her."
I always assume that the Democrat they go after the most is the one that their internal polls show could beat any of their guys head to head. Maybe that's too simplistic.. I dunno.
All I do know is that I'd like to see a Democrat in the White House who will not only try to stop the war in Iraq but return sanity to our foreign policy... you can't do that if you refuse to egage other nations diplomatically as opposed to using military force as the preferred method of implementing peace and stability in problematic regions of the world.
Hillary is not my first choice at all... but can you imagine a Hillary Clinton/Barak Obama ticket? With Bill Clinton on the campaign trail? Then, to borrow a phrase from George W. Bush, they could start "picking out the drapes" for the White House.
The ticket I think that most frightens them, would be something like Clinton/Wes Clark... she could easily take the Convention with Mr. Obama, but he is yet a young man in these affairs, having too little experience in the U.S. Senate, for a Nation to go on...
And it is about going National, for the General...
That's why also we need the General... General Wesley Clark...
There's a lot going on over at Army... Wes Clark's the guy'd that know how to fix it.
We need an Army guy like him, with his extraordinary West Point Credentials and Vietnam Service...
And the DOD having so much to do with the work, truly.
Put an Army Soldier on the Ticket, for the American People at this Time in their History....
Army Generals Washington and Eisenhower would endorse I'd bet...
The former president could be the Secretary of State perhaps... he has that kind of popularity, here and worldwide...
And I can't overemphasive General Clark's unique Qualifications as Army (and therefore able to work intimately with the DOD... and that's important this election).
Because the DOD has McCain all the way, and this is a fight, and they fight hard...
The Democratic ticket so needs Army Qualifications such as Gen. Clark has... somebody's got to work directly with the DOD, no?
Run Newt, RUN...Oh please, RUN...
Let's start a website and raise money for Newtie to run.
Taking back America: One dirty, stinking, filthy Fox News conservative at a time.
Gingrich is a nasty man, maybe he is upset that he will not be elected President?
I would be delighted to see Gingrich run. He is a smart guy and has been intelligently articulating conservative Republican positions since he's been out of office. That's wonderful... there's not only a record of everything he's said, when you hear Republican conservative ideology explained and articulated on a more intellectual level it is even scarier than hearing the Sean Hannity version of it. I would give anything to see him debate the Democratic candidate. The goobers may not get it but they're not voting Democrat under any circumstances anyway. Plus Gingrich has that personal "history" with wives...
His fourth wife was...
Rudy Giuliani's third.
I see absolutely nothing contradictory about this. It is summed up with: "[T]o a greater extent than we would have guessed," the former speaker and the former first lady have discovered that "we have the same instinct." Then he says she is ruthless and nasty. In his own mind, she is talented, competent, very professional, very intelligent, frankly pretty solidly in support of the president, (all his words) and both he and she have the same ruthless and nasty instinct. So where's the beef?
Gingrich returned the affection, calling his old foe "Hillary." He said that "to a greater extent than we would have guessed," the former speaker and the former first lady have discovered that "we have the same instinct."
I always suspected that Newt had the instincts of a "nasty woman."
"He is the smartest politician in America. She is a hard-working, disciplined person."
He's sending out hidden messages to the GOP base.These are not your people!
I always suspected that Newt had the instincts of a "nasty woman."
JCZ,,, I've thought the same thing. When I saw Gingrich and Hillary together when they worked on that health care thing, Gingrich was so phonily polite I was almost waiting for him to remark to Hillary "Love your dress..."
Will media ask Gingrich to explain apparent change of heart on Sen. Clinton?
Well I'm sure a few in the media will ask him. It gives them a chance to hear nasty stuff about Hills, then confabulate among themselves about it.
I don't happen to think of this as a change of heart. Gingrich was likely faking any warm & cozy feelings he expressed about Hillary.
This is just his true feelings being revealed once again.
"This is just his true feelings being revealed once again."
I'm convinced Gingrich has no FEELINGS... he is pure intellect and instinct.
This is a non story. In the cynical world of politics, one day your political foe is your friend (i.e. Bush/Ted Kennedy).......and if it's politically expedient, the next day they're at each others throats.
If the media went around asking every politician to explain that change of heart, we would have endless "Dr. Phil's" on our hands.
Who cares?
tommy could you find another site that better suits your needs for discussion or non-discussion as the case may be. this one doesn't seem to be it.
Maybe you should do yourself a favor and skip over all contrarian posts, specifically those with "TOMMY" at the bottom. It'd be good for your blood pressure, and I will promise to skip over your inane responses.
Deal?
but tommy i just feel you have a grave misunderstanding of this site. you called this a "non-story" and you said on the "carbon footprint" thread yesterday: "you'd do best to drop this whole thing..." but you see thomas, the idea of this site is to counter conservative misinformation. you seem to feel that the correct thing to do, because you repeat it ad nauseum, is to just ignore all these stories. one would have to think that you do this on purpose, to start arguments, or the other way to look at it is you simply don't get the meaning of the site, in spite of repeated admonitions to the contrary. which is it?
Don't overestimate Newt's intellect.
He is complimenting her on being like himself. A caluclating, guile-less politician. And he is complimenting Bill on being able to survive politically-based attacks that have no real merit.
Think about that for a second. He is complimenting the Clintons on being able to survive the conservative right's hitjob attacks.
This is not a measure of Hillary's worth as a president. Nor is is a good evaluation of Newt's capacity as a thinker.
Most of Newt's philosophizing about the future has not even come close to reality. And if he's starting to move into the mainstream on universal health care, then he is several step behind. Universal health care in the U.S. was set back over a decade by his conservative hit-job on it in the 90's.
Newt is, flat out, one of the most overrated "minds" in the political realm today.
"Newt is, flat out, one of the most overrated "minds" in the political realm today."
Like him or not, and I have a very strong "NOT" because of the nasty divisiveness he made into a Republican trademark beginning with the 1994 Congressional elections and which continues today... I think Gingrich has a VERY sharp mind, combined with cunning instincts. He was a chief architect in the Republican rise to power.
But I'd love to see him run (as I've said above)... Gingrich might not win the nomination but, if he was serious, he would take out a few Republican candidates in the Republican primaries.
Normally, I don't make predictions, but I think he will run. I think this about-face on Hillary is just his way of "apologizing for his vote on the war in Iraq" [not to be read literally but as a euphemism for taking back something you did that would offend your base].
If he does run, I agree that he has the ability to knock off a few of the other Republican contenders, maybe even Giuliani; but I worry that he has been flying under the radar for so long that people will forget who he really is/was. Remember, like Ronnie Raygun, the older you are, the better you were.
"apologizing for his vote on the war in Iraq"
LOL.. I love the way you put that.
Newt could make the race interesting and I wouldn't sell short the unpredictable effects he could have. It's just sooo early to tall how any of this is going to play out, though.
I think he is over rated. Cunning instinct you bet his analytical ability I think is very overrated. He seems a sloppy thinker to me. There are some brilliant people on the right I dont think Newt is one of them. He can spot a trend far before the power curve and exploit it to the hilt but I dont think that is the same thing
Solon:
I understand what your saying about Newt Gingrich and, on second thought, I have seen him on FOX when I thought he was surprisingly sloppy in thought and analysis. But, then, FOX News seems to have a dumbing down effect on everyone on their shows... maybe it's a special filter they use on their cameras or something. ;>)
As for Newt Gingrich let's just say he is head and shoulders over Republicans like George Bush and Rick Santorum. Just out of curiosity, which Republicans do you think have sharp minds? Oren Hatch has always worried me as an opposition spokesperson
BTW, at the risk of sounding boastful of my prognostication skills, I have been saying on MMFA since last October that after Rick Santorum lost his re-election bid he was going to wind up on FOX News as a "contributor". Well, I read just in the past couple of days that Santorum is, in fact, going to FOX as a contributor, which I assume means he'll be a regualr guest of Sean Hannitty.
True enough I remember those predictions score one for you.
Who cares?
I do... because it most likely signals that Gingrich is beginning to think more seriously about a run for president. The point is not just that Gingrich is acting like a jealous bitch...
Let him run. His feelings for Mrs. Clinton are irrelevant.
"His feelings for Mrs. Clinton are irrelevant."
Tommy.... uhh, nevermind.
Sigh...
there is nothing that tommy deems worthy of comment. ignore this, why are you discussing that, don't keep bringing this up and no one will notice it........repeat, repeat, repeat.....
There is one thing to say someone is a great politician vs. she is a nasty woman. You can be both.
The media will not ask Gingrich anything
He only appears on FAUX news/Murdoch owned press and spouts out his anti Clinton hate.
But Gingrich and Clinton don't have hearts. They have ambition and poll numbers and campaign backers and fundraisers and consultants from Madison Avenue and ......but no heart.
'a nasty woman' who runs an 'endlessly ruthless' campaign.
Another thread about a plundering of Hillary...and little support for her expressed by the liberals on this site.
Yeah, a full broadside on Gingrich and nasty republicans...but the silence is deafening about Gingrich's point...she's nasty and ruthless.
I think the silence speaks volumes about her real chances...many liberals are not enamored with her methods and politcal positions...and her lukewarm reception from members of an admittedly liberal site proves it.
yawn