About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly fabricated new sinister links between Media Matters and other progressives

May 08, 2007 3:55 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: On Fox News, Bill O'Reilly alleged a sinister link between Media Matters for America and Sen. Ted Kennedy. Discussing an email he said he received from Kennedy's office, O'Reilly said: "So, obviously, Kennedy sent that thing to us and shot it over to Media Matters." In fact, Media Matters cites materials from a variety of places as relevant, though in this case, it did not "duplicate" an email from Kennedy's office, but rather debunked an assertion O'Reilly made by providing transcript and video from a 2006 edition of The O'Reilly Factor and pointing to a 2006 fact sheet from Kennedy's office regarding immigration.

103 Comments

On the May 7 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly once again lobbed baseless attacks against Media Matters for America, this time purporting to find a nefarious link between Media Matters and Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA). Responding to an email he said he had received from Kennedy's office, O'Reilly said: "[A] day after getting that email from Kennedy's office -- sent directly to us -- guess who puts out a press release? The far-left outfit Media Matters, pretty much duplicating everything Kennedy's office sent to us. So, obviously, Kennedy sent that thing to us and shot it over to Media Matters. Another example of how the left-wing machine is intruding on the most powerful politicians in the country." While Media Matters cites materials from a variety of entities as relevant, in this case, there was no "duplicat[ion]" of an email from Kennedy's office to O'Reilly. Rather, in the item, Media Matters debunked an assertion O'Reilly made on the May 1 edition of his program by providing transcript and video from the May 8, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor and pointing to a 2006 fact sheet from Kennedy's office regarding immigration.

On the May 1 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly disputed Fox News contributor Kirsten Powers' account of a discussion the two had in 2006 about the provisions of the 2006 immigration bill sponsored by Kennedy and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). When Powers recalled, "I sat on this show and read a list to you of the bill of all the different things he [Kennedy] wanted to do," O'Reilly responded: "You're crazy." Media Matters documented with transcript and video that Powers did, in fact, attempt to list the security provisions in the Kennedy bill. On the May 8, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Powers told O'Reilly that the Kennedy-McCain bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee included several provisions addressing border security: "They have tons of security on the border stuff. I can read it to you right now ... double border patrol, adds 12,000 more agents ... adds new technology ... construction of fences."

Despite acknowledging he was "wrong" about Kennedy's plan, O'Reilly accused Kennedy of coordinating with Media Matters. O'Reilly asserted: "The wording was almost exact in the email they sent us, and in the Media Matters press release. Exactly. Media Matters would have had to have gotten that letter, because that's how they cribbed it." Later, Powers said that it was not "strange" that the wording of Kennedy's letter to O'Reilly was similar to "what Media Matters wrote," saying "the language is basically what's on Kennedy's website." O'Reilly then accused Media Matters of disseminating "propaganda," to which Powers maintained: "Well, no, because it's part of the bill. I mean, there was a bill."

O'Reilly also devoted time during the May 7 editions of both his Fox News television program and his nationally syndicated radio show to discussing the supposed connection between financier and philanthropist George Soros -- whom he dubbed "Dr. Evil" on his television program -- and Media Matters. During his radio program, O'Reilly falsely asserted: "Now, we have told you, and we do it stair-stepping, how Soros has bought up a bunch of Internet smear sites, including Media Matters, that do his bidding." He later claimed: "He's [Soros] now using his wealth to try to buy the Democratic Party, set up an apparatus through MoveOn[.org], through Media Matters, through these other things, to basically target Democrats.

In the past two weeks, O'Reilly has made numerous and varying assertions about a link between Media Matters and Soros, and has even created a flowchart purporting to show a complex web of Soros organizations, all funding Media Matters. O'Reilly's May 7 assertion that Media Matters "has [been] bought up" by Soros is also false. As previously indicated, Media Matters has never received funding from Soros, either directly or indirectly.

From the May 7 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thank you for watching us tonight. Hurricane Soros, getting stronger: That's the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo."

As we have been reporting for months, far-left billionaire George Soros is buying political influence in America in an unprecedented way. Soros is pouring tens of millions of dollars into far-left Internet sites and organizations designed to intimidate democratic politicians and advance his radical left agenda.

Up until yesterday, the Factor was pretty much alone in reporting about Soros, but in its Sunday edition, The New York Times ran an article entitled, "Anti-war Groups Use New Clout to Influence Democrats on Iraq."

While the article doesn't mention Soros by name, it does say that, every morning, a cluster of anti-war, mostly far-left, groups gather for a conference call with the Democratic leadership in Washington -- every morning.

At the center of this cluster is the notorious MoveOn organization, which has received at least $5 million from Soros himself and an unknown amount from organizations he funds. Doesn't take a James Carville to figure out that Soros now has direct access to the most powerful Democrats in the nation, and they had better listen up.

By the way, I want to compliment The New York Times for reporting it. Once again, "Talking Points" will pinpoint the big picture for you: One billionaire and his friends using the McCain-Feingold law and disenchantment over Iraq are attempting to call the shots within the Democratic Party and are making strong progress.

John Edwards pulled out of a debate sponsored by the Nevada Democratic Party and Fox News to curry favor with the Soros group. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson did the same. Both men have been treated very well by FNC, but neither can survive in the presidential race without the direct help of Soros.

Another, by the way: You didn't see any Republicans pulling out of the MSNBC debate, did you? Even though that network has moved sharply to the left. Most Americans have no idea who George Soros is, but he is one of the most feared men in the world. If Mike Myers didn't invent Dr. Evil, some might give Soros the moniker.

In 1992, Soros made a billion-dollar profit by selling the British pound short, badly damaging that country. In 1999, the president of China banned Soros from doing business in his country. In 2002, Soros was convicted of insider trading in France and fined $2.3 million.

Soros is so powerful that he can ruin most countries financially if he decides to attack their currency by selling it short. And now Soros has set his sights on the political landscape here in America. He has his character assassins lined up. He has MoveOn ready to move out. And he has direct access to the highest levels of our government.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is an urgent situation -- and that's the "Memo."

Now for the top story tonight -- somewhat related to the far left propaganda being dished daily by Soros-funded websites -- according to a new Rasmussen poll, 35 percent of American Democratic voters believe President Bush knew about the 9-11 attacks in advance and allowed them to happen. Thirty-five percent. Overall, 22 percent of American voters believe that madness.

[...]

O'REILLY: Thanks for staying with us. I'm Bill O'Reilly.

In the "Mondays with Michelle and Kirsten" segment tonight, an interesting situation. Last week, we debated whether Senator Edward Kennedy really wants strict border security since Kennedy and John McCain are heading up the immigration bill in the Senate.

Kirsten said Senator Kennedy is tough on border security. I was not convinced; nor was Michelle. A couple of days later, the Kennedy people sent us an email about the senator's border security positions, and Kirsten was right. Kirsten was right. They are much tougher than his previous plan. Kennedy now supports fencing but still not enough manpower, in my opinion.

But a day after getting that email from Kennedy's office -- sent directly to us -- guess who puts out a press release? The far-left outfit Media Matters, pretty much duplicating everything Kennedy's office sent to us. So, obviously, Kennedy sent that thing to us and shot it over to Media Matters. Another example of how the left-wing machine is intruding on the most powerful politicians in the country.

Joining us now with reaction: Kirsten Powers in New York and from Washington, Michelle Malkin.

I just think it's fascinating that Kennedy's people -- and we, of course, can have Kennedy on any time he wants. He doesn't come on the program, but, you know, I'll admit I was wrong. I didn't think -- his revised plan, much tougher than I thought it was.

But they basically, you know, shot it over, and then they gave it right to Media Matters. And the Media Matters people framed it as O'Reilly is a liar. He's a kook. He's this, that, and the other thing. Isn't that interesting to you?

MALKIN: It is, and I wouldn't be surprised whatever kind of coordination, if there even was that. You know, whether it's explicit or just the fact that these left-wing sites happen to be on the same ideological page as the mainstream Democratic leadership.

O'REILLY: No, it has to be. The word was too similar.

MALKIN: And I would warn very much, very strongly that, even though Kirsten may have been right on some of these points, the fact is that you cannot trust Media Matters or any of these connected left-wing sites as honest arbiters of the truth.

In fact, if you've been following the immigration debate closely, you know that there's actually no such thing as the Kennedy bill. Even though it was passed in the Senate, there was no House version that was passed along with it.

And in fact, all of the negotiations that are going right now between Kennedy's office, the White House, and some of the Republicans is all off the record. It's all behind closed doors. There's nothing on paper.

O'REILLY: OK. But his positions were stated to us, and they're tougher than they were. But I have to -- I just want everybody to be very, very definite on this. The wording was almost exact in the email they sent us, and in the Media Matters press release. Exactly.

Media Matters would have had to have gotten that letter, because that's how they cribbed it. What do you say?

POWERS: I'm just still in shock that you said I was right.

O'REILLY: When you're right it's so seldom I don't say that it much.

POWERS: I know.

O'REILLY: But I will admit that you were right. His position now is a lot tougher than it was, and I was not aware of it. As Michelle said, a lot of this going on behind closed doors, so I didn't know.

POWERS: OK. So, well, I mean, there was the McCain-Kennedy bill, which is I think what they were talking about. And I don't really find it to be that strange that it has the same language, because the language -- I did go and look at what Media Matters wrote because I knew we were going to be talking about this.

O'REILLY: Right.

POWERS: And the language is basically what's on Kennedy's website. And so the normal thing to do would be to go look at the transcripts and to look at what's on the website and compare them.

O'REILLY: But then that organization is taking stuff right from his website, issuing a press release that it's absolutely true.

POWERS: Assuming that what Kennedy's saying is true. Yes.

O'REILLY: They're just taking it -- they're just taking it and spitting it out with no -- you know, what is that? That's propaganda. If you take any politician's website and spit it out in a press release, it's propaganda.

POWERS: Well, no, because it's part of the bill. I mean, there was a bill.

O'REILLY: It's not part of the bill, because we haven't seen the revised bill.

POWERS: But the bill -- there was the bill that was the McCain-Kennedy bill. It was co-sponsored by Lieberman, by Brownback, by all these other people, and that's where they took it from.

O'REILLY: But there's another bill now, because that failed. All right, I'm bored with this already.

From the May 7 edition of Westwood One's The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly:

O'REILLY: All right. We've been telling you for months that a man named George Soros, a billionaire financier, is trying to hijack and take over the Democratic Party and is doing very well in his pursuit. Now, we were the only ones reporting the story up until Sunday, when on the front page of The New York Times -- and I was stunned when I saw it -- there was an article entitled "Anti-War Groups Use New Clout to Influence Democrats on Iraq," by Michael Luo, L-U-O. You ought to check this article out, NewYorkTimes.com.

Now, in the article, it says that a coalition of far-left groups every day, every day have a conference call with Democratic Party leaders. Every day. OK. Prominent among the group, by far the most powerful elephant in the room, is MoveOn.org. Funded directly by George Soros subsidiaries.

Now, we have told you, and we do it stair-stepping, how Soros has bought up a bunch of Internet smear sites, including Media Matters, that do his bidding. And the best example is the Senate race in Connecticut where Soros' money and far-left websites went in and got Ned Lamont nominated to be the Democrat [sic] candidate for the Senate. Whereupon Joseph Lieberman ran as an independent because he knew what was going on, he knew he had the people, and he won. Lieberman won. But not before Lieberman was slimed, was defamed, was slashed, was attacked on every level. And anyone who supported him in the Democratic Party was threatened, threatened by these websites, by these MoveOn people.

[...]

O'REILLY: Therefore, his Quantum investment firm makes gazillions of dollars, and he has wound up as being one of the most wealthy and powerful men in the world. He's now using his wealth to try to buy the Democratic Party, set up an apparatus through MoveOn, through Media Matters, through these other things, to basically target Democrats.

And what he says to them is, "Either you toe my far-left line" -- and remember, George Soros is as far left as you can go. He thinks America is the evil in the world. He wants euthanasia, unfettered abortion, legalized narcotics, one-world government, open borders. You don't get any further left than this man.

He says to the Democratic candidates, "Either you toe my line, or you don't get any money. Not gonna help you raise money through all my Internet," because that's where most of the money's raised now. OK. "And we're gonna slash you just like we did Lieberman."

[...]

O'REILLY: Now, this is off the chart, off the chart. This is Rosie O'Donnell, this is Sean Penn, this is the crazy, crazy fringe has now reached 35 percent of Democrats. Now, how do they do it? They do it through the entertainment media. The newspapers like The New York Times, things like that, they feel very uneasy about -- they know what's going on, which is why the Times actually ran that article. I was shocked they did. I was shocked they exposed what was going on. And I said, "Wow." And I -- it's to their credit, it's to their credit.

But the entertainment media is saturated by this stuff. Now, we gave you the pipeline. We'll put the map up again -- the chart, I should say -- up again on television where you see the money flow from Soros into MoveOn and into all these other organizations. And we're talking tens of millions of dollars here, ladies and gentlemen. We're talking bigger money than has ever been moved in any presidential campaign in the history of this country.

[...]

CALLER: I think we need to stop allowing MoveOn.org and Media Matters, these people that run these sites, to be anonymous. I think it's time we expose them by name and on your TV show --

O'REILLY: Yeah, I don't know. You know, I'm thinking about that, but they just -- they want that because they're preaching to a choir and the choir is not gonna lessen if they get more famous. So, you know, I just want you to know the apparatus, and I want you to know the guy behind it, and I want you to know who they're reaching.

Now, tonight on the Factor -- and you're gonna be very interested to see this, [caller] -- I'm gonna put up a letter that Ted Kennedy sent to us, to the Factor, and I'm gonna put alongside that letter a Media Matters press release. It's almost identical. So either Media Matters is stealing from Kennedy or Kennedy is stealing from Media Matters. One of the two. The wording is almost identical.

Now, once you get to that level of power in the Democratic Party, these people are players. And that's why I'm doing this reportage, so you know what's happening here. This is madness what is happening. And most Americans have no clue. I mean, you guys are way ahead of the curve listening to this program. But turn on some of the other right-wing shows. I mean, this isn't a right-wing show, but it is perceived to be conservative-leaning because I'm a traditionalist. But you turn on some of the other political conservative shows, and you will not hear any of this. All right. And everybody in America should know what's going on.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DorisRussell (May 08, 2007 4:00 pm ET)
         

      It has become very clear that O'Reilly has decided to attack MMFA with all his lies and might, the Imus situation got these haters upset. O'reilly knows he will be targeted next for any of his hate speech, he is scared and now lying.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by duncan12347948 (May 08, 2007 4:59 pm ET)
           

        Why does MMFA have a problem with being linked to Sen. Kennedy?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bingvangorden (May 08, 2007 5:33 pm ET)
             

          They're not expressing anything about being linked to Kennedy. They are merely pointing out the lie that they are.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by deeznuts (May 08, 2007 6:35 pm ET)
               

            Yep.

            Same with the Soros thing. Who gives a crap if MMFA gets money from Soros? It's a free country (more or less) and Soros is a US citizen.

            I'm sure MMFA would LOVE to have some of that Soros money, and if he wanted to he could openly write them a check. There would be absolutely no need for subterfuge. 

            The problem is that MMFA doesn't get money from Soros, yet so many continue to claim that they do. And the claim is made in such a way as to fabricate some nefarious, underground machination and insert this meme into the minds of the ready-and-willing Fox News audience. All of whom are only too eager to have their biases stroked and ensconced by the warm embrace of conservative misinformation.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brian in FL (May 08, 2007 7:26 pm ET)
                 

              I especially love the irony of O'Reilly saying this on a channel owned by Rupert Murdoch, a guy who actually DOES control a huge media empire.

              Could Soros ever possibly control as much of the message in our media as Rupert Murdoch, no matter how many cute charts and graphs Bill comes up with???

              Report Abuse
        • Author by NotThatGeorge (May 08, 2007 6:38 pm ET)
             

          And he huffed, and he puffed, and he blew your strawman argument down!

          No problem being associated with Senator Kennedy. The problem is being falsely accused of directing the actions of Kennedy and being in collusion with him when Media Matters simply copied info from Kennedy's publicly-available website! O'Reilly is being paranoid. Media Matters pointed that out. They then explained how his paranoia was not rooted in reality.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by MickD (May 08, 2007 8:17 pm ET)
               

            I think BO'R better watch himself. A "billionaire" like Mr. S may have a lot of resources at his disposal to "teach a lesson" to such a direct critic (especially since BO'R seems not to be acquainted with the truth). I'm just saying. I suggest an Alec Baldwin style re-visiting of the Loofah incident. I'm just saying.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by susangee (May 09, 2007 10:54 am ET)
                 

              Be careful, Mick. Keep talking like that and Bill O might have his jack-booted goons from Fox security kick down your door.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (May 08, 2007 4:11 pm ET)
         

      So, why doesn't he just ignore us? According to Tommy that is what you should do because doing otherwise just gives credibility. And we know there ain't no way in h-e-l-l O'Reilly is going to do that now, don't we?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (May 08, 2007 4:16 pm ET)
         

      I'm just blown away that a man who works for Rupert Murdoch is pounding empty war drums about another billionaire's alleged lust for political power.  Un-freakin'-believable. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Wes1 (May 08, 2007 7:15 pm ET)
           

        "They're just taking it -- they're just taking it and spitting it out with no -- you know, what is that? That's propaganda."

        What a joke.  That's coming from someone who obviously studied how to effectively use fear, lies, and self-pity to make a buck.  I think those guys over at Indiana U. deserve a little more credit for pushing him over the edge. 

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by susangee (May 09, 2007 7:54 am ET)
             

          I wish that KO or the some of the Air America people -- someone anyway -- would actually air footage of  "Father" Charles Coughlin side-by-side with footage of O'Reilly. The hysterical rhetoric, fear-mongering, and repeated use of logical fallacies and propaganda tools are nearly identical. I think that it might be eye-opening for many who shrug off the danger posed by purveyors of hate and deceit, like Limbaugh and O'Reilly. History shows that there is always an audience for this type of lunatic fringe hate speech. And that those who are followers of the likes of Coughlin, Limbaugh, and O'Reilly often possess that lethal combination of self-righteousness, hubris, and ignorance.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian in FL (May 08, 2007 7:28 pm ET)
           

        Whoops, sorry for the similar post above.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by indigo1968 (May 08, 2007 4:17 pm ET)
         

      It's official. The Factor is now the funniest show on cable television.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (May 09, 2007 3:22 pm ET)
           

        Unintentionally funny, perhaps.  Colbert and TDS are still far more watchable than O'Reilly's trainwreck of lies.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by MayorPoopenmyer (May 08, 2007 4:17 pm ET)
         

      Soros is clearly funding MMFA. Here is proof.

       

      George Soros' Open Society Institute ----->Tides Foundation ------->Democracy Allience ------->Center for American Progress ----->Keith Olbermann ----->Kevin Bacon ----->MMFA.

       

      You moonbats have been exposed!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 08, 2007 4:23 pm ET)
           

        Oh, wait a minute.  That chart is not credible.  Not yet.

        Make the arrows red and you'll be on solid factual ground. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 7:57 pm ET)
             

          I just did a flow chart that proves b.o. and little bush had a mind-meld, b.o. has bush-brown-ring-around-the-collar. b.o. says he respects bush. Respect means to hold in high esteem. bush and respect are a dichotomy. bush proves one thing: If you put a suit and tie on a turd, it's still a turd. The only way I could listen to a bush speach would go down to skidrow and inlist a wet-brain alcoholic to interpret. Just heard b.o. is going to have his carney side show act on tonite. His body language expert is going to analyze the queen. THIS HAS GOT TO BE A MUST SEE and could solve everyones problems and the iraq fiasco.

           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by monknj80 (May 08, 2007 4:19 pm ET)
         

      Why am I kind of getting a kind of odd joy in watching a Grown man have a breakdon on national TV. Keep at it MMFA!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (May 08, 2007 4:21 pm ET)
         

      This Madness!

      Whichever side of the political fence you come down on, or if you're stradling that fence, how would any of this be described as madness?

      This is a petty little man, with a petty little obsession.

      I'd say it was sad, but he deserves the derision.

      Americans are dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. Wounded Americans are being neglected in our military hospitals. And some of the veterans of this war are living on the streets.

      Yet, this pathetic little weasel has the balls to call a letter he claims to posess madness.

      Hey Bill, grow the f--k up!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by monknj80 (May 08, 2007 4:23 pm ET)
           

        Worrierking "you are a great american"!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (May 08, 2007 5:21 pm ET)
           

        Worrier,

        You are, sadly, correct in your assessment of this ridiculous tantrum O'Reilly has embarked on and screeches about on endlessly.  Does he honestly think that even his listeners hang on his every word, with their flow charts handy, and connect the dots originated by the "evil far left" factions he lays out every day?

        We are a country embroiled in war, as you say, among numerous other important issues we face..........yet he chooses to highlight this on the top of his program nearly every day, it's shameful, I agree with you.

        O'Reilly has no interest in furthering any dialogue on critical problems and vital concerns for us all, he is merely positioning and posturing himself in some schoolyard vendetta against those that want to expose him for the pathetic phony he has become. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (May 08, 2007 4:22 pm ET)
         

      Why does O'Reilly choose to dwell on Soros? 

      Why is Soros the Antichrist when we have billionaires from big oil, big tobacco, big medical insurance and big pharmaceutical all flexing their financial muscle to elect Republicans and make sure that we take it in the rear at the pump, the hospital, and the pharmacy counter?

      Either O'Reilly has some really screwed up priorities, or he's got some personal issue with Soros that he's not divulging.  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by AshenShard (May 08, 2007 5:43 pm ET)
           

        It is because he is not *their* billionaire.  Same thing goes for celebrities, if they have liberal views, then its 'shut up and entertain'.  If they have conservative views, then hey, they'll be on Fox News every chance they can get them on.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (May 08, 2007 6:38 pm ET)
             

          I wonder why Toby Keith doesn't get the "musicians don't know anything about politics and should shut up" treatment from the big-foreheads at Fox.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Bjohnson (May 08, 2007 6:42 pm ET)
             

           Heck, if a celeb's one of theirs they're begging 'em to run for president, like Fred 'I played a president in a movie once' Thompson. 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (May 08, 2007 7:10 pm ET)
           

        Perhaps Billdo is doing his little bit to distract us from the unsettling prospect of Rupert Murdoch attempting to buy the Dow and WSJ?

        It's a time-honored right-wing tactic: accuse the opponent of things you're doing yourself.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (May 08, 2007 4:23 pm ET)
         

      I'm glad the burden of proof in our nation's court system is higher than Billdo's.  Look, the words are almost the same, so that means MMFA is just taking them off Kennedy's website.  That MUST be the only answer.  What else could it be?  OK, I'm getting bored with this, moving along now.....

      I think I'll appeal to Judge Judy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (May 08, 2007 4:29 pm ET)
         

      I just caught that little Freudian slip at the end.  If you listen to those other right-wing talksh...WAIT, WAIT, WAIT

      You're slipping, Mr. Independentmiddleoftheroadfairandbalancesuperobjectivejournalismguy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sfcretired (May 08, 2007 4:31 pm ET)
         

      There are thousands of people who think everything Bill O’liar says is gospel. What is really scary is that most of them may be like this lady in Arkansas who has found the reason for global warming, at least in Arkansas.

       

       

      http://www.nctexasbirds.com/images/hot_news.jpg

       

      If there are thousands more like her, then we as a country are in deep doo doo. ;-)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jaliscodiss22460 (May 08, 2007 5:11 pm ET)
           

        Amen, that's the scary part.  He still has so many followers who continue to use adjectives like "far-left" to describe those exposing him for what he is. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (May 08, 2007 6:41 pm ET)
             

          Most people who toss around terms like "far Left" are usually so far to the Right they haven't seen the Left in a loooooong time.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by jscott (May 09, 2007 8:49 am ET)
           

        Somebody, PLEASE, stop her before she breeds.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jscott (May 09, 2007 9:46 am ET)
             

          That remids me of a funny story. 

          One winter there was a huge blizzard in Knoxville.  Power was lost for several days in rural areas.  Aroud the fifth day, a lady called the power company to complain, asking why she didn't have any electricity when she just saw a car go by her house and IT'S lights were on.

          Reckon they wuz cuzzins?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by djasper2761 (May 09, 2007 10:41 am ET)
             

          Anybody ever see Barb. and Bush Sr. side by side? I am convinced little bush is the progeny of his father and grandmother. b.o. and little bush are two loads their fathers should have shot out the window. They are both Copra-phagic-hebra-phrenics (get out your latin dictionaries). I grew up in So. California but live in w. Ky. I found out why they built the bridge from Ky. to Indiana. It is so the Kentuckians could swim across in the shade. Been all over Arkansas, Tn., In., Tx., Ks., Miss., Ky., (we have the blue people in the eastern part of the state. They are blue from generations of inbreeding) Ks., Ok., And a bunch of others. I call it the grease, sugar and bleached white flour belt. High level cerebral functioning is an anomaly (sadly). This an astute observation based on years of dealing professionally with this demographic. As always, there are exceptions. b.o. was reared in NJ. Probably too much lead in the diet as an infant. bush has high functioning DOWNS syndrome. Signed: Laura...Just kidding around. These folks know I love them as I have empathy for the disabled amongst us.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (May 09, 2007 12:36 pm ET)
               

            As someone from New Jersey, I'm used to the insults by now. Yours was especially hard to take.

            If you had accused us of any of the usual offenses (crowded, corrupt, polluted, etc.) , I'd have responded, "Guilty as charged".

            But New Jersey had nothing to do with Bill O'Reilly's upbringing. He was born and raised on Long Island.

            Maybe if he had lived in Jersey, he'd be a little less thin skinned and a real tough guy, not just someone who plays one on TV.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by djasper2761 (May 09, 2007 1:12 pm ET)
                 

              OOPS, I was wrong and admit it, now I don't qualify to have my own show on faux news

              Report Abuse
      • Author by MHK (May 09, 2007 9:08 am ET)
           

        That article cannot be serious.  Do you really think that she is that special?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jscott (May 09, 2007 1:19 pm ET)
             

          Well, they can't accuse the so-called liberal media of hiding the truth anymore, can they?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jscott (May 09, 2007 1:22 pm ET)
               

            Someone should tell Ms Meskimen that the Arkansas Bureau of "The Onion" is hiring

            Report Abuse
    • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 08, 2007 4:32 pm ET)
         

      Other than the pure insanity, my favorite part was at the end of what MMFA has highlighted, a lil slip, if you will by Bill:

       O'Reilly: And most Americans have no clue. I mean, you guys are way ahead of the curve listening to this program. But turn on some of the other right-wing shows. I mean, this isn't a right-wing show, but it is perceived to be conservative-leaning because I'm a traditionalist. But you turn on some of the other political conservative shows, and you will not hear any of this. All right. And everybody in America should know what's going on.

      So, not only does he admit, via Freudian slip that he is a diehard conservative (shocker, I know), but after he tries to say he is not right-wing, he makes the same slip in the next sentence! Classic!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Slade (May 08, 2007 4:34 pm ET)
         

      I think Soros should just officially change his first name to "Billionaire".  That's what everyone on Fox calls him anyway.  Well, almost everyone.

      Thank you and have a nice day.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (May 08, 2007 4:35 pm ET)
         

      Bill. A man on a mission.

      Bill. A man obsessed.

      Bill. A man on the verge of a mental breakdown?

      Paranoia runs deep. Into your life it will creep....

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (May 08, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
           

        Stop, Jeter, what's that sound? looky, BilldO's melting down. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (May 08, 2007 5:20 pm ET)
             

          There's a man with a letter over there

          Telling me, that I've got to beware.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by UnEasyOne (May 09, 2007 1:10 am ET)
               

            Battle lines being drawn, Billo's right and all of us are wrong

            Real people takin off their blinds; getting so much resistance from small minds 

            You've got to stop... 

            Report Abuse
        • Author by neondesert (May 08, 2007 5:30 pm ET)
             

          Ahhh, that warms my heart to know that the spirit of the '60's is still alive.

          If we can all come together for the enjoyment of watching one man's mental breakdown, why can't we learn to find common ground elsewhere?

          Peace.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by monknj80 (May 08, 2007 4:35 pm ET)
         

      MMFA must truly be getting under his skin. I can almost see the same bulging vein on his forehead when he "used to" speak of Olberman. I expect one day MMFA will get him so riled up we'll see an actual nose bleed on air.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MayorPoopenmyer (May 08, 2007 4:45 pm ET)
         

      On his tv show, he lifted his ban on all things French because a conservative was elected, but he's not a conservative.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by redking75687 (May 08, 2007 4:47 pm ET)
         

      Funny, I don't consider this site or MoveOn.org to be progressive, since they support and shill for right-wing Democrats and their right-wing policies. I don't consider Ted Kennedy to be progressive, either. But then O'Reilly seems to be under that common delusion that just being a Democrat is to be automatically progressive, which we real progressives know is far from the reality. He's so full of mindless cliches, it's pathetic. He should go back to harassing his female co-workers and leave the thinking to the grown-ups.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BLR (May 09, 2007 12:52 pm ET)
           

        The general rule among the troglodytes is that anyone Left of Bush is a left-wing loony.  Sooooo I guess the rule is that the left-wing, the progressive left, the liberal left, the moderate left, the centrists, the moderate right, and the traditional conservatives are all... left wing loonies.

        So many loonies, so little representation.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (May 08, 2007 4:58 pm ET)
         

      Any word on how the saucer people and reverse vampires fit into this?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (May 08, 2007 7:31 pm ET)
           

        The saucer people are still looking for proper cups. The reverse vampires still have the reverse dwag chute under development. Both are essential for proper coordination.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 08, 2007 5:06 pm ET)
         

      This proves what I've always suspected:  Right Wing Media is controlled by the GOP.  How do I know?  These liars are masters of projection...they falsely accuse the Left of doing what they are, in fact, doing.

      Example:  Rush Limbaugh stays in the Lincoln Bedroom, suddenly becomes Republican mouthpiece.  When his boy loses, he accuses the Democrats of buying favor by letting people stay in the Lincoln Bedroom.

      The pattern is obvious. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (May 08, 2007 5:22 pm ET)
         

      Maybe O'Reilly is thinking about the way the White House "shoots" items to Fox News and Drudge Report.

      I'm not really sure.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by the crapture (May 08, 2007 5:26 pm ET)
         

      Wow, it's official...O'Reilly is (apropos) buggier than that giant mound of bat-guano from that cave they explored on the Discovery Channel's Planet Earth documentary.

       

      Falafel-boy's Soros obsession is taking the phrase "bats**t crazy" to absurd new heights  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 5:30 pm ET)
         

      I watch b.o. every nite. Have not missed one of his "shows" since 2 months before the Gore-bush election. He reminds me of joe pine from the 60's. b.o.'s "show is like a fully loaded passenger plane having a head on collision with a fully loaded passenger train. I gota see it (over and over and over again) Fortunately, the only thing that gets hurt is the truth. In spite of b.o. saying he is and independent, he is a FAAAAAAAR right wing nut job on a cool-aid IV drip feed. I think he smokes his own poop as he sure is full of it. His "facts are ersatz. Anybody with at least 2 functioning brain cells can see right thru b.o. I will listen his supercilious guteral utterances tonite as I am sure I will be entertained once again by what comes out of his mouth. I think he is a card carrying member of the flat earth society. Could someone check on that please? Where is joe pine? I am starting to believe in reencarnation as I have never seen the 2 together.  Epictetus: it is impossible to teach somebody something they think they already know. D.J.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Pithaughn (May 08, 2007 6:08 pm ET)
           

        DJ,

        How many TV sets have you destroyed so far?

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by UnEasyOne (May 09, 2007 1:15 am ET)
           

        He is a member of the flat earth society and NAMBLA.  I have incontrovertable proof in this red folder.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by NotThatGeorge (May 08, 2007 5:33 pm ET)
         

      I saw this show when it aired, and O'Reilly was out of his mind with paranoia about Media Matters.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sagra (May 08, 2007 5:35 pm ET)
         

      If you ask two people on the street what year it is and get the same answer, clearly they're in cahoots, duh.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 5:37 pm ET)
         

      b.o. a traditionalist? Sumo wrestlers don't wash their "loin" cloths as they think they will lose their power. This is a tradition. Tradition is the game of fools. To do something because others do these things turns one into a sheep. Traditionalist? how about ultra conservative? Silly b.o. is circumlocutious in his description of himself. Does b.o. not wash his "loin" cloth?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (May 08, 2007 5:44 pm ET)
         

      I don't care a whit about the schoolyard spat between O'Reilly and mmfa, but if mmfa persists in bringing up the same info on their conncection to Soros...so can I.

      mmfa has debunked nothing concerning a financial tie with Soros. Others may take their statement of denial...without evidence to support it...as fact...I don't.

      The only facts they have released are the IRS forms for 2005 relating to OSI/Tides/mmfa funding. Until I see evidence of their funding/non-funding...I will continue to believe that Soros contributes to liberal organizations...these groups contribute to mmfa....indirectly or directly.

      The mantra is the same...why is mmfa so dogged in their denial of Soros funding. They could solve the entire matter by releasing the rest of the data...similar to the OSI/Tides reports. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (May 08, 2007 6:15 pm ET)
           

        "but if mmfa persists in bringing up the same info on their conncection to Soros...so can I."

        Hear that, Media Matters? You either confess your crimes or "Wesley" will bring it up! Wesley may be working on a PowerPoint slide, so watch out!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bkboase3653 (May 08, 2007 6:34 pm ET)
           

        Speaking of being obsessed with a link betwix Soros and MMFA...Bill is that you?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 09, 2007 10:13 am ET)
           

        True to Patriot-Act form, guilty until proven innocent.

        It's O'Reilly's red-arrow flow chart vs. IRS documents. 

        The flowchart wins? 

        The burden of proof is on you, O'Reilly and the rest of the rightwing prosecution. 

        So bring it already. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian in FL (May 09, 2007 2:07 pm ET)
           

        Wesley, regardless of who you believe in the Soros funding issue, ask yourself this: Are the pieces MMFA does on Bill O'Reilly fair? Do they give what O'Reilly says in context? Do they link to the audio and/or video of what O"reilly says, so there is no issue about him being misquoted?

        I think the answer is clearly yes. They are fair in their criticisms, and they always provide a link to Bill's actual statements.

        O'Reilly's goal with all this "Soros funds them" debate is that people like yourself will just ignore whether the actual articles about O'Reilly are fair and accurate, and instead, you'll just ignore EVERYTHING on this website. He wants you to automatically dismiss Media Matters as "that Soros smear website", when they aren't "smearing" him in any way. O'Reilly has to attack the messenger, because he can't defend his own message.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 10, 2007 8:28 am ET)
           

        They absolutly have debunked his claim. Since HE made the claim the burden of proof is on HIM not MMFA. By showing he can not back up his assertion they have effectively debunked him. YOU also do not get to reverse the burden of proof. BILLY made the claim its up to BILLY to prove his claim. It is flat out a baseless assertion.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Fifthcolumnist (May 08, 2007 5:53 pm ET)
         

      For sometime I have been checking this site, MMFA and have found it to be very correct in its quotes on what people are saying.  What I find so strange about Bill O's rants against MMFA is that there are several billionaires for Bush yet, you do not hear Bill O'Ranty raging against them and their influence on www.billionairesforbush.com

      Check it out, I have pictures on my blog about this group.  Just trying to get the word out.  I really do not Fox News.  Fair and balanced my left foot.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (May 08, 2007 7:36 pm ET)
           

        Good for you. I'd like to see more info on the money people and their influence. They get little exposure they need more.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by valentinian (May 08, 2007 5:54 pm ET)
         

      I just can't believe he expects to be taken seriously after comparing Soros to Doctor Fricking Evil.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 08, 2007 6:09 pm ET)
           

        I think Bill would have an easier time proving that Soros has a tank full of sharks with freaking laser beams attached to their heads.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DiscoJohn (May 08, 2007 6:01 pm ET)
         

      Does anyone have a copy of the Kennedy press release that O'Reilly compared to MMFA press release? He kept saying that the wording is too similar, but I'm yet to actually see these documents.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by UnEasyOne (May 09, 2007 1:22 am ET)
           

        Of course not!  O'lielly asserts evidence - he doesn't produce it.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 6:21 pm ET)
         

      pithaughn, I have not destoyed any tvs. b.o. has bush-brown-ring-aroud-the-collar. His is an integral part of the Kakistocracy bush and his henchmen have created. I know dumb when I see dumb and b.o. says bush is not dumb. I believe b.o. thinks the gop can go dumber. If bush unzipped his bush costume to reveal he is a chimp, the gop would say " he is doing a great job on the terror war and b.o. would encourage America to let it serve out the remainder of its term. Cheney really is the boss anyway. I have seen bush's signature and it reminds me of hitlers. I am an artist and can see things like that. b.o. won't answer my emails so am venting here. D.J.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by flhinton9099 (May 08, 2007 6:28 pm ET)
         

      Why anyone would still watch this jackass is beyond me.  Bill-O gets more and more ridiculous everytime I see him.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 6:35 pm ET)
         

      if you can see he is getting more and more rediculous.. you are still watching. your busted!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 08, 2007 6:44 pm ET)
         

      O'Reilly is becoming more unstable almost by the day...

      It's sad to see this man become little more than a psychotic, piddling, deranged chump.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pbg (May 08, 2007 6:44 pm ET)
         

      The next time O'Reilly's on Letterman, Dave should have George Soros walk on in a Dracula cape...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluetan409379 (May 08, 2007 7:04 pm ET)
         

      So, just where does Media Matters get it's money from?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 7:07 pm ET)
           

        ann coulter

        Report Abuse
        • Author by MHK (May 09, 2007 9:45 am ET)
             

          I'm wondering when our resident crack team of investigators are going to start asking questions about what type influence their favorite propaganda channel and its owner has on our political process/media?

          The irony of BOR going on and one about evil influence Soros has on our political process / media when the man he is employed by has more influence on our country then Soros could ever dream of.  Murdoch is in the process of trying to control more of the MSM by purchasing the WSJ, yet day after day BOR and his horde of mindless zombies are going to try and vilify Soros and MMFA? 

           

           

           

           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (May 08, 2007 7:39 pm ET)
         

      Oh please. (Choke)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 8:02 pm ET)
           

        you'r right, it's sean hannity and charlie daniels. That settles that!!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (May 08, 2007 9:23 pm ET)
             

          It maybe more correct, but it didn't make me laugh like the first one did. Unless there's something I don't know about Charlie D.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by djasper2761 (May 08, 2007 10:55 pm ET)
               

            It's what I call a "FOXFACT". It's true because I said it's true and I you don't agree you hate America (does b.o. say people hate America because of the Grand Canyon or is it Yosemite?) it could not be cu...coulter because she is putting all her money in her new book. bush. THE GREATEST PRESIDENT EVER and in the future too. You need to reserve your copy today as hannity is going to give them out as stocking stuffers next xmas. Those three are great arguments for the development of a retroactive birth control pill but not such a good example of why cloning research should go forward.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by flhinton9099 (May 08, 2007 9:19 pm ET)
         

      If Soros is a much of a bogeyman that Bill-O makes him out to be, why doesn't Soros buy out Fox Noise in a hostile take-over and liquidate it's assets?  If Soros hated free speech as O'Reilly claims, this scenario would not be out of the realm of possibility.  Since the Imus contraversy, right-wingnut talking heads like O'Reilly have gotten more paranoid.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (May 08, 2007 11:27 pm ET)
         

      Bill O'Reilly is NUTZ.

      Better watch out Bill. You do realize that we have Clinton Inc., there was Murder, Inc., but now SOROS Inc. I would tread lightly Bill. That Dr. Evil can be a nasty guy. But why would anyone want to hurt you and get you off the air....we know the DEVIL that you are. My fear is that you will be replaced by Michelle Makeinitup. Coulter is a was-been(maybe a husband) and has no credibility even amongst her own kind.  Be afraid Bill, be very afraid.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mescal (May 09, 2007 3:45 am ET)
         

      Ever since the disaster (at least to the wingnuts) of the 06' elections, O'Lielly has become increasingly sullen & dyspeptic. Clearly, he felt that the American people had let him down, as they continue to do by rejecting his cheerleading for the occupation of Iraq. As his disposition has become more & more sour, his rhetoric has become more & more fascistic & intolerant. His paranoia has grown to absolutely Savage Weinerian proportions, as O'Lielly sees conspiracies everywhere.

      Did anyone else notice how hoarse his voice sounded in both the video & audio provided? Its very close to how he sounded the day after his meltdown with Geraldo. I can't help but wonder who he was screaming at this time. His staff? His family. The girl who brought him the morning's pastry that afternoon?

      MMFA justifies its existence if for no other reason than it is slowly driving O'Lielly even MORE NUTS than is his natural state. The ultimate berserker meltdown doesn't seem all that far off now. His impulse control is rapidly waning, as evidenced by his ever more frequent screaming episodes with his guests. Its only a matter of time until he actually physically assaults one of them.

      MMFA must promise us that, when that happens, they will provide complete transcripts & vidio the next day.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by fatty (May 09, 2007 6:48 am ET)
         

       As far as O'Reilly goes, This is nothing short of Madness.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by RedRightHand (May 09, 2007 9:00 am ET)
         

      Madness ...?

      THIS IS SOROS!

      ~One of Bill O'Reilly's remaining 300 braincells

      Report Abuse
    • Author by yazzawhack (May 09, 2007 11:18 am ET)
         

      Oh My!   "check out some of the other right wing shows" , hehe.    Not that this is a right wing show....oh no...

      I wonder if billo is as concerned about the daily access that the evangelical leaders have had to Bushco as he of  the insidious left wing secular progressive, antiwar billionaires, hmmm?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ChristianDemocrat (May 09, 2007 11:35 am ET)
         

      A proposal to George Soros...

      Would you please cut a check to MMFA?  It doesn't have to be much.  Even $5 will do.  However, you will make those that are certain there is a financial tie between you and MMFA very happy.

      Then the rest of us can respond "There it is.  So what?  It's a free country (supposedly)."

      Thank you.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ChristianDemocrat (May 09, 2007 11:39 am ET)
         

      But turn on some of the other right-wing shows. I mean, this isn't a right-wing show, but it is perceived to be conservative-leaning because I'm a traditionalist. - O'Reilly

      Bedeee bedee bedee bedee That's all folks! LOL

      Report Abuse
    • Author by woodymcbreairty8457 (May 09, 2007 12:22 pm ET)
         

      BILL O'REILLY IS BEYOND BEING AN EXTREMIST.

      LET'S FACE IT, I THINK BILL O'REILLY IS A NUT CASE WHO IS BECOMING DANGEROUS TO OUR COUNTRY AND OUR FREEDOMS.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by djasper2761 (May 09, 2007 1:36 pm ET)
           

        sean hannity is even worse. (I don't use caps in their names for the same reason I don't for the word maggot) These people are EVIL personified. If you performed a vivisection on b.o. and hannity Linda blair would pop out upchucking split-pea soup) I guess I am a masochiast as I can't stop watching these throw backs from the inquisition era. When I first saw hannity I was mesmerized. I said to myself: "This guy is just doing a comedy routine. Nobody could possibly believe the nonsensical jibberish eminating from his pie-hole. Or is he built upside down and that is his posterior orifice. It is reaaly hard to tell the difference. I am pretty sure his feet smell and his nose runs, so he has to be built upside down.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by yillb (May 10, 2007 1:39 pm ET)
         

      O'Liely has really done MMFA a great service here!

       How many Grannys n' Grandpa's who keep Fox on constantly, will now check the site out of curiosity (thanks to Junior setting them up with an internet account)? I think lots!

      Once (IF) they go see for themselves this evil, vast left wing site, they are liable to say, Oh, MMFA is a site that does research and exposes lies in the Media. I may just have to visit here more often. ("No slime here mam, just the facts")

       The exposure Bill O and Fox is giving MMFA is great advertisement. The work here is beyond reproach, and that fact will be obvious to many of the lazy older, (right leaning but not right wing) couch potatos that are used to being spoon fed lies without questioning them. (Like my father, who is Republican, but still has an open mind when given the facts.)

      Thanks Bill!   

       

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.