About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

On MSNBC and Today, Chip Reid claimed McCain is delivering "straight talk" about Iraq

March 15, 2007 7:21 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

11 Comments

Reporting from what anchor Amy Robach called Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) "Straight Talk Express" bus tour, on the March 15 edition of MSNBC News Live, NBC News congressional correspondent Chip Reid asserted that "the kind of straight talk [McCain] is doing now is very different" from 2000, later adding, "It's straight talk about Iraq and his support for the war." Similarly, on the March 15 edition of NBC's Today, Reid aired a clip of McCain's comments about Iraq at a forum hosted by the International Association of Fire Fighters and added: "That is the kind of straight talk John McCain is delivering today." However, in reality, McCain's rhetoric on the Iraq war has been anything but "straight." As Media Matters for America has noted, McCain has been inconsistent in his public statements on the issue. While he has assailed the White House's execution of the war, he has also asserted that the United States is on "the right course" in Iraq, said that President Bush "has a good team around him" on national security issues, and as recently as August 2006 expressed his confidence in Bush's ability to "lead the war."

McCain has made some statements criticizing the White House's management of the war, but he has also repeatedly praised the wartime performance of the Bush administration during this period, as Media Matters has documented. For example, while campaigning for Bush in New Hampshire in 2004, McCain said: "I believe that he's strengthened our military. ... I think he strengthened our national defenses. I think he has a good team around him." On the March 7, 2004, edition of ABC's This Week, McCain told host George Stephanopoulos: "I'm confident we're on the right course. ... I am confident that an imperfect democracy is what we'll get out of Iraq will be vastly superior to what the people of Iraq had prior to this." But as the Associated Press reported, McCain said at a February 20, 2007, campaign rally that "the war in Iraq has been mismanaged for years and that former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld will be remembered as one of the worst in history."

In 2006, McCain sometimes expressed confidence in President Bush's leadership and stressed the importance of staying optimistic about the prospects for American victory in Iraq. On the March 1, 2006, edition of MSNBC's Imus in the Morning, host Don Imus commented that Iraq "already looks like a civil war," to which McCain responded: "I keep trying to look at the bright side of this, because we have to -- because the consequences of failure are catastrophic. But the gathering of the seven most respected religious leaders the day before yesterday calling for calm and calling for some kind of reconciliation, I think, was important. I think, at least we're on the right track here." On the August 20, 2006, edition of NBC's Meet the Press, guest host David Gregory asked McCain if he had confidence in Bush and his administration to "lead the war" in Iraq. McCain replied: "I do. I do. I have confidence in the president and I believe that he is well aware of the severity of the situation."

But just two days later, at an August 22, 2006, Republican fundraiser in Ohio, McCain said the Bush administration had "not told the American people how tough and difficult this task would be." Then on August 25, McCain backtracked, releasing a statement saying, "I commend the President for his public statements offering Americans an honest assessment of the progress we have made in Iraq and the challenges that still confront us there, and, of course, for his determination to defend American security and international peace and stability by succeeding in this arduous and costly enterprise," as Media Matters noted. But in January 2007, McCain again criticized the administration for presenting "rosy scenarios" about the situation in Iraq, which he said "exacerbated" public "disillusionment" with the war.

From the 9 a.m. hour of the March 15 edition of MSNBC News Live:

ROBACH: This morning, John McCain is back on the Straight Talk Express for a bus tour that is inevitably raising comparisons between the McCain of 2000 and the McCain of today. The trip starts in Des Moines, Iowa, and ends tomorrow in Cedar Falls, and he then heads to the other key primary state of New Hampshire.

NBC's Chip Reid is in Des Moines. So, Chip, back in 2000, Time magazine put McCain on its cover with the headline "The McCain Mutiny." Well, he's now much more of an establishment figure, so does McCain hope this bus trip can help him recapture that maverick energy he had back in 2000?

REID: I think so. It's hard to say. You know, the kind of straight talk he's doing now is very different. It's straight talk about Iraq and his support for the war. It's a very different mood.

By the way, let's take a look at the bus behind me. There it is, the Straight Talk Express, pulled out of mothballs, where it has sat someplace for the last seven years. Actually, I'm sure it's not the same bus. The bus driver is right there. No, the bus driver says different bus.

But Amy, I tell you, it's going to be tough to recapture that kind of magic. He has spent seven years turning himself into kind of the establishment candidate.

[...]

REID: They [the McCain campaign] believe that people will eventually say, "Hey, John McCain is straight talking about the Iraq war. And it's not pleasant, but at least it's straight talk."

From the March 15 edition of NBC's Today:

REID: In a speech to the firefighters union Wednesday, McCain made clear he will not tone down his support for the war for political purposes.

McCAIN: I believe the situation is too serious and our troops deserve much more than a debate that is little more than political theater intended to embarrass the president --

REID: That is the kind of straight talk John McCain is delivering today. So getting back that kind of giddy energy that the Straight Talk Express had back in 2000 will be very difficult.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DorisRussell (March 15, 2007 7:35 pm ET)
         

      McCain is no straight talker.

      When will the MSM get off that bandwagon?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MHK (March 16, 2007 11:01 am ET)
           

        I wonder why so many people in the media use "straight talk" when discussing John McCain when we all know that he is really no different then any other politician. 

        It's almost like they have coordinated talking points...   Oh wait never mind,  we all know that a coordinated right wing effort to prop up their candidates and to denounce candidates from other parties doesn't exist. 

        That's just silly tin foil hat thinking.   

        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (March 15, 2007 7:49 pm ET)
         

      Yeah, I'm going to get on board with the war now because I've caught the "giddy energy of the straight talk express".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by navy_guy (March 15, 2007 9:00 pm ET)
         

       

      The Senator from Arizona is a shadow of what he once was OR at least pretended to be.  All respect for him as a ' Maverick' faded away after HE allowed the Rove- Bush Election Machine to insult his  service, his family and above all his integrity. In earlier days of the Republic  WHEN a sense of honor prevailed among adversaries.........back then, McCain would have been within his rights to duel it out and by that I do not mean with words.

      Conservatism as understood by his predecessor, a REAL CONSERVATIVE, Barry Goldwater  has been trashed under the boot heel of the NeoConmen and the Bush quasi- Fascists  with the 'straight-talker 'taking the path of subservience to what is truly an irony............ SINCE, McCAIN knows better in his heart of hearts .BUT lacks the strength of his convictions........ What the HELL does he fear?????????????

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 16, 2007 10:44 am ET)
           

        I agree.  There was a time when I actually could have voted for McCain, but after that little episode you referred to, I lost all respect for the man.  And, yes, I realize that the Democratic nominee may be no better.  However, as long as the Republicans are forced to kowtow to the Religious Fascists, I will continue to vote Democratic.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by west1 (March 16, 2007 12:18 am ET)
         

       As MMFA continues to report on pro-Republican bias and anti-Hillary/Obama bias in the media, Hillary this week says that she plans on keeping troops in Iraq if elected; not to protect the Iraqis but to protect US interests.  She said there is nothing we can do to stop the mass killings.  In other words, she could care less about the Iraqi's and supports the US occupation.  Her Senate vote today for a non-binding partial troop reduction was political theatre.  And this is who MMFA continues to defend; and it calls itself a progressive website.

      Link to article in which Hillary Clinton calls for troops to stay in Iraq: 

      http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0315-02.htm

      Report Abuse
      • Author by redking75687 (March 16, 2007 12:40 am ET)
           

        That's nice. Hillary proves she's a war criminal and supports Bush's illegal invasion of occupation and will even continue it into the 2010's. Guess that AIPAC money can buy anyone. And here I thought all Democrats were liberals. I must have been watching too much corporate television.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by AmericanMutt (March 16, 2007 11:39 am ET)
           

        Not according to the link you provided, in fact it shows that you are lying;

        Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton foresees a “remaining military as well as political mission” in Iraq, and says that if elected president, she would keep a reduced military force there to fight Al Qaeda, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and possibly support the Iraqi military.

        I realize that facing reality is hard for kool-ade drinkers like yourself, but gladly more and more people are waking from the fever dream you are still clining too. Much as i am unsure about Senator Clinton, my objections are based on facts and reality, why are yours not so based?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by redking75687 (March 16, 2007 12:57 pm ET)
             

          How does a "reduced force" mean an end to the occupation? From what I've read, the Democrat plan is to keep half the forces we have there now still in country while moving others to the Gulf States as back-up to keep up the occupation and prop up the puppet regime and continue to kill arabs for Israel. "Re-deployment" they call it. Still stinks to high heaven of imperialism.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by west1 (March 16, 2007 1:14 pm ET)
             

          Her stated reasons are pretty much the same as Bush's.  What makes her think she could accomplish anything with a smaller force. If she was there to help the Iraqi's she would not have said:

          Hillary:  "We would not be doing patrols. We would not be trying to insert ourselves in the middle between the various Shiite and Sunni factions." In other words, she would just stand there, pretty like have been doing. As long as we don't equip the Iraqis to defend themselves, e.g, w/Apache helicopters for local fighting, fighter jets to defend themselves from other countries. Of course Iraq will never be able to defend itself (and that is the many in the US want it that way because this was never about Iraq's freedom).

          Hillary:  "No one wants to sit by and see mass killing,” she added. “It’s going on every day! Thousands of people are dying every month in Iraq. Our presence there is not stopping it."  What an awful attitude for a potential president.  Then what are we doing sending our troops there to die and by watching 1000s of Iraqis die every month?  Her solution:  Send less troops.  It is an occupation. 

          Report Abuse
    • Author by EvilRepublicansnow (March 16, 2007 7:28 am ET)
         

      I am so sick of McCain and his flaunting around promoting this war.  He is as much a criminal as Bush.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.