About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

ABC's Tapper gushed over the return of McCain's "Straight Talk Express"

March 16, 2007 5:12 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

20 Comments

During a March 15 report on 2008 presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), in which ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper is seen interviewing McCain aboard McCain's campaign bus, the "Straight Talk Express," Tapper asserted that, now that the "bus is back," so is "McCain's willingness to entertain any question." In fact, McCain has reportedly "steered clear of offering opinions on two of the biggest issues on the political landscape this week," in the words of New York Times reporter Adam Nagourney in a March 16 article. Specifically, according to the Times:

He declined to say whether he agreed with the assertion by Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that homosexuality is immoral, or whether he thought Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales should be ousted for his handling of the firing of federal prosecutors.

During his interview with McCain, Tapper also asked the senator: "Do you have the fire in the belly -- to win this -- like you did last time?" and noted during the report that McCain "appreciates irony in literature."

From the March 15 broadcast of ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:

GIBSON: Out on the political trail, today, a phenomenon that we haven't seen in seven years. John McCain, out on the campaign trail in the familiar campaign vehicle he used when he ran against George Bush for the Republican nomination in the year 2000. He came so close to winning the nomination that year, but this year? ABC's Jake Tapper is on the road with the Arizona senator.

[begin video clip]

TAPPER (voice-over): The bus is back, and with it, McCain's willingness to entertain any question.

TAPPER: Do you have the fire in the belly -- to win this -- like you did last time?

McCAIN: Sure, I even had it the last time. Listen, Jake, this is the first time we've been on the bus, but we've been working at this for well over a year. We've been trying to lay the political and financial base.

TAPPER: But all that planning and McCain's, somewhat, more cautious nature today as a front-runner --

McCAIN: Well, these are different times, as you know.

TAPPER: -- means his campaign has taken on a distinctly different tone, less joyful, more severe, more emphasis on his conservative credentials.

McCAIN: I strongly support the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman.

TAPPER: And while McCain professes more moderate views on immigration and other issues --

McCAIN: I strongly feel that climate change is taking place.

TAPPER: -- what once seemed his greatest strength -- his popularity with moderates and independents -- has dissolved because of his strong support for President Bush's re-election and for the president's war, a war McCain has linked to more than any other candidate. Will it doom him?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The next president of the United States, Senator John McCain.

TAPPER: At a town meeting today in Ames, Iowa, McCain made this revealing gaffe when discussing Republican losses at the polls last November.

McCAIN: One of the reasons why the Republicans lost the war -- oh, excuse me -- lost the last election was not because of the war, but because of spending.

TAPPER: Do you find any irony in the sense that you're struggling a little bit now because you're so closely tied to somebody who once was your biggest political enemy? You're a man who appreciates irony in literature.

McCAIN: Yeah, yeah. There's been -- there is irony and that I was the greatest critic of the conduct of the war and one of the earliest, and now I'm being tied to it. As far as the war is concerned, it's far more important -- I would rather lose a campaign than lose a war.

TAPPER: McCain, at one point today, was going to cancel some of his Iowa campaign activities, such as this town hall meeting here in Mason City, Iowa, Charlie, to fly back to Washington, D.C., to vote on Iraq legislation in the Senate but, ultimately, he decided not to do so. The war in Iraq has already impeded his presidential plans enough.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by evillib1727 (March 16, 2007 5:18 pm ET)
         

      Ya know what I found funny about the whole general thang. They interview gays from San Francisco about this. IMHO, they have no saying in it because THEY voted the millitary out of SF. Like they really care is my point.

      But, how is this a hot topic? Just more crap to seperate the sheep. BAAAAAAAA

      Personally, I would not be happy showering next to a guy that might find me attractive. But that is my personal preference.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (March 16, 2007 5:25 pm ET)
           

        Evil, the subject doesn't come up. Really.

        Usually there are other things to worry about in the military.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by evillib1727 (March 16, 2007 5:35 pm ET)
             

          Honestly, I could care less. I mean, if you make a good Marine, that is all that matters. My feeling probably stem from the fact I was raped by a guy. But I am not homophobic. Like I said, makes me uncomfi, not angry. I jsut do not like the radical gays that spout out all the time.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 16, 2007 5:27 pm ET)
           

        Voted the military out of San Fransisco?  How did they do that?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by evillib1727 (March 16, 2007 5:35 pm ET)
             

          They voted millitary presence out of the schools.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (March 16, 2007 5:59 pm ET)
               

            Right; they voted ROTC and recruiters out of the schools.  Not quite the same as voting the military out of the city.  Splitting hairs, I know.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by abba2zappa6850 (March 17, 2007 3:25 pm ET)
               

                  THEY VOTED THE MILITARY OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AS THEY SHOULD ALWAYS HAVE! THERE ARE MILITARY SCHOOLS FOR THE WAR-MONGERS TO SEND THEIR KIDS TO, KNOWING OF COURSE THAT THEIR KIDS WILL BE TRAINED AS OFFICERS AND THUS LESSEN THEIR CHANCES OF SEEING COMBAT ULTIMATELY OR BEING INJURED IN COMBAT! AND AS FOR THIS DEMOCRACY THING, SHOULDN'T WE SUBJECT OURSELVES TO IT FULLY, BEFORE TRYING TO PASS IT OFF ON ANOTHER NATION(S)? WE CERTAINLY HAVEN'T EXACTLY SHINED IN THAT AREA! SENDING A STRAIGHT-A STUDENT TO A 20-YEAR PRISON TERM FOR POSSESION OF TWO JOINTS DOESN'T SOUND LIKE DEMOCRACY AT IT'S FINEST, IF YOU CARE TO THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MOMENT!

            Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (March 16, 2007 7:00 pm ET)
             

          And if our military can be defeated and sent running by voters, I don't know if thise Iraqi elections are such a good idea.Sounds like appeasement to me.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (March 17, 2007 1:30 am ET)
             

          SF got ROTC out of schools, as noted already, and I think there was something about not wanting a military ship anchoring in the harbor there.

          BIG issue on Republican radio, and to the sheep, it's "voted the military out".

          "Baa"  is sort of a tip-off.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by chimpevil (March 17, 2007 11:00 am ET)
           

        Hey evil, if you ain't tough enough to withstand some dude ogling your (I'm sure) gorgeous bod in the shower, what makes you think you have the mettle to go mano-to-mano with somebody who wants to blow you (up that is!) on the battlefield?  Methinks if a little leering makes you quake you wouldn't have the mental toughness it takes to be a soldier anyway.

        Your friend,

        c. evil

        Report Abuse
        • Author by evillib1727 (March 17, 2007 11:13 am ET)
             

          I do happen to have a gret body. And I have been the center of attraction with gays most of my life. But the reason I said I am no comfi, if you read it, is because I was RAPED by a guy when I was 8. I would have no problen sniping out a molester or terrorist. thank you!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (March 18, 2007 4:05 am ET)
               

            "I do happen to have a gret body. And I have been the center of attraction with gays most of my life."

            Whoa, I thought I accidentally logged onto Gay Penthouse forum.Not that there's anything wrong with that.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by aDifferent McCain (March 19, 2007 9:47 am ET)
               

            And I would be happy to join you in the hunt Evil.

            (But a side note. And maybe you know this Evil, there is a big difference between being a homosexual and being a pedophile.) 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Vondarrien (March 16, 2007 5:30 pm ET)
         

      TAPPER: Do you have the fire in the belly -- to win this -- like you did last time?

      Great hard hitting question, Tapper. WTH is McCain supposed to say? "No, Jake, I am indeed NOT ready to win this like last time.

      What a Republican kiss a@@ this punk is. How is he allowed on TV?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (March 16, 2007 7:02 pm ET)
         

      Straight Talk My Ass.

      [link to thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (March 17, 2007 1:33 am ET)
           

        That's not fair, WK. The question was about AIDS. It's not the "Gay Talk Express".Now if they'd asked him about sports, I bet they would've got some no-nonsense answers.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2007 7:07 pm ET)
         

      Phony McCain and his phony "strait talk" express. This guy sold his soul about 7 years ago, maybe longer. So he brings the bus out again and it's big news? Please. IMO he has no chance of winning anyway.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (March 19, 2007 12:56 am ET)
         

      TAPPER: McCain, at one point today, was going to cancel some of his Iowa campaign activities, such as this town hall meeting here in Mason City, Iowa, Charlie, to fly back to Washington, D.C., to vote on Iraq legislation in the Senate but, ultimately, he decided not to do so. The war in Iraq has already impeded his presidential plans enough.

      ===============================================

      WTF?????

      Sheesh. God forbid this whore actually have to go  back to Washington and do the job the good people of Arizona pay him to do.

       

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.