Morris column smeared Pelosi with misrepresentations of stock ownership
In a June 28 column co-authored with Eileen McGann, Dick Morris falsely suggested that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) -- whose husband owns up to $15,000 in Alcatel-Lucent stock -- previously owned stock in "Alcatel SA." Morris wrote:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has disclosed that she holds stock valued at up to $15,000 in Alcatel-Lucent (formerly Alcatel SA), a company with extensive investments in Iran and Sudan -- nations that sponsor terrorism.
The column's headline -- "Nancy Pelosi Invests in Iran-Linked Company" -- further suggested that Pelosi purchased stock in Alcatel S.A. In fact, a search of Pelosi's financial disclosure filings dating back to 1996 revealed no evidence that she ever purchased stock in Alcatel S.A. Rather, her husband, Paul Pelosi, purchased stock in Lucent Technologies in 1999. Lucent Technologies then merged with Alcatel S.A. in 2006 and, as a result of that merger, Paul Pelosi now owns stock in Alcatel-Lucent, as personal financial disclosure reports filed by Pelosi in 2006 and 2007 show.
Pelosi's most recent financial disclosure form clearly shows that her husband's Alcatel-Lucent stock was formerly Lucent stock. (The notation "SP" in the left-hand column is an abbreviation for "spouse."):

While Morris detailed several allegations regarding Alcatel S.A.'s alleged ties to "nations that sponsor terrorism," his column cited no objections to the business practices of Lucent before the merger. Furthermore, in attacking Pelosi for owning -- and calling on her to divest from -- Alcatel-Lucent stock, Morris never informed readers that before the merger, Lucent was one of the market's most-widely held stocks. USA Today financial markets reporter Matt Krantz wrote in January 2006: "Look at just about any 'most-widely held' list of stocks, and you'll likely see Lucent near the top." Similarly, in 2002, USA Today listed Lucent as the 13th most-widely held stock in "accounts at Merrill Lynch."
Indeed, Pelosi's husband is not the only prominent figure to own Alcatel-Lucent stock. Republican Sens. Jon Kyl (AZ) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) also own stock in the company. According to Kyl's 2007 personal disclosure form, which covers the 2006 calendar year, Kyl has owned stock in Alcatel since at least 2001 and purchased over $6,500 worth of Alcatel and Lucent Technology stock from 2001-2006. Indeed, unlike Paul Pelosi, prior to the Alcatel-Lucent merger, Kyl appears to have owned stock in both Alcatel and Lucent Technology. According to Hutchison's 2007 personal disclosure form, Hutchison owned between $1,001 and $15,000 worth of Alcatel-Lucent stock as a result of the two companies' merger. Hutchison appears to have owned only Lucent stock prior to the 2006 merger.
Rather than revealing this information, Morris simply wrote, "For the Speaker of the House to own stock in such a company is a particular outrage. She should immediately sell her stock and call on all other members of Congress who hold stock in the company to do likewise."
Moreover, in addition to citing allegations of current ties between Alcatel-Lucent and "nations that sponsor terrorism," Morris cited actions taken by Alcatel prior to the company's merger with Lucent in 2006:
Prior to his overthrow, Alcatel carried out major fiber optic products [sic] for dictator Saddam Hussein in Iraq, despite U.S. government warnings to the French company that the project could advance Iraqi military capabilities.
Morris also quoted a 2006 letter to President Bush in which Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) expressed concerns about the merger:
Criticizing Alcatel, former House Armed Services Committee Chairman and current GOP presidential contender Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) expressed his worry over Alcatel's activities in a letter to President Bush. In it, he wrote, "I am concerned about potential transfers of technology or sensitive information to other countries with which Alcatel has business dealings, which have included Burma, China, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria."
But as Morris himself suggests, the concerns he quoted from Hunter's letter were about the business practices of Alcatel -- not of Lucent, whose stock Pelosi's husband owned at the time. The Associated Press reported November 14, 2006:
Lucent chief executive Patricia Russo and Mike Quigley, chief operating officer of Paris-based Alcatel SA, are scheduled to appear Tuesday before the House Armed Services Committee, headed by Duncan Hunter, the outgoing Republican chairman from California.
Hunter, whose San Diego district includes many workers of Qualcomm Inc., a key competitor of Lucent and Alcatel, says he is worried about whether classified work Lucent's Bell Labs performs for the Defense Department will be kept secret when Alcatel completes its takeover of Murray Hill, N.J.-based Lucent.
"I am concerned about potential transfers of technology or sensitive information to other countries with which Alcatel has business dealings, which have included Burma, China, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria," Hunter wrote in an Oct. 26 letter to President Bush.
Moreover, Morris did not note that Bush signed off on the merger between Alcatel and Lucent. According to a December 1, 2006, Financial Times article, the Bush administration's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States approved the Alcatel-Lucent merger under the condition that the two companies "entered into a national security agreement that restricted Alcatel's access to sensitive work done by Lucent's research arm, Bell Labs, and the communications infrastructure in the US":
The US government has reserved the right to re-open its national security review of Alcatel's merger with Lucent in the event that the companies fail to comply with some of the restrictions placed on the transaction.
Although the committee that vets foreign takeovers of US assets approved the merger between the French and US telecommunications equipment makers last month, the condition, revealed in a recent regulatory filing, underscores how significantly the environment for foreign deals has changed since the Dubai ports debacle this year.
Alcatel's merger was approved by the inter-agency panel that reviews sensitive transactions, the committee on foreign investment in the US (Cfius), for 90 days before it was approved by George W. Bush, the US president.
[...]
In order to get approval for the deal, the companies entered into a national security agreement that restricted Alcatel's access to sensitive work done by Lucent's research arm, Bell Labs, and the communications infrastructure in the US.
If the companies "materially fail to comply" with the terms of the national security agreement, the cabinet-level members of the security agencies may, along with the treasury secretary -- who chairs Cfius -- reopen their review of the deal and revise their recommendation to the White House about its approval.
Indeed, on November 17, 2006, the White House released a statement on its approval of the merger, specifically noting the president's role in approving such transactions in order to determine if "there is credible evidence that the foreign interest exercising control [in a U.S. company] might take action that threatens to impair the national security."
From Morris and McGann's column:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has disclosed that she holds stock valued at up to $15,000 in Alcatel-Lucent (formerly Alcatel SA), a company with extensive investments in Iran and Sudan -- nations that sponsor terrorism.
The disclosure of Pelosi's holdings comes at the same time that legislation is making its way through the California legislature barring state pension fund managers from investing in companies, like Alcatel-Lucent, that do business with "terror-friendly" nations.
[...]
Prior to his overthrow, Alcatel carried out major fiber optic products for dictator Saddam Hussein in Iraq, despite U.S. government warnings to the French company that the project could advance Iraqi military capabilities.
Alcatel is currently "involved in similar telecommunications projects ranging from upgrading networks to the installation underwater fiber optic cables" in Sudan and Libya.
Criticizing Alcatel, former House Armed Services Committee Chairman and current GOP presidential contender Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) expressed his worry over Alcatel's activities in a letter to President Bush. In it, he wrote, "I am concerned about potential transfers of technology or sensitive information to other countries with which Alcatel has business dealings, which have included Burma, China, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria."
[...]
For the Speaker of the House to own stock in such a company is a particular outrage. She should immediately sell her stock and call on all other members of Congress who hold stock in the company to do likewise.
Only if we send a signal to these companies that their associations with Iran and other terrorist states comes at a huge price can we dissuade them from continued involvement. But if there is a massive selloff of their stock, company executives will feel the pinch in their salaries and bonuses.















"Indeed, Pelosi's husband is not the only prominent figure to own Alcatel-Lucent stock. Republican Sens. Jon Kyl (AZ) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) also own stock in the company. According to Kyl's 2007 personal disclosure form, which covers the 2006 calendar year, Kyl has owned stock in Alcatel since at least 2001 and purchased over $6,500 worth of Alcatel and Lucent Technology stock from 2001-2006. Indeed, unlike Paul Pelosi, prior to the Alcatel-Lucent merger, Kyl appears to have owned stock in both Alcatel and Lucent Technology. According to Hutchison's 2007 personal disclosure form, Hutchison owned between $1,001 and $15,000 worth of Alcatel-Lucent stock as a result of the two companies' merger. Hutchison appears to have owned only Lucent stock prior to the 2006 merger."
Would I have to kill his former boss to get Morris to talk about that in his so-called "column"?
Is there a school that Satan...... I mean Dick Cheney owns, run by Rupert Murdoch, and in secret where people that aren't sure they have a (or want it removed) soul or not go to?
Is it a viable theory?
Or has the answer always been:
The FOX College of Noise Making
as edwards pointed out in the vice presidential debate in 04, cheney said repeatedly before taking office that we should lift sanctions on iran and that u.s. oil companies should be allowed to do business there.
All I can say about Little dick is that he doesn't know his right foot from his left foot. But he knows some hookers' right foot from her left. Sorry, that was insensitive but true. Also, I have factual knowledge that Little dick owns stock in Dr. Scholl's. Sorry, my coulterside is showing today.
Is anyone stunned that this dick has his facts wrong..
If memory serves me correctly, cheney has a large collection of Dr. Mengle memorabillia ( I recently bumped my head while reaching for the TP as I ran out of pages from coulters book)
Why doesn't Pelosi sue Dick Morris for lying about her?
Partly because it's easy to legally lie about someone in this country.
And partly for the same reason that you won't sue me when I claim that you worked in Saddam Hussein's cabinet in 1996.
If Morris is not lying and smearing Hillary Clinton, he is lying and smearing Nancy Pelosi. He really has issues with women in power. What a hateful person this guy is.
He is jealous of women. That will change when he has enough money for his sex change operation He will adopt the new middle name: less.
Yeah, I know, Doris. The only women Dick seems to not have a problem with are the ones he pays for sex...and to suck on their toes, of course....
Sorry, but I have to contradict you on this one, Doris.
Dick LOVES women in power.
In fact, he's willing to pay top dollar for them!
But only if they're wearing leather masks, wield leather whips, & are willing to let him suck their toes.
And just a bit of history: Lucent Technologies, before it got spun off from its parent company, used to be called Bell Labs.
In effect, he's calling Nancy Pelosi a traitor because her husband invested in AT&T.
Unless I missed it, this item never mentions where Dick's column is available. Is it in newspapers, a blog or what?
I'm just curious as to how big a circulation some of these clowns have with their own websites or blogs. Dick and others get on Fox almost every day, have their website pasted below them on the screen, luring the nuttiest FoxFans to the "secret club", where they can really let loose and stop being so PC.
But I feel confident that the type of person who goes to Dick Morris' website and reads his columns is the type of person who goes to another source and does some fact-checking.
Har. Just kidding.
Awww, someone smeared the woman who refuses to impeach Bush. How sad.
so it's ok with you that morris is lying? and congratulations on all those new supreme court decisions you and your pal nader helped bring about.
Yeah, me and Ralph put those judges onto the bench. And congrats on your party helping mass murder 650,000 Iraqis. Keep up the good work, the War God will reward you some day. Drink the blue kool-aid and ignore those dead children, little boy.
I don't blame Nader voters or Democrats for the mess in Iraq. That mess belongs to BushCo and his enablers.
Have you thought that self-righteousness is the cause for many a war? The holier than thou syndrome which in the extreme leads to violence, in the discussion threads leads to sniping and petty bickering.
So now it's "self-righteous" to point out that Nancy Pelosi REFUSES to allow Bush and his crew to be impeached? She REFUSES to bring war criminals to justice. That makes her a COLLABORATOR in war crimes. Keep supporting her, it just makes you an enabler of war criminals. Makes you an ACCOMPLICE in their crimes. But the Dems can do no wrong, eh? All them votes to keep the war going....it was the Repubs or Nader who forced them to do it, right?
Anyone who votes to fund or support the occupation of Iraq or Palestine is a WAR CRIMINAL. That is not self-righteousness, that is TRUTH. Pelosi is a war criminal. FACT.
I sincerely hope that you do not represent the Green party as an officer or hold any position. Some people have an aura of sanctity about them....you have the odor of sanctity.
Good lord! Talk about a divider and a demonizer. You are giving the right wingers a run for their money in that dept.
that's right red. sit back and act like you're so morally pure. when the fact is that the practical consequences of your support put bush in office. i have quoted you before the words of david cobb, the green party candidate in 04. who said voters in swing states had an obligation to weigh the consequences of their votes. i've always liked phil donahue, but even his wife marlo thomas came out a couple weeks before the election in 2000 and said you cannot vote for nader because of the danger that bush will end up swinging the court to the right. and she was correct, little boy.
You just keep drinking that blue kool-aid and blaming Nader for all the bad votes the Dems have made. Blame Nader for all the times they voted to keep our troops killing in Iraq or funding Israel's racist behaviour. Go ahead. Just prove to us all that you can't blame the Dems for anything bad they've done. Like a little child who can't believe his father's a mass murderer, even when the bodies are piling up outside the door. Go ahead. Blame someone else who NEVER voted for any of this, absolve those who HAVE.
and you just keep drinking that green kool aid. the fact is that the democrats have a one vote majority in the senate and you're attacking pelosi because she won't start impeachment against bush. here's a frickin news bulletin, there would be one or two republican votes at the most, so it's a non starter. why hand them the propaganda for something that won't happen. let me make it simple for you, since you're the one with the childish mentality of my way or screw it. there have been plenty of candidates in the last two elections who are to the left. they don't pull votes. period. you can sit in your ivory tower and pretend differently but it doesn't happen. so you deal with the best alternative, and don't allow a guy like bush to gain office. you say, repeatedly, that the democrats are just as far right as the republicans. that's an untrue statement any way you look at it. you have zero credibility.
wow you can lia and smear with the best of the conservatives cant you red king its 800,000 dead iraqis and 650,000
Nancy Pelosi is the Speaker of the House and so it's no surprise that Dick Morris has his pants in a knot. Strong women that don't swallow his um....line are the enemy. When Hillary wins the Presidency, Morris will turn blue and spin himself into orbit. This moral midget can't influence his wife, much less anyone else.
Morris: "For the Speaker of the House to own stock in such a company is a particular outrage. She should immediately sell her stock and call on all other members of Congress who hold stock in the company to do likewise."
And then we have this from Reuters, Tony Snow, and the White House.....
(Reuters) Nov. 17, 2006 "WASHINGTON - [......] "Alcatel and Lucent have agreed with U.S. government agencies to enter into two robust and far-reaching agreements designed to ensure the protection of our national security," White House spokesman Tony Snow said in a statement released in Hanoi, where Bush is attending an economic summit."
Someone had better tell Morris that buying this stock is actually investing in the protection of our national security....or so says Tony Snow and the White House.
Replying to Huntington Beach Lefty: Morris is a contributing writer to a DC newspaper called The Hill (www.thehill.com), whose editor is Hugh Gurdon (hgurdon@thehill.com) (t.202.628-8501). Since The Hill needs to keep up some semblance of fairness as covering Capital Hill, it's probably a better place to complain about this than to Morris himself or Fox News -- though all of them are doubtless aware of his SOP.
Regarding Speaker Pelosi, I'm curious why she hasn't turned the tables with her new powers, like having Leslie Stahl of CBS 60 MINUTES investigated for undue influence, intimidation, unfair tactics of arm twisting regarding her line of questioning on "impeachment", of Bush. What is our government doing letting these media buffoons rake them over the coals like old time gangsters and not doing anything about it?
I think it's time for a little federal housecall at CBS--don't you? (the kind that cracks the knuckles) It does concern coercion to obstruct, inhibit or intimidate criminal investigations doesn't it?
Dick is a lying SOB, but just "Republican" define it all . . a complete lack of morals and intergrity . . .
Now we get a "pardon" for a WH criminal - we won't have justice in America unril EVERY (R) stands for REMOVAL!!!! IMPEACH NOW!!!!