Media advanced McCain's false "flak" attack on Obama
Numerous media figures and news outlets uncritically reported or advanced Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) recent jab at Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) for spelling "flack jacket" with a "c" in "flack," including: NBC News Washington bureau chief Tim Russert, ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper, Newsweek senior White House correspondent Richard Wolffe, MSNBC host Tucker Carlson, Fox News chief political correspondent Carl Cameron, the Associated Press, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and New York Daily News. However, as Media Matters for America noted, "flack jacket," as Obama's release spelled it, appears on dozens of official military websites.
In a May 25 press release, responding in part to McCain's criticism of his recent Iraq war vote, Obama asserted that "the course we are on in Iraq" is not "working." Obama said "a reflection of that [is] the fact that Senator McCain required a flack jacket" and other military protection when walking through a Baghdad market during a trip to Iraq in April. In his response that same day, McCain took issue with Obama's spelling: "By the way, Senator Obama, it's a 'flak' jacket, not a 'flack' jacket."
As Media Matters noted, MSNBC congressional correspondent Mike Viqueira subsequently reported that "flack" is an "alternative to the spelling of 'flak,' " citing Webster's New World Dictionary. In addition to Viqueira, on the May 25 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN congressional correspondent Dana Bash also reported that the term "apparently can be spelled both ways."
Indeed, Media Matters compiled numerous examples of military websites using the same spelling as Obama. Furthermore, on November 19, 2004, McCain himself entered email messages into the Congressional Record in which former Secretary of the Air Force James G. Roche wrote: "I refuse to wear my flack jacket backwards!" While McCain offered numerous emendations and clarifications to the text of the email, he gave no indication that he thought "flack" was misspelled.
Following are media figures or news outlets that uncritically repeated or agreed with McCain's attack on Obama's spelling:
- A May 25 AP article reported that McCain "went as far as to correct Obama's spelling of flak jacket," suggesting that Obama's spelling was indeed incorrect.
-
On the May 25 edition of MSNBC's Tucker, less than two hours after Viqueira's report on the
2 p.m. ET hour of MSNBC Live, Carlson uncritically quoted McCain's
assertion that
Obama had misspelled "flak" and called Obama a
"greenhorn" because of
it. On-screen
graphics accompanying the
segment featured
a "[sic]" beside the word "flack":


Discussing the dispute with Carlson, Wolffe also suggested that Obama's spelling was incorrect: "That thudding sound that you hear is the rear end of a PR guy in the Obama campaign getting a kick by the candidate for not checking the spelling." - On the May 25 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume,
Cameron described
"flack jacket" as a "rookie misspelling." As Media Matters documented, media
figures have repeatedly used the
term "rookie" to describe Obama.
- On the May 25 edition of
ABC's World News with Charlie
Gibson, Tapper uncritically repeated McCain's charge,
saying that "McCain, a Navy veteran, responded that Obama had
misspelled the word 'flak.' "
- On the May 26 edition of NBC's Saturday Today, NBC News congressional correspondent Chip Reid,
like Viquiera and Bash, noted after checking "the dictionary"
that "either spelling is acceptable." Anchor Lisa Daniels
added, "Glad
we settled that." However, on the May 27 edition of NBC's Sunday Today, Russert asserted that Obama "misspelled the word flak," adding that "McCain seized on that, suggesting that Senator
Obama doesn't have the necessary experience in military and security
affairs."
- A May 26 New York Daily News article
uncritically repeated
McCain's charge and, like the on-screen graphics on Tucker, placed a "[sic]" beside Obama's
"flack."
- A May 26 Los Angeles Times article
uncritically repeated McCain's press release, calling it "a
slap at Obama's experience and his grasp of military terminology."
- A May 26 Washington Post article
uncritically reported McCain's charge, calling it
"McCain's kicker."
- A May 26 New York Times article reported that, following Obama's press release, "Mr. McCain did not leave that alone," and then uncritically repeated McCain's attack on Obama's spelling.
From the May 25 Associated Press article:
Hours after the Senate vote, Democrats and Republicans unleashed critical, increasingly personal statements challenging their rivals rhetoric certain to appeal to each party's core voters. McCain even went as far as to correct Obama's spelling of flak jacket.
Obama defended his vote as one for a new Iraq policy for the country and U.S. troops.
From the May 25 edition of MSNBC's Tucker:
CARLSON: What do you make of the pretty amusing argument between John McCain and Barack Obama? Bara -- John McCain issues a press release after yesterday's vote on the Iraq war funding bill, saying that "Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton voted against funding for the troops. This is the equivalent of waiving a white flag in the face of Al Qaeda."
Barack Obama comes back and issues a press release saying, "Well, that's funny, John McCain. You required, you know, two armored personnel carriers, and, you know, a regiment of the U.S. Army and a flak jacket to walk through the market downtown Baghdad." That's about the worst.
McCain comes back and says, "After two years in the United States Senate, Barack Obama, you -- I guess-- have earned the right to cast this vote. But, by the way, 'flak jacket'" is spelled F-L-A-K, not F-L-A-C-K. You can't even spell 'flack jacket' right." You Greenhorn!
WOLFFE: Right.
CARLSON: Who wins?
WOLFFE: I love it. Who wins? The American people win.
CARLSON: No, come on.
WOLFFE: Who wins? It's fabulous that these two guys are mixing it up. Obviously, they have their own problems in their primaries. The fact that they're engaging with each other when they haven't gotten through the primaries. That thudding sound that you hear is the rear end of a PR guy in the Obama campaign getting a kick by the candidate for not checking the spelling.
PETER FENN (Democratic strategist): Tucker --
WOLFFE: You know, it's entertaining. It's entertaining, but both of these guys -- look, on balance, the picture of McCain walking through that market was just terrible.
CARLSON: It was. It was true.
WOLFFE: And pictures speak much louder than these press releases.
FENN: Tucker --
CARLSON: They do, and yet hold on, wait, Peter --
FENN: I was going to ask one question. You asked the question wrong, Tucker. It's "Who gets the most flack?" That was the way you --
CARLSON: The best guys -- very good! The flack who wrote the press release, I suspect. I was most -
FENN: Sorry. I had to get to get that in.
From the May 25 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:
OBAMA [video clip]: Governor [Mitt] Romney [R-MA] and Senator McCain clearly believe that the course that we're on in Iraq is working. I do not. And if there was ever a reflection of that, it's the fact that Sen. McCain required a flack jacket, 10 armored Humvees, two Apache attack helicopters, 100 soldiers with rifles by his side so he could stroll through the market in Baghdad just a few weeks ago for a photo-op.
CAMERON: Before Obama voiced that, his campaign released it on paper with a rookie misspelling. McCain wrote back, "By the way, Senator Obama. It's a 'flak' jacket, not a 'flack' jacket" with a "c."
From the May 25 edition of ABC's World News with Charlie Gibson:
TAPPER: In fact, things got personal between Senators McCain and Obama. In a blistering series of press releases, they took each other on. Obama said if there was ever a reflection of the fact that the policy in Iraq had failed, it's that McCain needed a flack jacket and troops in order to walk safely through a Baghdad market. McCain, a Navy veteran, responded that Obama had misspelled the word "flak." Charlie?
CHARLES GIBSON (anchor): Indeed, there was a lot of sniping going on on Capitol Hill. And that takes us to our chief Washington correspondent, George Stephanopoulos, who joins me tonight. Because, George, this sniping really did get bitter today on the Democratic side and on the Republican.
From the May 26 New York Daily News:
Obama shot back in a written statement, dredging up McCain's most embarrassing recent moment to say the Arizona senator is mistaken to believe the war is working.
"If there ever was a reflection of that, it's the fact that Sen. McCain required a flack [sic] jacket, 10 armored Humvees, two Apache attack helicopters, and 100 soldiers with rifles by his side to stroll through a market in Baghdad just a few weeks ago," Obama said.
An hour later, McCain hit back, calling Obama a whippersnapper.
Obama's "two years in the U.S. Senate certainly entitle him to vote against funding our troops," McCain said, but cited his own service and Vietnam experience.
"By the way, Sen. Obama, it's a 'flak' jacket, not a 'flack' jacket," McCain added.
An unnamed McCain aide piled on, telling the Politico Web site that "Obama wouldn't know the difference between an RPG and a bong."
From the May 26 Los Angeles Times:
"And if there ever was a reflection of that," he added, "it's the fact that Sen. McCain required a flack jacket, 10 armored Humvees, two Apache attack helicopters, and 100 soldiers with rifles by his side to stroll through a market in Baghdad just a few weeks ago."
McCain responded with a slap at Obama's experience and his grasp of military terminology. "While Sen. Obama's two years in the U.S. Senate certainly entitle him to vote against funding our troops, my service and experience combined with conversations with military leaders on the ground in Iraq lead me to believe that we must give this new strategy a chance to succeed, because the consequences of failure would be catastrophic to our nation's security," McCain said.
"By the way, Sen. Obama, it's a 'flak' jacket, not a 'flack' jacket," McCain added.
From the May 26 Washington Post:
McCain and Obama have a history of prickly relations. In February 2006, McCain wrote Obama a withering letter, oozing with sarcasm, that accused him of "self-interested partisan posturing" on the issue of Senate ethics reform.
Shortly after Obama's blast yesterday, McCain upped the ante. "While Senator Obama's two years in the U.S. Senate certainly entitle him to vote against funding our troops, my service and experience combined with conversations with military leaders on the ground in Iraq lead me to believe that we must give this new strategy a chance."
The McCain kicker: "By the way, Senator Obama, it's a 'flak' jacket, not a 'flack' jacket."
From the May 26 New York Times:
"And if there ever was a reflection of that," Mr. Obama continued, "it's the fact that Senator McCain required a flack jacket, 10 armored Humvees, 2 Apache attack helicopters and 100 soldiers with rifles by his side to stroll through a market in Baghdad just a few weeks ago."
Mr. McCain did not leave that alone. "By the way, Senator Obama," he said in a statement, "it's a 'flak' jacket, not a 'flack' jacket."
From the May 26 edition of NBC's Saturday Today:
REID: During a speech in Chicago, Obama returned fire.
OBAMA [video clip]: That's our message to John McCain, that's our message to Mitt Romney. It is time to bring this war to a close.
REID: The war of words between McCain and Obama became a bit petty at one point. Obama put out a press release critical of McCain in which he used the expression "flack jacket." Well, McCain, who has a bit of a temper, fired off a spelling correction. He said quote, "By the way, Senator Obama, it's F-L-A-K jacket, not F-L-A-C-K jacket." Well, we checked the dictionary, and either spelling is acceptable. Chip Reid, NBC News, the Capitol.
DANIELS: Glad we settled that.
From the May 27 edition of NBC's Sunday Today:
LESTER HOLT (host): And I want to get your take on the spat between Senator McCain and Senator Obama. They had a series of press releases over the war -- war funding votes. What's the backstory there?
RUSSERT: Well, Senator McCain and Senator Obama have mixed it up before on campaign finance reform. Clearly, Senator McCain sees it within his interests, within his Republican base, to be outspoken against Democratic candidates like Senator Clinton, Senator Obama, who voted against authorization. He seized on one word. Senator Obama talked about Senator McCain going to an Iraqi marketplace warring a flak jacket and surrounded and protected by American troops, but misspelled the word flak. And Senator McCain seized on that, suggesting that Senator Obama doesn't have the necessary experience in military and security affairs.















Leave it to Russert...
to have his head up his butt.
Big Bad McCain, desperately feeling about for his cojones. LOL.
News flash for you, sir: the Christian Right has them nestled firmly in their hot little hands, and they aren't letting go.
These dumb @$$ cons can't even spell potato. After Quayle proved he wasn't smarter than a fifth grader, you'd think they'd try to keep their ignorance under wraps.
"These dumb @$$ cons can't even spell potato. After Quayle proved he wasn't smarter than a fifth grader, you'd think they'd try to keep their ignorance under wraps."
Actually, Quayle got the spelling of potato from a flash card the teacher had made. His main mistake was assuming that government school teachers are competent.
So then its the Governments fault that a full grown man with a college degree can't spell potato. Did the card spell it as a plural you know potatoes? Was it really their screwup? Even if it were how does that change the FACT he didnt know how to spell the word? Good try at obfuscation I give it a six on the logic scale a ZERO
McCain is going after that all-important "good speller" voting bloc, which leaves out the vast majority of rightwing pundits and bloggers.
I know for a fact this latest attack by McCain on Obama has earned him the vote of a geek named "Herman" in New Jersey, who previously favored Obama ... a single issue voter, Herman.
Way to go, John!
All this fuss over "flack" vs. "flak", either ways is OK, fine......but it brings to mind the ire raised over the terms "Democrat" and "Democratic", where either way was certainly not fine.
Well Tommy, its less about the word itself (flack/flak).
Its more about McCain dodging the question by bringing up this cr@p.
So instead of answering the question he attacks, over spelling.
You say that as if you're confused about why "flack" can be spelled either way but "Democratic Party" cannot. There is no such thing as the "Democrat Party." However, there are two ways to spell "flak jacket."
Your comment is akin to saying, "If there are two accepted spellings for the word color, then why does everybody make a fuss when I spell dog wrong?"
False equivalence. Flack and flak are always alternatives. Either is an alternative spelling for the EXACT SAME THING. Using Democrat as an adjective is WRONG gramatically and done for a specific reason. Pretend all you want it isnt a petty slam at Dems no one is fooled.
Solon,
The analogy didn't go to their equivalence, but rather to their sensibilities......it may not be appropriately comparable to you, but it was just an observation on my part.
I am not surprised that some got all huffy over it, but considering you're far more intelligent than they are, I am a little surprised you didn't get it........but I still love ya anyway.
Didn't get it? What's to get? If you actually have a point, then come out with it, because I don't think anyone "got it." And incidentally, I didn't get "huffy" about it, but it does give me a nostaligic thrill to see you trot out the old "huffy" accusations. And the tried and untrue swipe at my intellignece was just an added bonus. Now if you have a point, make it, or stop with the empty insults.
I've been stroked. Flack, flak. Both correct. Democrat Party INCORRECT. McCain tried to take Obama to task for a spelling that WAS CORRECT. Using Democrat party isnt. You have no point. Clams wasnt huffy he was right
Any American going to vote for a MUSLIM????
Considering that some already did - for Keith Ellison in congress and further considering Sen. Obama is a christian... ummm never mind.
inapart,
Whom are you referring to here? Certainly not Obama I hope.
He's not a Muslim.
Well Americans in a district in Minnesota not only voted for one but ELECTED one so I guess the answer is yes. What that question has to do with, well, virtually ANYTHING is the mystery here.
I'm sure a lot more people would vote for a Muslim than would vote for an ignorant, pin-headed dunce like you.
This is a great example of our lazy media. Even after an explanation has been provided, some just continue repeating inaccurate information. Makes one wonder IF we the public are more well versed on the news than they are.
The real story here should have been what a petty man McCain was to attack the spelling in the first place & to try and use it as some sort of evidence that Obama must be lacking as some sort of "greenhorn".
Anyone know IF anyone in the media has brought to McCain's attention the fact that Flak/Flack can be spelled either way? Probably not.
This is such a nothing issue, but if the media can't get THIS correct, we shouldn't be surprised they have flubbed their reporting of the news for decades.
"This is a great example of our lazy media. Even after an explanation has been provided, some just continue repeating inaccurate information." - Jeter2
Sorry, Jeter, but I just can't go along with you on this one. While there ARE countless examples of journalists & media talking heads who make errors that CAN be attributed to their laziness, this is one of those cases where that explanation just doesn't make sense. When someone has been corrected REPEATEDLY for spreading false information but continues to spread it, a more logical conclusion is that, rather than laziness, what they're demonstrating id PARTISANSHIP. This misinformation is, in truth, DISINFORMATION. It is done in order to receive the public & to distort their perceptions about certain individuals & certain concepts.
It's remarkably like the false stories about Al Gore on the 2000 election, & the Republican meme that he was pompous & a "serial distorter". They were promoted & advanced through the MSM as a means of ridiculing Gore... & thereby giving relative stature to Dubya' that he certainly had not earned. The same "lazy" misinformation was circulated about Kerry's war record on 04'. I think you would be hard pressed to find any similar "lazy" distortions being made about Dubya' in either campaign.
No... "laziness" is giving these people a benefit of the doubt that their records don't suggest that they merit.
THE LOGIC GOES LIKE THIS:
A. Only REAL soldiers know how to spell "FLAK".
B. Obama's campaign spelled it "FLACK".
C. Therefore, Obama is a "greenhorn" and his positions on all military matters cannot be taken seriously.
The problems with this construct are many (for example, C does not logically follow from the previous premises), but the BIGGEST error is that A is simply not true; EITHER spelling is acceptable. Therefore, the conclusion drawn from a FALSE PREMISE is also FALSE, by definition.
The main thing is, McCain does not want to talk about how he was FALSELY and DISINGENUOUSLY telling the American Citizens how SAFE the markets are in Iraq, when it was clear it was so UNSAFE, he had to have multiple layers of protection just to walk 50 feet, from a FLAK/FLACK jacket, to 100 specially assigned armed troops, to armored Humvees, to Apache Attack helicopters patrolling overhead.
In other words, McCain LIED with the clear intent to DECIEVE. So of COURSE he wants to change the subject to spelling ... or damn near ANYTHING else but how big a phony and a liar he is.
Hmmm. "I" before "E", except after "C". That would be, a clear intent to DECEIVE. Guess to the rightwing, I have lost all credibility on any topic, due to a misspelt word. How can I live with the shame?
"The real story here should have been what a petty man McCain was to attack the spelling in the first place & to try and use it as some sort of evidence that Obama must be lacking as some sort of "greenhorn". "
Exactly. How ridiculous is the media sometimes?? McCain had no answer to the substance of Obama's statement - but the media act like McCain made some great comeback! Even if McCain had been right about the spelling, it should have been treated for what it was - an incredibly lame response, basically proving that Obama was right.
Any American going to vote for a MUSLIM????
- inapart / Tuesday May 29, 2007 06:59:54 PM EST
Well, given the fact that there aren't any Muslim's running for president, I guess that answer would be NO! Perhaps you were referring to Rep. Keith Ellison who has ALREADY BEEN ELECTED?
That completes our lesson for today kids.
Too easy.
Any American going to vote for a MUSLIM????
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Be afraid, be very afraid. There's more of them.....
Add Add CBS Evening News with Katie Couric (5-25-07 broadcast) to that list.
Video here: http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=2854543n
The relevant part starts abour 4:10.
Jim Axelrod: "Notice how Obama spelled "flack" - incorrectly." This over a video reproduction of Obama's words:
"The fact that Senator McCain required a flack [sic] jacket... and 100 soldiers with rifles..."
The irony here is that McCain is using this non-issue to deflect the flack/flak(metaphorical) from the real issue, namely his dishonesty about the situation in Iraq.
And that in itself is completely dishonest on his part. He knows very well that he's manipulating the lowest common denominator with that comment.
Hey McCain get a dictionary you big snow bunny wabbit
There is an inverse relationship between the number of times Mr MCain opens his mouth and his chances of getting nominated.
This is pretty funny. Can you imagine if Dubya Bush had used the spelling 'flack'? I'll bet McCain would be quick to back him up if he was called out on it. The President can't be wrong! If you say so, you're unpatriotic! The dictionary must be changed! Oh, wait...
It's sad that this was all McCain had for a comeback. Not nearly as sad though, as the absurd lack of fact checking from the mainstream press.