About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hume mischaracterized, selectively cited Tennessean article to smear Gore

March 20, 2007 8:23 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

14 Comments

On the March 19 edition of Fox News' Special Report, host Brit Hume mischaracterized a March 19 Tennessean article -- which discussed royalties former Vice President Al Gore received from a zinc mine located on his property -- to suggest hypocrisy on the part of Gore, whose documentary film warning of the catastrophic effects of global warming recently won an Academy Award. After claiming that "Gore may be contributing to global warming" through the mining on his property, Hume went on to cite an individual quoted in the article criticizing Gore as hypocritical, but did not mention that the article also quoted an environmentalist saying that Gore's connection to the mine "doesn't bother him." Further, Hume highlighted Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports that the zinc mine is "part of a complex that released more than 19 million pounds of toxic substances," but left out the Tennessean's report that "there is no evidence the mine has caused serious damage to the environment."

From the March 19 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

HUME: Al Gore may be contributing to global warming in more ways than just using large amounts of energy at his Nashville mansion. The Tennessean newspaper reports Gore has received more than a half-million dollars in royalty payments from zinc mining on his property.

The EPA says Gore's mines are part of a complex that released more than 19 million pounds of toxic substances into the air, water, and land from 1998 to 2003. The mines are scheduled to be reopened later this year after four years of inactivity.

The paper says some of Gore's neighbors see a conflict between the mining and the former vice president's moral call for environmental activism. One man said that Gore was, quote, "not walking the walk," adding, "Mining is not exactly synonymous with being green, is it?"

In claiming that "[t]he EPA says Gore's mines are part of a complex that released more than 19 million pounds of toxic substances into the air, water, and land from 1998 to 2003," Hume omitted the fact that The Tennessean also reported that "there is no evidence the mine has caused serious damage to the environment in the area or threatened the health of his neighbors." Further, according to the article, Greg Denton, manager of the planning and standards section in the Tennessee Division of Water Pollution Control, said of the water testing, "I don't see anything here that indicates a water quality issue."

Additionally, as Media Matters for America noted, the article also quoted Caney Fork Watershed Association representative John Harwood as saying that the "operation has a record of vigilance in not operating to harm the environment."

Hume went on to cite one of "Gore's neighbors," who said that Gore was "not walking the walk" and said, "Mining is not exactly synonymous with being green, is it?' " But Hume did not include The Tennessean's identification of him as a "conservative" who "says Gore's view that global warming is a certainty is arrogant." Moreover, the article also cited an environmental activist who saw no conflict between Gore's mining involvement and his environmental advocacy. According to The Tennessean, "Earthworks president and chief executive Stephen D'Esposito said Gore's involvement with mining doesn't bother him 'in any way, shape or form.' 'We are going to have mining. The question is doing it in the right place and the right way,' said D'Esposito." Earthworks is a Washington, D.C., environmental program which, according to its website, "evolved from the work of the Mineral Policy Center (MPC)" to "to help reform mining laws and practices in the U.S. MPC has worked largely behind the scenes to combat the destructive impacts of mining, drilling and digging." Gore has asked the mining company to work with Earthworks "to make sure the operation doesn't damage the environment," according to the newspaper.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (March 20, 2007 8:42 pm ET)
         

      gore does not live in an earthen hut and walk everywhere he goes. therefore he is a hypocrite. have i covered it?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (March 20, 2007 8:54 pm ET)
           

        Close, but you can count it good.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by rusty shackleford (March 21, 2007 10:05 am ET)
           

        The argument is, Gore doesn't live in an earthen hut and walk everywhere, thus there is no such thing as global warming.

        Right-wing logic at its finest. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (March 20, 2007 9:11 pm ET)
         

      Wow, we can mine without polluting (at least zinc, if not coal, oil, etc).

      Report Abuse
      • Author by monkeyboyiv (March 20, 2007 9:26 pm ET)
           

        Yes, but it cuts into the almighty profit margin. It's written: For I say unto you, take up thy storehouses and your cattle and he who can sell for the most, shall surely be blessed.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ajwan (March 20, 2007 9:26 pm ET)
         

      If it's shocking for some to believe you can do things like mine and run an economy in an environmentally sound way, it must be equally shocking for them to believe it's possible to drive to the local Dunkin Donuts in anything other than a 10 mpg SUV.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by AmericanMutt (March 21, 2007 2:01 am ET)
           

        no it is a common fallacy of the nut-ball fright-wingers to claim they know how everyone else should feel based on lies and spin from the likes of O'lielly feeding them pablum. The same way they can claim that if you support gay marriage or civil unions then you must support man-dog unions too. Just plain stupidity that way to many people cannot seem to see beyond.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by easygoer002209 (March 20, 2007 10:17 pm ET)
         

      Is somebody really supposed to care that there's a zinc mine somewhere on property owned by Al Gore?

      Clinton still has his catty zipper sniffers...will these ppl dig through Gore's garbage cans?  They would if they could....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (March 20, 2007 10:23 pm ET)
         

      Hume smear Gore? What else is new.  Mr GOP Talking Machine is afraid of Gore.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (March 20, 2007 10:59 pm ET)
         

      Okay, it must make the Fox News pundit churn into butter, they spin so much. They are afraid of Gore, Obama and H. Clinton. How much sh*t they have to make up during the day. Poor fiction.. I mean new writers for Aile's army.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (March 20, 2007 11:20 pm ET)
           

        How do these knuckleheads even sit under that sign that says Fox "news" and keep a straight face?

        And ol' knapsack face Hume is the one that actually tries to pretend to be a newsman. Hi- Larious.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (March 21, 2007 12:22 am ET)
         

      Faux News: We distort, you're deceived.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by LarryE (March 21, 2007 4:40 am ET)
         

      This one is really over the top, even for FlopsNews.

      A "lie" can fairly be defined as a statement made with the intent to deceive. By that definition, this was not "misinformation," it was not even "selectively quoting." Hume lied through his teeth. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by olivelawyers (March 21, 2007 10:51 am ET)
         

      How amazing that the "a" neighbor was found who objected to Gore's purported inability to "walk the walk" (almost made myself puke even quoting the overused phrase that's approaching the communication skill of "uh" and "you know" and "like"). My kindred in Tennessee in all their wisdom refused to support his father in '70 while the guy was at the zenith of his power, and refused to support Al Jr. for the Presidency in favor of mash-for-brains Bush. What speaks more loudly is the absence of a riot of neighbors from further east on I-40 and being quoted for ignorantly condemning the man. See any qualifications of this "neighbor" whose expert opinion is being so widely quoted?

       I'm not a manufacturer but I have worked in factories where zinc was an essential element in production. I have a lay understanding acquired during products liability litigation of its importance in defense manufacturing (going back to pre-1941, see http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,851271,00.html?promoid=googlep through the present http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/zinc/znmis0406.pdf ). How abhorrent that someone is mining it with minimizing adverse environmental impact in mind. Let's keep him out of the Presidency where his example might be enforced on less environmentally friendly corporations, by all means.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.