About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fineman "can't blame" McCain for angry outbursts because "his courage forever is being tested by his bad luck"

May 25, 2007 2:56 pm ET

33 Comments

In his May 23 online column, "The Upside of Anger," Newsweek chief political correspondent Howard Fineman wrote that he "can't blame" Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for his propensity toward angry outbursts because "his courage forever is being tested by his bad luck." Fineman lauded the 24-year Capitol Hill veteran as an "outsider" and furthered the baseless media narrative that McCain is a different type of candidate, writing that McCain "seems uncomfortable" pandering or "overcompensates by being too enthusiastic."

Fineman also wrote, "The war, of course, has been disastrously run, which isn't [McCain's] fault" -- even though McCain voted in 2002 to give President Bush the authorization to begin the Iraq war and has had oversight responsibilities as a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee for the entire four-plus years of the conflict. As Media Matters for America has noted, The Hill reported in April 2006 that McCain deferred to Bush by not recommending that then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld resign, stating instead that the decision on removing Rumsfeld was Bush's alone.

Fineman's column included two examples of McCain's "courage": his continuing support for the Iraq war and for immigration reform. But in both cases, Fineman himself observed that McCain may simply be stuck with unpopular positions he's taken publicly. On the war, Fineman noted, "Having come this far with Bush, it would be difficult for him to withdraw from the role ... of cheerleader in chief for the president's policy in Iraq." Fineman also wrote: "It's the same story with immigration reform. He has devoted years to it. ... Maybe he has no choice but to stick with it."

Fineman is not the first Newsweek staffer to attempt to portray McCain's campaign stumbles as virtues. As Media Matters noted, Newsweek assistant managing editor Evan Thomas wrote a May 14 cover story about McCain's "profile in courage," noting that McCain "is not the front runner in fundraising." His explanation for McCain's poor showing was that McCain "is not, at heart, a politician. He is a warrior."

From Fineman's May 23 Newsweek column:

In other words, Romney was a pampered phony. It was funny, in a biting way, the McCain we reporters came to know and love: Popeye McCain busting Dudley Do-Right with a tattooed fist.

The Romneyans didn't find it amusing. Said one at the top of the command structure (who should have had the guts to attach his name to his comments): "That's what happens to a guy of McCain's age when he doesn't take his Metamucil. I don't think he is the kind of angry fellow we want to let alone with the nuclear arsenal."

[...]

McCain has lived this movie before, which is why he is angry, and I can't blame him. His courage forever is being tested by his bad luck.

[...]

McCain rarely mentions that he, too, is a Son Of: third-generation Annapolis grad and namesake of admirals. But he is entitled to feel like an outsider. Six years in a POW camp during Vietnam gives you that right. His rise has been pretty much self-propelled.

At 70, he feels that this should be his time. He has valid reasons for thinking so. He waited his turn in the traditional Republican fashion. We are in the midst of a slow-motion war, and McCain is a warrior. He knows the world, its dangers and wonders; he knows the military, its powers and its limitations. He knows Washington. He has a big campaign organization, and substantive knowledge of most every issue.

He deserves credit for courage, too. Yes, he has pandered to the Bush crowd and religious conservatives (though he seems uncomfortable doing it, or overcompensates by being too enthusiastic, and all in all looks like he is following a dance-step chart).

Having come this far with Bush, it would be difficult for him to withdraw from the role that Tony Blair has now abandoned -- that of cheerleader in chief for the president's policy in Iraq.

Still, there is courage. His support for the Bush war policy exceeds what is politically necessary; even in the world of the GOP primaries, it is risky at this point. This is a course he genuinely believes in, and will pursue even if it costs him, which it well might. It's the same story with immigration reform. He has devoted years to it. The compromise he has worked on for years, and helped to fashion recently, is unpopular on all sides. Maybe he has no choice but to stick with it. But he is.

Now to the luck. The war, of course, has been disastrously run, which isn't his fault. Romney, who is moving up in Iowa and New Hampshire -- indeed, he is functionally the front runner in the "early" states -- can dip into his vast fortune if circumstances require. McCain's most prominent evangelical supporter, the Rev. Jerry Falwell, died last week. McCain fell behind in early fund-raising, and now has to catch up -- and miss vote after vote in the Senate. A friend and ally, Fred Dalton Thompson, is waiting in the wings for McCain to falter, and may well soon join the race.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (May 25, 2007 3:02 pm ET)
         

      Read the entire column, this is a very fair piece on McCain, as Fineman sees it. It's place here as some misinformative cheerleading rant for McCain is misplaced.  Really.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (May 25, 2007 3:15 pm ET)
           

        i've read more than a few of mccain's "angry" outbursts and i never thought he was entitled to them because of his "bad luck".  they were just arrogant.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (May 25, 2007 3:18 pm ET)
             

          I would agree with you on that particular point, I disagree with Fineman there.......but the piece overall is really not pro McCain, it's more nuanced than that.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (May 25, 2007 3:26 pm ET)
               

            it's "not pro mccain"?  when he says that mccain has a right to be angry?  i don't think he has a right to throw temper tantrums.  nor do i think mccain "knows the world". 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (May 25, 2007 3:51 pm ET)
                 

              And lets remember how the press chastised Dean for HIS anger

              Report Abuse
              • Author by bittermarv (May 25, 2007 4:02 pm ET)
                   

                I think that's the key point here.  Everyone has a right to be angry.  You also have a right to be enthusiastic about doing well in a primary and to try and fire up your troops.

                Unless you're a Democrat.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (May 25, 2007 4:54 pm ET)
                     

                  (sniff, sniff).......these poor (sniff, sniff) Democrats.  I can hardly (sniff, sniff) control my sympathy for them.

                  (sniff, sniff)

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bingvangorden (May 25, 2007 5:03 pm ET)
                       

                    Thanks for the sarcasm Tommy. But you can't deny that Democratic out bursts are construed very differently in the press as compared to Republicans. If Hillary speaks like McCain she's a b*tch and he's a maverick who speaks his mind. Republicans are allowed to be angry, encouraged to be, and are not belittled like Democrats are on the news shows.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (May 25, 2007 5:11 pm ET)
                         

                      "in the press".....oh come on, the press is too liberal, the press is too conservative, the press is left, the press is right, blah blah blah.

                      These blanket generalizations are not worth the keyboard they're typed on.......by and large, in their totality, they all get treated like crap, and they all get a pass.  It's not as monolithic as the media bias proponents would like to believe, from any side.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mefirst (May 25, 2007 5:43 pm ET)
                           

                        wasn't the dean scream treated differently than, for instance, the many gaffes and outright lies of bush?

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by bittermarv (May 25, 2007 8:57 pm ET)
                           

                        I was referring to Dean.  I thought anyone with any knowledge of politics would get that.  Instead of getting that (because I know Tommy knows better) Tommy chose to act like a dick.

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by solon (May 28, 2007 11:48 am ET)
                           

                        I have been saying for two years that the left/right frame is too simplistic to explain the press. What they DO however is make up a storyline and go with it no matter the facts. The storyline they are using right now means McCain gets a pass for what they pilloried Dean for. It deserves criticism and exposure.

                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (May 28, 2007 11:45 am ET)
                       

                    What you absolutly CANNOT control is your ZEAL for the double standard for the way the press treats Dems and the GOP.  McCain angry he has a right, bad luck and all tommy says its all fair. Dean gets pilloried for being angry for like two years tommy agrees wholeheartedly and makes a lame joke about the dichotomy. You know you are a hypocrite, right tommy?

                    Report Abuse
          • Author by bingvangorden (May 25, 2007 5:00 pm ET)
               

            True it's not pro McCain per se. Bu t I get from MMfA that their beef is with Fineman claiming his opinions are a result of bad luck vs. bad opinions.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (May 25, 2007 3:20 pm ET)
         

      "I don't think he is the kind of angry fellow we want to let alone with the nuclear arsenal."

       

      Let's see...

      We had an incompetent President invade a sovereign nation that posed no imminent threat to the US and has resulted in plunging us into the middle of a Civil War.

      What do you suppose an angry President McCain and his trigger temper might do? 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mr. l (May 25, 2007 3:21 pm ET)
         

      Yeah- his 'bad luck' is siding with Bush and co. on every issue for the last seven years...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by clumberfeet (May 25, 2007 3:34 pm ET)
         

      Bad luck follows McCain from the USS Forrestal to being shot down in Vietnam to the Hanoi Hilton like a slime trail.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (May 25, 2007 3:44 pm ET)
           

        Quite a stretch- The mess in Iraq is just "bad luck" specifically for McCain.

        I realize nobody suffers like Bush, and all of us sacrifice by watching the war on TV, but I'm a little concerned about a candidate who's going to use the mismanagement of the invasion of Iraq as an excuse to lose control of himself.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by redking75687 (May 27, 2007 10:44 am ET)
           

        He's a Jonah. Like the Hope Diamond. We need to ditch both.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by daganium4595 (May 25, 2007 3:48 pm ET)
         

      After McCain was  dismantled by John Stewart on The Daily Show, I thought McCain would get the message & drop this running for president foolishness.

      But I should have known the MSM would eventually come to McCain's rescue.

      McCain, objectively speaking, is a sad figure.  How ironic a comedian exposed that while a "serious" reporter like Fineman tells us McCain is a sad figure simply because bad luck has made him appear that way.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (May 25, 2007 4:04 pm ET)
           

        Much like Dole, McCain thinks it's finally his turn.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Pithaughn (May 25, 2007 3:52 pm ET)
         

      "The war, of course, has been disastrously run, which isn't [McCain's] fault" The endless obsession with who to blame. Get over it, let's start to work on ending it!! After US invasion forces have withdrawn from countries where they don't belong, then, historians and investigative journalists can place the blame. Maybe a few dozen indictments for the truly guilty. There is no time to mess around now, this invasion is dragging this country and the whole mideast towards WW III . It's clear the factions in the mid east will never be able to co-operate on a scale that would seriously challenge the military power of the US and NATO. Get US forces out of the way and force Israel, Syria, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia to police their own neighborhood.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (May 25, 2007 4:05 pm ET)
           

        The endless obsession with who to blame. Get over it,

        No. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (May 25, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
           

        Let's get to work on ending it! That's rich! You can't fix something if you can't get the decision makers to acknowledge how badly they screw up. It's amazing. You'll blame Clinton for anything and he's been out of office for 6 years yet you want us to just gloss over what Bush has done. There is an intelligence estimate coming out from the Senate soon that confirms what we complainers have been saying all along. Bush was well aware that invading Iraq would embolden our enemies. At least show some humility, admit you have been in error in believing chimpy and learn from your gullible mistakes. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by redking75687 (May 27, 2007 10:46 am ET)
           

        But Israel wants us there. We're on Crusade for Jerusalem, remember?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (May 25, 2007 4:39 pm ET)
         

      For the most part I like Howard Fineman. But this narrative of John McCain being some kind of poor guy with bad luck is getting tiresome. Grumpy McCain has created his own bad luck in the last 6 years by pandering and abandoning any real principles he once had. His ambition to be president has ruined him IMO. He is a sad figure, not becasue he's holding unpopular positions or because of bad luck. He's sad because he is a ghost of the man he used to be. I wish these news people would stop living in the past when McCain maybe once was a righteous guy with principles and straight talk. 

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (May 25, 2007 4:48 pm ET)
         

      There once was a principled man

      On torture, he'd like a ban

      He used to talk straight

      But he's taken the bait

      He now panders to the far right fans

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (May 25, 2007 5:10 pm ET)
           

        ooh I love it! Political poetry!

        Good Stuff.

        ;^} 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by peghen1428 (May 25, 2007 6:43 pm ET)
           

        Great Poetry, I hope you stick to your regular job.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (May 25, 2007 7:14 pm ET)
             

          Ah, you're just sore about that limerick I wrote about you a few weeks back when you had proverbial egg on your face.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (May 25, 2007 11:01 pm ET)
         

      On May 18th, 2007 McCain cursed a fellow Senator. "During a meeting Thursday on immigration legislation, McCain and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) got into a shouting match when Cornyn started voicing concerns about the number of judicial appeals that illegal immigrants could receive, according to multiple sources -- both Democrats and Republicans -- who heard firsthand accounts of the exchange from lawmakers who were in the room. 'F*** you! I know more about this than anyone else in the room.'" [74] Academic commentator Paul Levinson pointed out that this outburst came after McCain voted to increase fines for indecency over the broadcast airwaves, for infractions which include cursing not as strong as the words McCain used for a fellow senator. McCain was also a sponsor of the Broadcast Decency Act in 2005, which raised FCC fines for infractions from $32,500 to $325,000.

      [link to en.wikipedia.org] [link to www.paullevinson.net]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by drkoelper (May 25, 2007 11:19 pm ET)
         

      Reading and listening to Howard Fineman nowadays makes my stomach queasy. He's a smart guy, but in this case he's clearly too chummy with his subject, which leads one to question his objectivity. Regardless, he serves as an example of why major media should rotate their D.C. press corps.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (May 25, 2007 11:46 pm ET)
           

        Yes, these guys should be changed like diapers. And for the same reason. I'm channeling someone.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Newsweek
    Newsweek
    Newsweek
    251 W. 57th St.
    New York, NY 10019