CNN alleged "creative math" in Obama's fundraising before debunking the allegation
During the July 17 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer repeatedly teased a report on Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) fundraising practices by asserting that Obama is using "creative math" and suggesting he is "overselling his grassroots support" in reporting that 258,000 individuals donated to his presidential campaign in the first six months of 2007. Blitzer stated that this "new flap" is due to the fact that the campaign counted those who purchased campaign merchandise as donors. In his ensuing report, however, CNN correspondent Tom Foreman rebutted the suggestion that Obama engaged in "creative accounting," reporting that Obama is actually "obeying the law in all of this" because "[u]nlike most of his opponents, Obama sells his campaign merchandise directly, instead of outsourcing it," and the law requires that money paid for merchandise sold directly by the campaign be counted as a contribution. Foreman also refuted the claim that Obama is "overselling his grassroots support," reporting that "people who have bought campaign merchandise only count for about 1 percent of all the donors who have given Obama money."
Indeed, the Federal Elections Commission states on its website that "anything of value given to influence a Federal election is considered a contribution" and explains that "if you pay $15 for a T-shirt sold by a campaign, your contribution amounts to $15 (even though the T-shirt may have cost the committee $5)." The Obama campaign website explicitly states this -- twice -- on its "Obama Store" homepage: "All purchases made on the Obama Store are 100% contributions to the campaign and count toward your overall contribution limit." Neither Foreman nor Blitzer mentioned this fact. Foreman's report was followed immediately by a brief segment in which CNN Internet reporter Abbi Tatton visited the online "Obama Store." Tatton also failed to note that the website informs patrons that their purchases, by law, count as campaign contributions.
Similarly, on the July 18 edition of CNN's American Morning, anchor John Roberts teased a report by Foreman, asking: "Is Barack Obama's online fundraising just smoke and mirrors?" However, in his report, Foreman aired video of Obama saying: "The reason that they're listed as donors is because, if they purchase it through the campaign, and it goes into the campaign coffers, it would be a violation of campaign laws if we did not list that. So, all we're doing is abiding by the law." Foreman added: "The raw read? He's right. Other campaigns have farmed their merchandising out to vendors, so they can't count their buyers as donors."
The CNN reports followed a July 17 New York Times article reporting that "Mr. Obama's campaign has also employed novel tactics -- like counting sales of $5 speech tickets or $4.50 Obama key chains as individual contributions -- to pump up his numbers and transform grass-roots enthusiasm into more useful forms of support." The Times article made no mention of the fact that this "novel tactic" is apparently required by law. The Times also reported that "[n]o other campaign is known to have listed paraphernalia sales as donations." However, CNN's Foreman reported: "At least four other presidential candidates do the same thing, [Sen.] John McCain [R-AZ], [Rep.] Tom Tancredo [R-CO], [Rep.] Duncan Hunter [R-CA], and [Rep.] Dennis Kucinich [D-OH]."
Wall Street Journal OpinionJournal.com editor James Taranto touted the Times' story, writing in his July 17 "Best of the Web Today" column that Obama's "numbers are inflated," adding: "This doesn't seem fraudulent, but it sure is cynical."
From the July 17 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: And Barack Obama's grassroots cash bonanza, his campaign apparently using some creative math to report a massive list of donors.
[...]
BLITZER: And if you bought a Barack Obama t-shirt or a button, his campaign is labeling you as a donor. Is he overselling his grassroots support?
[...]
BLITZER: Coming up, new information about Barack Obama's record-breaking donor list. Did he overstate his grassroots support, or simply use some creative accounting? Obama's t-shirts and buttons are at the center of this new flap. We're going to check out the price tags online.
[...]
BLITZER: Sen. Barack Obama's breaking records when it comes to the battle for presidential campaign cash, but some people now seem to be questioning the way he's adding up all of his numbers. Let's go to CNN's Tom Foreman, he's in New York. He's following all of these numbers. What is going on, Tom?
FOREMAN: Well, Wolf, to put it simply, what is going on is Barack Obama has surprised a lot of people with all the money he has raised. And now those buttons and bumper stickers and T-shirts are causing a bit of a stir.
OBAMA [video clip]: We've got people who have been giving $5 and $10 and $25.
FOREMAN: It was a record-breaking announcement, Barack Obama winning the money race big, both in contributions and the number of donors.
JOHN DICKERSON (Slate.com chief political correspondent) [video clip]: You get these stories of people who come to these Obama events and say, I -- I haven't much been interested in politics, but, here, I'll give you the money out of my handbag. That gives a sense of momentum. It gives a sense of movement.
FOREMAN: What's creating the fuss is the simple fact that the senator from Illinois is growing his supporter list in a nontraditional way. People who buy Obama campaign hats, buttons, and bumper stickers are all being counted as part of that record-breaking number of contributors.
At least four other presidential candidates do the same thing, [Sen.] John McCain [R-AZ], [Rep.]Tom Tancredo [R-CO], [Rep.] Duncan Hunter [R-CA], and [Rep.] Dennis Kucinich [D-OH]. Unlike most of his opponents, Obama sells his campaign merchandise directly, instead of outsourcing it. The people who have bought campaign merchandise only count for about one percent of all the donors who have given Obama money.
OBAMA [video clip]: The reason that they're listed as donors is because, if they purchase it through the campaign, and it goes into the campaign coffers, it would be a violation of campaign laws if we did not list that. So, all we're doing is abiding by the law.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE [video clip]: There's a whispering campaign that Obama is trying to inflate his donor numbers.
FOREMAN: Obama dismissed those charges.
OBAMA [video clip]: We're so far ahead of everybody else in terms of number of donations, that we don't need to be playing with the numbers.
FOREMAN: And he may be actually on to a successful fund-raising venture.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE [video clip]: The campaign spokesman tells me, though, that they've raised several hundred thousand dollars through this process. It is a pretty novel way not only to raise money, but also to grow the campaign small-donor list.
FOREMAN: And it's a novel way not to make your opponents not very happy.
You know, we mentioned this idea of a whisper campaign. What that's really all about is there are people who don't like the fact that Obama seems to have a lot of grassroots support, that he has big numbers of people. So, they are looking at any way to tell somebody who will tell somebody who will tell a reporter, hey, maybe he's not counting it right.
But the truth is, he's obeying the law in all of this. And he gets to count them right now, whether or not opponents like it -- Wolf.
BLITZER: Interesting. Thanks very much, Tom Foreman, looking at all those numbers for us. Let's go straight to our Internet reporter, Abbi Tatton, right now. Abbi, how much does a campaign T-shirt, for example, cost in the Obama store?
TATTON: Well, Wolf, this one sells for $20, and, yes, 8 cents at the Obama store, which is featured prominently at the front page of the Barack Obama Web site, and lets supporter even buy their campaign merchandise, pins, hats, all American and union-made, it says on the site, in bulk.
But some of the things go for a lot cheaper than that T-shirt, two stickers, for example, for five bucks. The keychain, which is so popular right now, it's only available on backorder on the website, selling at $4.50 -- the store one of the many ways that Obama is using the website to bring in these small dollar amounts -- Wolf.
BLITZER: Abbi, thank you for that.
From the July 18 edition of CNN's American Morning:
ROBERTS: And is Barack Obama's online fundraising just smoke and mirrors? Tom Foreman looks into claims of fuzzy math. "Raw Politics," coming up next.
[...]
FOREMAN: The Obamarama under the O-microscope. Some political insiders are suggesting he has inflated the number of his donors by counting every person who buys a hat, bumper sticker, or button. Response?
OBAMA [video clip]: The reason that they're listed as donors is because, if they purchase it through the campaign, and it goes into the campaign coffers, it would be a violation of campaign laws if we did not list that. So, all we're doing is abiding by the law.
FOREMAN: The raw read? He's right. Other campaigns have farmed their merchandising out to vendors, so they can't count their buyers as donors. They call it sour grapes, kids.
The New York Times reported on July 17:
Just moments before he arrived, Mr. Obama had said goodbye to a less exclusive crowd of 10,000 that had gathered to hear him speak across the bay in Oakland. They paid nothing to hear him, but spent $40,000 on Obama T-shirts, baseball caps, buttons and other knickknacks. And the Obama campaign registered each of the purchasers as one of the record 258,000 contributors it signed up in the first six months of the year.
Since he got into the race, Mr. Obama has hopscotched from big-ticket to big-crowd events across the country, trying to turn the early excitement about his candidacy into campaign cash and a national political organization.
Like other candidates, he has worked hard to cultivate a network of bundlers, who can solicit the checks from individual donors for the legal maximum of $2,300 that are the mainstay of any major campaign. But to capitalize on his celebrity, Mr. Obama's campaign has also employed novel tactics -- like counting sales of $5 speech tickets or $4.50 Obama key chains as individual contributions -- to pump up his numbers and transform grass-roots enthusiasm into more useful forms of support. No other campaign is known to have listed paraphernalia sales as donations.
Taranto wrote in his July 17 Wall Street Journal OpinionJournal.com "Best of the Web" column:
The first is a New York Times piece, titled "Obama's Camp Cultivates Crop in Small Donors." We've heard this before, of course -- but when you read the Times piece, however, it turns out that the numbers are inflated:
Just moments before he arrived [at a $2,300-a-plate fund-raiser in San Francisco], Mr. Obama had said goodbye to a less exclusive crowd of 10,000 that had gathered to hear him speak across the bay in Oakland. They paid nothing to hear him, but spent $40,000 on Obama T-shirts, baseball caps, buttons and other knickknacks. And the Obama campaign registered each of the purchasers as one of the record 258,000 contributors it signed up in the first six months of the year. ...
To capitalize on his celebrity, Mr. Obama's campaign has . . . employed novel tactics -- like counting sales of $5 speech tickets or $4.50 Obama key chains as individual contributions--to pump up his numbers and transform grass-roots enthusiasm into more useful forms of support. No other campaign is known to have listed paraphernalia sales as donations.
This doesn't seem fraudulent, but it sure is cynical.















Odd. I would think if you did NOT report sales of T-shirts and other campaign related schwag that the FEC (or whatever the organization that oversees fair elections is called) would be all over 'em. Worst case, I'd think a campaign would want to play it safe on such matters.
Of course, none of that matters when you view every aspect of a campaign as a horse race.
I saw this report. The entire gist of CNN's coverage was:
A) Obama's campaign sells merchandise directly from it's website, instead of outsourcing it, like most other campaigns do.
B) Obama's campaign lists people who buy Obama merchandise as campaign contributors, which is exactly what they are.
C) "Some people" (Unnamed, of course) don't like that the Obama campaign is doing this.
D) Obama's campaign is required to do this.
E) There's no story here, but hey, we got to show you several pieces of Obama merchandise AND plant the seed of suspicion in the minds of the viewers.
In short, a total waste of about five minutes of airtime.
And underinformed Mr. Taranto? Join Mr.Blitzer in the remeadial class for reality awareness. Yes there will be a test, but not a real one. If there was you'd be joining Alies and Cavuto shortly. To be briefed on the the care and risks of stored sponges.
Nice, "Alies and Cavuto" is a new talking point already and the article hasn't been up a day yet.
Did he overstate his grassroots support, or simply use some creative accounting?
Yes, No.
Is he overstating his grassroots support? Depends on how you look at it, but I would argue yes: If a campaign claims it has 250k individual donors, and you know that the media will portray that as if 250k people are mailing in checks, then you are overselling a bit.
But, creative accounting? No, he's following the law...the next story should be about which campaigns are most grossly NOT following the law by not reporting things like merchandise sales.
dexteritas, your "if" "and" and "then" argument for Obamas overselling of his campaign is sort of a stretch.
"if" he has the donors, and "if" he knows that the media will interpret it a certain way, he's overselling it?
Considering that he's following the rules, even if he were to anticipate the medias treatment of it, what could be done to not oversell his fundraising?
It's opportunistic advertising.
Do you think I'm "misinforming" you if I say that McDonald's claim to have served "over 99 billion" is overselling because 99 billion people haven't yet lived on this earth, and they're clearly counting repeat customers?
Yes, I think that would be misinforming, as McDonalds is promoting a total number of customers served, and I don't think they would have to take into accout anybody interpreting it to mean 99 billion unique individuals.
Besides the fact that they're not required by law to report this.
You're such a jokester, Huntington...I'm sure you REALLY know that reporting sales is, in fact, the law if you're a business. You're just a prankster though, that's all.
Obama's campaign is technically correct that each merch purchase is a donation...and I'm sure they're getting the SS# of each purchaser to ensure they only count one buyer once if they come back for more later. Touting people who have "donated" $5 that could be buying an Obama hat to poop in it or later modify it to be anti-Obama CAN BE REASONABLY INTERPRETED TO BE OVERSELLING HOW LARGE AND EFFECTIVE YOUR DONOR POPULATION IS.
I'm not sure if McD's "X billion served " on their sign is a count of burgers (that's what it used to be) or customers, but if you're trying to compare that to their sales report or say that they file that on their taxes, I think you might be the prankster.
But you ignored my original question about what Obama's campaign should do to not be "overselling" in your opinion.
Give up HBL, you're out of your league here.
Dexter with the many digits is much smarter than you or I.
I'm willing to bet that you never imagined that so many people were buying Obama hats to "poop" in them or to turn them into anti-Obama hats.
It's a diabolical plan from a true evil genius..
Hey King- you're right, I know when I'm beat. Whether by the "merchandise vs. donors" or the "one donation each vs repeat donors", or the implication by McDonalds that they had 99 billion different customers, or the lack of any suggestion for action by Obamas campaign that would have made the critics happy, I really could not narrow down what I was arguing against. ;0)
I would say no and no. Obama's not the one who was misrepresenting it -- that's the fault of the media that never reported it until now. As CNN stated, the stipulation of "customer = contribute" has been disclosed on his Web site throughout the campaign. It's not Obama's fault the media didn't do its job.
You'd think the corporate press would be wooed out of their expense account loving socks regarding the boffo money that Obama has raised. But nooooo, they have to find some kind of fault with it (talk about cynical).
If Mitt Romney were selling "Mitt Oven mitts" there would be a 10 minute feature on how cute it was and Matthews would devote an entire Hardball to it.
Clearly for the same reason that Romney is crushing in the Iowa and NH polls right now and there's about 2 stories on it in the national news.
*Repub primary polls
I'm not an expert, but isn't it in the best interests of a campaign to NOT report merchandise sales as donations? I mean, because if the Obama campaign didn't, then couldn't a rich person just buy 1,000,000 T-Shirts to support the campaign while going over the $2,300 limit? Therefore, it seems to me that Obama is actually doing the honest thing in this. I may be wrong thou, again I am not an expert on political fund raising and there may be a hole in my argument that I am overlooking.
Being a donor to this campaign myself, there is also a button to round up your donation if you buy a sticker, button, or t-shirt. Whether the media likes it or not, we are supporting him and there are that many contributors. Next quarter, it may be double! He's not a one hit wonder. He's a great man, and once you choose to believe in "the audacity of hope," you want to give others hope. It's exactly what we need in America.