About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CBS Evening News, ABC's World News failed to note Imus' history of racially charged insults

April 10, 2007 8:24 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

20 Comments

Reporting on the suspension of MSNBC's Don Imus, the April 9 broadcasts of the CBS Evening News and ABC's World News described Imus as "outrageous," "provocative," and "inflammatory," but did not note that Imus in the Morning has a history of racial slurs.

On the CBS Evening News, anchor Katie Couric asserted that Imus has "made a career out of saying the outrageous" and that he "admits he went too far when he made racially charged remarks about a woman's college basketball team." The report that followed, by CBS correspondent Richard Schlesinger, asserted that Imus has "said outrageous things before, about people like Hillary Clinton, who was referred to as 'an old bag.' " Similarly, a report on World News by correspondent Dan Harris quoted University of Southern California professor Todd Boyd asserting that Imus "has a history of provocative, inflammatory comment."

However, as Media Matters for America has documented, Imus' remarks are part of a history of not just "outrageous," but racially offensive comments. For instance, Imus told the Mexican-American governor of New Mexico, "besa mi culo," or "kiss my ass," and executive producer Bernard McGuirk suggested that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) would pander to African-Americans by wearing "cornrows and gold teeth."

Additionally, as noted in an article in the July 18, 2000, edition of The Village Voice, Imus has referred to former Defense Secretary William Cohen as "the Mandingo," and his African-American wife "a ho." As The Boston Globe noted in a March 27, 2004, article, " 'Mandingo' is also the title of a 1975 movie in which a black male slave is paired intimately with a white female slave master." That article reported that frequent Imus guest Mike Barnicle had apologized for similarly using the term on his own radio show to refer to Cohen's wife, Janet Langhart. The Village Voice article described other racially charged insults that Imus has made about specific individuals:

The muckraker Philip Nobile has been tracking Imus's racist rap in a series for the webzine tompaine.com. When you take this patter out of laff-riot context, it's strikingly similar to the drollery of David Duke. Imus and his buds have called O.J.'s lead attorney "chicken wing Johnny Cochran," Sammy Davis Jr. "a one-eyed lawn jockey," Patrick Ewing "Mighty Joe Young," Defense Secretary William Cohen "the Mandingo," and his black wife "a 'ho."

In an appearance on the April 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, Cohen noted that "at one point when we married -- they played 'Jungle Fever' " on Imus in the Morning and that Langhart "was referred to as 'brown sugar' " on the program.

A May 26, 2000, article in The Washington Post reported that "sometime around 1995, when the New York Times hired black journalist Gwen Ifill to cover the White House, Imus reportedly said: 'Isn't the Times wonderful? It lets the cleaning lady cover the White House.' " The article stated that Imus "doesn't deny the Ifill comment, but says he can't find a record of it," and added, "Whether he said it or not, Imus apologized to Ifill on the air after he was criticized." On the April 10 edition of Imus in the Morning, Imus asserted, "I never said anything about Gwen Ifill. This was a comedy routine where we make up the news which we've been doing since 1968 on the radio." Later in the program, Imus said "it was intended to reflect the absurd philosophy we perceived of, I guess it was the Reagan administration -- not that we thought the Reagan administration was a bunch of racists, that's not the point." On the April 9 edition of the program, Imus said that "I did not say that, and obviously there are ways to check that. I didn't say that."

By contrast, the report on the April 9 broadcast of NBC's Nightly News noted that Imus in the Morning "has come under fire before" and that in 2000, Imus pledged to Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page that he would "stop using racially insensitive language." That report also quoted Page asserting that Imus "keeps saying racist things."

From the April 9 edition of ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:

HARRIS: Imus interviews leading politicians and journalists. He did so before the comment and has done so since. [Rev.] Al Sharpton says Imus is mainstreaming racism and should be fired.

[begin video clip]

HARRIS: For you, this is not so much about Don Imus, this is about everybody else and what can be said in public?

SHARPTON: That is exactly right. This has nothing to do with Don Imus. It has everything to do with federally regulated airwaves, radio and television, and what advertisers will subsidize and pay for.

BOYD: I don't think he's gonna lose his job. No. He's too profitable to too many people for a comment like this to derail him, particularly when you have someone who has a history of provocative, inflammatory comment.

[end video clip]

HARRIS: He may not lose his job, but tonight, there is this: NBC is now saying it will suspend its simulcast of the Imus in the Morning show for two weeks. They simulcast it on MSNBC. CBS, which syndicates the show, has criticized his comments, but Charlie, as of yet, there is no talk of canceling the show.

GIBSON: ABC's Dan Harris, reporting tonight.

From the April 9 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:

COURIC: Hello, everyone. The limits of what you can say and what you should say on radio and television are once again the subject of a national debate tonight, a debate involving race and taste.

Don Imus, who's made a career out of saying the outrageous, admits he went too far when he made racially charged remarks about a woman's college basketball team.

Imus works for CBS. His national radio program is simulcast on cable by MSNBC.

Amid calls for his firing, Imus went on the Reverend Al Sharpton's radio show today to apologize and explain himself.

We have two reports tonight, beginning with Richard Schlesinger. And a word of caution -- you may find some of the language offensive.

SCHLESINGER: Don Imus has always had the reputation as the thinking man's shock jock, a smart aleck who's actually smart.

IMUS [video clip]: Please stop it. Stop talking. Go home.

SCHLESINGER: But this time, the edgy talk-show host might have gone over the edge with his remarks about members of the Rutgers women's basketball team, who made it to the NCAA finals.

[begin audio clip]

IMUS: That's some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got tattoos and --

McGUIRK: Some hard-core hos.

IMUS: That's some nappy-headed hos there. I'm gonna tell you that now --

[end audio clip]

SCHLESINGER: That exchange could end Don Imus' career. He has spent days apologizing for it.

[...]

SCHLESINGER: This is a show that has said outrageous things before, about people like Hillary Clinton, who was referred to as "an old bag." But Imus said repeatedly the Rutgers players did not deserve his ridicule.

From the April 9 edition of NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams:

ELLIS: Imus has been praised for his work with several charitable organizations, including his ranch for kids with cancer. But his show has come under fire before. That led to Imus publicly pledging to columnist Clarence Page in 2000 to stop using racially insensitive language.

PAGE: What do you say to somebody who you don't think is a racist and yet keeps saying racist things? That's what we're seeing with Don Imus right now.

ELLIS: But he's not just a shock jock. Over the years, Don Imus' program has become a major stop for politicians and journalists, leading some to wonder if that will change.

BOB STEELE (Poynter Institute): For a journalist to be part of that shtick is irresponsible and unethical.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (April 10, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
         

      speaking of couric, she does this thing on cbs radio she calls her "notebook".  she noted on the fourth anniversary of the saddam statue toppling that no one forsaw all that has happened since. no, some of us did.  it was pretty obvious we were going to end up in the middle of a lot of ancient fueds. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by CaseySpring (April 10, 2007 8:54 pm ET)
         

      CBS News and ABC News have also not noted how Imus has called the President the "Worst President in the World" and the Vice President a "Porkchop" and War Criminal. If hateful language toward the Rutgers team is such a big story shouldnt hateful speech toward the President and VP be a story as well?  Why is hatespeech tolerated on MSNBC?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by spooky3 (April 10, 2007 9:57 pm ET)
           

        Let me try to put this in the simplest terms possible.

        A) you can criticize or mock people because they DO things that are deserving criticism or mocking (or worse);

        B) you can make fun of people because of their race, gender, national origin, disability, appearance, etc. 

        A is NOT THE SAME AS B. 

        Imus is in trouble because he did B.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by CaseySpring (April 10, 2007 10:03 pm ET)
             

          Dick Cheney has a disability, he has a heart condition.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nativeofsf (April 11, 2007 7:46 am ET)
               

            Unfortunately Caseyspring, you couldn't comprehend Spooky3's last statement [#B] to wit: Tis a pity, the myopia of your non sequitur unmasks how crippled your reasoning ability flatulates...

            NOBODY'S MAKING FUN OF DICKHEAD CHENEY BECAUSE OF HIS HEART CONDITION! Imus spoke the truth about GrinningWimp being the "Worst President" and his VP, a "War Criminal."

            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (April 11, 2007 12:07 pm ET)
               

            "Dick Cheney has a disability, he has a heart condition."

            Dick Cheney's disabilitiy is his inability to tell the truth. Perhaps that's caused by his "heart condition". He lacks one.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by DorisRussell (April 11, 2007 2:43 pm ET)
               

            Please stop playing games.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (April 11, 2007 4:46 pm ET)
               

            Cheney's disability is that he's an asshole.

            And so is Imus.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by leatherhelmet (April 11, 2007 12:19 pm ET)
           

        Yes, another daily dose of MMFA beating up on a liberal bigot.

        I guess when we weren't looking a conservative must have bought this website. 

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by spintronic (April 11, 2007 3:31 pm ET)
             

          I thought I read somewhere (maybe in another thread on Imus) that he's a registered republican?

          Just wondering.. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by leatherhelmet (April 11, 2007 9:46 pm ET)
               

            He might be a registered republican, but he is not a conservative.  David Brock just issued a statement that Imus was a conservative spreading disinformation. That is a flat out lie.

            Conservatives are Hannity, Coulter and Limbaugh.  You know their agenda.  Imus voted for Kerry, is against the war, called Bush and Cheney war criminals.  I am not an Imus fan and he should apologize to the Rutgers women, but he is getting railroaded and David Brock should hang his head in shame.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (April 12, 2007 4:42 pm ET)
                 

              Is there some sort of litmus test for being a conservative?  Imus knows Kerry very well and I suppose that is why he voted for him.  Imus made pretty clear that he doesn't agree with Kerry on very many things.

              As for being against the war, one of the most conservative members of Congress, John Hostetler of Indiana voted against the Iraq War resolution.  You can definitely be conservative and against the war.  As for Cheney and Bush being war criminals, I don't think that indicates Imus is a liberal, but it may indicate he is at least a realist on one issue.  You only need to watch Imus for 5 minutes to see he is a real conservative.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by dsolomon (April 10, 2007 11:35 pm ET)
         

      I am disgusted with Imus, but I have a question.  Why does Rush Limbaugh get away with all the hateful, sexist, heartless, cruel, vicious things he says?  And what about Bill O'Reilly - he says terrible things too. 

      I think Imus should pay for his racist remarks, but why do Limbaugh and O'Reilly get away with all the terrible hate they spew??

      Can someone please explain this to me? 

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (April 11, 2007 8:03 am ET)
           

        You're new here, right?

        Use the google to find references to "mediamatters" "limbaugh" "racist".

        You'll see hundreds of complaints from us accusing him of racism. You'll also see many right wing-nuts defending him because he has "being humorous".

        The same goes for O'Reilly. He is constantly tilting against imaginary windmills and is called on it each and every time by MMFA.

        I don't believe that any of these idiots should be "fired" for what they say. But I do believe that their advertisers should know that if they continue to support these hate filled rants, then the public will not buy their products. that's how it works. If the advertising dollars dry up, then, it's the right's beloved "free market" that will be the final arbiter of what can and can't be said.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by treming (April 11, 2007 10:40 am ET)
           

        I think part of the reason for the difference is that Imus has a better reputation than these others, primarily because of his ability to book well-known and respected guests from politics and the media (BTW, what is a decent, smart guy like Tom Oliphant doing supporting Imus?).

        Rush, and to only a slightly lesser extent, O'Reilly, are seen for what they are: ideologs with agendas.  Their guest lists reflect this.  The fact that journalists and politicos of various stripes appear regularly on Imus gives him a sort of "gravitas-by-proxy."  The downside of this, as Imus is now learning, is that this tends to make people expect more of you than the Rushes and O'Reillys of the world. 

        My feeling is that rather than continue to lambaste Imus (who is, on his own, a colossal irrelevancy), more pressure should be brought on those mainstream, respected public figures who think the Imus show is a legitimate and worthy forum on which to discuss their ideas.

         http://rhetoricgarage.blogspot.com/2007/04/semiotic-clouds.html

         

        ted

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (April 11, 2007 12:30 pm ET)
           

        You make a good point DSOLOMON...

        But remember, Limboob was roughed up over the Michael J. Fox comment about his "faking" the tremors from parkinson's disease.

        I think the answer is that:  They make so many dumbass comments, the media has been lulled into waiting until they make a "Huge Blunder"--like Imus--and reveal themselves as infantile, rascist, jackasses; then the media responds with their ususal weakness. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eniobob2631 (April 11, 2007 5:48 pm ET)
         

      I'm getting tired of all these people saying how much good Don Imus has done as a reason to forgive and forget.I have no reason to doubt that he has done some good  things.But here is a way to kind of get a different spin on this whole situation.Suppose for a minute these (10) young ladys on the team had each been working in their choosen professions,and had a track record that would allow their accomplishments be known also. I just wonder.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by carolinacal (April 12, 2007 9:13 am ET)
         

      All the white politicians are so quick to forgive and forget.

      But never forget this: Imus is a racist whore who has been at this game for many many years.

      Imus is an old racist whore whose time is past. He should resign and apologize, and then dedicate the rest of his life to undoing the harm he has caused with his years of hate speech, hate speech which was broadcast to millions of people over the public airwaves.

      Imus is an old racist whore who will say any hateful racist thing to line his pockets and then pretend to apologize for his hate talk. He is like all the other whores who suck on the public teat while spewing excrement and getting handsomely paid by the people who like to eat excrement.

       Imus is an old racist whore who makes his home and ranch into a charity for the tax breaks. He wouldn't give one dime unless it benefitted him directly.

      Imus sold himself as a whore long ago, now it is time for him to rot away in the pile of dung he created.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ebowden69109 (April 13, 2007 12:40 am ET)
           

        Iagree with a lot of what you are saying but why isn't anyone calling for the firing of Mcguirt?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (April 13, 2007 11:49 am ET)
         

      I don't think we need to worry much about Bernard McJerk. He's an Imus skirt-holder, so that's pretty much the only place he can work. Look for him to follow the human corpse to whatever pile of dung he lands on next.

      I predict he winds up on Fox Radio somewhere: the Fox Noise ass-kissers are on a "Was Imus Treated Unfairly" kick at the moment.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.