About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Politico's Smith: Fox News' coverage of Hillary Clinton "has been largely respectful"

April 11, 2007 6:51 pm ET
image

11 Comments

In an April 10 Politico article on the decisions by Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Edwards, and Barack Obama to not participate in a debate co-sponsored by Fox News, Politico senior political writer Ben Smith wrote: "Each of the leading Democrats has handled the situation differently, reflecting different relationships with Fox." Smith went on to claim: "Fox's coverage of the Clintons, too, while rarely warm, has been largely respectful, and appears to have retreated from the stridently anti-Clinton line of the 1990s."

In fact, in 2007 alone, Media Matters for America has documented many examples of Fox News personalities and their guests making false, misleading, or offensive claims about Hillary Clinton:

From Smith's April 10 article:

Each of the leading Democrats has handled the situation differently, reflecting different relationships with Fox. While Edwards has responded swiftly to calls from the liberal, activist, online wing of his party, Obama might have had more personal motives. His campaign has been openly hostile at times to Fox since the network aired an Insight Magazine report suggesting he'd had an extremist Muslim education in Indonesia. Fox later corrected the report.

Obama exited the Fox/CBC debate Monday with a low-key statement from his spokesman, Bill Burton, that CNN would be a "more appropriate venue" for a debate. And Clinton appeared content to be the last one off the debate roster, putting out a statement that didn't even mention Fox by name and seemed calculated to preserve the carefully nurtured relationship between the Clintons and Fox News' leaders.

Bill Clinton and News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch have emerged as allies at times in recent years, with Murdoch appearing at Clinton's annual New York conference, and Clinton even employing Murdoch's daughter-in-law at his foundation.

Fox's coverage of the Clintons, too, while rarely warm, has been largely respectful, and appears to have retreated from the stridently anti-Clinton line of the 1990s. Last year, Murdoch's New York Post even endorsed Hillary Clinton for reelection to the Senate. In 2005, Bill Clinton recorded a message of praise for Ailes for a gala at which the former Republican political operative was honored.

If Clinton's careful courtship is driven by a respect for the power of Murdoch's media properties -- which, in England, are often credited with having made Tony Blair the prime minister -- Edwards' campaign hardly cloaks its disdain.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mr. l (April 11, 2007 6:57 pm ET)
         

      Poltico = the new Fox... with less... everything

      Report Abuse
    • Author by greekfurnace (April 11, 2007 6:59 pm ET)
         

      You see... it's all depends on what one in the Republican sphere would call "largely respectful". This is it.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by friedbergboy1422 (April 11, 2007 7:01 pm ET)
         

      Let me guess, this article is tongue-in-cheek too, right? HAHAHAHA!  I get it! UGH!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (April 11, 2007 7:38 pm ET)
         

      no doubt now where this guy's head is at.  dick morris, on every other day making up stories out of thin air about the clintons,  is "respectful"?  nah.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (April 11, 2007 9:17 pm ET)
         

      That "respectful coverage" has been much in evidence over the past six months: not once has any major FoxLies spokesperson referred to Senator Clinton as a "nappy-haired ho".

      Or have their bigots and liars simply overlooked that one, needing Imus to remind them?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (April 11, 2007 9:25 pm ET)
         

      Man, come on now, get some basic reporting skills. His statement is patently false, especially with the evidence in plain view of the Chris Wallace Bill Clinton interview. Do your leg work (or mouse work, geez).

      Report Abuse
    • Author by redking75687 (April 11, 2007 9:30 pm ET)
         

      Mudorch and the Clintons working together? Not a good sign, is it.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (April 11, 2007 10:18 pm ET)
         

      Maybe this is another example of this guy's idea of a joke.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (April 12, 2007 2:15 am ET)
         

      ...and exactly why is it worth mentioning when a "news outlet" is respectful towards a presidential candidate?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by splashy9 (April 12, 2007 5:50 am ET)
         

      Sounds like Fox is trying to actually appear like they don't hate Democrats, blacks, hispanics and anyone else that doesn't agree with the RW noise machine.

      So, the boycott of Fox is working. Hopefully they will go out of business and the people that would have watched them will actually get some real news for a change.

      Well, unless they only listen to the radio idiots, in which case they will be pretty much the same when it comes to being misinformed.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by buyavowel (April 12, 2007 7:38 am ET)
         

      At least they haven't accused her of murder...lately.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.