CNN's Yellin failed to identify jailed lobbyist, disgraced members of Congress as Republicans
On the August 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, congressional correspondent Jessica Yellin reported that the recently passed congressional ethics bill "was pushed by Democratic leadership in response to scandals involving Jack Abramoff and Congressmen Duke Cunningham and Bob Ney." Yellin, however, failed to identify either of the two former members of Congress as Republicans, nor did she identify Abramoff as a Republican lobbyist.
As Media Matters has noted, on the July 30 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer identified Rep. William Jefferson (LA) as a Democrat when discussing a FBI and Internal Revenue Service raid on the home of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), but did not identify Cunningham, whom he had also mentioned, as a Republican.
In 2006, Ney pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy and making false statements in connection with the Justice Department investigation into Abramoff and was sentenced to 30 months in prison. In 2005, Cunningham pleaded guilty to conspiracy to accept bribes from defense contractors; he was sentenced to more than eight years in prison. Abramoff pleaded guilty in January 2006 to charges of fraud, tax evasion, and conspiracy to bribe public officials; he was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison.
From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the August 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
CAROL COSTELLO (guest host): A big issue in the presidential race right now also has been a big concern on Capitol Hill. As we have reported, Democratic rivals are accusing Hillary Clinton of being too cozy with lobbyists. Congress has passed new lobbying reform legislation. Our congressional correspondent Jessica Yellin is here. Jessica, is this attempt at reform actually going to make a difference?
YELLIN: Well, Carol, reasonable people disagree. Democrats say it's intended to clean up the culture of corruption in Washington, but it's certainly not going to keep money out of politics.
[begin video clip]
YELLIN: Dave Hoppe is president of one of Washington's elite lobbying firms.
Are you part of the problem with American politics?
J. DAVID HOPPE (Quinn Gillespie and Associates president): I don't think so. What lobbyists do is provide information.
YELLIN: Hoppe worked for decades as a Republican aide on Capitol Hill. He says the ethics and lobbying bill is not going to send tremors through the halls of Congress.
HOPPE: The job we do is not going to change fundamentally because of this.
YELLIN: The bill was pushed by Democratic leadership in response to scandals involving Jack Abramoff and Congressmen Duke Cunningham and Bob Ney, and outrage over figures like this: $1 billion -- that's how much the health care industry spent lobbying the year of the Medicare debate.
HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI (D-CA): We'll keep our promise to drain the swamp that is Washington, D.C.
YELLIN: The new rules mean no more gifts like free seats at sporting events or special golf trips; no more parties for members of Congress at the political conventions; the end of affordable flights on private jets; and new public reporting requirements.
CRAIG HOLMAN (legislative representative for Public Citizen's Congress Watch): Now, the books are going to be open.
YELLIN: But there's nothing that stops corporate interests from giving millions in campaign contributions, and lawmakers can still get a free lunch as long as it's at a fundraiser.
HOPPE: It's very difficult to write these laws. It's one of those things every time you try and close something, you open something up.
[end video clip]
YELLIN: Another major change: Lawmakers will now be required to disclose whether they put special spending measures called earmarks in bills. So it'll now be a matter of public record whether they steered money to any special interests -- Carol.















Any reasonable assumption could be made that when the reporter says "the bill was pushed by a Democratic leadership in response to scandals involving.......", that is was in response to Republican misdeeds. And if that wasn't enough, it was immediately followed by a clip of Pelosi wanting to "drain the swamp".
I doubt she would be referring to Democrats in that swamp.
You beat me to the punch Tommy, but I'll still add my two cents :-)
I think it would stand to reason IF a congressional ethics bill was being pushed by the Democrats that the biggest offenders were obviously Republicans.
Had the biggest offenders been Democrats, then you can bet it would have been the Republicans pushing hard.
These guys only worry about ethics when it's their opponents getting caught.
However, for the politically challenged CNN should have made the viewers aware of the party affiliation of those mentioned.
The Conservative News Network covers for one of its own, once again.
More deception from Tommy and Jeter when they try to claim that there's nothing here, and they push the "Why is this here" mantra.
The Democrats are pushing good legislation in response to misdeeds by Republicans. That should be mentioned. Leaving off the Republicans titles is deceptive.
Leaving off the Republicans titles is deceptive
So is calling yourself NoMoBush, when we all know you are Sue/Ellie717/NotThatGeorge.
As I wrote in my post earlier, CNN should have included which parties the offenders were affiliated with for the politically challenged.
Anyone else would have understood the Democrats would never have pushed an Ethics Bill if it were their own members screwing up.
Please do not join the crew that accuses NoMoBush of something that has been repeatedly denied, is unproveable, and serves only to bully that person because that person opposes vociferously the point of view that you take. If you wish to dispute that person's assertions, or conclusions, feel free to do so. If all you have is personal attack, at least step forward with something more novel than this warmed-over ad hominem.
I have never (yet) flagged a comment on this site. I may begin soon, if this gang (five members, if you have joined) continues - and if that results in bringing attacks upon me, I have been attacked by right-wing whackos on some of the nastiest boards on the net, without ever yet having been myself banned for cause. I have been banned from some sites for disagreeing with the host, but even there had the satisfaction of forcing admission of the arbitrary nature and lack of rules violation.
Jeter, not you too Please!!! Nomobush did not call anyone names so this senseless continuation with the Sue/Ellie is beneath you and Tommy. Why do you guys do this? I cannot understand. How do you KNOW that this is Sue/Ellie?. Please tell me how you know. Nomobush said nothing rude but you along with Tommy and Casey continue. I enjoy posting with you Jeter but lately you and Tommy sound like little boys who need a “timeout”. You join in the “bandwagon” of accusations but nobody has supplied proof. And even if you had proof of prior insults there was nothing in what Nomobush replied that would lead you to start the Sue/Ellie tread. We all have heated moments and say rude things, myself include, hopefully we can get past them. You and Tommy cannot seem to do that.
Anyone else would have understood the Democrats would never have pushed an Ethics Bill if it were their own members screwing up.
I don't think so and neither does MMfA.
I think that the Democrats learned from their defeats in the mid 1990's. I think they also learned from watching the Republicans (who came into office claiming to be white knights, but quickly turned into the bad guys with many corrupt methods).
It's disingenuous to say that there's no possibility that the Democrats could have or would have come up with this after what has happened in the last 2 decades. I think there's plenty of evidence that the Democrats have learned from their past mistakes as well as the mistakes of the Republicans.
Regardless of the mistakes Jeter made in the statement above, my point still stands. Failing to mention that all the people being mentioned as bad guys in that story were Republicans is furthering the conservative agenda that both parties are equally guilty of this crap. They aren't. Furthermore, both parties are not equal when it comes to trying to fix problems like this. The recent Republican leadership has a pattern of ignoring or covering up ethics issues from their members. There are no similar Democratic scandals currently. Anyone who doesn't recognize the current culture of corruption that exploded once the Republicans got into office and tried to create a permanent Republican majority is blind.
Yellin should be limited to doing Dr. Scholl's commercials.
Yep, not only did they not identify the rascals, but they never even mentioned Trafacant, Rostenkowski or many others.
Not only that but Cunningham and Ney are now felons and have no right to vote, therefore party affiliation means nothing.
In Ohio and California, felons do have the right to vote.
You moonbats just don't get it, do you? If the Republicans look bad, the media also has to make the Democrats look bad also. It is called being"Fair and Balanced"?
Yet another blatant effort to foster the notion that the "Culture of Corruption" is a bi-partisan operation. At least at this time, it is not. The "Culture of Corruption" is a thoroughly Repugnant creation, and needs to be called out as such.
At least Yellin acknowledged that her source for "reasonable people" disagreeing about whether this is a good change, "worked for decades as a Republican aide".