About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Matthews: "Ultimate street politician" Giuliani was "on the curb" with "soot on his face" on 9-11

June 12, 2007 7:46 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

25 Comments

On the June 12 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC's Hardball, called Republican presidential candidate and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani "the ultimate street politician," adding, "He was there on the curb when 9-11 struck. He had soot on his face." He also called Giuliani a "street fighter" and described him as "somebody who's clear and present and right there answering our questions," and who "gives us the awful truth."

As Media Matters for America has noted, Matthews has repeatedly lauded Giuliani for being "on the street corner" during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. However, authors Wayne Barrett and Dan Collins wrote in their book, Grand Illusion: The Untold Story of Rudy Giuliani and 9/11 (HarperCollins, August 2006), that when Giuliani heard about the disaster, his "original destination" wasn't "the curb" or "the street corner" but rather his "much-ballyhooed command center" in the World Trade Center complex (Page 6). According to Barrett and Collins, then-New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, "who was waiting to meet [Giuliani], decided it was too dangerous to bring the mayor up to the command center [Giuliani] had so carefully and expensively built" (Page 340).

According to Barrett and Collins, Giuliani selected 7 World Trade Center as the site of his Office of Emergency Management's (OEM) command center after "overrul[ing]" warnings from a previous police commissioner, Howard Safir, and NYPD chief operating officer Lou Anemone not to locate it there and "[r]ejecting an already secure, technologically advanced city facility across the Brooklyn Bridge" because Giuliani "insisted on a command center within walking distance of City Hall" (Page 41). That building, 7 WTC, ultimately collapsed on 9-11. Thus, Barrett and Collins concluded that if the command center had not posed such a safety risk to Giuliani, "all the dramatic visuals ... would instead have been tense but tame footage from its barren press conference room" (Page 41).

During the May 1 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, while discussing Giuliani's performance on 9-11, HBO host Bill Maher asserted that "the reason why [Giuliani] was on the streets that day is because his office was blown up," adding, "All of the experts told him to move the command-and-control center out of the World Trade Center. He put it in the World Trade Center." Maher also said: "He's not a terrorism fighter. He has no credentials in this. In fact, he failed at the one time he had an opportunity, just like Bush." In response, Matthews asked, "So, why do people think he did serve well and perform well, as the leader of New York, during that crisis? Why do people think that?"

Additionally, during his June 12 appearance on Morning Joe, Matthews said of Giuliani: "[P]eople who've dealt with him in New York over the years -- the press, the police, minorities -- don't like him." But beyond mentioning Giuliani's "brusque style," Matthews did not provide other reasons cited by first responders for criticizing Giuliani. New York City's firefighters have also been critical of Giuliani for what they cite as his failure to ensure that the New York police and fire departments had interoperable radios, as Media Matters has repeatedly documented. According to Barrett and Collins, "Everyone agrees that a critical problem that day was that the police and fire departments could not communicate; that's one of the reasons the lack of interoperable radios became such a focus of fury." (Page 343) Indeed, at the time of the attacks, the New York fire department was using outdated VHF radios that were incompatible with the police department's UHF radios. On March 14, The New York Times reported Harold A. Schaitberger, general president of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), as saying of Giuliani: "The whole issue of the radios is unforgivable. ... Everyone knew they needed a better system, and he didn't get it done."

As Media Matters has also noted, in a March 15 article, Cox News Service reported: "As revered as he is by many for his efforts after the attacks, Giuliani is reviled by some firefighters who believe he mishandled the development of a radio system that could have saved lives on 9/11 and turned his back on first responders' remains in the rubble." On March 30, the Associated Press further noted criticisms by the IAFF and by Sally Regenhard, chairwoman of the Skyscraper Safety Campaign and mother of a firefighter killed on 9-11. The AP noted that the Giuliani "administration's failure to provide the World Trade Center's first responders with adequate radios [is] a long-standing complaint from relatives of the firefighters killed when the twin towers collapsed. The Sept. 11 Commission noted the firefighters at the World Trade Center were using the same ineffective radios employed by the first responders to the 1993 terrorist attack on the trade center."

From the June 12 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

JOE SCARBOROUGH (host): This guy is getting votes from a large chunk of Evangelicals, despite the fact he is pro-choice, and if that's the case, who stops him?

MATTHEWS: Well, I just think it comes down to this, Joe. Every time there's a presidential election -- and this has nothing to do with ideology or partisanship -- the people try to solve the current problem. Back when it was Eisenhower against Truman, I mean, Truman was bogged down in Korea, and he was a bit -- a little tainted, let's put it that way, so they brought in a general as clean as a hound's tooth who had received the Nazi surrender who said, "I will go to Korea."

And in '60, Eisenhower looked like he had lost a few steps because of the U2 and Cuba and Sputnik, and we bring in the youngest guy ever elected. It seems like, throughout our history, we're always solving the problem, even to the point in 19 -- or rather 2000, when we had the Monica mess, we brought in a guy with a very regular marriage, and he said, "When I take the oath to the Constitution, I mean to -- I promise to protect the dignity of the Oval Office." And he got close enough to get it in Florida, so what's the problem right now?

It's a president who seems to be not in touch with on-the-ground American and Iraqi reality, who seems to be either distracted or theoretical or somehow not tied down to the hard-core street reality.

Now, Rudy's the ultimate street politician. He was there on the curb when 9-11 struck. He had soot on his face. He seems like he doesn't have a ranch or a place to go to. He's always there, right in your face, dealing with reality. I think that's what -- with all his aggravations and personality stuff and roughness -- I think that's what people are looking for: somebody who's clear and present and right there answering our questions, not rolling disclosure, telling us what a committee's gonna tell us.

The problem with Hillary of course, in the end, is that she will be -- not lazy; she's not lazy -- but she'll be coming at us with -- after she's met with her advisers, and she's groomed an answer, like she does on the war, and she'll finally come out three or four days later with some sort of perfectly fashioned answer that's been tested, and we won't really feel that it's the truth -- the hard truth we need.

Rudy, for all his awfulness in many ways, gives us the awful truth, I think. At least, that's the way people are taking him right now.

SCARBOROUGH: When you say "all his awfulness," you're talking about his --

MATTHEWS: His manner -- his brusque manner. The fact that people who've dealt with him in New York over the years -- the press, the police, minorities -- don't like him. I'm always impressed when I meet reporters who covered him in New York, 'cause I had no problem at all with him, who meet him and say, "He's awful. He's just awful." Because he is a street fighter.

SCARBOROUGH: He's a tough guy.

MATTHEWS: I mean, he doesn't like a piece you write, he goes to war with you. You know, and I've had that experience with him, actually. I've dealt with him that way.

SCARBOROUGH: And I'll tell you what. And I think you can say that maybe one reason why Richard Nixon, a guy that wasn't cuddly, who you'd want to invite to your Thanksgiving dinner, most likely, Richard Nixon elected in 1968, post-Tet, in the midst of -- in all the mess that's going on over there. So, we'll see. Hey, let's talk about --

MATTHEWS: So, right now, it's Rudy. I think you're on the ball.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (June 12, 2007 7:52 pm ET)
         

      Yes, Rudy is a Street Politician.

      He came into NY when it was a dangerous, crappy, city.  Now look at it.

      He accomplished more than anyone thought possible in NY.  While he made some errors in judgment along the way, nobody demonstrates leadership more than that man.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (June 12, 2007 8:16 pm ET)
           

        I'm not going to your blog, spammer. Now git.

        Yeah, Rudey is one helluva politico ain't he? I think he's better suited to maybe a mob boss. Do mob bosses dress in drag?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Taz (June 12, 2007 9:20 pm ET)
             

          I think he's better suited to maybe a mob boss.

          Why because he's Italian? Stereotyping much?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne (June 12, 2007 9:40 pm ET)
               

            No because he's a fascist, troll.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne (June 12, 2007 9:50 pm ET)
                 

              Geeze, I didn't even think about how his name sounds Italian. Is he Italian? Interesting that your mind went there, though. I'm sick of the politics of fear and him yelling 9/11 for cheap political points. He would be a retread of baby Bush and the fear mongering. You are a spectacular ingrate, Taz btw.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (June 13, 2007 11:37 am ET)
                   

                Well Julia, I'm Italian, and quite frankly having Giuliani [he is Italian] compared to a *mob boss* does smack of a wee bit of stereotyping.

                But you say you didn't know, so that's a pass in my book :-)

                Actually I don't have a problem with the mafia thing, my Grandfathers did, my Father much less. I had a Great Uncle named Rocky, and it was assumed by almost the entire family that he was...connected, if you know what I mean.

                As a kid I thought that was wicked cool ;-)

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jawill11 (June 13, 2007 12:58 pm ET)
                     

                  I'm not going to speak for Julia, but I think the mob boss can be safely thrown at Giuliani because of his actual mob connections throughout his career, not the least of which being Bernie Kerrack.

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne (June 13, 2007 5:03 pm ET)
                     

                  I found this in Wikipedia about Rudy's dad, Harold it is interesting:

                  He was in Sing Sing and was a mob enforcer. So I guess Rudey does have ties to organized mob activity outside of Bernie Kerick. Although that was not my meaning in bringing up his authoritarian ways.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne (June 13, 2007 5:07 pm ET)
                       

                    And Jeter, I don't think "Mob" when Italians are brought up. My mind just doesn't work that way. But I guess it does for others. Sorry to have offended anyone even unintentionally. Except, Taz, the ingrate.

                    Report Abuse
      • Author by BushLied (June 12, 2007 8:23 pm ET)
           

        Oh please, Im in a bad mood tonight from reading these posters.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (June 12, 2007 8:39 pm ET)
           

        Giuliani is a joke without a punchline.

        Now begone troll...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (June 12, 2007 8:49 pm ET)
         

      Is this not yet another example of the pattern by Matthews in his love for Rudy? Am I wrong?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (June 12, 2007 8:52 pm ET)
         

      CM, in his talking points, never opined on whether GWB brought "dignity" (he's simply "out of touch") back to the office. So much dignity with his dogma, stubborness, disrespect of the global community, paranoid secrecy (making Nixon look like a piker), obfuscation, Cheney, parade of resigned cabinet members/associates, Karl Rove, Kenny-Boy, gun lobby and fake, fake, fake sincerity.

      So friggin' dignified.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Goldsteins_Book (June 13, 2007 12:33 am ET)
         

      I myself like both Scarborough and Matthews, but come on. Six years later, don't you think it's about time he wiped the soot off?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by neondesert (June 13, 2007 12:55 pm ET)
           

        "wiped the soot off"

        That is an elegant and poetic metaphor.  Copyright it soon, and you could be richer by the end of campaign season.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (June 13, 2007 8:26 am ET)
         

      mmfa keeps harping on the location of the command center and the inadequate radio systems of the PD/FD...somehow I don't think that will resonate with the voters.

      Camille Paglia, a democrat columnist at salon.com, makes some interesting comments on the presidential race:

       - only a Pollyanna on helium would believe that any of the top-tier Democrats will definitely be able to defeat a leading Republican like Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani

       - Campaigning against the rapidly deflating Bush zeppelin is a dead end.

       - But the TV pundits who rushed to proclaim Hillary the winner of the second debate were off by a mile...she overplayed her hand and began to intrude and domineer...raising her voice and keeping it at that abrasive level for the rest of the debate

       -  For many Democrats like me, however, Hillary's history of prevarication, rigidity and quasi-divine sense of election is profoundly unsettling

      She also weighs in on Gore...describing him as a cartoon character with an inept record. Edwards and Obama...inexperienced with steep learning curves. She tips her hand by offering some praise of Kucinich.

      Keerist...makes me think that I might really be a democrat...in wolves clothing. 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (June 13, 2007 9:14 am ET)
           

        Do you think Rudy's rush to re-open Wall Street at the expense of the health and the lives of the rescue workers at ground zero might resonate with the voters?

        Do you think his shameful assertion that our troops were responsible for hundreds of tons of explosives being looted from the Al-Qaqaa munitions dump in Iraq might resonate with the voters?

        We've heard a lot about supporting the troops over the last 5 or six years. No one has shown more disrespect for our troops on the ground in Iraq than Rudy Giuliani. here are his words.

        "No matter how you try to blame it on the president, the actual responsibility for it really would be for the troops that were there,"

        "Did they search carefully enough? Didn't they search carefully enough?"

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (June 13, 2007 9:35 am ET)
             

          You could have a point on the health risk you cited...but on a national scale...I don't think it will resonate.

          As far as trying to paint Giuliani as anti-troops...good luck with that one. He has too much political capital as a "tough guy"...right or wrong.

          His comments about searching for WMD's was directed at the military leadership...not the effort of the "on the ground" troops.

          I don't think either or your points will resonate with voters in the primary or a national election. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (June 13, 2007 9:39 am ET)
               

            We'll have to see.

            I think Americans will tire of his using the ghosts of 9/11 to sell himself.

            New Yorkers seem to be.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wesley (June 13, 2007 9:54 am ET)
                 

              Oh New York...New York.

              A contest between Clinton and Giuliani...both New Yorkers...could very well prove pivotal...with the huge number of electoral votes. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 13, 2007 10:39 am ET)
                   

                Is "Ultimate Street Politician" available for Playstation yet ?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by worrierking (June 13, 2007 10:51 am ET)
                     

                  Et Tu, HBL, Et Tu?

                  You haven't gone over to the Kernel's side now have you. I'm starting to suspect anyone who references video games now.

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by canadian1106 (June 13, 2007 8:03 pm ET)
         

      Where was Guiliani's head regarding terrorism pre 9/11?  Seems it wasn't on his radar screen very much either.  You know, what are his real qualifications for being a president other than saying he was there on 9/11?  He made a lot of goofs after 9/11 with those firefighters, rescue workers etc. who are now dieing because of their being there to help.  And what about all his connections to Bernie Kerick and what about his company after he left the role of Mayor? Why aren't those being more widely covered?

      Why is it the major role models of the republicans seem to be anything to do with 9/11, the soon to be actor candidate Thompson while democratic leaning actors are told to shut up or disappear off thepolitical mainstream,  or Romney, someone with a bigger flipflop record than you could ever pin on John Kerry.

      Even 10 or 11 candidates dont get republicans anywhere close to being a presidential hopeful the rest of the world could look up to. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by corkcol6005 (June 15, 2007 9:08 am ET)
         

      Rudy is a one-trick pony.  All he and his camp followers ever talk about is what he did after 9-11.  Didn't we just go through an election back in 2004 where Bush and Cheney rode 9-11 back into the White House?  If this is ALL Rudy can talk about, then it is a sad day for the Republicans if he is there candidate.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.