About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring his colleagues, CNN's Blitzer repeatedly suggested only Democrats voted for subpoenas

June 28, 2007 6:41 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

11 Comments

On the June 27 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer repeatedly suggested that only Senate Democrats subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney's office, seeking documents about the administration's warrantless domestic wiretapping program. Blitzer continued to frame the news as a confrontation between Democrats and the Bush administration even though CNN correspondents Dana Bash and Elaine Quijano and Democratic strategist Paul Begala all pointed out during The Situation Room that several Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee had voted to authorize the subpoenas.

As the Associated Press reported on June 28: "[T]he Judiciary Committee's three most senior Republicans -- Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, former chairman Orrin Hatch of Utah and Chuck Grassley of Iowa -- sided with Democrats on the 13-3 vote last week to give [committee chairman Patrick] Leahy [D-VT] the power to issue the subpoenas." Leahy formally issued the subpoenas on June 27.

At the start of the 4 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room, Blitzer said: "Happening now, the Bush administration, hit with a new flurry of subpoenas, including the vice president's office," adding, "It's the latest in a series of showdowns between congressional Democrats and the Bush White House." Introducing the first Situation Room report on the development, Blitzer said, "The administration charges this is yet another example of Democrats resorting to confrontation." Bash quickly noted that "the vote to authorize these subpoenas last week was 13-3," adding that "this warrantless surveillance program has certainly been controversial in both parties." Later, Quijano stated: "But as we heard Dana just point out, this was a bipartisan vote, Wolf. So Republicans also on board with this."

Later in the 4 p.m. ET hour, however, Blitzer asked of Begala: "Is there a possibility that the Democrats might overreach in issuing all of these subpoenas, Paul?" Begala responded that "the three highest-ranking Republicans on the committee ... all voted to give their chairman the power to subpoena. It was a 13-3 vote." Despite these repeated references by his colleagues to the bipartisan vote, during the 7 p.m. ET hour, Blitzer asserted that "a potential constitutional confrontation between congressional Democrats and the White House in the making, happening now."

From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the June 27 edition on CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Happening now, the Bush administration hit with a new flurry of subpoenas, including the vice president's office. It's the latest in a series of showdowns between congressional Democrats and the White House. We're gonna tell you what's at stake right now.

[...]

BLITZER: Meanwhile, top Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee right here in Washington say they're simply fed up with what they call "a pattern of evasion and misdirection" by the Bush White House. So they're issuing new subpoenas demanding documents about the president's controversial warrantless wiretap program. And the White House and the Vice President Dick Cheney's office are among the targets. The administration charges this is yet another example of Democrats resorting to confrontation. Our White House correspondent, Elaine Quijano, is standing by with the reaction from there, but let's get the specifics of these subpoenas from our congressional correspondent, Dana Bash. Dana.

[...]

BASH: Now, this is the second time in about three weeks that Congress has sent subpoenas over to the White House. And there's no question that this is really an illustration of how much the dynamic here in Congress and the difference between now and before November has changed with Democrats in control.

But what's interesting, Wolf, about this is that the vote to authorize these subpoenas last week was 13-3. That means that many, if not most, of the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee actually thought that this was a good idea because this warrantless surveillance program has certainly been controversial in both parties.

[...]

QUIJANO: But interesting to note that [White House deputy press secretary Dana] Perino, also in her response, said that it was "unfortunate" that congressional Democrats were continuing to choose the route of confrontation. But as we heard Dana just point out, this was a bipartisan vote, Wolf, so Republicans also on board with this. Wolf.

[...]

BLITZER: Is there a possibility that the Democrats might overreach in issuing all of these subpoenas, Paul, to this Republican administration? Sort of the way that Republicans overreached during the Clinton administration when you were a key figure in the White House? You understand the question?

BEGALA: Absolutely. When I worked for President Clinton, one committee alone issued over 1,000 subpoenas. They even investigated President Clinton's Christmas card list. Now I don't think the Democrats are going anywhere near that. They've been in power for six months. This is, I think, the first time the Senate Judiciary Committee has voted to subpoena. And, the three highest-ranking Republicans on the committee -- Senator Specter, Senator Hatch, who have chaired the committee in the past, and Senator Charles Grassley, a veteran Republican from Iowa -- they all voted to give their chairman the power to subpoena. It was a 13-3 vote.

From the 7 p.m. ET hour of the June 27 edition of The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Tonight, a potential constitutional confrontation between congressional Democrats and the White House in the making, happening now. The Senate Judiciary Committee issuing subpoenas, demanding documents about the president's warrantless wiretap program. The vice president's office is among the targets, putting more heat on an already embattled Dick Cheney. The Judiciary Committee chairman, Patrick Leahy, says he's fed up with what he calls a pattern of evasion and misdirection by the Bush administration.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Harlequin (June 28, 2007 8:11 pm ET)
         

      Blitzer must think mentioning the Republicans voting for the subpeonas is equivalent to peeking inside the girls locker room, so he doesn't do it out of fear of being caught by the coach aka right wingers.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (June 28, 2007 9:41 pm ET)
         

      The biggest laugh is the White House whining that the Democrats are resorting to "confrontation".  This administration has done nothing the past 61/2 years but poke sticks in the eyes of the Democrats.  The Democrats finally get control of the CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED powers of congressional oversight, and those snivelling pu$$ies on the right quiver like jello and snot comes running out of their noses.  Waahhhh!!!  They're picking on me.  Waahhhh!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sfcretired (June 28, 2007 11:07 pm ET)
         

      Yep,

      Those damn democrats, what’s up with that?   The legislative branch, under the democratic MAJORITY, is finally doing its job but ole Wolfie doesn’t see it as a joint effort but a partisan effort.   The Situation Room and Wolf are a joke.

       

        

      I guess he figured no use in validating what he had just heard.  Must have really pi$$ed him off that it didn’t follow the strict partisan politics the MSM had gotten so used to prior to last November.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HALISTON (June 29, 2007 12:31 pm ET)
           

        Yet the democratic congress has the worst poll numbers in the history of polling.  They are doing  great job of sending this country down the drainand closer to socialism.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (June 29, 2007 2:21 pm ET)
             

          HALISTON: a case could be made that the numbers are so low ( what are they anyway ) because they aren't putting enough pressure on the administration.

          Some examples of the great dangers of socialism would be good as long as your up.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (June 29, 2007 2:48 pm ET)
             

          OOOOOOOOOO! Socialism! Eeeeeeek! Hide the kids...lock up the silverware! Burn the crops!

          It's hard to believe that the troglodytes still trot out the socialism bogeyman whenever the Democrats propose something that actually makes sense.

          Pavlov's parrots.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by UnEasyOne (June 29, 2007 12:20 am ET)
         

      A 13-3 vote could more accurately be described thus:  "On a bipartisan 13 to 3 vote, the..."

      "Journalist" has become a bad joke in this country.  The only real journalism (with a few exceptions) is done on the net these days.  What passes for journalism in the MSM is 90% spin and pro corporate advocacy.  The good news is that these jokers are losing viewership in direct proportion to the rise of the blogosphere - and guess who dominates here.

       After being told for decades that "the silent majority" approve of the depredations of the right, we finally have a voice!  

      Until the denizens of the right find a way to shut us down, that is. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (June 29, 2007 4:30 am ET)
         

      Blitzer doesn't seem to understand that there are much less than 13 Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee.  The vote could have been unanimous and still Wolf Blitzer's talking point would have remained that the dems are overreaching.

      Conservatives often succeed in convincing themselves that rock solid facts theat they just heard moments ago didn't happen.  I question Blitzer's sanity.  He heard THREE times that the subpoenas were a bipartisan 13-3 decision and still...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (June 29, 2007 9:07 am ET)
         

      Blitzer (you can't make up these names!) apparently doesn't listen to the responses from the other commentators, he just continues as if he hadn't heard them. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by flimflam421 (June 29, 2007 9:44 am ET)
         

      Wolf Blitzer is a weak-minded simpleton who "knows" what the story is and doesn't get distracted by facts.

      I saw him for the first time when he was reporting for Desert Storm.  They were showing footage of aircraft going down a runway,and he was talking over the video.  He talked very factually about how these planes were coming back from successful runs into Kuwait and Iraq.

      The only problem was that the planes had afterburners on.  Obviously they were taking off, not landing.  He didn't have a clue, and he didn't bother to find out, but he knew what he wanted to say, so he said it.

      Fifteen years later, nothing has changed.  He still only thinks in simple thoughts and doesn't bother to learn facts.

      I wish, wish, wish, I could only strike the word "controversy" from his vocabulary.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by halfaworldaway (June 30, 2007 2:37 pm ET)
         

      wolf blitzer sounds like a porn stars name

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.