About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ingraham said she is considering whether to accept CNN offer to guest host

August 01, 2007 6:48 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

40 Comments

On the July 31 broadcast of her nationally syndicated radio show, Laura Ingraham -- who has attacked reporters stationed in Iraq for "report[ing] only on the IEDs [improvised explosive devices], only on the killings ... only on the reprisals," and for "reporting from hotel balconies" instead of in the field -- said CNN "emailed me" and "said, 'Will you fill in the 8 o'clock [p.m. ET] hour for a week?' " Paula Zahn Now currently occupies the 8 p.m. weeknight time slot on CNN, but host Paula Zahn is leaving the network, to be replaced ultimately by Campbell Brown. Ingraham is the second conservative radio personality that CNN has recruited to guest host a prime-time show during the 8 p.m. time slot. As Media Matters for America noted, Glenn Beck, whom CNN hired in 2006 to host a CNN Headline News program, filled in for Zahn from July 2-6.

Ingraham's attack on reporters stationed in Iraq came during an appearance on the March 21, 2006, edition of NBC's Today. Later that day, on Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, Ingraham stated that "before the [Today] segment began ... I actually was watching a report by their NBC reporter, Richard Engel, who was doing one of those from-the-balcony reports, reporting on the bombs going off, reporting on the difficulties in Iraq." She followed up these comments on the May 31, 2006, broadcast of her nationally syndicated radio show, stating:

And by the way, when I went on the Today show back in March to talk about the fact that it would be nice for the Today show to go to Iraq and do a show on a military base, and I brought up the hotel balconies, that was coming right off a Richard Engel report from a hotel balcony about the latest IEDs going off. The point of that is all the guys I talked to in Iraq were tired of it, and I was speaking for them.

In the wake of a car bomb explosion that killed two CBS News crew members -- cameraman Paul Douglas and freelance sound man James Brolan -- and severely wounded correspondent Kimberly Dozier, Ingraham asserted on the June 6, 2006, edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor that she was "surprised" that NBC president Steve Capus criticized her for her comments about what she called the "dinosaur media." She claimed she had said that reporters in Iraq should "go to a military base" and "just talk to the troops" when in fact, in her original comments, Ingraham added that reporters should "go out with the Iraqi military."

Additionally, while discussing CNN's offer on July 31, Ingraham said she was "not sure whether I should do it or not" because "lots of factors are in play, but just in principle." She further commented that she would "be up against [Fox News host Bill] O'Reilly. That'd be tough. Might be fun to just mess with the computers at CNN and see if I could put chewing gum under the seat and stuff." During an appearance on the June 1 edition of CNN's American Morning, Ingraham referred to "the liberal elites ... at CNN."

Some of Ingraham's other notable comments follow:

  • As the blog Firedoglake first reported, on the November 7, 2006, edition of her radio show, Ingraham encouraged listeners to jam the phone lines of the Democratic Party's voter assistance hotline 1-888-DEM-VOTE. Ingraham said: "I want you to call it and I want you tell us what you get when you call 1-888-DEM-VOTE. They're on top of all of the shenanigans at the polling stations. One problem: you can't get through." She later added: "Let's keep 'dem' lines ringing." Firedoglake later reported that that the voter assistance hotline was "being flooded with calls from crank callers."
  • On the June 27, 2004, edition of CNN's Reliable Sources, Ingraham challenged former President Bill Clinton's assertion on CNN's Larry King Live that nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh has said that former deputy White House counsel Vince Foster "was murdered in an apartment that belonged to the Clintons." Ingraham said: "I never heard Rush Limbaugh say anything of the like. And I'm certain he didn't say that. ... There are people on the right who were saying those things. Those things were reprehensible. I don't know anyone responsible who was saying that." However, according to the national media watchdog group Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), during a 1994 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show, Limbaugh said he had received a fax with "a bit of news ... that claims that Vince Foster was murdered in an apartment owned by Hillary Clinton." FAIR went on to report that "[a]fter he returned from a commercial break, Limbaugh began referring to the story as a 'rumor,' but continued to claim that the story was that 'the Vince Foster suicide was not a suicide.' "

From the July 31 broadcast of Talk Radio Network's The Laura Ingraham Show:

INGRAHAM: CNN called me up and asked me if I would fill in -- if I would think of -- they didn't call me up, they emailed me -- excuse me -- and said, "Will you fill in at the 8 o'clock hour for a week?" Would you consider doing a week some time because they have a number of months before Campbell Brown takes over the 8 p.m. slot. She's having a baby, and she's going to have the baby, I guess, and then do the show. And I'm not sure whether I should do it or not -- well, obviously lots of factors are in play, but just in principle. If all those other factors, all those other conditions --

MALE PRODUCER: Well, there is one factor that will be in play up against you there at 8 o'clock.

INGRAHAM: Oh, that's right. I'll be up against O'Reilly. That would be tough. Might be fun to just mess with the computers at CNN and see if I could put chewing gum under the seat and stuff. See if that would work out. But -- it's so -- I don't know, we'll see, we'll see. They've done some interesting segments and shows. I don't even know who the hosts are anymore. It's just a rotating cast of characters at 8 o'clock, and I don't know how -- I don't know how you can take four months off from competing with O'Reilly. How do you take four months off? You got to get a show on the air. You can't take four months off. But that's what they're doing. I mean this is -- What do I know? I'm just a radio host. I'm not a big television executive. I don't know anything.

From the June 1 edition of CNN's American Morning:

JOHN ROBERTS (host): Take a quick listen and we'll get you to react to it.

BUSH [video clip]: If you want to kill the bill, you don't want to do what's right for America. You can pick one little aspect out of it. You can use it to frighten people or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all.

ROBERTS: What do you think about that, Laura, the fact that he says that opponents of this bill are opposed to what's right for America?

[...]

INGRAHAM: Well, you know, it's absurd. I think it was a bad tactical decision for him to say that. The way to get people on your side is not to insult them, especially people in the conservative movement, who worked tirelessly to get him re-elected, and the president has been consistent on supporting this. You know, you have to give him credit on that. And, I've, I've never questioned his motives in pushing for this type of comprehensive reform. But to insult his base, I mean, I hope he thinks he's going to be saved by the liberal elites at, at CNN, John, because if, if he is, then, then I'll be wrong about this. But I think it's kind of silly.

ROBERTS: Excuse me, what was that last comment?

INGRAHAM: What? How did -- you know, by the way, John, how did you introduce me for this segment before the break? "The outspoken Laura Ingraham." Do you guys -- do you guys introduce liberal commentators that way? I'm going to check.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (August 01, 2007 6:51 pm ET)
         

      This is misinformation, how.........? 

      Oh, another preemptive strike against somebody who isn't loved around here?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian in FL (August 01, 2007 7:06 pm ET)
           

        You're right Tommy. Replacing a hard news reporter, on a non-opinion news show, with a partisan right-wing hack does not show any form of bias in any way. I'm sure Laura Ingraham will be completely "fair and balanced", and not report any misinformation at all, despite her past record.

        Thank God we have you as the Voice of Reason.

        We should just sit back and cheer as hard news is turned more and more into right-wing opinion. I'm sure that will lead to Americans being even more informed about the issues, such as how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.

        (end sarcasm)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by News Corpse (August 01, 2007 11:50 pm ET)
             

          And the whole idea of scheduling Ingraham after Beck's tryout bombed is proof that CNN isn't interested in improving their ratings, they just want to install a right-wing hack.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (August 02, 2007 8:38 am ET)
           

        Known liars have no place on a news network.  And Laura Ingraham is a known liar.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (August 01, 2007 6:53 pm ET)
         

      Besides, I would think you all would be salivating at this little week long stint.......more material!!  Replace Zahn with Ingraham will give how many more thread topics every day?  Think about it.........  ;)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (August 01, 2007 9:06 pm ET)
           

        Salivate over Laura? Tommy, have you seen those nekkid pictures of her? Gross!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (August 02, 2007 11:50 am ET)
             

          I think you may be confusing laura Ingraham with that bitchy skank Laura Schlessinger.  Schlessinger was the one with the naked pics ont eh Internet.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (August 02, 2007 10:16 am ET)
           

        TOMMY:

        That you think MMFA is "salivating" over the prospect of MORE Rightwing lies, smears, and disinformation shows you completely misunderstand what Liberals and Progressives are actually pushing for: MORE HONESTY, more reporting with ETHICS, more journalistic integrity.

        Having YET ANOTHER Rightwinger being considered to replace another Rightwinger shows, of course, that our MEDIA has been overtaken by rightwing partisans, unconcerned with things like honesty or ratings. But it's a sad thing, and one day it will STOP.

        Until then, our job as citizens and Liberals does not invoke "salivating", but instead great sadness at the terrible roads the rightwing has taken this nation down, with the inestimable costs in suffering, death, maimings, corruption in the highest offices, and a general degrading of our nation. No "salivating" is possible, only the hard work of change and then healing. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nomobush (August 01, 2007 7:06 pm ET)
         

      Launched in May 2004, Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.

      MMfA monitored the hiring practices of CNN as well as the commentary by Laura Ingraham. If she gets the job, CNN will be helping her forward the conservative agenda as she has a history of pushing commentary that's not accurate, reliable or credible. Glenn Beck, another substitute host, has a similar track record.

      Instead of CNN hiring a neutral journalist for the job, they chose to employ two conservative ones. That's why this is news, and is on MMfA today.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 01, 2007 7:21 pm ET)
         

      Glen Beck and Laura Ingraham hosting news shows?  Kind of like right wing media hacks debating global warming with legitimate scientists.

      Guess it shouldn't be a surprise, but another reason to not watch CNN.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cage free brown (August 01, 2007 7:25 pm ET)
         

      she might not do it "on principle". I love that. It's like Newsweek doing a love letter cover story on Ann Coulter and then her braying that the evil liberals deliberately put a bad picture of her on the cover.

      how long are Big Media going to allow people who openly hate their guts to  say and do whatever they want and then have the bad taste to BITCH about it?

      sheesh!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by k2 (August 01, 2007 7:37 pm ET)
         

      2006 Conservatives lose majorities in the House and Senate 2006-2007 Polls continue to show sharp declines in support for conservative causes 2007 Conservatives have trouble raising 2008 campaign money 2001-2007 Conservatives engaged in unprecedented corruption

      Ergo, CNN deduces that the nation wants more conservative voices.

      They're sharp over there!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by kevin1007 (August 02, 2007 4:41 pm ET)
           

        Polls consistently show that there are more conservatives in this country than liberals.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by sneakypie (August 01, 2007 7:48 pm ET)
         

      I tihnk the reason they are going more conservative is because they think it's necessary to propogandize for the conservative cause more now than ever.  If they don't get the lies and misinformation out they fear the lDemocrats will get more power.   Look at who they've hired.  Several former FNC "reporters", Glenn Beck, Mrs. Dan Senor & now they want Laura Ingraham.  Funny, they haven't offered any jobs to any real reporters.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by News Corpse (August 01, 2007 11:53 pm ET)
           

        Note that Campbell Brown (Mrs. Senor) has her own rep for rightist bias:

        “It’s difficult to say that you’re against the war and at the same time not say that you’re against the troops.”

        That's right out of her husband’s emails from Karl Rove.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (August 01, 2007 8:09 pm ET)
         

       - ...Truth is, Beck's show has been in a ratings slump for most of this year. (The show's audience peaked 10 months ago.)... - Eric Boehlert

      Well...if we're going to judge sites by popularity...ol Eric neglected to point out mmfa's performance.

      Since mmfa traffic peaked during the 2006 mid-terms...their traffic has fallen by 90%...that's right 90%...as tracked by Alexa.

      mmfa pulls many of the same reporting stunts that they criticize daily.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (August 01, 2007 8:44 pm ET)
           

        News flash:

        News and political web sites have had declines in readers since the mid-terms. Who would've thought!

        In addition to sites like CNN's, right-wingnut web sites like hatemonger Malkin's and the laughable Townhall (sites you might be familiar with, judging by your posts here) have had similar declines since the mid-term elections last November.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (August 01, 2007 8:49 pm ET)
             

          Atta boy davey...now pass your news flash along to Boehlert.

          I can always count on a particular few to master the obvious...thanks for the help. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by dave_chicago (August 01, 2007 8:56 pm ET)
               

            You also deceptively chose a very short period-right around election day-to come up with your "90%" figure. Deceptively--pretty much as deceptive as your your co-misinformers Media Matters targets daily.

            (A similar "90%" figure can be derived by looking at the right-wing townhall.com. Of course, you posted a similar message on their forum, too, I'm sure....)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wesley (August 01, 2007 9:04 pm ET)
                 

              Nope...just used the same time frame that Boehlert dishonestly chose to use...you know...the one where he cherry picked and said Beck had peaked 10 months ago.

              With your good help...we have punctured the ratings game played by Boehlert.

              And...nope...don't read or post at townhall.com 

               

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 02, 2007 8:20 am ET)
                   

                If Beck's ratings actually peaked 10 months ago, how is it "cherry-picking" to report on it?

                You need a class in remedial logic.

                Scratch that, take the intro course. You don'r even have the fundamentals.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by aDifferent McCain (August 02, 2007 8:28 am ET)
                   

                I don't know if you were around during the mid-terms Wes.

                There is a very good reason for a drop in numbers in all political sites. During the mid-terms the level of troll activity increased to a point were traffic was nearly 200% higher than normal (my own figure, but re-reading some sites seems to bear this out). 

                So since those people were just 1-2 posting trolls yeah activity has gone down. But that's applicable across the political site spectrum. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by wesley (August 02, 2007 8:54 am ET)
                     

                   - There is a very good reason for a drop in numbers in all political sites - adifferentmccain

                  I agree completely...

                  That's why I pointed out the dishonesty of Boehlert and mmfa comparing Beck's ratings from the mid-terms to now and calling it a ratings slump.

                  When, mmfa's ratings dropped by 90% during the same time period...are we to call mmfa's performance a slump? Or just the dynamics of election cycle news?

                  I don't have any inclination to support the ratings performance of Beck...I am pointing out the whimsical reporting by Boehlert and mmfa...the very same type of reporting that they decry every day. 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (August 02, 2007 11:21 am ET)
                       

                    I know you wish that were the case, but truth is Beck is in a ratings decline. He has been since june of last year (before the mid term elections).

                    There are of course several examples showing slumps. When your show is the reason for CNN ending up in 3rd place, and you finish way behind Paula Zahn, who is reportedly leaving because of poor ratings, I'd say you are in a slump.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by wesley (August 02, 2007 11:38 am ET)
                         

                       - I know you wish that were the case -   

                      Sorry to disappoint you snoop...but you're all wet.

                      I am no fan/supporter of Beck...my comments are directed at Boehlert. I don't watch or listen to Beck...and couldn't care less about his low ratings.

                      Boehlert...in the pet phrases of mmfa...uncritically reported and failed to report that almost all political news/talk media peaked during the 2006 mid-terms and have since retreated to more normal ratings.

                      Here's a real slump for you...mmfa peaked in traffic around Jan06...and other than a spike at last years mid-terms they have lost about 90% of their traffic over the last 19 months.

                      In fact their traffic currently has fallen below their startup ratings in 2004...could it be that all those petty media catfights are catching up with them? 

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by snoopy (August 02, 2007 12:03 pm ET)
                           

                        OK, so your comments are directed at Boehlert. Noted. So you are just saying MMFA is in the same boat as Beck. Noted. Failed to note - this is apples to oranges. Beck is on CNN, his show is funded by advertising, he is not giving his advertisers a return on their investment. MMFA is supported by donations from their blogging audience. Not the same at all.

                        I just shook off the water on you. Don't forget to get a towel!

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by wesley (August 02, 2007 12:16 pm ET)
                             

                           - MMFA is supported by donations from their blogging audience - snoopy

                          They may be "supported" by their audience...but are not completely funded by them...your assertion is quite laughable.

                          They are funded by other liberal groups...ergo...how did they pay Kelly Craighead, one of Hillary's closest friends, over $200,000 as an adviser before they even had an audience.

                          Here's an apples to apples scenario. Beck's ratings are poor and falling...but not falling near as fast and low as mmfa's 90% traffic loss. 

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by snoopy (August 02, 2007 12:43 pm ET)
                               

                            So why don't you post the proof of your assertions? Let us see for ourselves how you came up with that 90% number?

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by wesley (August 02, 2007 12:59 pm ET)
                                 

                              I have already sourced the info above...but for my challenged friends I'll repeat it.

                              Go to alexa.com...it's all there...and much more. Knock yourself out...enjoy your homework.

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by snoopy (August 02, 2007 2:08 pm ET)
                                   

                                OK, so? MMFA is at it's base again and peaks during important events, yay for you for making that point. It doesn't prove your claim that Boehlert is a hypocrite cherry picking data on Glenn Beck.

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by wesley (August 02, 2007 2:25 pm ET)
                                     

                                  I didn't say he was a hypocrite...I said he was dishonest.

                                  He singled out Beck as slumping since the mid-terms...when in fact...almost all political sittes have slumped since then.

                                  And as context...I've proven that mmfa has fallen farther and faster than Beck over the same period.

                                  Well King...this case is closed. 

                                  Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 02, 2007 8:18 am ET)
               

            I can always count on a particular few to master the obvious...thanks for the help. 

            And I can always count on a particular few to be unable to grasp the obvious at all. Check out that beam in your own eye, Wes, before you comment on the motes in others'.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (August 02, 2007 9:08 am ET)
                 

              People like Wesley are fun to watch as they go down in flames.......

              :-)

              Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (August 02, 2007 2:07 pm ET)
           

        Maybe MMFA will get canceled, oh that's right it's not a cable TV news show. Never mind.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by CaseySpring (August 01, 2007 9:50 pm ET)
         

      CNN has allready lost credibility with the employment of Beck.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sasami (August 02, 2007 2:50 am ET)
         

      Ingraham oozes hatred. Of course she'll do wonderfully on "liberal" CNN!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by aDifferent McCain (August 02, 2007 8:36 am ET)
         

      off topic here, but it is not being reported enough so here.

      "And now it looks like the GOP is training their legions of sex criminals earlier than anyone feared. This morning's Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the former head of the Michigan Federation of Young Republicans raped a college student at the national Young Republicans convention in Cleveland's Warehouse District." -DownWithTyranny

      Link 

      I especially liked the story below that, titled:

       COLLEGE DEMOCRATS OF AMERICA REPORT NO RAPES

      Report Abuse
    • Author by guy montag (August 02, 2007 3:06 pm ET)
         

      My favorite Laura Ingraham moment was when she gushed about the "St. Crispin's Day Speech" in Shakespeare's Henry V.  She was trying to use it to support the war in Iraq, but only displayed her own ignorance.  She referred to "the British" when Scotland was allied with France at the time.  And the Hundred Years War ended in an English defeat through exhaustion, because they couldn't conquer a map and the English taxpayers got tired of being milked for such a vainglorious enterprise.

      Even worse, Ingraham the Catholic convert conveniently forgot that her English heroes went on to burn Joan of Arc at the stake--the French freedom fighter who became a Catholic Saint!  I mean, talk about the blind leading the blind.  It was an absolutely pathetic and desperate performance.

      Also, Henry's, "We few, we happy few, we band of brothers." who were about to face the French kinda reminded me of the many Young Republican chickenhawks who cheerlead from afar.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by thomas.melvin4266 (August 02, 2007 4:30 pm ET)
         

      Please all this bickering over which liar will be on which network news channel.  Let us face it folks; I am 50 years old and I have never heard a conservative politician or news reporter ever tell the truth.  Why these fine christians don't really have a true concept of the truth.  Ann (long neck) Coulter says all liberals are godless; while she spews vicious lies and character  assassinations while saying she is a god fearing lover of the Bush policy, what ever it may be (except on letting those fifthly people south of the boarder from becoming American's like her).  Does she ever ask herself “What Would Jesus Do”, or just she just refer to “Mien Kauf” for words of inspiration.  Republicans’, conservatives, what ever they call themselves are the dumbest bunch of cowards that this country has ever seen.  While I served in the military for more than 23 years they all talked about how they supported us while none of their children served.  When William Jefferson Clinton was president, my leadership showed distain for him even though based on his medical condition (asthma) he would not have been allowed to serve; while they praised Bush for his war dodging in the Texas NG where he served as an example of a drunken rich kid.   So let us not bicker over the fact that conservatives are all aligned with Lucifer (their true god) and Liberals who fight for individual liberties and speak only the truth are on the side of Jesus; “the Prince of Peace (not the god of war “Mars”)”.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Talk Radio Network
    Talk Radio Network
    Talk Radio Network
    P.O. Box 3755
    Central Point, Oregon 97502
    Phone: 541-664-8827
    Fax: 541-664-6250
  • CNN
    CNN
    One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
    Phone: 404-827-1500
    Fax: 404-827-1906
    http://twitter.com/cnn
  • Laura Ingraham
    Laura Ingraham