About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring missed votes, CNN's Watts said McCain fundraising suffered because he "had to go be a senator"

May 07, 2007 3:27 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

15 Comments

On the May 2 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN political analyst J.C. Watts told host Wolf Blitzer that Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (AZ) "reported about $12.5 million raised in the first quarter; $11 million of that was raised in a month. And then he had to go be a senator and try to take care of some war things." Neither Watts nor Blitzer informed viewers that McCain has missed more votes than any other senator so far in 2007 -- excluding Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD), who suffered a brain hemorrhage in December and has not yet returned to the Senate -- or that McCain has missed a number of votes pertaining to the war in Iraq.

According to the U.S. Congress Votes Database on WashingtonPost.com, as of May 3, McCain has missed 63 of 150 votes in the 110th Congress, or 42 percent. By contrast, the two Democratic frontrunners, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY) and Sen. Barack Obama (IL), have missed three and seven Senate votes, respectively. Furthermore, McCain has missed all 21 Senate votes since April 16, including the April 26 vote on the Iraq war supplemental funding bill conference report, which set a timetable for the withdrawl of U.S. troops from Iraq, a measure McCain staunchly opposes.

Several media outlets have taken note of the trend. In an April 27 article on the Senate vote that passed the conference report for the Iraq war funding bill, the Los Angeles Times reported: "This is the fourth major Iraq-related vote missed by McCain, a presidential candidate who has been a leading champion of the president's current Iraq policy." Further, an April 26 post on the Capitol Briefing blog on WashingtonPost.com -- titled, "McCain: Most absentee '08 Senator" -- reported: "McCain also continues to miss many critical votes on Iraq, the issue that he has previously said would be so critical to his own campaign." The blog linked to a March 16 Capitol Briefing post noting that "McCain is the only declared presidential candidate to miss any of the Senate's Iraq votes, according to Capitol Briefing's analysis of Senate votes. The other five senators running for the White House -- Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), Joe Biden (D-Del.), Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), and Barrack [sic] Obama (D-Ill.) -- have been on hand for all seven votes." The March 16 post further stated, "During the past six weeks, the Senate has cast seven votes dealing with how President Bush should proceed in the now four-year-old war. And McCain has missed five of them, bypassing what he calls 'meaningless' procedural votes in favor of campaign stops in his pursuit of the Republican presidential nomination."

Among the Iraq-related Senate votes McCain has missed this year:

  • April 26 -- H.R. 1591 Conference Report; U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007
  • March 15 -- S. J. Res. 9; a joint resolution to revise United States policy on Iraq
  • February 17 -- Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S.574; a bill to express the sense of Congress on Iraq
  • February 5 -- Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S. 470; a bill to express the sense of Congress on Iraq.

From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the May 2 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: In today's "Strategy Session," two presidential candidates who have been trailing in some polls are seeing some new heads of steam. Also, how should Congress respond now that the president has vetoed that war spending bill? Joining us now, two CNN political analysts. Donna Brazile is a Democratic strategist. J.C. Watts is a former congressman from Okalahoma.

J.C., let me start with you. And look at this American Research poll on the Republican side. John McCain, in three states -- Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina -- all of a sudden, in Iowa, he's ahead over Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney. Look at this, in New Hampshire, 29 percent to Giuliani's 17 percent, Mitt Romney with 24. And, in South Carolina, McCain has 36 percent to Giuliani's 23, Mitt Romney down at 6 percent.

Is it fair to say he's the comeback kid, John McCain?

WATTS: No, I don't think he's come back. I think John McCain; this is where I would have anticipated that he would have been at this time of the season. You know, John reported about $12.5 million raised in the first quarter; $11 million of that was raised in a month. And then he had to go be a senator and try to take care of some war things.

Now, John -- the race is given neither to the swift, nor to the strong, but to those that will endure. And I think John McCain is positioned best to endure the campaign over the next 12 months.

BLITZER: It's interesting. In the national polls, when you ask -- forget about the states -- Giuliani still comes out on top. But, in these critical three early states, Donna, McCain is really, really doing well.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by conleytgwinn (May 07, 2007 3:34 pm ET)
         

      McCain has been busy trying to recruit Cheney to be his VP, in case Bungle decides against Martial Law, cancellation of the 2008 elections, and the title "Deciderer for Life (Dear Glorious Leader)".

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by THEmole (May 07, 2007 3:50 pm ET)
         

      Well at least a few news orgs have pointed out McCain's inconsistancies.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (May 07, 2007 3:56 pm ET)
           

        McCain was, a man most consistent

        With Presidential hopes pretty distant

        As an absentee senator

        He had a progenitor

        In a Commander-in-Chief Non-existent

        Did I beat JuliaJayne this time?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (May 07, 2007 3:58 pm ET)
         

      McCain Straight Talk Express not only lost its wheels in 2000, but upon inspection lost its axles also by sucking up to the GW obfuscation machine. And I submit that voters remember that. And his incessant penchant to rephrase the questions asked.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by THEmole (May 07, 2007 4:04 pm ET)
           

        Rephrasing a question demonstrates one's understanding of the question...now if only McCain could comprehend a competent answer...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (May 07, 2007 4:29 pm ET)
             

          He ( Mccain ) would like you to think that but I submit to you rephrasing the question is simply a " I don't want to answer " reply.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (May 07, 2007 4:24 pm ET)
         

      Not much fundraising going on in Baghdad, or on The Daily Show.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 07, 2007 5:09 pm ET)
         

      Perhaps we have a subtle dig here at Clinton and Obama, who have raised far more money than McCain?  Are we to assume that they have done so at the expense of their senatorial duties?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (May 07, 2007 6:34 pm ET)
           

        That may be the intent, but McCain hasn't been showing up for important votes.

        As I said before, I think the real story is not that McCain hasn't been fundraising.  I think it's that not as many are as eager to give him funds. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by anotherjoe (May 08, 2007 7:27 pm ET)
           

        Sorry, but I don't follow your reasoning.  The story states (pretty clearly) that both Obama and Clinton missed FAR FEWER votes than McCain without making their fundraising interfering with their Senate duties.

        How that should be taken as a "dig" at either Obama or Clinton escapes me.  If anything, it should be evidence that both senators are doing a fair job balancing their expected job with their extracurricular activities.  (If McCain's "absences" were this excessive at any other job--aside from health reasons--he'd be getting a lot more free time since no other employer would allow for this much absenteeism.)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (May 07, 2007 5:29 pm ET)
         

      No one ever accused JC Watts of being intimately connected with the truth or acts.  But he HAS been intimately connected with enough women to have fathered a few illegitimate children......

      Report Abuse
    • Author by heavymusic (May 07, 2007 9:26 pm ET)
         

      Donna Brazile is a clueless loser as well as J. C. Watts the self righteous, self admiring 5th string political analyst hack that CNN resurrected from deserved obscurity. CNN (Celebrity News Network) is a bloody red meat cable news outlet  that has no shame and no ethics.  That ferret-faced weasel  Wolf Blitzer is the biggest  whore on cable news.  He'll  take his orders from  the CNN Reichstag to exploit anything, anywhere, anytime, at the expense of anybody. He gives streetwalkers respectability. At least they kiss you before you get f****d.    

      Report Abuse
    • Author by savvy_observer (May 08, 2007 9:23 am ET)
         

      i didn't hear this particular exchange, but Watts manages to get in the democrat slur [' . . . democrat plan, democrat leader, democrat agenda. . .'] several times in each appearance on CNN.  i've emailed a number of TV hosts, democratic talkingheads, and even my congressman urging them to correct this childish behavior on the tube.  have any of you ever heard a republican called on this, on the air?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.