About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Sesno baselessly asserted Giuliani would be "pro-military" and "tough on ... spending"

June 15, 2007 7:37 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

9 Comments

On the June 14 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN special correspondent Frank Sesno asserted that "[i]f past is prologue," former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) would be a "pro-military" president who would also "butt heads with Congress, interest groups, and conservatives, who already distrust him." Sesno did not cite any aspect of Giuliani's record in public life to indicate why he would be more "pro-military" than any of the other presidential contenders, nor did he provide any indication of what he meant by that term. Sesno also asserted that Giuliani was "tough on crime, taxes, and spending" as New York's mayor, despite what Time magazine and The New York Times called Giuliani's "second-term spending spree."

As Media Matters for America has noted, CNN has repeatedly characterized those who supported the Iraq war or now oppose the withdrawal of U.S. troops as "pro-military" or supporters of the troops, suggesting that those who take contrary positions do not support the troops or are anti-military.

On Sesno's claim that Giuliani was "tough on ... spending," Village Voice reporter Tom Robbins wrote in 2002 that while Giuliani "made good" on a promise to reduce the size of government in his first term:

[T]he second term was a different story. City expense spending (not including state and federal contributions) rose by 6 percent in 1998, 4 percent in 1999, another 6 percent in 2000, and, finally, an added 9 percent in the Giuliani administration's last full year, according to the Independent Budget Office. In the last five years of the Giuliani administration, spending grew at twice the rate of inflation.

Similarly, Steven Malanga, senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute, wrote in 2002 that Giuliani "abandoned [his] abstemiousness during his second term":

During the late nineties, as the economy boomed, the city went on an especially extravagant spending spree. In 1998, the part of the budget financed by city tax revenues rose 6 percent, more than double the inflation rate; in 2000, it increased 5.7 percent; and in 2001, it rocketed up 9 percent -- three times the inflation rate.

In December 2001, the Citizens' Budget Commission (CBC), an independent fiscal watchdog, reported that spending increased more in Giuliani's second term (through fiscal year 2001, which ended on June 30, 2001) than in the three previous terms (Giuliani's first term, David Dinkins' (D) only term, and Ed Koch's (D) third term):

The CBC also reported that Giuliani's second-term capital budget was higher in 2000 dollars than was either of his two predecessors':

From the June 14 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

SESNO: What if New York's last mayor becomes America's next president? He'd be the first mayor ever to go from here to here. He'd be the first Republican who favors abortion rights, domestic partnerships, and gun control. The first Catholic, twice-divorced Republican to make it to the Oval Office.

That's a lot of firsts.

You can bet he'd be tough on crime, taxes, and spending. He was in New York. Made the city safer; cleaned up the streets; famously filled potholes himself. "Gotham's Action Hero," The New York Times once called him. But he ticked off a lot of people, too; was accused of being imperious; a dictator in mayor's clothes, who ruthlessly pushed out the homeless and aggravated racial tensions.

What if he were president? If past is prologue, he'd be pro-business, pro-military, but he'd butt heads with Congress, interest groups, and conservatives, who already distrust him.

What if the man who lived 9-11 so up close and personal became president? Well, for him, it's still personal. The country is weary and worn, but he'd continue the offensive against terrorism in Iraq and around the world, he says.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (June 15, 2007 8:07 pm ET)
         

      What do you mean about baseless??  This Post is baseless.

      He said he is going to be strong the military in terms of increasing funding and giving them everything they need.

      Moreover, he is a man who means what he says and says what he means.  He said he was going to clean up NYC, and he did it.

      He also attacked the teachers Unions and cut spending.  If you can attack the teachers unions in NY, you can take on Congress.

      http://copiousdissent.blogspot.com

      Report Abuse
      • Author by redking75687 (June 15, 2007 9:47 pm ET)
           

        Guiliani favours fascism. He's the kind of guy who would have his cops shooting the homeless to "clean up the city". He backed his police when they shot and raped suspects.

        He doesn't like the military either, he just loves war. He'll kill our soldiers to satisfy the greed of his war industry masters. He's Establishment....they ALL do it exactly the same way.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 16, 2007 2:43 pm ET)
           

        Image: a mental picture; idea b) the concept of a person

        What Rudy appears to be is like Junior. Remember when Juniors tough image of "Osama, wanted dead or alive". Some in this country rallied around the so called "tough" cowboy. Well he still alive and that tough cowboy bullsh** has gotten where? The Middle East is going up in flames. All Rudy has to offer is more the same. Image, no substance.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by iflurry8094 (June 15, 2007 8:30 pm ET)
         

      Lesse here... hero of 9/11... pro-military... "tough on spending"...

      Wow, he's Dubya 2.0! What's not to love? =D

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (June 15, 2007 9:08 pm ET)
         

      I don't think our military can stand another pro-military president.

      And the heroes of 9/11 died in those buildings, they weren't wandering around the city holding news-conferences.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (June 15, 2007 10:41 pm ET)
         

      "Moreover, he is a man who means what he says and says what he means." - Idiousdissent

      =======================

      Really?

      Did Rudy "say what he meant and mean what he said," when he said this?

      "No matter how you try to blame it [missing explosives in Iraq] on the president, the actual responsibility for it would be for the troops that were there. Did they search carefully enough? Didn't they search carefully enough?"

      [link to www.usatoday.com]

      If so, that's a helluva way to be "pro-military" . . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bryanday4211 (June 16, 2007 5:38 pm ET)
         

      I have an investigative topic for Media Matters: Kindly investigate the organization Media Matter for there baseless claim that CNN’s Frank Sesno “baselessly asserted Giuliani would be “pro-military” and “tough on ... spending”. Clearly they have either not studied speeches or official positions of the former NYC mayor Giuliani, or they have selectively researched documents while turning a blind eye of the obvious to support their baseless claim.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (June 16, 2007 7:38 pm ET)
           

        Do you know what the word BASELESSLY MEANS? What is the BASIS for this claim? I mean his spending rose dramatically during his last term and he did diss the military for their handling of the explosives at that cache outside of Baghdad. I would say there  was adequate reason to question exactly what their BASIS for the claim is and his speeches dont really mean much. Bush gave lots of speeches about compassion and controlling spending and in opposition to Nation building how did THAT work out for us?

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mr. l (June 18, 2007 1:31 am ET)
           

        If by baseless, you mean the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, done by the city of New York and by the city of officce and management looking at data for 22 years, then you are correct... not!!

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.