Media ignore key details in Obama/Rezko letter story
On June 13, the Chicago Sun-Times reported that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), while serving as an Illinois state senator in 1998, "did a political favor" for Chicago Democratic fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko by writing letters to state and local government officials in support of a Chicago housing project proposed by Rezko's company, New Kenwood LLC. The Sun-Times asserted that the "letters appear to contradict a statement last December from Obama, who told the Chicago Tribune that, in all the years he's known Rezko, 'I've never done any favors for him.' '' In reporting on this story, however, several media outlets omitted statements included in the Sun-Times article that challenge the paper's assertion that Obama performed a "favor" for Rezko -- specifically, Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton's claim that "I don't know that anyone specifically asked him to write this letter," and Rezko's attorney's claim that Rezko "never spoke with, nor sought a letter from, Senator Obama in connection with that project."
In October 2006, Rezko was indicted on charges that he "used his influence as one of Gov. Rod Blagojevich's closest advisers and fundraisers to seek millions of dollars in kickbacks and campaign donations from firms seeking state business," according to the Chicago Tribune.
From the June 13 Sun-Times article, headlined "Obama's letters for Rezko":
As a state senator, Barack Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko's successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens.
The deal included $855,000 in development fees for Rezko and his partner, Allison S. Davis, Obama's former boss, according to records from the project, which was four blocks outside Obama's state Senate district.
Obama's letters, written nearly nine years ago, for the first time show the Democratic presidential hopeful did a political favor for Rezko -- a longtime friend, campaign fund-raiser and client of the law firm where Obama worked -- who was indicted last fall on federal charges that accuse him of demanding kickbacks from companies seeking state business under Gov. Blagojevich.
The letters appear to contradict a statement last December from Obama, who told the Chicago Tribune that, in all the years he's known Rezko, "I've never done any favors for him.''
The Sun-Times, however, went on to quote Burton claiming that he did not "know that anyone specifically asked him to write this letter," and Rezko attorney Joseph Duffy saying that Rezko had not asked Obama to write the letters -- undermining the article's claim that the letters constituted "a political favor":
On Tuesday, Bill Burton, press secretary for Obama's presidential campaign, said the letters Obama wrote in support of the development weren't intended as a favor to Rezko or Davis.
"This wasn't done as a favor for anyone," Burton said in a written statement. "It was done in the interests of the people in the community who have benefited from the project.
"I don't know that anyone specifically asked him to write this letter nine years ago," the statement said. "There was a consensus in the community about the positive impact the project would make and Obama supported it because it was going to help people in his district. ... They had a wellness clinic and adult day-care services, as well as a series of social services for residents. It's a successful project. It's meant a lot to the community, and he's proud to have supported it.''
The development, called the Cottage View Terrace apartments, opened five years ago at 4801 S. Cottage Grove, providing 97 apartments for low-income senior citizens.
Asked about the Obama letters, Rezko's attorney, Joseph Duffy, said Tuesday, "Mr. Rezko never spoke with, nor sought a letter from, Senator Obama in connection with that project."
While reporting on this story, several media outlets left out either Burton's or Duffy's statement, or both. The June 13 edition of ABC News' political online newsletter The Note cited the Sun-Times' claim that the "letters appear to contradict" Obama's claim that he has never done a favor for Rezko, but did not quote either Burton or Duffy. Rather, The Note reported that "[t]he Obama camp is casting it as an attempt to increase housing for seniors." From the June 13 edition of "The Note":
Obama wrote letters to local officials on behalf of a project controlled by indicted real-estate dealmaker Tony Rezko, the Chicago Sun-Times' Tim Novak reports. "The letters appear to contradict a statement last December from Obama, who told the Chicago Tribune that, in all the years he's known Rezko, 'I've never done any favors for him.'" (The Obama camp is casting it as an attempt to increase housing for seniors.)
A June 14 New York Times article and a June 13 report on CNN's The Situation Room featured statements from Burton regarding the letters, but neither addressed whether Rezko had asked Obama to write the letters, nor mentioned Duffy's statement.
From the Times article:
[Years earlier, as a state legislator, Mr. Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting efforts by Mr. Rezko and a partner to build apartments for the elderly with $14 million in government money, The Chicago Sun-Times reported in its June 13 editions. The developers received $855,000 in fees.]
Mr. Obama's spokesman, Bill Burton, said the senator was one of several politicians who intervened because the project was important to local residents.
Mr. Burton also said in a statement that the senator "has held himself to a high standard and has had a career in public service fighting for the toughest possible ethical rules."
"This is not a record changed by anything that has happened to Tony Rezko," Mr. Burton said.
From the June 13 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
WOLF BLITZER (anchor): There are also some new questions about Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama's ties to a Chicago developer. Tony Rezko is a former Obama supporter and donor now under federal indictment. A published report says Obama once wrote letters in support of Rezko Development, while Obama was serving in the state Senate.
CNN's [national correspondent] Keith Oppenheim is watching this story for us. Keith is joining us now live. Keith, so, update our viewers who are not familiar with what's going on. What's going on? Because in Chicago, at least, this has been an uproar of sorts.
OPPENHEIM: It has. And really, there are a couple of possibilities as to what this could mean for Obama's campaign. One is that all this about Tony Rezko and his connections to him just may be a slight tarnish to Obama's reputation, if at all. But a bad scenario for Senator Obama is that this story could be an ongoing liability, one that could really put the candidate's credibility into question.
[begin video clip]
OPPENHEIM: In Chicago politics, Tony Rezko has been someone to know, a player in real estate. He's known Barack Obama for 17 years and contributed thousands to his numerous campaigns.
Last year, Rezko was indicted by a federal grand jury, accused of demanding kickbacks from companies that want to do business with the state. Rezko pleaded not guilty. But while Rezko was under investigation, Obama bought a house in Chicago and a sliver of the property next door owned by Rezko's wife. Jay Stewart is the director of a Chicago watchdog group called the Better Government Association.
STEWART: That raised a lot of eyebrows -- not the transaction itself, but the fact that, at that point, everybody in Illinois knew Tony Rezko was being looked at by the federal government.
OPPENHEIM: Obama tried to put the matter to rest last December, when he told the Chicago Tribune, regarding Tony Rezko, "I've never done any favors for him."
Today, the Chicago Sun-Times produced a 1998 letter, which, the paper said, suggests otherwise. Obama, who was then a state senator, wrote to city officials on behalf of one of Rezko's real estate deals to build a senior citizen complex on Chicago's South Side. Campaign press secretary Bill Burton told the Sun-Times, "This wasn't done as a favor for anyone. It was done in the interest of the people in the community, who have benefited from the project."
Burton told CNN, "The fact of the matter is Obama has led a career fighting for the toughest possible ethics reforms in government. This sort of thing isn't a worry to us."
The question is: Is there more to Obama's relationship with Tony Rezko that could become a distraction?
[end video clip]
OPPENHEIM: Wolf, Senator Obama has been trying pretty hard to distance himself from Tony Rezko. Last week, his campaign donated $23,000 in charity -- that's money that came from three of Rezko's business associates. Now, last year, the campaign donated $11,000 in charity. That's money that came directly from Tony Rezko. Back to you, Wolf.
BLITZER: All right, thanks very much. Keith Oppenheim, watching this story in Chicago for us.
Other media outlets -- including Fox News and MSNBC.com -- reported Burton's comments to the Sun-Times but failed to note Duffy's claim that Rezko never asked Obama to write the letters.
From a June 13 entry on MSNBC.com's First Read weblog:
The Chicago Sun-Times reports today that, as a state senator, Obama wrote letters supporting indicted developer Tony Rezko's bid to win more than $14 million in contracts, which appears to contradict Obama's earlier claim that he's never done favors for Rezko. Obama's camp responds that the letters he wrote were intended to benefit the community, not Rezko. "As the Sun Times acknowledges in today's article, Senator Obama didn't support this project as a favor to anyone -- he did in an effort to have the most positive impact on his community possible," the campaign says. One thing seems to be sure, however: So far, Obama is getting tougher treatment from his hometown newspapers (especially the Sun-Times) than Clinton is from hers.
From the June 13 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:
BRIT HUME (host): Barack Obama's hometown newspaper is reporting that he wrote letters to city and state officials nine years ago supporting political patron Tony Rezko's efforts to build apartments for senior citizens. The Chicago Sun-Times writes the letters appear to contradict a statement last December where Obama said, quote, "I've never done any favors for him."
Rezko was indicted last fall on federal charges that he demanded kickbacks from companies seeking state business. Obama has admitted to what he called a "bone-headed" -- his word -- real estate deal with Rezko, calling it a mistake. Rezko has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Obama's election efforts.
Obama's campaign press secretary says the Rezko letters were written in order to benefit the people who would live in the apartments that Rezko was trying to build.















OK! 2-1 Obama heading into the final quarter! Is Clinton's site switching affiliations? C'mon, nay-sayers!
The GOP is scared sh**less of Obama.
Just look how they send out the talking points, that get picked up by media outlets, especially Fox (har har) "news."
The Moonie Times "Insight" website is STILL at it with that "madrassa story spread by Hillary" BS.
Well, I hope Obama is ready...
These are just the first few love taps from the right-wing filth machine.
Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton's claim that "I don't know that anyone specifically asked him to write this letter," and Rezko's attorney's claim that Rezko "never spoke with, nor sought a letter from, Senator Obama in connection with that project."
Yeah I'm sure we all write letters of recommendations for people who don't ask us for them ;-)
This doesn't look good for Obama, no matter how you spin it.
Now let's picture how this would have read here if it was, oh say Republican Mitt Romney writing letters to state and local government officials in support of a Boston housing project proposed by a [unsavory person's] company.
Do I really need to speculate. Ha!
Jeter, my question is; Is a favor not a favor if nobody asked for it? I think that's the weak part of this item. It could be made to look bad for Obama, but I think that depends on the publics determination as to whether this was a favor for the guy.
That is, any action taken by a politician that benefits anybody else is interpreted as a favor done for that person.
Either way, I think Duncan and you are completely in sync here. ;0D
Is a favor not a favor if nobody asked for it?
If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Ok sorry, your question just reminded me of that riddle ;-)
I dunno Beach, like I wrote earlier does one write a recommendation or a letter of support for someone who didn't ask for one?
I don't see this as the downfall of Obama, even if the allegations are true, but I do wonder how MMFA and all of you would view this situation IF a Republican rather than a Democrat was involved.
*Now about Duncan. I find his posts amusing, but in the good way. You go Dunc!*
Jeter2,
This doesn't look bad for Obama in the slightest. This looks great for him ... this is an opportunity!
As long as he's aggressive, and stuffs this filth right back down the throats of those spreading it.
Debunked,
Way to spin it ;-)
And if Obama hasn't done anything inappropriate...then you're correct, he'll be fine.
Republicans endorse housing for the elderly? Yeah that’s stretching the hypothetical corruption scenario. Let’s pretend Mitt and an Auto Mall developer. Now were talking.
If memory serves, Obama was alleged to be involved in a corrupt scheme with Rezko where the latter sold the senator land (adjacent to Obama's current house in Chicago) at prices that were well below market prices. No wonder Obama wrote the guy "good character" references /sarcasm
Genghiz, Genghiz, Genghiz. It was not "corrupt", it was not "well below market value" - are you the poster child for those Children Left Behind we've heard so much about? Repeat after me: first we research, then we post. Not the other way 'round.
Obama has apologized for this shady deal. Your spin doesn't negate Obama's admission of guilt. Additionally, in the 2004 elections, Rezko raised thousands of dollars for Obama, which the latter encouraged even though he knew Rezko was under investigation.
What part of "first we research, then we post. Not the other way 'round" don’t you understand, Genghiz? Obama did not "apologize[] for this shady deal." He said that he regretted having made a "boneheaded" mistake, i.e., making a land purchase that could have an appearance of impropriety. There was no "admission of guilt" by Obama, because there was nothing shady or illegal or improper. (See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/16/AR2006121600729.html)
Well done Linus...
The wingnuts have got a head full of right-wing smears and lies ... (Really, they lead these people around like sheep on a leash, don't they?) ...
Now they think they "know something." Most of these sheep would be better off sitting at home and knitting, rather than filling their heads with right-wing bunk.
When is a crook not a crook?
When he's a politician from Chicago.
Well said. See how some posters have ignored the fact that Rezko was one of Obama's top boosters.
Do you like throwing mud, Ed?
Obama's not a crook.
Historically accurate but not specifically relevant to Obama. Is someone claiming there was a criminal act here?
NotThatGeorge
Do you like throwing mud, Ed?
Obama's not a crook.
I agree. He's a Democratic politician from Chicago.
I hadn't heard that was illegal.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
"This wasn't done as a favor for anyone," Burton said in a written statement. "It was done in the interests of the people in the community who have benefited from the project.
Um yeah. Uh huh.
That quote quacked me up!
See what you've done, HBL? See what you've created by releasing the secret of puns?
Get your torches and pitchforks, villagers. Another one's loose...
I got the rope......
I currently live in Springield, IL. and work for the state in both Springfield and Chicago. Anyone who cares to do any actual research or make use of basic reading comprehension can learn that the letter Obama wrote was not done as a favor to Rezko. He wrote it because several community activist felt the building complex would be great for the area. Which despite all the illegalities that Rezko has been connected to, the project was/is a positive for that community. Several people of influence backed the project not as a favor to Rezko but because people in the community requested them to do so since most felt it would be good for the people there. Also at the time that the letter was written, it was far before any wrong doing was alleged by Rezko. And there were political enemies of Rezko who wrote letters of support for the project also. Just because Rezko got what was beneficial for him out of it, didn't make it a favor he received from Obama. So to recap for those trying to imply nefarious intent where there is none. The letter was written at the behest of people in the community not Rezko, as anyone would be able to understand since even those who had mutual disldain towards Rezko backed the project, not as a favor for him. Rezko nor anyone associated to him asked Obama to help. Also they wouldn't since Obama had no real major influence at that time in that specific area. If he wanted a favor he would have contacted the current Governor's father in-law(Mel) who Rezko did have a actual relationship with and had major influence. Also coincedentally the only political figures to be connected in anyway to Rezko's alleged wrongdoings are low and behold the Governor and his father-in-law, not Obama since his only tangial contact with Rezko was before he became known for his possible illegal strong-arming. You maybe able to find things increminating about Obama in his short Illinois political life but this ain't one of them.
It's amazing how dishonest the CNN piece is, actually. FOX is rather more careful about the facts: obviously, they love reporting this stuff, but the CNN report far exceeds it in sneers and false impressions. In none of them is the timeline meaningfully presented. The story is, "wealthy developer gives money to Obama, Obama reccommends a project for seniors, then five years later, the guy is indicted -- by the Gonzales Justice Department -- for unrelated things. Even though there is nothing wrong that we can find, still, he should have known nine years ago that the guy would be indicted, so he should never have sent a letter recommending that project. What kind of looney tune world do these "reporters" live in?
Obviously, "favor" means throwing a contract his way. It means, doing something corrupt for his campaign money. He's still done no "favors."
Solon;
Less than 10% (7% actually) of the nat'l press (MSM) self identify as conservative. Their liberal bias is self-evident. The complaints against the media on this sight are mostly like what Roger7 pointed out: namely that the MSM didn't 'correct' a conservative statement or debunk a statement critical of a liberal Democrat. I find it hilarious, almost as good as the Onion.
For instance, one of the headlines on the main page tonight reads: "Media report McCain's attack on Reid but omit McCain's own criticism of military leaders." The complaint seems to be that the MSM didn't try to paint McCain as a hypocrite. But the story wasn't really about McCain - it was about Reid's statement. In other words, the MMFA complaint is not germane to the story. After all, I don't complain that the MSM doesn't mention Mary Jo Kopechne every time it does a story on Ted Kennedy talking about women's rights.
Another example:"To Russert, only Dem's vote against funding bill "would be seen...as not supporting the troops."" Where is the bias there? It's true. if a Democrat votes against the funding, he'll have to justify that before the electorate, and it will be a very hard case to make. The GOP 'anti-votes' were against the 'timelines' in the first bill. If a Republican voted against the funding bill without timelines, he'll have to face the electorate as well. But nearly all the GOP supported the bill without the timelines. In other words, it's not a problem for the GOP leadership - but it is for the Dems. Which is what Russert said.
So, MMFA's complaint seems to boil down to the fact that Russert arrived at a reasonable conclusion, albeit a 'cheerleading' one. If I were to complain about bias in that report, I'd point out Russert's failure to mention the absolute cynicism of the Dem leadership who are apparently only interested in the political fallout from their position, not the good of the troops. If Russert weren't carrying liberals' water, he would have.
Wow! I think by the length of post from the righties of late on this site, they must really feel their collective PR grip is on the slip. After 10 years of being pelted by a right wing radio monopoly, over saturation of right wing talk show hosts and wholesale sell out of corporate news networks, packaging ex-homecoming kings and queens as journalists, now guided by ratings, quarterly profit motives and it’s protective sensibilities, this is encouraging. They forgot about the web. Or did they. Can you say Net Neutrality?