About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Blitzer injected Bay Buchanan quote into segment on some feminists' criticism of Clinton

June 19, 2007 7:48 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

20 Comments

On the June 18 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer concluded a segment on criticism of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) by some feminists, such as Susan Douglas and Nora Ephron, by injecting a quote in which Republican strategist Bay Buchanan called Clinton a "radical feminist." Blitzer gave no explanation for bringing up Buchanan and her book The Extreme Makeover of Hillary (Rodham) Clinton (Regnery Publishing, May 2007) in the context of a debate between Arianna Huffington, co-founder of the Huffington Post website, and former Clinton press aide Lisa Caputo. Nor did he give Huffington or Caputo a chance to respond. Also, Blitzer did not tell viewers that Buchanan is a senior adviser to Republican presidential hopeful Rep. Tom Tancredo (CO).

While discussing the topic with Huffington and Caputo, Blitzer read a passage from Buchanan's book in which Buchanan claimed Clinton "does not just represent radical feminists; she is one of them." Blitzer identified Buchanan only as a "conservative." Buchanan resigned from her position as a CNN commentator in March, when she announced that she had joined Tancredo's presidential exploratory committee as a senior adviser.

Additionally, in a report at the beginning of the segment, Situation Room contributor Carol Costello said: "You would think Hillary Clinton would embody a feminist victory. A woman long described by certain conservatives as a feminazi, now a viable candidate for the president of the United States. But you'd be wrong."

From the 5 p.m. ET hour of the June 18 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: White House hopeful Hillary Clinton is getting a boost in the polls. A just-released USA Today/Gallup poll shows 39 percent of Democrats surveyed picked the New York senator to be president. That's if [former Vice President] Al Gore isn't in the race. Twenty-six percent prefer Sen. Barack Obama [D-IL]. [Former Sen.] John Edwards [D-NC] is third with 13 percent. But Senator Clinton may have to make up some ground with a core group of potential supporters.

Let's go back to CNN's Carol Costello. She's watching this part of the story for us. Carol.

COSTELLO: You know, Wolf, it's surprising, because you would that think these women, who are a lot like Hillary Clinton, would rally around her. But while Senator Clinton enjoys a whopping two-to-one level of support from women over Barack Obama, she is not winning over some baby-boomer feminists.

[begin video clip]

COSTELLO: You would think Hillary Clinton would embody a feminist victory. A woman long described by certain conservatives as a feminazi, now a viable candidate for the president of the United States. But you'd be wrong.

[...]

BLITZER: I'll leave both of you with this quote from Bay Buchanan, a conservative who wrote a book about Hillary Clinton, The Extreme Makeover of Hillary (Rodham) Clinton. She wrote in her book this: "First and foremost, Hillary is an ardent and radical feminist. Of all the liberal causes of her past, this is the one most deeply rooted. She does not just represent radical feminists; she is one of them." All right. I'll leave our viewers with that thought just so that we get Bay Buchanan's concept into this discussion as well. Ladies, thanks very much for coming in.

As Media Matters noted, in a May 24 appearance on The Situation Room to promote her book, Buchanan misrepresented Clinton's claims about where her daughter was during the September 11 attacks. Also promoting her book on the May 21 edition of C-SPAN's Washington Journal, Buchanan misrepresented statements made by Clinton about her vote for the 2002 resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DorisRussell (June 19, 2007 7:52 pm ET)
         

      I love how CNN is giving credibility to Bay Buchanan a known and admited Clinton hater. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (June 19, 2007 8:17 pm ET)
           

        Ahem. The correct term is Big Buttcannon.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by djasper2761 (June 19, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
             

          I saw this as a joke. bay  has ZERO credibility and her Hillary book is a JOKE. I saw this as Wolfies way of poking a jab at bay. Maybe I am wrong, I saw it as a inside joke.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (June 19, 2007 9:41 pm ET)
               

            You could be right, but I'm just posting my total disregard of Bay. She's clearly living off of her brother's fame.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by djasper2761 (June 19, 2007 11:23 pm ET)
                 

              sort of looks like shes starving. I think she could dodge rain drops. Is this considered name calling? If not, let me go on; she hates AMERICA, she is an idiot (Igot that one from b.o.) and she hates the troops or she would have donated her living corpse for bayonet practice.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (June 20, 2007 6:49 am ET)
           

        Blitzer actually said, "just to get this INTO THE DISCUSSION"?

        The discussion was OVER. Blitzer added a parting shot that was both inflammatory, and hugely controversial at least. He quoted a Hillary-hater and well-known Rightwing partisan as FRAMING Hillary with a term calculated to horrify voters.

        Being defined as a "radical" ANYTHING is simply a SMEAR, and repeating it without any possibility of a challenge or rebuttal is a blatant example of carrying the Rightwing water. The term "feminist", of course, has been demonized by the likes of Limbaugh as a type of woman that the insecure and fearful "men" in his audience (and HIMSELF) should view as hateful and loathesome.

        Blitzer calls himself a "newsman"? Will Regnery be sending him a check? Will Bay send him flowers?

        This was Blitzer doing his best to follow the Rightwing narrative, using a sneaky and low-down tactic, making sure the negative got the "last word".

        All that said, the whole incident was so transparent, and the charge so ludicrous, the only folks cheering would be the ones who are already Hillary haters. Playing to the GOP "base" these days is like having the Mets play the Yankees in an exhibition game in Luckenbach, Texas (population: 3). The fans may be wildly enthusiastic, but they are grossly outnumbered by the players. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by bones2earth (June 19, 2007 8:34 pm ET)
         

      Crock of the Bay.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by deeznuts (June 20, 2007 1:12 am ET)
         

      What I'm really curious about are Buchanan's criteria for what makes someone a "radical feminist."

      Not curious enough to read her freakin' screed, mind you. But maybe slightly vaguely interested.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (June 20, 2007 7:48 am ET)
           

        "Radical Feminist" Repub code for "uppity" women.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 20, 2007 10:05 am ET)
             

          I guess if a feminist is somebody who works for equal rights for women, an Extreme Feminist wants extremely equal rights.

          That seems to be when the right drags out the word "Nazi", to apply it to those who are the most opposed to anything Nazi, like discrimination.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Missouri Democrat (June 20, 2007 11:19 am ET)
           

        Deeze it's simple for gopers a "feminist" is a strong woman who is not afraid to speak her mind. See gopers are so used to the wifey saying "yes dear" that it's inconceivable for them to think that a woman knows her own mind.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by rdirkse (June 20, 2007 5:21 am ET)
         

      I'm sure her book is playing well on FOX

      Report Abuse
    • Author by thomas.melvin4266 (June 20, 2007 7:33 am ET)
         

      What was Blitzman thinking?  Does he owe Bay-B. something?  Who is she anyway?  One day she shows up on a news channel and all the sudden she is an expert - of what?  Writing a book of lies!  And please somebody tell me what is with her first name?  Her parents named her after a body of water; was she a real pee'er.  Did she go through diapers into her teens like sand bags used to stop a raging river flood - or was it santitary napkins.  What is the wrong (I mean right) affraid of when it comes to Clinton.  Are the affraid that she may be more popular than let's say; "W", "Dick", "Condi", or "Scooter".  I tell you people, we need to get out the vote and destroy the Republican parties dreams of a 1000 year rule.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (June 20, 2007 11:04 am ET)
           

        Nice rant!  

        My guess is Bay thought she could make some money writing this book. 

        Hillary is a magnet, she seems to either attract or repel depending on which side one is on.  

        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (June 20, 2007 11:08 am ET)
             

          Thomas, The nice rant part was sincere. Some pretty funny comments. 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 20, 2007 1:20 pm ET)
           

        I think Bay was the beneficiary of the cottage industry created by the WingNuts in the 90s in their attempts to destroy the Clintons. She found her niche easily, since she had a famous Republican brother, and was really good at making caustic remarks with no basis in fact...just like her sisters in slime — Coulter, Ingraham, and Matalin.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by emerald (June 20, 2007 10:32 am ET)
         

      Tex-great post, spot on.

      Just like the term liberal, right-wing mediots and their fundie flunkies have attempted to redefine the term feminist, and in many uninformed quarters, they have succeeded.

      If any Democratic candidates would come out and say they are not supporters of feminism, they would immediately lose my vote.  Feminism is (according to Miriam Webster) "the theory of the political, economic and social equality of the sexes." 

      I would be interested to see a show of hands from both sides of the aisle on this issue.  My guess is the Repubies would leave their hands by their sides if asked whether they "believe" in feminism.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (June 20, 2007 11:00 am ET)
           

        emrald,

        I doubt if anyone today, (except perhaps muslims,) do not agree with your definition.

        As with many other terms the use of the word feminist has taken on a variety of meanings similar to liberals, conservatives, etc.  

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (June 20, 2007 11:09 am ET)
             

          oops. I left off an 'e' in emerald. My apologis. :-)

          Report Abuse