Media reported Giuliani speech at Regent, but not Robertson's controversial history
On the June 26 edition of CNN's American Morning, co-host John Roberts and Slate.com chief political correspondent John Dickerson previewed GOP presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani's speech that day at Regent University, a college founded and led by televangelist Pat Robertson. During the segment, Roberts and Dickerson agreed that Robertson's praise of Giuliani in 2005 represented a "good" and "great endorsement," respectively. Yet neither Roberts nor Dickerson mentioned Robertson's history of bigoted and controversial rhetoric, including calling for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, saying that Islam is a "bloody, brutal type of religion," and describing gays and lesbians as "self-absorbed hedonists ... that want to impose their particular sexuality on the rest of America." In addition, a number of other media outlets reported on Giuliani's June 26 speech. While all the reports noted Robertson's role at Regent University, none mentioned his controversial past statements.
Despite Robertson's history, Roberts and Dickerson claimed on American Morning that praise from Robertson is a "good" and "great endorsement":
ROBERTS: Well, certainly, he's got a big problem with conservatives on the issues of gay rights, abortion. Just overall, here's what Pat Robertson said about Giuliani. This was back on May 1, 2005, speaking on ABC's This Week. He said, quote, "Rudy is a very good friend of mine. I think he'd make a good president. I like him a lot, although he doesn't share all of my particular points of view on social issues. He's a very dedicated Catholic and he's a great guy. McCain I would vote against under any circumstance."
Robertson hasn't officially thrown his support behind anybody yet, John, but that's some pretty good endorsement, wouldn't you think?
DICKERSON: That's a great endorsement for Giuliani if you compare it to the -- what other people in the religious community have said about him, which has been quite harsh. And so, from somebody who some voters may look to for guidance on this kind of thing, that's about as good as Giuliani's going to get.
Media Matters for America has documented several instances of Robertson's false claims and inflammatory rhetoric. For example:
- Most recently, while apparently referring to his prior remarks calling for the assassination of Chavez, Robertson said that "now we've begun to see the kind of person he is and more and more people are saying to me, 'I think you were right.' " Robertson also said that when he first made his call for Chavez's assassination, "[n]obody even knew who Hugo Chavez was. They thought he was some grape picker from out in California. And all of a sudden my comments put him on the front page."
- Robertson said that people who have received too much plastic surgery "got the eyes like they're Oriental" while holding his fingers up to the side of his face.
- Following a report on a summit between Pope Benedict XVI and Muslim envoys to address tensions over controversial remarks the pope made about Islam, Robertson stated, "It's amazing how the Muslims deal with history and the truth with violence. They don't understand what reasoned dialogue is."
- Robertson falsely claimed that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg "believed in" polygamy, legalized prostitution, and lowering the age of consent to 12 years old.
- Robertson also once called gays and lesbians "self-absorbed narcissists who are willing to destroy any institution so long as they can have affirmation of their lifestyle." He attributed the legalization of no-fault divorce and abortion to gays and lesbians, adding, "[N]ow they want to destroy marriage."
In addition to American Morning, the June 26 editions of CNN's The Situation Room and Anderson Cooper 360, NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams, Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume, and a June 26 Associated Press article all reported on Giuliani's speech at Regent and noted Robertson's affiliation with the university, but did not mention his history of controversial rhetoric.















Gays and Lesbians responsible for divorce and abortion? How does that work?
By osmosis though conservative brain tissues. Leading to ossification and deposition in an oubliette of the semiattached conciousness.
Is this a trick question?
Where did you learn those words?
I couldn't find my copy of Eye Watering Words for Undergraduates. So I had to use a pocket Merriam/Webster for the spelling of osmsis. Page 495 seemed to have alot of words aching to be used.
Another word you might find interesting is eirenicon. From irenicon, the latter used in christian religious writings.
So I had to use a pocket Merriam/Webster for the spelling of osmsis.
What'd ya use to spell it this time? =)
Forget the big words. Don't you understand its step 3 in our "homosexual agenda, to take over america."
See homosexuals for years have been marrying people of the opposite only to divorce later, claiming to "come out" of the closet. And since gay men are such taste makers and trend starters, hetero-couples can't help but to follow our lead.
As for abortion......I think thats step 33, I think page 195....um.....darn I lost my copy of the Gay Agenda, if anyone finds it, please return it to me, its in a pink Hello Kitty Trapper Keeper :)
What has become apparant to me is there seems to be nothing so utterly ludicrous some rightwinger somewhere wont say it
ADMcCain,if your Gay Mafia has got such a chokehold on the Wedding-Industrial complex, how do you explain the bridesmaids dresses?
I'm pretty sartorially challenged, even for a flaming heterosexual, and I can go all Blackwell on those things.
You've got some holes in your story. ;0)
Bishop Carlton Perason has lost his large church and followers simply because he ask the following
Do you ever see anywhere in scripture where Jesus rejected anybody, period? From the prostitute caught in adult trick (ph), to the tax collector?Or
The bible does say, "Thou shalt not lay with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination."However...It also says, "Slaves, obey your masters." That's new testament. It says if you -- Jesus says you must hate your mother and father and brother and sister if you're going to follow me. You want to take that literally? Does that mean I have got to hate my parents to follow Jesus?
For Rudy and all who court Robertson and his followers I say you are full of sh*t. Religion is your muse to get the power that you seek. You have no faith or real concern for your follow man. You would sell your first born to get into power. You have no soul or conscience.
For Robertson to say "he's a great catholic" what happened to Rudy's first two marriages? How much money did the church receive to annul (if that's what happened) Rudy's first two marriages? How can you "stand before god" and declare "in sickness and in health, till death due us part" and then the church annuls the marriage as if it didn't happen?
I'm beginning to feel like Bill Maher, religion has become an organized corporation, saying what they think the public wants to hear and interpreting the bible to suit there needs..
Ding ding ding ding.
Amen! Great post.
I agree 100%. One of the primary reasons that I cannot vote Republican is this shameless spectacle that is repeated every election cycle; Republican candidates lining up to kiss the ring of Pat Robertson. It's disgusting.
I think you meant to say "Radical Cleric Pat Robertson."
pearlene_scott1602
Matthew 23: 33 "You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?" That particular reference follows a whole slew of similar denunciations. He starts off the series with
"But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut off the kingdom of heaven from people; for you do not enter in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in."
Jesus was very adamant that unless one received Him as the Messiah, that person would perish in Hell. But He usually put it positively, 'Jesus answered and said to him, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God."' Again, He says, "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life."
The amazing thing about Jesus is not that He rejected some (He did), but that He accepts some - some of the most unlikely - like the ones you referenced, and even the likes of Pat Robertson.
MMFA's ostensible reason for complaining about this story is that the MSM didn't drag out all Robertson's silliness from the past. "Yet neither Roberts nor Dickerson mentioned Robertson's history of bigoted and controversial rhetoric,..."
Unfortunately for MMFA, the story wasn't about Robertson, it was about Giuliani and his speech. To whine about that is comparable to me complaining that no one mentioned Mary Jo Kopechne when they referenced Ted Kennedy in the recent immigration bill stories. (That's not relevant, you say? Well, neither are Robertson's gaffes.)
Maybe the honchos at MMFA should try to get jobs as journalists so they can write stories the way they think they should be written - maybe they could write for the Nat'l Enquirer - no need to connect with any reality there.
I understand the criticism but its not quite the same. He WAS speaking at Regents that IS the University Robertson founded. It would be more like why didnt they bring up Chappaquiddic when talking about the immigration bill at a press conference for it at Kennedys HOUSE. The answer of course is that they shouldnt and your point is valid to me.
...there is just one nagging question that i can't toss.... who listens to Ann Coulter, anyway?
I don't know who actually LISTENS, but a whole bunch of fools buy her nonsense-filled books.
I don't know what Coulter has to do with this thread, but she pillories the left with a biting sarcasm and humor that is funny. A lot of what shesays makes me wince, but every once in a while she will get off a zinger that makes her worthwhile.
An historic first - Solon almost agrees with me on something - you feeling ok?
(just kidding)
I actually agree with you more than most of the conservatives that come here. I often have problems with your mischaracterizations of liberals or our positions and if you really think Coulter is funny then I have to ask if YOU feel ok, but overall you are thoughtful and usually make an original point, not a regurgitated rightwing meme. THAT I appreciate even when I disagree with it. Hey I am a seriously lefty liberal. We may not agree on much but I consider myself honest make a good point I will concede it