About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Times falsely suggested Obama equated "evil" of 9-11 with Gitmo, Abu Ghraib

June 05, 2007 6:58 pm ET
image

8 Comments

A June 5 Washington Times article about the June 4 Presidential Forum on Faith, Values, and Poverty reported that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) said "there is evil in the world -- as seen in the September 11 terrorist attacks -- and said he sees it in the detention camp in Guantanamo and in the prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib in Iraq." Obama, however, did not use the word "evil" in reference to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal or to the Bush administration's "decision to detain people without charges" at the Pentagon's detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Rather, he cited them as examples of how the United States has "act[ed] unjustly."

The Times reported:

Mr. Obama, a senator from Illinois, gave the most political answers of the trio, and the forum gave him a chance to clarify what some have said is an inconsistency in his position about the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

When asked whether God takes sides in a war, Mr. Obama quoted Abraham Lincoln as saying that "we shouldn't ask whose side God is on, but whether we're on His side." He added there is evil in the world -- as seen in the September 11 terrorist attacks -- and said he sees it in the detention camp in Guantanamo and in the prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib in Iraq.

In fact, Obama drew a specific distinction between the "evil" of the September 11, 2001, attacks and the "unjust" actions at Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib. He also stated that "the danger of using good versus evil in the context of war is it may lead us to be not as critical as we should be about our own actions."

From the June 4 forum, hosted by CNN and Sojourners/Call to Renewal:

SOLEDAD O'BRIEN (moderator/CNN anchor): The president talks a lot, as you know, about sort of good versus evil in war. Do you agree with that?

OBAMA: Well, I do think there's evil in the world. I think that, when planes crash into buildings and kill innocents, there's evil there. I think violence and cruelty, wherever it's perpetrated, expresses evil in the world. And I think that all of us have an obligation to speak to that and act against that forcefully.

Now, there have been times in our history where that requires that we take up arms. I think that the Civil War was a just war. I believe that defeating fascism and ensuring that Europe was liberated was the right thing to do.

What was also interesting about Lincoln, though, during the course of the Civil War, was his recognition that simply because we've engaged in something just doesn't mean that there aren't times where we may act unjustly. Abu Ghraib obviously is something that all of us should be ashamed for, even if you were supportive of a war. I believe Guantanamo, the decision to detain people without charges, is unjust.

And so the danger of using good versus evil in the context of war is it may lead us to be not as critical as we should be about our own actions.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by juliajayne (June 05, 2007 7:26 pm ET)
         

      What do you expect? It's the Washington Times. Not exactly the standard bearer of truth. Next this will be in "Insight" (sic) magazine and at the Drudge report. It looks like one of Stephen Colbert's edit jobs with his interviews.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pbg (June 05, 2007 7:49 pm ET)
         

      Extry! Extry! Barack Obama uses 'Abu Ghreib' in same speech as '9/11'!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by redking75687 (June 05, 2007 8:26 pm ET)
         

      If he don't like Guantanamo so much, why isn't he leading a Senate crusade to take down the prison and the president? Or are the Dems just gonna complain their way into the White House and not do a damn thing to stop Bush in the next year and a half?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (June 05, 2007 11:40 pm ET)
         

      Righties don't DO "nuance".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (June 06, 2007 12:10 am ET)
         

      What the heck is Obama talking about?  Lincoln suspended habeas corpus for Americans.  That is far more radical than holding unlawful enemy combatants at Gitmo.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mizonglohong (June 06, 2007 6:37 am ET)
         

      Before you try to tarnish a man's reputation, you should have your facts straight. Sad you have to use your position to do this.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.