Will the media ask Bush who is telling the truth about his Syria conversation with Pelosi?
On April 20, The Washington Post reported that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said President Bush, at an April 18 White House meeting, "told her he did not criticize her recent trip to Syria." According to the Post, Pelosi said Bush "told her in an unsolicited comment that it was actually the State Department that criticized her" for heading a bipartisan delegation to Syria and meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The Post also reported, however, that deputy White House press secretary Dana Perino "took issue with Pelosi's account of the conversation in the Cabinet Room," claiming "that Pelosi started the conversation about the Syria trip and that she never heard Bush back off his criticism."
David Rogers posted an entry on The Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire weblog reporting that in response to Pelosi's assertion that Bush denied having criticized her trip, White House spokesman Tony Fratto referred to Bush's comments at an April 3 Rose Garden press conference criticizing congressional delegations to Syria.
Given Perino's and Fratto's suggestions that Pelosi is not telling the truth about the conversation, and given Pelosi's spokesperson's reported claim that the conversation occurred "as an aside," Bush is presumably the only person besides the speaker who knows whether he denied having criticized her trip. As Media Matters for America documented, Pelosi came under harsh criticism by Republicans in the administration and in Congress -- criticism that was in many cases uncritically reported or echoed by the media -- for her trip to Syria and meeting with Assad. The situation gives rise to several questions that the media might pose to Bush:
- Did you tell the speaker that you did not criticize her trip to Syria?
- If not, why do you think she reported afterwards that you did tell her that?
- If so, have you informed your spokespeople that they are mistaken? Also, if you were not critical of her trip, why did you allow other members of your administration to denounce her?
Indeed, as Media Matters for America noted, on several occasions, Perino directly criticized Pelosi for her trip to Syria and her April 4 meeting with Assad, but offered no specific criticism of the Republican member of Pelosi's delegation or the other Republican members of Congress who also met with Assad in the days preceding and following Pelosi's meeting. On March 30, Perino called Pelosi's trip "a really bad idea," and on April 2 she said the trip would "alleviate[] the pressure that we are trying to put on [Syria] to change their behavior." On the April 5 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show, Vice President Dick Cheney attacked Pelosi's trip as "bad behavior." During an April 4 interview with ABC News Radio, Cheney said of Pelosi's trip: "It means without [Assad] having done any of those things he should do in order to be acceptable, if you will, from an international standpoint, he gets a visit from a high-ranking American anyway. In other words, his bad behavior is being rewarded, in a sense."
Responding to a question about Pelosi's trip at the April 3 press conference, Bush said the White House has "made it clear to high-ranking officials, whether they be Republicans or Democrats, that going to Syria sends mixed signals -- signals in the region and, of course, mixed signals to President Assad," though he did not mention any specific "high-ranking officials."















Another phrasing of the question to Bungle:
"Did you lack the guts to criticise Pelosi to her face, since you had already set the dogs on her through your corporate Media allies, your administration spokespersons, and all the "friendly" members of Congress?"
Yeah, those are some great questions to ask GWB. The average pro-MMFA poster here could come up with 10, 50, 100 great questions for the Decider to answer. As Poppy once said via Dana Carver, "ain't gonna happen."
No one covering the White Horse wants to lose their seat. No one in the town meetings has the opposition. No one around the Naked King will allow his nudity to be questioned. 21 months to go.
Carvey. It's Carvey.
- IRAG WAR "LOST" SAYS TOP DEMOCRAT -al jazeera headline today
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid...that should be the democrat party ticket for Pres/VP...since they are intent on doing the president's job of conducting foreign policy.
You seem to have a problem with the term 'lost'.
If it's not yet lost, how do we prevent losing?
Clearly, nothing this administration has tried has been close to successful.
Today there are reports that we're building a wall around Sunni enclaves in the city of Baghdad. The reports state that both the Sunni's and Shiia are against this. Explain how our handling of this situation helps matters. If it it's not helping could it be making matters worse?
I've heard all the platitudes, "Stay the course", "fight them there so we don't have to fight them here". For once can you explain where we go from here without the talking points?
- You seem to have a problem with the term 'lost'. -
Nope...just reported the headline the way al-jazeera printed it. Maybe al-jazeera should just go ahead and give Pelosi and Reid their own by-lines...since they are the only ones who know the real scoop...you know...America has lost the war in Iraq.
I don't need Smerconish to be able to identify limp-wristed sissies.
Al-Jazeera headline: Al Queda recruitment at all time high in Iraq...George Bush foreign policy credited.
So anyone who opposes this tragic situation is a "limp-wristed sissy".
You've got the debating skills of a third grader. I asked serious questions and your response is to treat me with disrespect. I really expected some kind of discourse.
Thank You
Oh, stop with the outrage and hurt feelings.
No, I do not think that "anyone who opposes this tragic situation is a "limp-wristed sissy". The comment was directed towards Pelosi and Reid.
Nor do we need a program to recognize the lets get as many Americans killed as we possibly can warmongers for whom no amount of dead will satisfy their sick bloodlust.
You must have bought one of those "Gay-dar" products they talked about on the Daily Show a while ago.
There is no such thing as a Democrat party. I think the ReNAMBLAcan party ought to , in keeping with their recent record, nominate Rainman and Gordon Gekko.
Of course the media won't confront the Moron in Chief for his lies. Why should they start now?
BUILDING WALLS AROUND SUNNI COMMUNITIES?
Isn't that reminiscent of what Hitler did to the Jews in Warsaw?
Can you have a Sunni ghetto?
No one should believe anything Speaker Botox says. Coddling up to state sponsors of terrorism such as Assad displays a complete lack of character.
Thus, no one should believe a word President Chucklenuts says...
That's not coddling, Val,that's a date.
Considering the almost constant stream of lies from this White House. Considering that George Bush lies like most people breathe, I would say if we are grading on credibility it is Chimpy McShortbus who cannot be believed about the time of day.
Can you explain why if Assad is a supporter of terrorism, we made arrangements with his government to render prisoners to his country for "questioning" under our "Extraordinary Rendition" policy?
Maybe we should expose the Bush administration for "Coddling up to state sponsors of terrorism'.
Be nice to bush, Worrierking. He( and his family and administration) may conduct business with or ignore sponsors of terrorism, but he can't be accused of meeting with them.
That would involve traveling overseas and engaging in foreign policy. I think he's clean as a whistle there.