About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Blitzer asked Boehner about new Iraq timeline, but not about previous one, now expired

May 10, 2007 2:31 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

20 Comments

On the May 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer asked House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) to explain what he meant when he said on May 6, "By the time we get to September, October, members are going to want to know how well this is working," which Blitzer said was Boehner's reference "to the new strategy in trying to deal with the security situation in Baghdad and elsewhere in Iraq." But Blitzer did not ask Boehner to reconcile that statement with one -- as Media Matters for America has documented -- that Boehner made during a January appearance on CNN, in which Boehner set a different timeline regarding the war's progress, for a period of time that has already passed. On the January 23 edition of CNN Newsroom, Boehner told CNN congressional correspondent Andrea Koppel: "I think it will be rather clear in the next 60 to 90 days as to whether [Bush's] plan is going to work."

Also, during the May 9 edition of Fox News' Special Report, Fox News congressional correspondent Major Garrett reported on Boehner's May 6 statement without also noting that Boehner had laid out a timeline of just "60 to 90 days" in January. Garrett stated, "Boehner told Fox September is the time to judge the surge," and went on to air a clip of Boehner in which the congressman said: "We'll know in September how well this plan is going, whether it should continue."

As Media Matters noted, in their May 8 coverage of the Iraq war funding debate, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and the Associated Press all cited Boehner's statement that members of Congress will want to see results from Bush's troop increase by September or October, without noting his January 23 "60 to 90 days" declaration.

From the May 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: And joining us now from Capitol Hill, the top Republican in the House of Representatives, Congressman John Boehner, the minority leader. Congressman, thanks very much for joining us.

I want you to clarify what you said on Sunday. You suggested this. You said, "By the time we get to September, October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn't, what's Plan B." You're referring to the new strategy in trying to deal with the security situation in Baghdad and elsewhere in Iraq. What did you mean?

BOEHNER: Well, what I meant was is that all of our troops will be in place with the surge come the end of June. And so we'll have July, we'll have August, we'll have some idea in September how well this plan is working. We'll also have a better idea how the Iraqi government is doing in terms of the types of actions they need in order to take more control over their own destiny. And so, that's -- it's a natural time, I think, in the calendar. Members will have been home the month of August on a district work period, and when we get back in September, there's going to be a reassessment.

From the May 9 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

BOEHNER: I think the public, while they're frustrated with the war, the pace of progress in Iraq, just as I am, they don't want to lose and they don't want to just give up.

GARRETT: [Rep. Rahm] Emanuel [D-IL] minimized public discontent or the risks Democrats face on Iraq.

EMANUEL: Can we at some point politically make a mistake? That's possible. The main thing is, if we do right -- you know, I come from Chicago. Good government is good politics. If we do right by our troops, we do right by our national security interests, the politics will follow.

GARRETT: Boehner told Fox September is the time to judge the surge.

BOEHNER: We'll know in September how well this plan is going, whether it should continue.

GARRETT: Emanuel said the surge can't work if the Iraqi government doesn't do its part.

EMANUEL: This entire policy leads -- leans, rather, on the troops. Where is the political strategy?

From the 3 p.m. ET hour of the January 23 edition of CNN Newsroom:

KOPPEL: Pretty well, [anchor] Kyra [Phillips].

In his interview with CNN, Leader Boehner, for the first time, put the White House on notice, saying that the U.S. should know within the next two to three months whether or not the surge is going to work in Iraq. He also called the surge, which he supports, the last, best good chance to succeed.

[begin video clip]

BOEHNER: Well, no one is happy about how the war in Iraq is going. Clearly, the president is not happy. That's why he has offered a new strategy for securing Baghdad.

A lot of the other strategies have succeeded elsewhere around Iraq, but the problem has been in Baghdad. I think the American people want us to win in Iraq. I think the president's plan has a chance of being successful.

KOPPEL: How long can you and your membership give the president and give the Iraqi military, before you say, "You know what? You're not doing your job"?

BOEHNER: I think it will be rather clear in the next 60 to 90 days as to whether this plan is going to work. And, again, that's why we need to have close oversight, so that we just don't look up 60 or 90 days from now and realize that this plan is not working. We need to know, as we're -- we move through these benchmarks, that the Iraqis are doing what they have to do.

KOPPEL: You spent a weekend at Camp David recently, along with other Republican leaders, and had a lot of one-on-one time with President Bush to talk about Iraq. What did you tell the president?

BOEHNER: Well, I told the president and others in his administration that there's skepticism on the Hill as to whether this plan will work.

There is skepticism about whether the Iraqis really will step up and bring their military into Iraq, whether they will do the other parts of this plan that they have committed to. And that's -- the skepticism is built around the fact that so much of the plan is dependent on the Iraqis doing their part.

[end video clip]

KOPPEL: Now, an aide to Boehner told me that the leader's remarks were simply a gut feeling that he had. They were personal feelings that he had.

But, Kyra, it gives you a window when you consider the pressure that the Republican Party is under, especially Leader Boehner over here on the House side, when you consider that it comes just one day after he and some Republicans put the White House on notice that they wanted a report every 30 days on the status of what was happening in Iraq, on specific benchmarks, for the first time in writing, saying that they wanted this to come from the White House, from the Bush administration, and also one day, Kyra, after Leader Boehner said many in his party, including himself, are skeptical that this policy, that this surge is going to work -- Kyra.

PHILLIPS: All right, Andrea Koppel, sure appreciate it.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (May 10, 2007 2:42 pm ET)
         

      Before he became House Minority Leader, I had never seen his name before or heard it pronounced. I'm pretty sure the guys in high school didn't pronounce it "Bay-ner."

      But seriously folks..

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 10, 2007 2:43 pm ET)
         

      Okay, this is what I want someone in the Lapdog Press to ask:  Why isn't this an "artificial" timeline, and why doesn't it give aid and comfort to the turrists?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (May 10, 2007 2:45 pm ET)
         

      "By the time we get to September, October"

      ...or "In the next 60 to 90 days"

      ...or "The check is in the mail"

      Isn't that what folks say, when they're just stringing you along?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (May 10, 2007 2:50 pm ET)
         

      Imagine Merle Haggaard;

      If we make it through September, Everything's gonna be allright I know...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (May 10, 2007 2:51 pm ET)
         

      There is skepticism about whether the Iraqis really will step up and bring their military into Iraq,

      Um. I wasn't aware they had left. Is kuwait under attack again?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 10, 2007 3:07 pm ET)
         

      Well, if these Republicans conclude in September that the "plan" is not working, will the Flying Monkeys label them Defeat-icans?  Will they be accused of "undermining the troops?"  I guess we'll have to wait and see.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (May 10, 2007 3:33 pm ET)
           

        I don't think Bush will change his talking points, but he won't label the repubs either. Remember, many conservatives oppose Bush on his immigration policies, but the discourse goes on without name-calling by the talking heads.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Mike Mid-City (May 10, 2007 3:31 pm ET)
         

      It's a video game world...... new plan?... push reset.

      Like the easy button.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 10, 2007 3:59 pm ET)
         

      Bush announced today that he would consider "benchmarks".  Ah, so.  Here it comes.  The skunk has lifted its tail.  They're positioning themselves to blame the Democrats for "losing Iraq".  Hide and watch and....hold your nose.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (May 10, 2007 4:26 pm ET)
           

        nerzog, I believe you're failing to see the subtle difference between a "timeline for surrender" and a "timeline for Victory".

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 10, 2007 5:17 pm ET)
             

          You know....I never looked at it that way.  Since no one can really define "victory", the Bushies can declare it any time after they get the oil revenue sharing agreement in place.  Once that is secured, they can declare victory and ...poof...Ticker Tape parade!

          Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (May 10, 2007 7:04 pm ET)
         

      If nothing else, Boehner is a devoted Republican. Most of Boehner's public statements in support of the administration, though, are so transparently bullsh*t they're almost cartoonish... you get the impression that even he must not believe half of what he says. But Boehner is the kind of Republican whose private conversations I would love to listen to after he's had two or three glasses of Scotch under his belt. I'd be willing to bet that in private he blasts Bush and the damage Bush has done to the Republican Party.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (May 10, 2007 7:25 pm ET)
         

      Does anybody else think that in 2020 we will still be in Iraq hearing about the new timeline which makes Iraq the garden of Eden in six more months?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (May 10, 2007 11:32 pm ET)
           

        uh . . .  we already tried that garden thing . . . didn't work out for us . . . maybe by 2020 we could work up a more useful target, like, i dunno, maybe IRAQ?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (May 11, 2007 10:39 am ET)
           

        It depends on how long it takes Exxon and BP to suck all the oil out of the ground.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sams Computer (May 11, 2007 2:38 am ET)
         

      BoneHead, I mean Boehner is a Bushie thru and thru. He gives the "Surge" additional time to work. Then when it continues to fail he wants to go to Plan B? Plans A to Z have already failed!

      I say to Boehner, Plan B My Ass!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (May 11, 2007 8:26 pm ET)
         

      The oil is flowing; the multinational oil corps are making record profits, hundreds of billions. All is well.

      The blood is flowing. Ah, well, the cost of "freedom". 

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.