Newsweek, Kurtz uncritically repeated false fuel efficiency accusation against Obama
SUMMARY: In a recent column, Newsweek's Keith Naughton stated as fact that Sen. Barack Obama's "assertion that Japanese cars average 45mpg, when the actual mileage is closer [to] 30mpg" was a "factual gaffe," echoing the Chicago Tribune's Jim Mateja. Likewise, The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz uncritically reprinted part of a Power Line post that highlighted Mateja's claim. However, a report from the Pew Center on Global Climate Change stated that the 2002 average fleet fuel economy value in Japan was 46.3 miles per gallon when converted to the U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard.
In a "web-exclusive" May 11 column on Newsweek's website, Newsweek Midwest bureau chief Keith Naughton stated as fact that Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) "assertion that Japanese cars average 45mpg, when the actual mileage is closer [to] 30mpg" was a "factual gaffe," echoing Jim Mateja, who made a similar claim in his May 10 Chicago Tribune column. Additionally, in his May 14 Washington Post "Media Notes" column, Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz uncritically reprinted part of Power Line blogger Paul Mirengoff's May 10 weblog post that highlighted Mateja's column. As Media Matters for America and National Journal's The Hotline noted before Naughton's column was published, Mateja wrote that Obama "should [hire] a fact-checker" because Obama stated that "Japanese cars [are] now getting an average of 45 miles to the gallon." In fact, Obama's assertion was supported by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change's December 2004 "Comparison of Passenger Vehicle Fuel Economy and GHG Emission Standards Around the World," which calculated the 2002 average fleet fuel economy value in Japan was 46.3 miles per gallon when converted to the U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard.
According to the Pew Center report, its 46.3 miles per gallon calculation was based on a 2002 Japanese Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) report. The Pew report derived the 46.3 miles per gallon number from a "not normalized" number of 34.3 miles per gallon reported by JAMA. The Pew report noted that the Japanese and U.S. mileage tests "differ in terms of speed profiles, duration in seconds, acceleration and deceleration profiles (slopes of rising and declining vehicle velocity), and frequencies of starts and stops." Based on simulations, the report concluded that "to roughly convert a fuel economy rating based on the Japanese cycle to one based on the U.S. CAFE [Corporate Average Fuel Economy] cycle, one multiplies by 1.35."
Despite Media Matters' May 11 item noting the Pew report, Kurtz uncritically reprinted part of Mirengoff's May 10 post in Kurtz's May 14 online column. By the time of Kurtz's column's publication, Power Line posted an update responding to Media Matters, but the update was not noted in Kurtz's column.
Several of the bloggers who, as Media Matters noted, uncritically reported that Obama was factually wrong in making his 45 miles per gallon assertion responded to Media Matters. For example:
- In
a May 12 post, Power Line's John
Hinderaker wrote, "You can't tell from the Media Matters post
whether its author bothered to read the Pew report or not," noting
that the report stated that an improvement in Japanese regulations
"will result in an average fleet fuel economy of Japanese vehicles
of 35.5 mpg by 2010." However, the report also notes in a footnote that
"35.5 mpg" "has not converted to [the U.S.] CAFE
test cycle." Hinderaker acknowledged "that different countries
use different test procedures to measure fuel economy, and it [PEW]
devised a system to normalize those different procedures." But he
dismissed the validity of the normalization procedure for producing a
"ridiculous" result: "I haven't had time to research the
logic underlying Pew's conversion, nor do I intend to," because, he
added, "[t]he claim that the Japanese automobile fleet had an
average fuel efficiency of over 46 mpg ... is ridiculous."
Hinderaker also cited a Fortune magazine article that said that "motor vehicle fleets get ... 31 mpg in Japan," but it is unclear what standard Fortune was using. Fortune did not cite its source for the 31 miles per gallon figure. It is possible that Fortune was referring to 31mpg under the Japanese fuel efficiency test.
- In his column, Mateja quoted a Toyota spokesman as saying, "No carmaker gets 45 m.p.g. Ours is closer to 30 m.p.g." In his May 13 post on The Hillary Spot weblog at National Review Online, contributor Jim Geraghty, who originally wrote that the May 10 column was a "good catch," defended the Toyota spokesman from the "easily-agitated folks at Media Matters," writing that the spokesman was "accurately describing the miles per gallon of Toyota vehicles sold in the United States, separate from Toyota vehicles sold in Japan." However, Geraghty conceded that "Obama was accurate if his term 'Japanese cars' referred only to cars sold in Japan; while from the context that seems like a safe bet, it might have helped if he had clarified ... that he wasn't referring to Japanese cars sold in the United States."
- In his May 14 blog post, NewsBusters executive editor Matthew Sheffield repeated the claim that "Barack Obama was caught ... for incorrectly stating that Japanese cars get an average of 45 miles per gallon." Sheffield asserted that "[f]ar-left groups," presumably Media Matters and Hotline, have reported on the figures in the Pew poll. Sheffield then claimed that Pew's normalization "doesn't seem to be accurate as John Hinderaker points out," but Hinderaker did not explain why the normalization ratio was incorrect, explicitly stating: "I haven't had time to research the logic underlying Pew's conversion." Sheffield was defending his May 10 post, in which, citing Mirengoff and Mateja's column, Sheffield said that Obama made an "unforced error" and a "significant mistake."
From Obama's May 7 speech:
OBAMA: For years, while foreign competitors were investing in more fuel-efficient technology for their vehicles, American automakers were spending their time investing in bigger, faster cars. And whenever an attempt was made to raise our fuel efficiency standards, the auto companies would lobby furiously against it, spending millions to prevent the very reform that could've saved their industry. Even as they've shed thousands of jobs and billions in profits over the last few years, they've continued to reward failure with lucrative bonuses for CEOs.
The consequences of these choices are now clear. While our fuel standards haven't moved from 27.5 miles per gallon in two decades, both China and Japan have surpassed us, with Japanese cars now getting an average of 45 miles to the gallon. And as the global demand for fuel-efficient and hybrid cars have skyrocketed, it's foreign competitors who are filling the orders. Just the other week, we learned that for the first time since 1931, Toyota has surpassed General Motors as the world's best-selling automaker.
At the dawn of the Internet Age, it was famously said that there are two kinds of businesses - those that use email and those that will. Today, there are two kinds of car companies - those that mass produce fuel-efficient cars and those that will.
The American auto industry can no longer afford to be one of those that will. What's more, America can't afford it. When the auto industry accounts for one in ten American jobs, we all have a stake in saving those jobs. When our economy, our security, and the safety of our planet depend on our ability to make cleaner, more fuel-efficient cars, every American has a responsibility to make sure that happens.
Automakers still refuse to make the transition to fuel-efficient production because they say it's too expensive at a time when they're losing profits and struggling under the weight of massive health care costs.
From Naughton's May 10 "web-exclusive" Newsweek column:
[Detroit Mayor Kwame] Kilpatrick [D] is kind, though, compared to what others in Detroit are saying. "Sen. Obama embarrassed himself in Detroit with his lack of understanding of the problems facing the automobile industry, and what it will really take to fix them," the conservative-leaning Detroit News said in an editorial beside a political cartoon mocking Obama for criticizing a Detroit SUV that turns out to be a Toyota Land Cruiser.
During his speech, the auto execs in the crowd -- and there were many -- began muttering that he didn't know what he was talking about. (One factual gaffe getting a lot of traction is Obama's assertion that Japanese cars average 45mpg, when the actual mileage is closer 30mpg). "It was definitely uncomfortable," says Eric Foster, a Detroit political consultant who sat near tables full of auto execs. "The mood lightened when he took on the oil industry."
From Kurtz's May 14 online Washington Post column:
Power Line's Paul Mirengoff sees a troubling trend for Obama:
"Barack Obama is really scuffling, as baseball players used to say when they went into a tailspin . . . He got the death count in the Kansas tornado wrong by 9,988 people. Now, Jim Geraghty reports that Obama botched his facts in a speech criticizing the U.S. auto industry for 'investing in bigger and faster cars while foreign competitors invested in more fuel-efficient technology.' Obama stated that 'while our fuel standards haven't moved from 27.5 miles per gallon in two decades, both China and Japan have surpassed us, with Japanese cars now getting an average of 45 miles to the gallon.' But Toyota, which should know, has responded that 'No carmaker gets 45 m.p.g; ours is closer to 30 m.p.g.'
"Any candidate can make a mistake or two, but the most recent one in particular suggests that Obama may lack the staff support he needs to compete with the Hillary Clinton machine."

















C'mon. Anybody here think the average Japanese car gets 45 MPG? Seriously.
Hinderaker: "I haven't had time to research the logic underlying Pew's conversion, nor do I intend to," because, he added, "[t]he claim that the Japanese automobile fleet had an average fuel efficiency of over 46 mpg ... is ridiculous."
It IS ridiculous.
It might be surprising, but it's not ridiculous.
If you don't believe it, you can read the report.
I will read your report. In the meantime I did some checking and found that the TOP 5 Japanese cars average 46.3 MPG but that includes 3 hybrids. So if you limit it to the top 5 then the average is 46.3. I don't know if Obama qualified the statement like that.
Top 5 Most Fuel Efficient Japanese Cars:
The average of the top five Japanese cars get 46.2 mpg in the city and 49 mpg on the highway.
Can anyone find out what the top 5 American cars fuel economy is?
Top 5 Most Fuel Efficient American Cars:
P.S. Even our hybrids only get 36 MPG.....sheesh
GO figure. My biggest beef is that the technology is there to do it and still make cars that people want. I truly believe the American auto industry is killing itself if not already a walking corpse.
However, Geraghty conceded that "Obama was accurate if his term 'Japanese cars' referred only to cars sold in Japan; while from the context that seems like a safe bet, it might have helped if he had clarified ... that he wasn't referring to Japanese cars sold in the United States."
To imply that Obama was referring to Toyotas manufactured and driven in Japan, instead of those directly competing with US carmakers for US drivers, is pure spin.
But if this is Obama's biggest "gaffe", who cares.
why is it spin, since he mentions china and japan in the same sentence? i don't think there are a lot of chinese cars sold in the u.s.
First sentence of the quote in MMfA's article mentions "foreign competitors." He's not talking about what cars the Upper Mongolian Car Company is making for Upper Mongolians to drive, he's talking about those cars that compete with Detroit automakers.
It's ok to say "Doh" and move on. Seriously. This is not an election issue.
he also talks about "global demand" for those hybrids being filled by those foreign competitors. he said "japanese cars now getting an average of 45 miles to the gallon". that sounds more like he's talking about cars produced in japan and sold on the world market, while we're pounding sand. he didn't make any "gaffe".
Well, if we're talking about the world market, then why did he quote Japanese-only fuel economy standards?
he quoted theirs and ours, and he's saying "global demand" is on the side of their cars. how is this unclear to you?
Nothing you wrote was unclear or I disagree with..but what you wrote is not what the article is about. The article is about Barack saying a Camry gets 45mpg over here (paraphrasing). Go to the Toyota dealership after work and find a non-hybrid Toyota that gets that.
yeah, "paraphrasing". because he did not say anything like that. he said "japanese cars", period. last time i checked, cars produced in japan by japanese manufacturers would qualify as japanese. especially when he contrasted the demand for their cars to ours.
Then, Japanese cars PERIOD would include those competing on the US market and the world market, both of which have different standards than Japan.
the japanese cars manufactured in japan are clearly what he was talking about, since he was quoting their mileage standards. you're creating the spin.
Dex, you are not allowed to have that type of opinion with mefirst, you will be attacked and labeled and smeared. Remember you must conform.
I see your point on Obama , but it seems a more play on words. Bottom line is that American cars are very far behind Japan and the world in this category and this goes back to the Bush administrations disregard for increasing the health of our enviornment.
give me a frickin break. why is it you always show up to defend these right wingers. show me exactly where i smeared him.
I agree Doris. I did my best to note in my earlier posts that I thought the "gaffe" was no big deal. Toyota is killing detroit, regardless of whether it's by the slaughter rule or not.
except i didn't see it as a "gaffe", but an accurate statement. so you're still spinning.
So Toyota disputing that claim means nothing to you?
what did they dispute? i'm not arguing that their mileage standards here are the same as in japan.
They clearly disputed the 45 mpg figure.
'No carmaker gets 45 m.p.g; ours is closer to 30 m.p.g.'
read on. "...contributer jim geraghty defended the toyota spokesman....writing that the spokesman was accurately describing the mpg of toyota vehicles sold in the u.s., separate from toyota vehicles sold in japan."
So why would Obama be talking about what MPG Japanese cars get outside the USA? Do we care about that or something?
I guess you can interpret it that way but if I were listening I would assume he meant a car I actually had an option to buy.
are you bothering to read the thread here? he was talking about "global demand" and the fact that toyota is now the no. 1 automaker in the world. and the fact that our companies have refused to pay attention to mileage standards and are suffering the consequences. why should we care? it's a four letter word. j o b s. if you can't read what he plainly said, i can't force you to see it.
Okay, I see your point on this one, thanks for clarifying.
and thank you.
Drive a Corolla a couple of years back on an 800 mile trip, here in the open, hilly NW, freeway speeds of 75 mph. Averaged a hair over 42 mpg. Could have crowded the 45 mpg mark if I had been more interested in mileage than in making time on the trip. Would own a Toyota in a minute, except I can't stand the local dealer and the next nearest is a couple of hundred miles away.
Crazy nitpicking to pick on Obama for this "gaffe." I'm sure he will utter something in the future that will be more newsworthy.
But if this is Obama's biggest "gaffe", who cares.
No, Obama's claim that 10,000 people died in Kansas due to the Greensburg storm is a much bigger gaffe, but, interestingly, it also involves arithmetic.
Why are cars manufactured and sold in the US called 'Japanese' cars (like the Toyota plant here in the CA Bay Area), while cars manufactured in Mexico or everywhere BUT the US are labeled 'American' cars? Since money knows no national boundaries, its about where the jobs are, not the corporate profits.
And does ANYONE really believe the Big 3 in Detroit (or is that Germany?) when they open their mouths about anything related to fuel efficiency?
This is bullcrap! There was no gaffe made, only the high-pitched sound of the spin against Obama. Clearly American automakers are losing ground against foreign competition because they can't deal with reality! With the price of oil (in this country at least) going up, fuel effcient cars are the way to go.
This is going to be just like the 1970s all over again. By this I mean prices shot up, people wanted cars with better gas milage, and companies like Toyota got a foothold into this countries car market, keeping it ever since.
Anyone notice how the far righters like to change the subject. The original topic was increasing fuel milage, which turned into a story about Sen Obama.
George will also fix this problem. He will insist that the CAFE numbers be increased by 30%. Not the actual milage just the numbers on the cars stickers.