About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Falsehood, schmalsehood: Post's Cohen reports "Grandpa's" claim about Clinton and hedge funds

August 07, 2007 2:14 pm ET
image

13 Comments

In his August 7 column, written as a fictional conversation with his deceased grandfather, Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen reported that while Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) supports changing the tax law so that compensation received by hedge fund managers based on the gains their funds realize will no longer be taxed at the capital gains rate, she will avoid the issue on the campaign trail. In the fictional dialogue, Cohen's grandfather says of Clinton's opposition to the current tax law: "She's not going to campaign on that. She'll let this Chuck character [Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY)] take the heat, and she'll do nothing." In fact, Clinton has campaigned on this issue. In a July 13 speech in Keene, New Hampshire, she called for changing the law and described the current system of taxing hedge fund compensation as a "glaring inequity."

According to a July 13 press release on her remarks at the Keene rally, Clinton said that the current system -- in which the share of managers' compensation pegged to the performance of their fund, called "carried interest," is taxed at the lower capital gains rate, not the higher income tax rate -- "offends our values as a nation." From the release, titled "Hillary Clinton Proposes Ending Unfair Tax Breaks for Wall Street Investment Managers":

Hillary Clinton today announced her support for cracking down on the tax loophole that allows some Wall Street investment managers to pay dramatically lower tax rates on their income than those paid by average working Americans. Current tax laws allow investment managers in certain partnerships to take large amounts of their compensation in the form of "carried interest," which is taxed at the low 15% capital gains rate, rather than at income tax rates as high as 35%. Many finance and tax experts, including billionaire financier Warren Buffett, have raised concerns that carried interest is essentially earned income. Therefore, it should be taxed as ordinary income, just like the earnings of average American workers.

Hillary's economic vision focuses on shared prosperity in the face of rising economic inequality in our country. A key element of her economic agenda is tax fairness that rewards work, not just wealth. Speaking at a rally in Keene, New Hampshire, on her Ready for Change, Ready to Lead tour, Clinton said that the preferential tax treatment of carried interest presents a "glaring inequity" that must be addressed to restore fairness to our nation's tax system.

"Our tax code should be valuing hard work and helping middle class and working families get ahead," Clinton said. "It offends our values as a nation when an investment manager making $50 million can pay a lower tax rate on her earned income than a teacher making $50,000 pays on her income. As President I will reform our tax code to ensure that the carried interest earned by some multi-millionaire Wall Street managers is recognized for what it is: ordinary income that should be taxed at ordinary income tax rates."

Clinton's speech was widely reported. In a July 13 article on the rally, The New York Times wrote that Clinton "today became the latest presidential candidate" to call for ending the practice of taxing "carried interest" at the capital gains tax rate. A July 14 Associated Press article similarly reported that Clinton "joined other Democratic hopefuls in supporting the end of a tax break for some wealthy Wall Street financiers that she argued creates 'a glaring inequity.' " Clinton's remarks were also reported on the July 13 edition of NBC's Nightly News and the July 14 edition of NBC's Today.

From Cohen's August 7 Washington Post column:

"What do I mean? What do I mean? Listen, college boy, in my day, the Democrats stood for the little man. You know the little man, boychik?"

"Yes, Grandpa."

"He's the working stiff. He's the guy with a lunch pail. You think it's right he pays a higher rate of taxes than those hedge-fund managers?"

"Oh, Grandpa, you're talking about something called the 'Carry.' It stands for carried interest, and it means that these money managers and hedge-fund guys, wonderful risk-takers and builders of wonderful wealth, get taxed as if their income is capital gains -- 15 percent. The IRS says it's legal."

"Legal, shmegal! You think it's fair?"

"Fair?"

"Yeah, fair. You heard of fair, Mr. Famous Columnist?"

"This is not a matter of fairness, Grandpa. Believe me, there are vast issues of macroeconomics and tax policy here, which, if not handled properly, will sink the economy."

"Who are you?" my grandfather bellowed. "The poor pay more than the rich, and you give me this macaroni economics stuff. You should be ashamed of yourself." He paused.

"You know this Schumer?"

"Chuck? The senator? Yeah."

"He's opposed to this tax fairness. What kind of Democrat is this?"

"You have to understand," I explained, "Schumer represents Wall Street."

"What about Main Street?"

"Hillary supports your view."

"You think I was born yesterday? She's not going to campaign on that. She'll let this Chuck character take the heat, and she'll do nothing."

"Do you have two sources for that?"

"Oh, wake up! Don't you know nothing about bosses and workers and who controls politicians? Too much college made your brain soft." He paused again.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by easygoer002209 (August 07, 2007 2:54 pm ET)
         

      me: Grandpa, this Hillary Clinton has some sharp, innovative ideas about changes we should make in running this nation.  It reminds me of the successes we had in the 90s when her husband was president.

      Grandpa: But you saw what they did to her husband.  They hated him because not only did he prove them wrong, but he also beat them at their own game.  He was sharper, faster, more cunning and more charismatic than anybody they ever saw before, so they spent 7 years and 70 million dollars, eventually reducing themselves to sniffing his zipper when the ICs couldnt file a charge against him.

      me: you're right grandpa...thanks for reminding me.  You called it, didn't you?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (August 07, 2007 2:55 pm ET)
         

      This is not a matter of fairness, Grandpa. Believe me, there are vast issues of macroeconomics and tax policy here, which, if not handled properly, will sink the economy.

      Sink the economy? What an amazingly fatuous argument in favor of preferential tax rates for rich hedge fund managers.

      But taxing other hard working people at 35% is OK?

      Get me an aspirin!

      Randy

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (August 08, 2007 8:04 am ET)
           

        Yep, asking that the wealthy pay a higher share of their income in taxes than the middle class is engaging in Class Warfare, smacks of Communism, and will hurl the economy into the firery abyss.  Of course it will.

        Here are other programs which, if enacted (God forbid!) will destroy the economy:

        Social Security

        Minimum Wage

        Unemployment Insurance

        Medicare

        Medicaid

        Sundays and Holidays off

        Federal food and drug inspection

        Unions

        etc, etc. etc. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (August 07, 2007 3:01 pm ET)
         

      I really don't think campaigning about changing the tax rate on Hedge Fund Manager compensation is really going to 'connect' with the electorate.

      It's like saying Hillary is for apple pie.  It's one of those policy wonk issues that everyone supports (besides Schumer who must be getting lots of contributions from hedge fund managers.)  Since everyone supports the changing of the tax coed it ceases to be an issue. 

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (August 07, 2007 3:03 pm ET)
           

        hahaha.. tax coed.. I like it.  

        Must be a fruedian slip...  It sometimes happens when I fantasize about Hillary and tax codes.  

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (August 07, 2007 4:03 pm ET)
         

      Maybe this is one of those issues that sort of slid by all those "values voters" who voted for Bush because he loves Jeeeeezzzzzzuuuuusssssss. While they're all worked up about Gay marriage and Flag Burning and the Ten Commandments, Bush and his Billionaire Buddies are shifting the nation's tax burden downward in their direction. If Hillary truly intends to fix this gross injustice, I support her efforts. But then, who can be bothered about such wonkish issues when all those gay people are trying to destroy marriage! Holy Crap!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 07, 2007 4:44 pm ET)
         

      Great job by Media Matters...

      Cohen is the worst sort of vermin.

      However, it is sad to see Chuck Schumer oppose tax fairness for Hedge Funds.  (Makes you wonder if he's really a Democrat at all, or some kind of corprocrat?)  I had quite a bit of respect for him--until now.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (August 07, 2007 4:53 pm ET)
         

      Dear Richard Cohen:

      Your grandfather came to me in a dream, and asked me to tell you that you're an idiot.

      :-)

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Pithaughn (August 07, 2007 5:20 pm ET)
         

      And of course he uses the lamest sort of vehicle to express his lies, the imaginary conversation. It really galls me that a hack, lazy, tired old columnist gets this cushy job and a sharp, up and coming poster like TEX is still sweating it out waiting for a break!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (August 08, 2007 8:00 am ET)
           

        I agree- Cohen' use of the "imaginary conversation" is not just a cheap ripoff of Art Buchwald's writing style, it's a cowardly way to throw out a charge in a passive-aggressive manner that is supposed to make it hard for us to criticize.  If you have a charge to make against the Senator, Mr. Cohen, just do it.  Spare us the cloying conversation with the dead man, please.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (August 08, 2007 8:54 am ET)
             

          I guess that Richard Cohen's next opinion piece will include a conversation with Saturday Night Live's "Mr. Subliminable".....

          :-)

          Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (August 07, 2007 5:43 pm ET)
         

      You can read this as either really bad political analysis, unsourced gossip, or some kind of satire column. 

      Richard, we need to know! Please supply some kind of disclaimer or warning for your next column. Something like:

       

      "The following is not based on fact and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely accidental"  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 08, 2007 8:17 am ET)
         

      Maybe next time he should channel his deceased grandma; she might have more common sense about Hillary and hedge fund tax policy (one could hope!)

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.