About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Thompson's ABC Radio commentaries riddled with misinformation

June 27, 2007 1:33 pm ET

61 Comments

Since April 2007, ABC Radio Networks has featured a daily commentary from former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-TN), titled the "Fred Thompson Report." ABC Radio launched the "Fred Thompson Report" amid growing speculation that Thompson would run for president in 2008. When asked if he would run on the March 11 broadcast of Fox News Sunday, Thompson told host Chris Wallace: "I'm just going to wait and see what happens, as I say. I'm going to have my own thoughts about what's necessary to get the job done, be successful in doing it." Thompson's aides have since strongly indicated that he will, in fact, seek the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, claiming that Thompson has raised several million dollars and even suggesting the date of his official announcement. Thompson told the Associated Press on June 26: "You're either running or not running. I think the steps we're taking are pretty obvious." Nevertheless, ABC Radio continues to host his daily commentaries.

A Media Matters for America review of Thompson's commentaries for ABC Radio Networks revealed that he has repeatedly advanced conservative misinformation on a variety of issues. Recordings and transcripts of each "report" are available on ABCRadioNetworks.com.

Tax cuts and juvenile homicide

In his June 22 commentary, Thompson claimed that the Bush tax cuts have "been so good for our country in so many ways," adding: "Prosperity is a wonderful thing in many ways. When societies have strong economies, people voluntarily take care of all kinds of problems, and the quality of life improves for everybody. This may be particularly true for children." Thompson offered an example of the way in which the "prosperity" he attributed to the Bush tax cuts has benefited children:

THOMPSON: Since 1993, according to Justice Department statistics, the juvenile homicide rate was cut in half. For kids between the ages of 14 and 17, the reduction was even greater. The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System shows child abuse declined by 43 percent and childhood sexual abuse by almost half. Sexual assaults against adolescents dropped by more than two thirds and aggravated assaults by almost 75 percent.

This is dramatically good news, especially for children and their parents. And the reasons behind these improvements in the lives of American children are linked to economic growth.

[...]

The irony is that we got these improvements in our children's lives from a strong economy driven by tax cuts.

According to Justice Department statistics, however, the drop in the juvenile homicide rate occurred almost entirely between 1993 and 2000 -- during the Clinton presidency, and before the Bush tax cuts. The homicide victimization rate per 100,000 population for children ages 14-17 in 1993 was 12.1 and dropped every following year to 4.8 in 2000. After 2000, the rate decreased to 4.3 in 2003, rising to 4.6 in 2004. Similarly, the homicide offending rate per 100,000 population for children ages 14-17 was 31.3 in 1993, and dipped every following year to 9.5 in 2000. After 2000, it lowered to 8.8 in 2003, then rose to 9.1 in 2004.

Libby case

In his June 6 commentary, Thompson referred to the sentencing of former vice presidential chief of staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to 30 months in prison as "the last in a series of acts that has resulted in a shocking injustice -- one created by and enabled by federal officials." Libby was convicted of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements during the federal investigation into the leak of former CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity. Thompson said of the Plame investigation:

THOMPSON: Nevertheless, the CIA demanded that the Department of Justice investigate the leak of her name. Not surprisingly, the fact that the CIA was making such a request was leaked. This put pressure on the DOJ. The DOJ, in turn, promptly caved to the media and congressional pressure to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate the Plame leak. However, there were two glaring problems for anyone with a sense of justice, or who may have gone to law school for one semester.

The Justice Department and the new Special Counsel knew that:

1.) The leaking of Valerie Plame's name didn't constitute a crime because she was not a "covered person" under the relative criminal statue and,

2.) They already knew the name of the leaker: State Department official Richard Armitage.

Yet small matters such as these do not matter much to Justice Department officials trying to cover their own fanny, or to a newly minted Special Prosecutor with a reputation to make and members of the media to satisfy.

U.S. attorney Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed Special Counsel by the Justice Department on December 30, 2003, and charged with investigating the Plame leak. Thompson's claim that the Justice Department or Fitzgerald "knew" before that time that the "leaking of Valerie Plame's name did not constitute a crime because she was not a 'covered person' under the relative criminal statue" -- presumably the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act (IIPA) -- is contradicted by a sentencing memorandum filed on May 25, in which Fitzgerald asserted that "[i]t was clear from very early in the investigation that Ms. Wilson qualified under the relevant statute (Title 50, United States Code, Section 421) as a covert agent whose identity had been disclosed by public officials, including Mr. Libby, to the press."

Moreover, in a May 29 filing, Fitzgerald included an "unclassified summary" of Plame's CIA employment, which established that she had headed a counterproliferation operation focused on Iraq and had traveled overseas in an undercover capacity in the five years prior to the disclosure of her identity. From the document:

On 1 January 2002, Valerie Wilson was working for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as an operations officer in the Directorate of Operations (DO). She was assigned to the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) at CIA Headquarters, where she served as the Chief of a CPD component with responsibility for weapons proliferation issues related to Iraq.

While assigned to CPD, Ms. Wilson engaged in temporary duty (TDY) travel overseas on official business. She traveled at least seven times to more than ten countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity -- sometimes in true name and sometimes in alias -- but always using cover -- whether official or non-official cover (NOC) -- with no ostensible relationship to the CIA.

At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson's employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.

Thompson's claim that the Justice Department and Fitzgerald "already knew the name of the leaker" echoed false claims that Armitage's role in the investigation exonerated Libby and other officials under scrutiny. As Media Matters noted, the fact that Armitage was the original source for columnist Robert D. Novak's original column revealing Plame's identity is not inconsistent with reports that Libby leaked Plame's identity to others before the Novak column -- specifically, to former New York Times reporter Judith Miller. Armitage was first publicly identified as Novak's source for Plame's identity in Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War (Crown, 2006), by Newsweek investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff and The Nation Washington editor David Corn. Armitage confirmed that he was the source for Novak's July 14, 2003, column, which first identified Plame as a CIA operative. In a September 7, 2006, interview with CBS News, Armitage said that he went to the FBI in October 2003 and told investigators he was Novak's source.

Global warming

In his April 13 commentary, Thompson mocked those who "think that our planet is suffering from a fever," saying:

THOMPSON: Now scientists are telling us that Mars is experiencing its own planetary warming: Martian warming. It seems scientists have noticed recently that quite a few planets in our solar system seem to be heating up a bit, including Pluto.

NASA says the Martian South Pole's ice cap has been shrinking for three summers in a row. Maybe Mars got its fever from earth. If so, I guess Jupiter's caught the same cold, because it's warming up too, like Pluto.

This has led some people, not necessarily scientists, to wonder if Mars and Jupiter, non-signatories to the Kyoto Treaty, are actually inhabited by alien SUV-driving industrialists who run their air-conditioning at 60 degrees and refuse to recycle.

Silly, I know, but I wonder what all those planets, dwarf planets and moons in our SOLAR system have in common. Hmmmm. SOLAR system. Hmmmm. Solar? I wonder. Nah, I guess we shouldn't even be talking about this. The science is absolutely decided. There's a consensus.

Ask Galileo.

Thompson's claims about "Martian warming" echoed what National Geographic described as "one scientist's controversial theory" stipulating that "global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun." As Media Matters noted, National Geographic reported that "Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of the St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia" noted that "2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey" show "that the carbon dioxide 'ice caps' near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row," and theorized that because warming is occurring naturally on Mars, warming on Earth might also be attributable to natural causes. According to the National Geographic article, "Abdussamatov believes that changes in the sun's heat output can account for almost all the climate changes we see on both planets." The article went on to report that Abdussamatov's theory has "not been well received by other climate scientists," and quoted "Colin Wilson, a planetary physicist at England's Oxford University" saying that Abdussamatov's "views are completely at odds with the mainstream scientific opinion." According to Wilson, they "contradict the extensive evidence presented in the most recent IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] report." The article added that "[t]he conventional theory is that climate changes on Mars can be explained primarily by small alterations in the planet's orbit and tilt, not by changes in the sun," and that "most scientists think it is pure coincidence that both planets are between ice ages right now."

Iraq

In his May 8 commentary, Thompson said of former CIA director George Tenet's May 6 appearance on NBC's Meet the Press:

THOMPSON: On the issue of Al Qaeda's relationship with Iraq, for example, Tenet said that the CIA had proof of Al Qaeda contact with Saddam's regime; that the regime had provided safe haven for Al Qaeda operatives and that Saddam had provided training assistance for Al Qaeda terrorists. He went on to say that the CIA had no proof that the relationship was operational or that they had any ongoing working relationship -- that it could have been that each side was just using the other. Maybe my recollection is faulty on this, but that doesn't seem to be inconsistent with what folks in the administration said. In other words, there was clearly contact and a relationship, but no one knew exactly what it meant.

In fact, administration officials -- Vice President Dick Cheney in particular -- frequently claimed direct connections between Iraq and Al Qaeda, and often suggested a link between Iraq and the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. As Media Matters noted, Cheney suggested that Iraq had been involved in the 9-11 attacks by repeatedly citing a Czech intelligence report that lead 9-11 hijacker Mohammed Atta met with a senior Iraqi intelligence official in April 2001, and claimed on the December 9, 2001, broadcast of Meet the Press that the report was "pretty well confirmed." Cheney continued to push the connection even after the 9-11 Commission concluded that "[w]e do not believe that such a meeting occurred," as The New York Times reported on June 18, 2004. In a June 14, 2004, speech, Cheney said that Saddam "had long established ties with Al Qaeda." The 9-11 Commission, however, found no "collaborative relationship" between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 1:54 pm ET)
         

      "Prosperity is a wonderful thing in many ways..." (Thompson)

      Never mind all the misinformation above, I'm as bothered by the simple-mindedness of platitudes like this.

      I laughed when I first heard of the possibility of Thompson making a run- I thought it was just an attempt by the GOP to try a sequel to the kindly old actor scam that worked with Reagan.

      I'm not laughing now. This guys on the radio spoon feeding the same pablum that gets posted by the wingnuts here every day.

      Thompson's got bedwetter appeal, and while I'd like to think that a lot of Americans have crawled out from under their hidey holes since 9/11, this guy might be able to round up the irrational neurotic contingent.

      Keeping it simple, no matter how much BS is involved, has worked for the Repubs in the past. Thompson might do pretty well. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by duncan12347948 (June 27, 2007 3:31 pm ET)
           

        good site for the real facts.

        http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/424107

        better gun control might be the reason for descease

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 3:47 pm ET)
             

          Duncan, another great link. Relevant, magical and enlightening

          Report Abuse
          • Author by duncan12347948 (June 27, 2007 4:17 pm ET)
               

            Are you serious? did you read the site? I know you hate my stuff but this was a serious site.

            What was wrong with the site?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 4:49 pm ET)
                 

              I love your stuff. I'm just sort of slow, and was wondering how the log-in page for on-line medical journals was related to the topic.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (June 27, 2007 5:16 pm ET)
                   

                I was tempted to register if only to find out what the hell Duncan was referring to.

                It's a medical site, but what would they be saying about gun control?

                Duncan said "better gun control might be the reason for descease".

                I'm not sure if it's disease or decrease that he's talking about. Either way, I've lost interest.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 5:24 pm ET)
                     

                  Maybe gun control is the reason for the deceased.?

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by worrierking (June 27, 2007 5:46 pm ET)
                       

                    Another possible meaning to ponder.

                    Better gun control might be the reason for descease.

                    Better gun control might be the reason for decrease.

                    Better gun control might be the reason for disease.

                    Better gun control might be the reason for the deceased.

                    This one will keep me up all night.

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by duncan12347948 (June 27, 2007 5:35 pm ET)
                   

                site has article to read. I did realize posting just went to the log in screen.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by duncan12347948 (June 27, 2007 5:50 pm ET)
                   

                here is part of the document

                Reasons for the Recent Rise and Decline in Violence

                As mentioned above, the homicide rate appeared to peak in the 1991-1993 period, and has shown a decline every year since. Current rates of less than 6 per 100,000 are lower than rates have been for more than 30 years. Dr. Blumstein stated that the reasons for the decline are much more complicated than the reasons for the rise in homicides and are almost certainly due to a combination of a variety of factors. There have been restrictions on gun ownership, such as that imposed by the Brady Bill, which has prevented more than 400,000 individuals with criminal records from purchasing handguns.[1] The number of federally licensed gun dealers has also decreased dramatically from 284,000 in 1993 to 100,000 in 1998,[11] and some states have restricted the number of guns that can be purchased at one time. Police in many cities have vigorously pursued illegal gun carrying, especially by youth.[12] Drug markets have matured and sales of crack appear to have declined. The robust economy has increased opportunities for legitimate employment, including opportunities for inner-city youth. Finally, the high rate of incarceration has certainly taken a large number of criminals off the street.

                The duration of this downturn in crime and violence is unclear. New drugs such as methamphetamine have appeared and may represent a new drug market. There are a large number of children and young adolescents coming into the peak age for delinquency over the next few years. The economy is still strong, but all predict that the bubble will burst at some point.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jscott (June 27, 2007 10:59 pm ET)
                     

                  Say what you want about Bill Clinton but he said he would put more cops on the street, and his programs did exactly that, and the crime rate declined.  And the FMLA has been such a Godsend for SO MANY working families that I can hold my nose and almost overlook his shameful involvement in the right-wing NAFTA scam.  Perot was right on the money with his prediction.  That giant sucking sound... 

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by edgarfield (June 27, 2007 2:14 pm ET)
         

      Thompson is a stalking horse for Dick Cheney. In fact, before Thompson began all of this not-campaigning campaigning he spent the weekend with Dick Cheney. Don't be surprised if Thompson runs and wins that Cheney gets the nod as Vice President. Cheney is the Darth Vader of American politics.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (June 27, 2007 2:36 pm ET)
         

      A pattern with ABC?

      Between the time he was governor of my state and his run for the presidency, Ronnie Raygun's daily radio show was carried on the ABC affiliate in L.A.

      During this time, Ronnie honed his skills at fact-twisting, selective fact usage and outright bamboozlement.

      With ABC's help, it seems that Freddy is trying to imitate Ronnie.

      Let the Kool-Aid drinking begin.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (June 27, 2007 2:43 pm ET)
           

        ABC Radio is also home to Sean Hannity and Mark Levin.

        That darn liberal media!!! 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (June 27, 2007 2:42 pm ET)
         

      Mark Belling--the same radio guest host who claimed that same-sex couples were selfish for having children--said that Thompson was his new favorite Presidential candidate. Why? Because unlike the other Republican candidates, he was very effective at articulating the conservative ideology so that it came off as commone sense to everyone. Also, he is not embarrassed or ashamed of his positions as a conservative. Mark likened him to Reagan in that sense, and so did some caller. I wasn't born until the first year of Reagan's second term (unlike you old foggies!), so I really can't confirm from personal experience whether he was great at getting his message across. Was the man appealing to a lot of people as a President?

      As for Thompson, I don't like any of his policy issues and, thanks to MMFA, none of the fallacious arguments he puts forth to support them.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 3:18 pm ET)
           

        Carn, as one of those old fogies (I turned 18 the year that Reagan ran for his first term) I can tell you that RR did appeal to many Americans. He's actually grown in stature among the right wing since then, with a lot of help from his friends.

        The late 70s were a strange and rough time for America, Carter was pretty realistic about the challenges that were there, and Reagan, like Thompson, was pretty good at playing on fears, patriotic ego, and dumbing down complicated issues into child-like sound bites that  made people feel good.

        He was my Governor before that, and even as a teenager, my BS detector went off every time RR spoke.It works on a good number of people, though. When times are scary, the lying smiley-face guy does pretty well.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (June 27, 2007 3:30 pm ET)
             

          I remember Ronnie Raygun too and never got his appeal. I guess I was somehow immune to his charm. I remember him being fact and reality challenged and didnt like him as our Governor. I will say unlike Bush many of my somewhat liberal friends seemed to like the guy. I remember one of them telling me he was a good man. When I ran down his policies one by one from the firing of the air traffic controllers to the Contras the guy disagreed with every single one of his policies but when I asked what it was he liked about the guy he just said he is a good man. He had something I just dont know what it was.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 3:57 pm ET)
               

            Solon, you just remided me of something, re: the air traffic controllers.

            The father of a high school buddy who lived around the corner from me was a controller, good  union guy with the PATCO stickers on his car and everything. He was also a big Reagan fan, and I gave him a lot of grief about it, and he called me a punk who didn't know anything.

            Shortly after Reagan's election, the guy was bagging groceries at our local supermarket.A few years later, he thanked me for not rubbing it in.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (June 27, 2007 4:04 pm ET)
                 

              I was a shop steward for my local when Ronnie fired the controllers.

              Most of the guys in my shop loved Reagan. They thought that it was great that someone stood up to the union. It was explained to me that the controllers had it too good.

              This coming from the union guys I represented. At the time, we made more money than the controllers, we had better vacation, better benefits and the only pressure we faced was maybe missing a deadline. If we missed the deadline, we were paid double and triple time to get the jobs out.

              Needles to say, by the time Reagan left office our shop of 300 people was down to about 45.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (June 27, 2007 4:28 pm ET)
                   

                Our union is a fairly strong one and we made more money than the air traffic controllers. A whole bunch of my union brothers loved Raygun but when he fired the controllers many of them said we should strike. Of course Taft-Hartley makes sympathy strikes illegal and it would have bankrupted the union, after that I am sure he still had a lot of support from my union guys but they didnt talk about him so much anymore

                Report Abuse
              • Author by wesley (June 28, 2007 6:23 pm ET)
                   

                 - ...the only pressure we faced was maybe missing a deadline. If we missed the deadline, we were paid double and triple time to get the jobs out. - king

                It could be that job performance and cost overruns were part of the reason for the loss of jobs. 

                Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (June 27, 2007 6:52 pm ET)
               

            When I think of Reagan, I think of the the song, The Drugstore Truckdrivin Man. Cording to recent releases of his diary not a bad or evil man. He allowed certain cowboys a loose rein. Some of those cowboys, who are still arround, can make him seem sane. I still have little use for him or his imaginary legacy. 

            Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (June 27, 2007 3:30 pm ET)
           

        I doubt that Thompson could be any less engaging toward the press than Reagan was.

        I have read allegations that Ronnie's staff went to considerable lengths to limit informal access by the press.  I remember that the engines of Marine One were frequently used to drown out questions when he was coming to and from the Whitehouse, simply looking at the reporters while smiling, pointing at his ear and shrugging his shoulders. 

        I think pretty much all Presidents have been guilty of ducking the press at some point during their terms, but during my life, the only other time I remember it being so obvious as it was with Reagan is when Clinton was tangled up in Tailgate. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by UnEasyOne (June 28, 2007 2:19 am ET)
             

          His handlers didn't want him talking because every time he went off script, he said something stupid that was really hard to explain away.  Like the time he recounted a war adventure that turned out to be a scene from a movie he was in.

          His blunders were legendary; he seemed genuinely unable to distinguish fact from fiction.  This is gonna come as a huge surprise, but the press gave him almost a total pass.  If there had been anything like real journalism at the time, the doddering old fool would have never gotten a second term.  Doesn't look like there will ever be an honest history written about him either, since he's been beatified.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (June 27, 2007 3:35 pm ET)
           

        When I went to school in the fifties and sixties one of our subjects was "Civics".

        I did pretty well in it, but could never comprehend just what the hell "jingoism" was.

        By the time Reagan came along, "we were standing tall", it was "mourning in America" and we were all "proud to be Americans".

        It was then that I understood. Jingoism is government by slogan.

        He was all message with no substance.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by MsOtter (June 28, 2007 9:33 am ET)
             

          "By the time Reagan came along, it was 'mourning in America'"  --Excellent Freudian slip, Mr. King!  (or was that intentional?)

          I was pretty young, but I never understood RR's charm either.  In fact, I remember feeling really scared that he would get carried away with his own rhetoric and launch bombs against the "evil empire."

          Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 27, 2007 4:28 pm ET)
           

        I remember Reagan pretty well. Even though I voted for him, I often thought he was a doddering old fart and full of crap most of the time. To borrow a phrase from Top Gun, he was really good at "blowing sunshine up your ass". Other than that, the fondness with which he is now remembered is mostly due to Right Wing history revision.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 28, 2007 12:25 am ET)
             

          Nerzog, if you ever feel like you're about to point out anything stoopid I've written in my posts, remember I've made a mental note that you voted for RWR.

          My mental notes are biodegradable after about 2 days, so don't sweat it too much.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by MoonbatYouBet (June 27, 2007 5:22 pm ET)
           

        Thompson is a nightmarish combination of Reagan and Bush.  He has Reagan's empty platitudes that make the listener feel good without realizing that nothing has actually been said.  He has Bush's "common man, common sense" delivery that flies in the face that the realities are not so simple and that the common sense is completely wrong.  All of this hides a nasty plutocrat who has only the best interests of his backers at heart.

         I fear that this schtick will be just enough to convince 51% of the electorate to pull his lever.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (June 27, 2007 2:43 pm ET)
         

      Old *fogey*. I never used the word before, so sue me.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (June 27, 2007 3:10 pm ET)
           

        "foggies" was ok. A lot of people are wandering around in a cool damp mist, just looking for some sunshine (some days we find it here, somedays we don't).

        Report Abuse
    • Author by CyHawk (June 27, 2007 3:10 pm ET)
         

      Think about Fred Thompson in Days of Thunder and then think "This guy wants to be president" and then try not to laugh. 

      I can't wait until he delcares his candidacy and we can all laugh at the Republican's putting up another actor. 

      I, for one, would nominate Bill Paxton...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Taz (June 27, 2007 3:20 pm ET)
           

        I can't wait until he delcares his candidacy and we can all laugh at the Republican's putting up another actor.

        Laugh all you'd like. The other actor won the White House, twice. He who laughs last laughs best.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 3:28 pm ET)
             

          If Thompson becomes President, at least then I'll have something in common with him.

          We'll both be laughing at the people who voted for him.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by draftedin68 (June 27, 2007 3:47 pm ET)
               

             

            Shortly after he became govenor, I saw (at a swap meet) a life-size poster of Ronnie all dressed up in a cowboy costume - sixguns and all.

            The poster's caption: "Thanks for the votes Suckers!"

            Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 27, 2007 3:50 pm ET)
               

            HBL, unfortunately Taz may be right. Not about Thompson winning but the Regan comparison by many Republicans.

            I watched "Morning Joe" and Matthews was on. Can't find an actual transcript but Matthews was gushing about how many (Repubs) associated Thompson's "acting" roles with the man himself. If he plays a "leader" then he must be one. Look out for the best "acting" since Regan from Thompson. They were very good at crafting Regan to appear "strong and tough" based on his "acting" and fear they will do the same with Thompson. For an industry that Repubs have despised (Hollywood) they are scripting Thompson for the "role of a lifetime" unfortunately for America.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (June 27, 2007 3:38 pm ET)
             

          Yeah, amazing that the party that hates Hollywood pries so many of their candidates from it.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by CyHawk (June 27, 2007 3:39 pm ET)
             

          You gotta watch out for actors though, they are liars by trade...

          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (June 27, 2007 3:36 pm ET)
           

        Dennis Miller did a pretty good job of playing a backstabber in the film "Disclosure".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 27, 2007 3:19 pm ET)
         

      Wow...Thompson reads Karl Rove's talking points very well. Just what we need; another empty-suit Rove/Cheney sock-puppet in the White House. Apparently, Cheney's not ready to give up his throne just yet.

      Watch for a slew of election day "irregularities" this time around.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 27, 2007 3:33 pm ET)
         

      As noted on the first thread today the Senate Judiciary Comittee has subpoenaded Cheney. Hope Waxman uses a power tool.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ajwan (June 27, 2007 4:14 pm ET)
         

      When it comes to republicans we do like to elect figure heads. Ronnie was an airhead and not a good actor except when it came to acting like a president. Bush, he's the ignorant, but compassionate kind of regular guy you could have a drink with (non-alcoholic for George of course). Thompson got the wise trusting older stateman look going, unfortunately disguising the fact he is a stupid liar.

      Actually I am not so against having a figurehead type role in our government. An elected role for someone to desiminate platitudes, project Americas strength and ideals, act confidently and come up with cool and funny slogans, etc. But in the name of holy God, do not put these people in charge of anything.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (June 27, 2007 4:44 pm ET)
         

      This guy looks old, and tired, and not to bright.  Run Fred...Run.

      Yeah pal, your recollection is a little faulty.  Maybe you can get Alberto Gonzales to be your campaign chief-of-staff.  He can't remember anything either.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 27, 2007 5:01 pm ET)
           

        All presidents age in office...can you imagine what Thompson would look like after 8 years of trying to clean up Bush's mess?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 27, 2007 5:32 pm ET)
             

          I put a photo of Thompson into my age-simulator program, typed in "8 years of Bush clean-up" and it popped out this.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (June 27, 2007 7:03 pm ET)
               

            Properly horrible Beach Have you seen Annies pic on firedoglake? I think her's is scarier.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by jscott (June 27, 2007 7:47 pm ET)
               

            After 8 years of bush (lowercase intentional) cleanup, even John Edwards would look like that.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by UnEasyOne (June 28, 2007 2:30 am ET)
               

            Best laugh I've had today, HBL.

            Seriously tho, I ain't laughin about this Thompson candidacy.  I remember how ridiculous Rayguns seemed and we wound up having to endure 8 long years of him.

            It's obvious the establishment is getting behind him; he's gonna have money out the kazoo; he knows how to follow a script and we underestimate him at our peril. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (June 27, 2007 5:50 pm ET)
         

      I know what Fred has in common with the solar systems largest planets, they and he are nothing but gas.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 27, 2007 8:51 pm ET)
         

      Apparently the picture I saw went away. Easlily impressionable people should stop reading here. Don't try to imagine Ann's face with a lampreys mouth, your mental health may depend upon this.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by HooU2say (June 27, 2007 9:47 pm ET)
         

      I liked Reagan despite my disapproval of some of his policies and involvement in several high profile controversies.  I put some thought into what "it" was Reagan had that I found appealing. For me "it" was his genuine love for this country. I never sensed a love of "power" from Reagan that I sense heavily in G.W. and Bill.  Reagan had "it" and Bill and George have "id".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by smashthestate (June 27, 2007 9:50 pm ET)
         

      Nobody takes this joke seriously, do they?  Come on...it can't be so! 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by smashthestate (June 27, 2007 9:52 pm ET)
         

      oops, when I say "joke", I mean Freddie...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jscott (June 27, 2007 11:02 pm ET)
           

        That's the same thing they said about Reagan too.  The joke was on US.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by luckyoldson (June 28, 2007 1:05 am ET)
         

      The mere fact that many Americans are considering voting Fred should tell you how far the bar has been lowered with G.W. at the helm.

       

      And speaking of the "Ronnie" effect...right now that chimp that starred with him in "Bedtime For Bonzo" could win. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mescal (June 28, 2007 4:11 am ET)
         

      Be afraid.

      Be very afraid. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (June 28, 2007 12:28 pm ET)
         

      God bless us all. I have realized that Thompson posts her under JOHN, and LEATHERHELMET.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ChristianDemocrat (June 28, 2007 12:45 pm ET)
         

      Ah...I wasn't aware of Thompson's radio bits.  Now I understand why he's been putting off officially running.  Unprecedented radio access for free is too wonderful to refuse.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (June 28, 2007 1:03 pm ET)
           

        I heard one of his bits the other day while driving- a little tale about a heroic chopper pilot who took over for his injured comrade, dropped him off at the medics, and returned to wipe out the machine gun nest.

        I don't mean that to trivialize what our troops do on a daily basis, just a little weird to have their stories reduced to "real American Heroes" commercials for a presidential candidate.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 28, 2007 1:09 pm ET)
         

      ALl they need to run is Thompson's scenes from Baby's Day Out where he starts screaming, "Get me that boo-boo!"

      He'll never be President after that.

      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.