About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

National media bury Wisconsin story backing up charges that Bush has politicized U.S. attorney offices

April 11, 2007 5:52 pm ET

30 Comments

An April 11 article in The Washington Post on the House Judiciary Committee's decision to subpoena hundreds of Justice Department documents related to the U.S. attorney firings noted that Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) has "joined other members in demanding records and additional information about a federal public corruption case" in Wisconsin. Regarding the case, the Post reported only that a federal appeals court in Chicago ordered a former state employee to be "released after overturning her conviction." The article did not report that Georgia Thompson -- who was not identified by name -- was convicted on charges brought by a Bush-appointed U.S. attorney just before the 2006 election, that Wisconsin Republicans used her conviction to attack Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle (D) during the campaign, that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit took the highly unusual action of ordering the defendant released during oral argument because of the lack of evidence to support the conviction, and that Feingold and five other senators have requested information about the case to investigate whether "politics may have played an inappropriate role" in the prosecution.

An April 11 Los Angeles Times article reported that the senators were looking to see if "politics may have played an inappropriate role" in the case, but also left out the fact that Republicans had used Thompson's conviction to attack Doyle.

Several other national media outlets have ignored the Thompson case altogether, despite its relevance to congressional allegations that the Bush administration has attempted to use the U.S. attorney function for political and electoral advantage. A Media Matters for America review* found that USA Today and The Wall Street Journal have not covered the story, nor have the national network broadcast news programs on CBS, NBC, and ABC. As Media Matters has previously noted, the broadcast networks' evening news programs -- ABC's World News with Charles Gibson, the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, and NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams -- were all slow to report on the U.S. attorney scandal.

On April 5, Thompson was released from prison after a federal appeals court overturned her conviction on corruption charges brought by Bush-appointed U.S. attorney Steven Biskupic. The Associated Press reported that Thompson was convicted of "steering a contract in 2005 to book state travel to Adelman Travel Group, a company whose chief executive donated to the re-election campaign of Gov. Jim Doyle," and added that these charges were cited by Republicans "in television ads" during the governor's race "to question the ethics of Doyle." The appeals court took the extraordinary step of ordering Thompson released immediately after hearing oral argument in the case, with one of the appeals court judges commenting that Biskupic's "evidence is beyond thin."

Democrats have called for investigations into Thompson's prosecution and have connected the case to the ongoing investigation of the Bush administration's dismissals of eight U.S. attorneys. Following the appellate court's order, several senators -- including Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) -- have sought to investigate the proceedings in Wisconsin, and all have signed a letter to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales seeking answers:

We are concerned whether or not politics may have played a role in a case brought by Stephen Biskupic, the United States Attorney based in Milwaukee, against Georgia Thompson, formerly an official in the administration of Wisconsin's Democratic governor. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals was reportedly so troubled by the insufficiency of the evidence against Ms. Thompson that it made the unusual decision to issue an order reversing Ms. Thompson's conviction and releasing her from custody immediately after oral arguments in her appeal.

An April 9 editorial in The New York Times also questioned Thompson's conviction and further likened the events to the U.S. attorney scandal: "As Congress investigates the politicization of the United States attorney offices by the Bush administration, it should review the extraordinary events the other day in a federal courtroom in Wisconsin," adding, "It just might shed some light on a question that lurks behind the firing of eight top federal prosecutors: what did the surviving attorneys do to escape the axe?"

Yet, in reporting on the senators' request, neither the Post nor the Los Angeles Times detailed the possible political motivations at play in Thompson's prosecution. Also, despite the relevance to Congress' current investigation into the U.S. attorney firings, most of the national media have completely ignored the story. A Media Matters review has found that aside from The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, the only national coverage has been provided by The New York Times and the Associated Press:

  • The AP first noted the federal court's decision to overturn Thompson's conviction in an April 5 report. The report noted that "Republicans repeatedly cited the case in television ads and on the campaign trail to question Doyle's ethics during last fall's campaign in which he defeated Republican Mark Green."
  • An April 6 AP article detailed Democratic concerns about Thompson's trial. According to the AP, "Some Democrats said Friday the acquittal of a former state worker on fraud charges raises questions about whether a U.S. attorney's investigation was a political attempt to tarnish Gov. Jim Doyle. ... From the beginning, many Democrats wondered whether U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic, a Bush appointee, pursued the case against Georgia Thompson to go after Doyle, a Democrat who was in a tight race for re-election in this swing state." The article noted that Wisconsin "State Democratic Party Chairman Joe Wineke said recent revelations about the firings of eight U.S. attorneys for what Democrats have called political reasons means 'there's a cloud over all of these things,' " and that "Doyle was one of several Democratic governors targeted by Republicans who saw him as vulnerable, but he ended up defeating U.S. Rep. Mark Green in November.'"
  • A separate April 6 AP article reported on Thompson's release from prison and Doyle's promise that Thompson would "be entitled to her job back with the Department of Administration if she wants it and potentially legal fees and back pay."
  • An April 10 AP article cited Rep. Tammy Baldwin's (D-WI) call for "Congress to investigate the prosecution of former state worker Georgia Thompson" and reported that Baldwin tied Thompson's prosecution to the U.S. attorney scandal currently being investigated by Congress. The article also reported that "Andy Gussert, president of AFT-Wisconsin, a union that represents state employees, also called... for congressional committees to look into the case. He said public servants should 'not become political footballs to be kicked around. ... This prosecution raises additional questions that resonate with concerns about the recent firings of U.S. attorneys. ... If people are to have faith in our judicial system, those questions will need answers.' "
  • An April 11 AP report on the House Judiciary Committee's decision to subpoena documents related to the U.S. attorney scandal noted that the Senate Judiciary Committee "also asked Gonzales for documents on a prosecution in Wisconsin that was overturned by a federal appeals court for lack of evidence. The defendant, state worker Georgia Thompson, had been accused of bid-rigging by favoring a company with ties to Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle. Leahy and five other Democratic senators said they were concerned whether politics played a role in the case."
  • Similarly, an April 11 New York Times article on the subpoena request noted, "In a separate development, Senate Democrats asked Mr. Gonzales to turn over documents related to a prosecution of a state contracting official in Wisconsin." The Times reported that Thompson "was convicted" of "corruption charges brought by Steven Biskupic," but "last week, after an appeals court heard oral arguments, a federal appeals court took the unusual step of ordering Ms. Thompson's immediate release from prison." The article added: "The senators sought all documents at the Justice Department in connection with the case, which was the subject of intense political advertising last fall against Gov. James E. Doyle, a Democrat."

* A Nexis search of The Washington Post, The New York Times, USA Today, and the Los Angeles Times, and NBC News, ABC News, and CBS News transcripts for terms "(Wisconsin w/50 state employee) or (Georgia w/5 Thompson) and (appeal w/5 court)" yielded these results. In addition, a Factiva search of The Wall Street Journal for terms "(Wisconsin w/50 state employee) or (Georgia w/5 Thompson) and (appeal w/5 court)" contributed to these results.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by conleytgwinn (April 11, 2007 6:04 pm ET)
         

      Well, I didn't expect to see a major expose on CNN, or ABC, or NBC, or CBS, or FoxLies . . . I suppose I am amazed that this important story saw the light of day even in print - after all, they are Corporate Media, too. Oh, right - the demographics of print vs "moving picture with sound": it is almost required that one read, to avail of the print media; and that, it seems, is not the audience that "moving picture" media seeks to exploit. I suppose, too, that the print media intends to claim "see, we covered the story", despite the fact that they instead only named the story, and omitted all the beef.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (April 11, 2007 6:47 pm ET)
           

        This is, in my view, a hole in the dike of a very big story.  Some have posed the question, "If these eight AG's were fired for not initiating political prosecutions, how many kept their jobs by doing so?"  It's pretty clear that the answer is, "One that we know of."

        It's not enough to discuss this among ourselves.  We should be contacting journalists and our Congressional Reps and Senators, making sure this doesn't get buried.  I've already done so.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by conleytgwinn (April 11, 2007 7:52 pm ET)
             

          Yeah, Sen. Levin got that dispatch along side the "WTF" about his comment that if Bungle vetoed the Emergency Funding, Levin would personally see to it that he got his "clean" bill. And then *I* would be forced to see to it that Michigan got a new Senator in 2008 - a real Democrat. As to Mike Rogers - well, I suppose I have sent email to others who have welcomed it as little, so I may even send Mikey correspondence on this as well.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (April 11, 2007 9:38 pm ET)
               

            Off topic, but I love Michigan. Born and raised in Frankfort...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (April 12, 2007 1:09 am ET)
                 

              Hey Snoopy! You're from Kentucky you stoopid hillbilly! ;0)

              Report Abuse
              • Author by conleytgwinn (April 12, 2007 10:26 am ET)
                   

                We once had a "mobile society"! I'm from W. Va. (I omitted the "damn", didn't I?) but now live in Mighty Meeee-chee-gan!

                Report Abuse
                • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (April 12, 2007 10:58 am ET)
                     

                  In case it wasn't clear, I was the butt of my joke there (for not understanding that there is more than one Frankfort).

                  Ans why wasn't your Mobile Society in Alabama?

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (April 12, 2007 4:51 pm ET)
                       

                    because, silly, that would be a trailer park society. While they do have wheels, they are generally parked on cinder blocks!

                    Report Abuse
    • Author by duncan12347948 (April 11, 2007 6:16 pm ET)
         

      Reporters are lazy

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (April 11, 2007 6:38 pm ET)
           

        Compared to reporters from sometime in the early 20th century, these folks are not reporters. How many of them worked their way up the historical reporters career ladder. Talking to real everyday people,as strange as they can be. Talking about their problems, putting their biases on hold to write the resulting story. They needed more than one reliable source before the story went to press. At least the ones with ethics worked this way.

        I've been thinking recently that Hunter S Thompson may have a responsibilty for these folks. He may be a role model for them. They can't duplicate his work from the right side, but there was that energy he put into his work as well as placing himself right in the middle of the story. It is an attractive role, but there was bed rock under his stories. He would make things up just as our current crop of writer/reporter bohahs do. His fibs were for rhetorical means not ever meant to pass as the truth. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dem02020 (April 12, 2007 12:14 pm ET)
             

          It's true that the standards of American Journalism seem hardly met in today's privately-owned broadcast and print "media"... standards which are simple, such as Truth and 'priority' (Obstruction of Justice is a high priority to the American People, paternity issues involving celebrities is not)... but it's not entirely a recent problem, this 'private press' serving little Public Good... we had William Randolph Hearst, 'The Great Yellow Journalist' as far back as the late 1800's...

          'Yellow Journalism' is what they called it back then, at the turn of the century, to describe the outrageous and sensational stories and scandals the newspapers concerned themselves (and their readers) with, in place of Truth and reporting on the 'high priority' issues of Justice, and local and national corruption, and National Policy, and War...

          It's even said that Mr. Hearst's misinformation, half-truths, and lies, are what compelled a U.S. war against Spain's interests in this hemisphere and in the Pacific...

          If that's not an example of 'media misinformation' at it's worst, then it certainly is an example of it at it's most deadly, and expensive... I can just imagine what MMFA's citations would have been back then:

          "Hearst Papers Falsely Imply Spanish Warships Off U.S. Coast"

          "NY Sun Reports Rumors Of Cuban Slaughter As Fact"

          "AP Reports Spanish Atrocities In Phillipines; Doesn't Check Facts"

          ...etc.

           

          Now, there was a man who lived back then, and he was a writer... and he was 'politically concerned', to say the least (he was a 'Socialist', to speak the Truth)... and among the several things that really ticked him off about American business and 'politics' and the combination thereof, was the extraordinary failures and deceptions of the 'press' at that time (the 'press' being literally that: Newspapers, almost exclusively)... so he wrote a book, an expose of the American 'press'...

          'The BrassCheck: A Study of American Journalism', by Upton Sinclair, 1919

          And rather than bore you with a review of it here, I'd link you to an HTML version (complete) here... http://teleread.org/brasscheckfull.htm (I love the Internet Wire)

          He makes many examples of the newspapers' habit of reporting senational scandals and even lies, over what is important and what is the Truth... many of the examples are personal, involving Upton Sinclair himself (again, he was a 'Socialist', and a writer and a public speaker both, and had to endure many "media" attacks because of it)...

          There are chapters titled "Aiming at the Public's Heart" and "The Associated Press and Its Newspapers" (he despised the AP Wire... I'll say more) and "Owning the press" and "The War-Makers" and "The Press and the War" and "The Problem of the Reporter"...

          And Upton Sinclair much lamented the way this 'press', this "media", American Journalism, had such a deceptive and worthless (worthless to all the ideals of a Democracy)... such a deceptive strangle-hold on so many of the American People's attention, as to compel them to a brutal and costly war, that did not involve in the least the National Security of the United States...

          (as I said, it's not entirely a recent problem)

          ...and in his lament, he seems to wish for something better, to fix this Democracy-threatening problem... he has chapters called "Cutting the Tiger Claws" and "The Press Set Free"... he seems to think the American People just need a way around this 'press', a way out from under it's oppression...

          Like they need a 'news wire' of their own, not owned by anybody... lighting-quick and 24 hours, with a head-spinning multitude of sources and references and facts (and books even)...

          Anyway, he seemed to think the American People could do better, regarding the high priority issues of their Nation, such as Justice etc.

          I don't know, click the link above, to read more of Mr. Sinclair's thoughts on the matter (on the Internet Wire)... read it between reading MMFA's citations here (on the People's Internet Wire), citations of misinformation and half-truths and lies even... whether they be simply sensational and scandalous, or worse even.

          Worse enough to deter an investigation into Obstruction of Justice, or to compel the American People to a deadly and costly war, that does not involve their National Security in the least.

          (I think Upton Sinclair would have been on the Internet Wire, a lot, were he to live today.)

          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (April 11, 2007 6:18 pm ET)
         

      What?  The corporate media has failed to fully investigate a story that exposes the criminality of the Bush Administration?  They wouldn't be that irresponsible...would they?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (April 11, 2007 6:24 pm ET)
           

        I mean, they've done such a thorough job investigating the real reason we're in Iraq,  haven't they?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (April 11, 2007 6:34 pm ET)
           

        If you want the red staters to know the truth, you have to write it like a "fun with dick and jane" primer.

        See Bush.

        See Bush lie.

        Lie, Bush, lie!...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by conleytgwinn (April 11, 2007 9:25 pm ET)
             

          Then we have to hire someone to do the voices, for it is clear that if not one of those "talking" books, with LOTS of pictures, it will never be use in Red State America.

          (Pretty mean for a self-confessed Appalachian hillbilly, but *I* never promised to play nice - that was Conchobar, wasn't it?

          Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (April 11, 2007 6:33 pm ET)
         

      this is the other side of the coin on this story. how many u.s. attorneys gave in to the pressure and used their power at the political whim of the white house?  and doing such a thing would not only be unethical but illegal.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Mr. White (April 11, 2007 10:51 pm ET)
         

      Someone needs to investigate The NJ US attorney Christie.  He issued high profile subpoenas against Menendez just before his Senate Election.  The case concerned his renting of a commercial building to government funded program.  The only question, the simple question was whether the rent was market rent or whether he receved more than market rent.  It was market rent.  The case went nowhere and faded faster than McCain's presidnetial bid.  Next we have Sneator Wayne Bryant in the democratic bastion of Camden County.  He was indicted by Christie in his latest effort to do some Republican Flag planting in Democrtatic strongholds.  This time its because Bryant used his political contacts to get him private sector jobs.  Shocker.  the first politician to do that.  As if Gormley in AC doesn't get government business and Casino business to his law firm because of his political connections.  Christie is loyal Bushie and needs to have the spotlight shone in his direction.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rockstaradvisor-music8345 (April 11, 2007 11:11 pm ET)
         

      The authors of this story have obviously not done their homework on this WI case.  The Georgia Thompson case was jointly persued by Republican US District Atty, Biskupic, Democratic District Atty (for Dane County), Brian Blanchard, and Democratic Atty Gen Peg Lautenschlager.   The letter below was recently sent out to WI media outlets by Dan Bach, then Lautenschlager's deputy Atty Gen. 

      "The recent appellate court decision overturning the conviction of Georgia Thompson has prompted a spate of criticism directed at the prosecution, including allegations that the case was engineered for political reasons and that the evidence of guilt was hopelessly thin. Critics of the case also point to the civil service status of the defendant, and her apparent lack of motive to steer the travel contract to Adelman, as evidence of prosecutorial overreaching. I participated in several meetings with prosecutors and investigators both before and after the Thompson trial. Having spent more than a dozen years as a federal prosecutor and four more as the state deputy attorney general, I will attest that this case was handled by professional, career prosecutors and investigators in as fair, thoughtful, and apolitical fashion as any I have witnessed. In contrast, the one-sided, self-interested criticisms of the decision to prosecute stand apart in their rush to judgment. As to the appellate decision, I echo the comments of other former prosecutors who pointed out the anomalous nature of the swift pronouncement from the bench. Appellate decisions overturning the considered judgment of a jury and veteran trial judge, based on the strength of the evidence, are exceedingly rare. We await a written decision to better understand the appellate court’s reasoning. In the interim, those relying on an unclear motive to affirm Thompson’s innocence are lost in the headlights of television drama---proof of motive in criminal cases is not required. And to those who contend that state civil service status stands as a bar to politically based pressure, real or imagined, there are many in Madison who would scoff at your naiveté. This state cannot afford to proceed any longer without meaningful campaign finance reform, and it will not be restored to its former “clean government” status without prosecutors willing to bring tough public corruption cases."

      Report Abuse
      • Author by inkslave (April 12, 2007 10:35 am ET)
           

        Hey, no fair confusing the righteous with facts!

        I'm as committed to seeing Gonzo get tossed out on his butt as the next commie. But I can't stand it when the righteous lefites start up the Whine Machine without bothering to check the facts. The US Attorney in Wisconsin is a Repug, yes, but an examination of his record will show he's been a stand-up prosecutor who has repeatedly stuck his neck out to pursue racial justice and, wonder of wonders, to differentiate between the innocent and the guilty based on the merits of a particular case. 

         I have problems with the way the Thompson case was handled and I think a thorough investigation of it is a very good idea. But dammit, people, you sound no better than the Fox News junkies when you weigh in on what's "true" and what's "lies"without even bothering to check the facts. No wonder we pinkos have such a bad rep.

        Don't let your hatred of Bush send you over to the Dark Side.  

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sfcretired (April 11, 2007 11:32 pm ET)
         

      For anyone interested here is a link to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel  which has a link to the Audio of the Oral arguments from the Thompson appeal, also and audio of Gov. Doyles news conference.  Seems to me that the government had a very weak case and should never have brought charges.  Just My Humble Opinion.

      Damn Crooks and Liars

       

       

      http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=587510

      Under picture click on audio.

       

      Had Enough, Vote Democrat in 2008!

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftwingcenter (April 11, 2007 11:44 pm ET)
         

      No kidding the story was buried by the MSM!  They've been too busy all week burying Imus to even pay attention to this situation!  I rather expect that the Shrub Administration has been thanking God for Don Imus all week, precisely because it's taken the focus off what is a colossally more important story!  What does anyone expect in a nation where the systematic destruction of the rule of law is less important than destroying Don Imus?  We--the customers of the MSM--wanted wall-to-wall Imusgate, and we got exactly what we wanted.  If a picayune little matter of evidence that the Justice Department is being transformed into an American Politburo, and the national administration into a third-world banana republic with several thousand "nucular" warheads, gets in the way of real important stuff like un-personing Imus, well, I guess that's too bad on us...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Leftwingcenter (April 11, 2007 11:52 pm ET)
           

        And of course we couldn't live without finding out who was the father of little Dannielynn!  The Shrub Administration is effectually blackmailing its US Attorneys into going on fishing expeditions against Democrats, directly undermining the essential assumption in a free nation that the Justice Department is not using its muscle for partisan purposes, and all we want to listen to is Imus and Dannielynn!  Maybe when Gonzales starts disappearing Democrat leaders a la Juan Peron, a few more people might wake up...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jkp1663851 (April 12, 2007 4:25 am ET)
         

      I have noticed that those that think firing a few attorneys is so politcal seem to have no comment on The "Goldenboy/I can do no wrong" Clinton firing ALL the US attorneys.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by easygoer002209 (April 12, 2007 6:56 am ET)
           

        Bush 43 fired them all too when he came into DC.  These 8 are Bush 43 appointees...Republicans who aren't "on board" with the politicization of the DOJ that we've all read about.  And it's much worse than what we've read, too.

        Quite unfortunate that the WH managed to mishandle the personal emails they were using to circumvent Congressional oversight.  Wow...lost emails...what can we do about THAT I wonder?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (April 12, 2007 9:53 am ET)
           

        Your talking point was debunked weeks ago. I think you have not earned your paycheck from Rove this pay period. Were you on vacation and missed all the updates?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (April 12, 2007 10:57 am ET)
           

        Nice try.  Most, if not all U.S. Presidents replaced the Federal Prosecutors upon election as both George W. Bush and Bill Clinton did.  What makes this a story is the timing of the firings.  Find me "all" the U.S. Attorneys who were fired based on performance issues during the Clinton administration.  Please don't show me those who were fired upon Bill coming into office, just the ones throughout his Presidency.  I'll wait for your reply.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ddravla8396 (April 12, 2007 4:51 am ET)
         

      At the beginning of a new president's term all of the US attorneys are fired.  They are political appointments.  Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, and Bush Jr. all did it.   What is unusual is for them to get fired in a president's second term.  And if they were fired because they didn't drum up fake charges against Democrats just before the November elections, it is illegal.  Get your facts straight JKP!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by laplacian (April 12, 2007 9:07 am ET)
         

      Well, they can't cover everything, and the Imus "nappy-headed hos" story is more important.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ozett (April 12, 2007 11:12 am ET)
         

      The talk radio guys are doing their followers a disservice by not explaining the significance of these attorney firings vs. the normal attorney firings of an incoming president. I can't tell you how many times I've heard the conservative apologists try that "Clinton did it too" line. They end up just looking stupid. Rush and company are letting you guys down.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rockstaradvisor-music8345 (April 13, 2007 12:29 am ET)
         

      Still waiting for a correction by Media Matters on the WI - Georgia Thompson story.   You guys didnt do any homework on it.  You owe it to your readers to come clean when you've made a mistake.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.