About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

In questioning Obama's "policy credentials," Wash. Post's Cillizza cited AP article without noting its false claim

March 30, 2007 1:58 pm ET
image

14 Comments

In a March 30 entry to his WashingtonPost.com weblog The Fix, Washington Post staff writer Chris Cillizza cited a March 27 Associated Press article by staff writer Nedra Pickler in claiming that "questions about when and whether [Sen. Barack] Obama [D-IL] will move beyond his rosy rhetoric and into real-world policy proposals have begun to crop up." Cillizza also asked his readers: "So, is hope enough? Or does Obama need to quickly build out his policy credentials to win the nomination?" However, as Media Matters for America documented, Pickler's article -- which asked: "Is Barack Obama all style and little substance?" -- falsely asserted that Obama has "delivered no policy speeches." Cillizza did not note the falsehood in Pickler's article.

In his March 30 blog entry, Cillizza wrote:

But, of late, questions about when and whether Obama will move beyond his rosy rhetoric and into real-world policy proposals have begun to crop up.

The Associated Press' Nedra Pickler wrote a story earlier this week that began: "The voices are growing louder asking the question: Is Barack Obama all style and little substance?"

Former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) got into the act on Tuesday during a speech to the Communications Workers of America. "It's great to talk about hope but that hope has to be turned into action," he said.

So, is hope enough? Or does Obama need to quickly build out his policy credentials to win the nomination?

Pickler, in her March 27 article, wrote:

The voices are growing louder asking the question: Is Barack Obama all style and little substance? The freshman Illinois senator began his campaign facing the perception that he lacks the experience to be president, especially compared to rivals with decades of work on foreign and domestic policy. So far, he's done little to challenge it. He's delivered no policy speeches and provided few details about how he would lead the country.

He has focused instead on motivating his impressive following with a call for unity and change in Washington. But along with the attention comes a hunger to hear more about what he's about.

However, as Media Matters noted, Obama delivered what the Chicago Tribune described as a "major policy speech on U.S.-Israel policy" on March 2 and has offered policy proposals on Iraq, education, the environment, energy, and health care. Indeed, Pickler's own article undermined her claim that Obama has "delivered no policy speeches." The article's third-to-last paragraph noted that during his presidential campaign, "Obama has offered a plan to get troops out of Iraq, beginning with a drawdown in May that would extended through a March 2008 goal of redeploying all combat troops. The plan is unlikely to become reality with Bush in office, but is what Obama says he would do if he were in the Oval Office today."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (March 30, 2007 2:07 pm ET)
         

      So Edwards takes a jab at Obama's lack of specificity?  Not all of it is coming, apparently, from the rabid right.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Pragmatic Liberal (March 30, 2007 2:14 pm ET)
           

        I'd like to see the full quote to even see if Edwards is even talking about Obama.  But, you're free to jump to conclusions all you want.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by neondesert (March 30, 2007 2:23 pm ET)
           

        Here's the part tof the Edwards quote that Cillizza left out:

        Because the truth of the matter is, there is too much at stake to stay at home and hope somebody else is going to solve our problems. It will never happen.

        We, all of us, we do have to be patriotic about something other than war. We have to take ownership of this country that we love so much.

        And it's great to talk about hope, but that hope has to be turned into action. It has to be turned into action that can bring about the change that America needs.

        (APPLAUSE)

        How he figured that Edwards was referring to Obama in the middle of that, I have no idea.  In other words, Cillizza was purposefully LYING. 

        So, you're forgiven for your misguided opinion... this time.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (March 30, 2007 2:31 pm ET)
             

          Considering Obama's book "The Audacity of Hope", you have not convinced me that Edwards is not poking at Obama in his "hope" reference.

          But thanks for your misguided post.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by neondesert (March 30, 2007 2:56 pm ET)
               

            I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

            You're probably right.  Edwards, in the middle of a speech about everyone actually getting out and doing something to help make real change, stuck in a jab at Obama.  It's so clear that I couldn't help but overlook it.  I feel foolish.

            I'm sure I'm not the only one here who appreciates the use of your keen inferential talents to help us understand what people really mean when their words get in the way.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (April 01, 2007 2:03 am ET)
               

            Good eye on the code word "hope", Tommy.I'm surprised you didn't mention that the wife of the Man from Hope is being referenced in a two-fer here.Very clever. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (March 30, 2007 2:18 pm ET)
         

      Well I posted a few days ago on the thread titled:

      AP falsely claimed Obama has "delivered no policy speeches" on campaign trail Tue, Mar 27, 2007 3:19pm EST

      And the same link to the article in the Chicago Tribune is here on this thread explaining Obama's Israeli Policy.

      So I'll just copy & paste what I wrote on that thread...

      Great.

      Obama is just one more politician who just sold his soul to AIPAC.

      And this policy should make him a more viable candidate how?

      So IF Obama is elected it will be business as usual? That Israel will continue to dictate a great deal of our Middle Eastern Policy.

      No thanks. Been there, done that.

      Bye Bye Obama. Sellout.

       

      Redking where are you? I can't wait to read your take on this....

       

      - jeter2 / Tuesday March 27, 2007 03:33:14 PM EST 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Pragmatic Liberal (March 30, 2007 2:19 pm ET)
           

        This post is repetitive.  Why is it here?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (March 30, 2007 2:40 pm ET)
             

          Still having reading comprehension problems Prag?

          I explained WHY in my above post.

          Now go back and read it S-L-O-W-L-Y this time.

          Hey Prag, Anna Nicole Smith is a bimbo...now run off to the other threads and tattle to everyone that I wrote that.

          Geez.[roll eyes]

          Report Abuse
          • Author by ajwan (March 30, 2007 3:52 pm ET)
               

            The 3/27 article by Pickler was a blatant lie, Obama did deliver policy speeches. Now the lazy and/or corrupt Cillizza is building conclusions based on the original lie, that Obama has no policy credentials.

            The mmfa posts were not repetitive and instead shows how BS grows in the media like mold on stale bread.

            I understand you disagree with Obamas Israeli policy, but it’s still irrelevant to both threads, repetitively so.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Pragmatic Liberal (April 02, 2007 11:46 am ET)
               

            Your post was repetitive and superfluous.  It's my job to point that out every time.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (March 30, 2007 3:21 pm ET)
         

      Chris Cillizza is a regular on Keith Olbermann

      Will he be named "Worst Person in the World"?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.