About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

After suggesting Vince Foster was murdered, Hannity praised caller who accused Clinton of multiple rapes

August 16, 2007 8:10 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: While discussing Sen. Hillary Clinton's newest campaign ad, Sean Hannity agreed with a caller who argued that "Monica Lewinsky and all those other women that Bill Clinton raped were invisible to her." Hannity replied, "I wish I'd thought of that."

52 Comments

During the August 15 edition of his ABC Radio Networks talk show, Sean Hannity agreed with a caller who argued that "Monica Lewinsky and all those other women that Bill Clinton raped were invisible to" Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY). The caller was referring to Sen. Clinton's recent campaign advertisement, in which she stated that families without healthcare "are invisible to this president." The caller added: "So, how can we expect her to see, you know, hundreds and thousands of Americans?" In response, Hannity said, "I wish I'd thought of that," and went on to ask, "[W]hat about all those women that accused her husband of being a serial abuser? Oh, she didn't pay any attention. Were they invisible?"

Beyond saying that he wished he had thought of the caller's smear against Clinton, in the past month, as Media Matters for America documented, Hannity has also suggested that, "[i]n the minds of some," there may have been "a motive for foul play" behind the death of former deputy White House counsel Vince Foster. Indeed, while teasing the segment on the July 22 edition of Fox News' Hannity's America, Hannity asked: "Did a close friend of Hillary Clinton commit suicide, or was it a massive cover-up?" But, although several conservative outlets have suggested that the Clintons were somehow involved in Foster's death -- as Media Matters has documented (here, here, and here) -- numerous investigations determined that his death was a suicide. The Office of the Independent Counsel -- then headed by Kenneth Starr -- completed its inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Foster's death with a report issued on October 11, 1997, which concluded that "based on investigation and analysis of the evidentiary record, that Mr. Foster committed suicide by gunshot in Fort Marcy Park."

From the August 15 edition of ABC Radio Networks' The Sean Hannity Show:

HANNITY: All right, Sean Hannity Show: I'm going to tell you about this in the next hour. Feminist Fonda -- Jane Fonda -- Gloria Steinem stiffing employees at their women's radio network, just like "Airhead America." Let's go to [caller] in Texas. Hey [caller], how are you?

CALLER: Hey, how you doing, sir?

HANNITY: Got 30 seconds, my friend, but they're all yours. Go.

CALLER: OK sir, yeah, I just had a quick comment to make about that invisibility ad about Hillary Clinton.

HANNITY: Yeah.

CALLER: She said something about -- I just wanted to make a comment about how, you know, Monica Lewinsky and all those other women that Bill Clinton raped were invisible to her. So, how can we expect her to see, you know, hundreds and thousands of Americans?

HANNITY: You know, what a -- I wish I'd thought of that. Hang on a sec. Maybe it's 'cause I didn't go to bed till 6 o'clock. All right, you get credit. You know what? Yeah, what about all those women that accused her husband of being a serial abuser? Oh, she didn't pay any attention. Were they invisible?

From the July 22 edition of Fox News' Hannity's America:

HANNITY: And coming up: Did a close friend of Hillary Clinton commit suicide, or was it a massive cover-up? It's the mysterious death of Vince Foster in this week's "Clinton Chapter."

[...]

HANNITY: And welcome back to Hannity's America. Of all the "Clinton Chapters" we've covered so far, well, this week, we delve into one of the darkest and most mysterious.

[begin video clip]

HANNITY: Chapter eight: the mysterious death of Vince Foster, part 1. Foster served as deputy White House counsel during the first Clinton administration for six months before his death. But before heading to the nation's capital, he spent most of his life in Hope, Arkansas, where he and childhood friend and future president Bill Clinton were neighbors.

Now, he worked at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock and became close with Hillary Clinton, who called him "Vincenzo," and when the Clintons went to Washington after the 1992 election, Foster went with them.

But Foster's term in the White House was an introduction to hard-knock Beltway politics. He was largely responsible for handling the Travelgate scandal and was responsible for dealing with all the first family's paperwork related to Whitewater.

Those first months of 1993 were tough on Foster. He was targeted by a series of Wall Street Journal editorials and battled with clinical depression. All of that changed on July 20, 1993. That was the day that Vince Foster got in his car and drove to Fort Marcy Park in Virginia, and he supposedly walked through the woods -- and depending on which version of the story that you believe -- he took his own life.

[...]

HANNITY: Now, these are just some of the mysteries surrounding the death of Vince Foster. Did he have in his possession papers that could have impacted the Whitewater investigation? How was the suicide note missed?

In the minds of some, these questions may have provided a motive for foul play. But the most heated debate over Foster's death wasn't political, it had to do with old-fashioned police work -- and that's where we'll pick up next week when we open up another chapter in the Clintons.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (August 16, 2007 8:24 pm ET)
         

      uh, monica testified to the grand jury that she started  the whole thing by flashing her thong at bill.  and no, he should not have responded. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 16, 2007 8:41 pm ET)
         

      And it's none of our business.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NL207 (August 17, 2007 1:08 pm ET)
           

        If this is truly not the public's business, then most surely neither was anything Mark Foley was doing the public's business.

        I see no difference between Clinton's misuse of his office to commit sexual shenanigans or Mark Foley's.  Neither broke the existing laws although engaging in illicit sexual activity with subordinate employees will usually get an executive fired in the private sector and must be considered reprehensible conduct in all sectors.  Clinton should have resigned as did Foley.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (August 17, 2007 1:24 pm ET)
             

          Oh, that's classic.  First off, it's a minor distinction that we're talking about pursuing boys under the age of 18 here.  That's a little bit of difference from a legal adult pursuing you.  If she found it objectionable she shouldn't have flashed him.

          If Foley wants to be with consenting adult males, I have no issue with that.  The real issue with it was the hypocrisy of raking Clinton over the coals and then trying to defend Foley.  The Republicans set the standard of the relevance of sexual behavior, and Foley paid for it, even by the terms of your argument.

          If it really was something he should have resigned over, then the Republicans should have voted to remove him.  The public didn't give a damn, and the Republicans knew they didn't have a case to remove him, but he should have resigned on principle.  Right. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by leatherhelmet (August 17, 2007 6:20 pm ET)
               

            So you have no problem with sexual harassment of employees or unwanted groping by presidents either?  Does that equal text messaging underage boys in your book?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (August 17, 2007 11:23 pm ET)
                 

              I believe I made the distinction myself about underage boys.  I also made a distinction between an employee pursuing someone and the other way around.  You can criticize for infidelity, but a consentual relationship is not harrassment, especially if the employee instigates it.

              Report Abuse
        • Author by bingvangorden (August 17, 2007 5:06 pm ET)
             

          soliciting minors repeatedly while your peers cover it up for you compared to a sexual encounter between consenting adults. Yeah, that's the same thing.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by superhero fan (August 17, 2007 6:10 pm ET)
               

            Age of consent in DC is 16 I believe.

             So none of Foley's boys were "minors" in this regard.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Pithaughn (August 17, 2007 3:23 pm ET)
         

      This is bad behaviour all around, all of you. Time out yourselves, for gosh sakes, and remember:

      It is said that you shouldn't wrestle with pigs, because you get dirty and the pig enjoys it

      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (August 16, 2007 8:55 pm ET)
         

      Hannity loves liars as long as they tell the lies that conform to his fantasies.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by neondesert (August 16, 2007 9:15 pm ET)
         

      LET'S PLAY HANNITY'S MADDOGLIBS!!!!!

      ===============

      "HANNITY: Now, these are just some of the mysteries surrounding the <_crime_> of <_name_>. Did s/he have in his/her possession <_plural objects_> that could have impacted the <_famous crime_> investigation? How was the <_tv cliche evidence_> missed?"

      "In the minds of <_number or estimation or wild-ass guess_>, these questions may have provided a motive for foul play. But the most heated debate over <_name_> <_crime_> wasn't political, it had to do with old-fashioned <_occupation_> work -- and that's where we'll pick up next week when we open up another chapter in the <_plural name_>."

      =============== 

      Yeah, I know that the idea of a question providing a motive for foul play is odd, like "Where did you get those shoes" turning into "You nosy bytch!!!  I am going to kill you now!!!"

      BUT IT'S A GAME, FOR CRYIN' OUT LOUD!  Chill and enjoy.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (August 17, 2007 10:30 am ET)
           

        Very nice, Neon. Although Autopsychic has demonstrated the exception to recent observations of the lack of Hannity supporters here (I think that was you).

        I believe the theory was that Hannity was so stoopid, even by GOP radio standards, that his base audience didn't have the capacity to post a comment here.

        Autopsychic seems to be right on board with the loaded rhetorical question and the 100% confidence that comes with wild-ass guesses and partisan speculation.

        Eerily similar, if you check the Melanie Morgan thread, to Barney Fife's approach;

        1. Ask open-ended questions that serve your agenda

        2. admit that you don't know the answers to these questions

        3. Demand that others answer these questions

        4. Refer to these questions as "facts"(WTF?)

        5. When debunked, backpedal by saying you covered your butt by admitting your ignorance

        6. Declare victory by pointing out that everything you implied may be false, but you never said for certain that those things were true

        Fascinating. Hannity is actually effective on some of our (presumed) fellow voters. ;0) 

         

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by neondesert (August 17, 2007 1:50 pm ET)
             

          I appreciate that you "got it".

          As far as autopsychotic being a Hannity apologist, I would tend to think that he's more defending the idea of Clinton being a rapist than supporting Hannity's integrity.

          Somehow, their paths crossed in Neverland, but I wouldn't perceive it as them taking a romantic walk hand-in-hand.  Merely a friendly "Nice day, don't you think?" exchange as they negotiate the intersection.  Autopsycho wants too much to exude the air of independence to actually admit being an "apologist" for anybody.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (August 17, 2007 2:08 pm ET)
               

            I think the air exuding from auto may stem from something other than independence; and

            the sanctimonious accusations of the neo-cons really reek and we may need to plant about 1,000 trees per con to balance them out.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by august west (August 17, 2007 3:47 pm ET)
             

          Surfcitysouthpaw: You left out Lou Costello's other tactic:

           7.  Demand that others present evidence to disprove the assertion.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (August 16, 2007 10:00 pm ET)
         

      Chances of Hannity making Obermann's list this week? He's been very busy and appalling. Got my vote.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by CaseySpring (August 16, 2007 10:13 pm ET)
         

      Hannity, where is your proof that Foster was murdered or our former President raped someone? The lies will never stop.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by SDL (August 16, 2007 11:20 pm ET)
           

        careful...asking Hannity for proof will get you banned from the hannity.com forum for...CONTEMPT OF HOST.

        You are to NEVER question Hannity over there!!!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (August 16, 2007 10:14 pm ET)
         

      I hear Hillary Clinton may have dropped a black glove at the scene of the crime :-O

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (August 16, 2007 11:04 pm ET)
         

      The lady has class O-:

      Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (August 17, 2007 4:49 am ET)
         

      This phoney, overpaid, untalented media hack is a waste of air time. Why ABC Radio Networks and Roger Ailes hired this hypocrite, I will never know.

      I can tell you from personal experience, he is not truthful. He also withholds the full story to fit his own twisted agenda.

      Some of his callers are not the brightest stars in the universe. They follow this man like a cult leader, ready to drink his Kool-Aid. Sean is NOT a great American, but a Fraudalent American. 

      Sean has stated that he doesn't want Hilliary Clinton in the White House, and he vowed to make sure it does not happen (money, lies, etc.) He is obsessed with Clinton, talking about her almost daily. I think something is wrong with him.

      How Jill puts up with this sorry crap, I will never know. But hopefully she will have the courage to leave this Fox News nightmare.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Manny Yunker (August 17, 2007 6:49 am ET)
         

      Great point.  As far as I remember, Juanita Broaddrick (spelling?) is the only woman that Bill allegedly raped, so it should have been "woman" that he raped, rather than "women"!

      Monica was under no duress, Kathleen Willey was only groped, and the rest of Bill's paramours were perfectly willing, so this pointing out of Hannity's misspeaking is absolutely on target.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (August 17, 2007 9:19 am ET)
         

      These people with Clinton-fixations are just as bad as those who have spent almost forty years now hating Ted Kennedy for Chappaquiddick.  Except they are even worse, because they can't even point to a tragic accident as "evidence" that their fixation is somehow justified.

      What a waste of a life.  The Clinton-haters will NEVER get over the fact that they guy they loathed was legitimately elected, by large margins, TWICE, and that the American people responded to their lame Moralistic crusade to impeach him by strengthening the Democratic majority in the House.  They don't just hate the Clintons, they hate a large segment of the American public for not joining them in that hate. Pathetic.

      And Hannity? He's getting paid to be a Clinton-hating fanatic, so in a way his attitude is justified.  He's not sitting in his mom's basement, trying to piece together the "mystery" of Vince Foster with the help of crackpot websites.  

      I won't even address the "raped Monica Lewinsky" comment- that's just too ignorant to deserve a response. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by billie789 (August 17, 2007 10:36 am ET)
         

      Sean Hannity is a pathetic excuse of a human being and he also a huge example of why the Republican party is in full meltdown.

      Living in Utah, we've had to put up with him coming to town several years in a row to be the host of the so-called July 4 "Stadium of Fire" freedom-fireworks show at Brigham Young University. (God, I almost choked saying BYU, Freedom, July 4 and Sean Hannity in one sentence...)

      The local freedom fascists who kept inviting him finally got the hint that they looked like partisan idiots bringing the guy back as he veeered further and further into a pschotic ditch on the right side of the road. So, this year they brought in Hannity-lite, Glenn Beck.

      (You all don't know how lucky you are to not have to put up with the reddest state in the union and the neo-nazi "freedom" torch-light rallies. The only thing missing are the burning crosses and bed sheets).

      Anytime someone of Hannity's ilk has to go back to the "blame Bill Clinton" sewer, you know they're out of gas. 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by smittymatt16 (August 17, 2007 11:40 am ET)
           

        I don't see how  you can say the Rep party is in full meltdown when the Dems have control of the House and the Senate, and both of their approval ratings are at an all time low.  I think it's safe to say that all of our politicians are not making anyone in this country happy.  The majority of them like to twist words, distort truths, and tell you what you want to hear.  We have far greater issues than Reps are idiots, or Dems are dummies.  We are not united at all as a country, on any front.  A healthy balance of Rep and Dem conversation and resolve is what we need, and no one is willing to compromise for anything. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (August 17, 2007 11:52 am ET)
             

          Although Congressional approval ratings are very low, it should be noted that Democratic ratings are much higher than Republican ratings in Congress, so I am not sure that evidence is as definitive as it seems you would like.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by autopsychic (August 17, 2007 12:30 pm ET)
               

              Ah ha ha ha. That's a classic!  "oh yeah? our approval is low but yours is lower!!"  You gotta admit, you're quite an orator. Love your arguement on that one.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Graydogs (August 17, 2007 12:52 pm ET)
                 

              AP: "oh yeah? our approval is low but yours is lower!!"  You gotta admit, you're quite an orator"

              And where do you get this idea from open_mind's coments? Open_mind said that the overall aproval rating of CONGRESS is low these days, but that Democrats in Congress have higher ratings than Republicans.

              It's like a teacher stating that her "class" is performing under expected ratings this year, but that the girls are performing better then the boys. This could even suggest that the boys are doing to poorly that they are dragging down the class averages. What don't you get?

              Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (August 17, 2007 12:54 pm ET)
                 

              Ummm...Considering the argument was comparing two things, silly me, I thought a comparison was in order.  What was I thinking?

              ; )

              Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (August 17, 2007 11:49 am ET)
         

      Ahhh.  McCarthys' America.  Thanks Fox for the Fairness and balanced reporting.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 17, 2007 12:51 pm ET)
         

      The CIA, the military and George W. Bush are all on record saying the buried, unusable weapons found in Iraq are not the WMD we were searching for.

      Senator Rick Santorum who was trailing badly in his reelection bid started this story with a hysterical press conference which was flogged by Fox News (sound familiar?)

      The people of Pennsylvania decided they didn't want Rick to be their senator any more.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (August 17, 2007 1:41 pm ET)
           

        Well, AutoPsycho, like Hannity, never met a fact he couldn't ignore.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (August 17, 2007 1:13 pm ET)
         

      All I have to say about these Professional Besmirchers of Cable "News" and Radio Talk is that any real man (and by that I mean any mature, responsible adult) in an important career postition occasionally takes sabbtical to engage in reflection and ___Professionl Development___ . These folks are the vanguard of the decline of civil and polictical discourse in American society. Or to put it another way: Grow Up.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wizbor4654 (August 17, 2007 1:34 pm ET)
         

      Wow, after listening to the clip all I can say is what a misleading headline.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by traveler2559851 (August 17, 2007 1:50 pm ET)
         

      Hannity is a right wing rat. Unscrupulous like the Bush regime.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluecatbernadino4671 (August 17, 2007 2:14 pm ET)
         

      Just like I said all along, more Bill Baggage, I think not.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bingvangorden (August 17, 2007 2:24 pm ET)
         

      It's still amazing to me that people could be so blinded by irrational hatred for Bill Clinton they actually believe he had Vince Foster whacked and is a serial rapist. Ken Starr and the Republican dredged up any and every hair brained charge they could come up with, spent millions of our tax dollars investigating the guy and came up with only one lie about an extra marital affair. Yet the same people ignore the incompetence and criminal activity going on in the White House. Seek help.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Icedog (August 17, 2007 2:25 pm ET)
         

      I've been reading the posts on this site for a few months and it is obvious that "discussing the article" translates to agreeing with the other liberal posters, and any and all dissenters are simply labeled as "trolls".

       All views are welcome.....yeah right. The "inclusive" and "free speech" crowd indeed.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (August 17, 2007 5:09 pm ET)
           

        Apparently you can't read friend. There are plenty of conservatives like Tommy and others who carry on pretty good conversations. What's not tolerated much is GOP talking point already disproven and thoroughly debunked garbage.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (August 18, 2007 11:58 pm ET)
           

        You are apparently a selective reader.  I will admit that the quality of debate from conservatives have deminished due to the hand they have been dealt - the Bush Administration imploding as we speak.

        There have been some good debates here at times.  I have even been swayed personally by some conservative posters in the past.  Perhaps you have just decided to start monitoring MMFA at a particularly bad time in our history as a nation and for what currently constitutes conservative "thought".  I am sure it will get better sometime.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 17, 2007 2:36 pm ET)
         

      Your views or opinions have to be based on facts and, no, facts aren't debatable they are the basis for discussion.

      If you're just going to pull things out of thin air or base your opinions on the views of people who do your opinions are as worthless as the nutjobs I see once in awhile on my ride uptown on the A train.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 17, 2007 2:54 pm ET)
         

      ...if you're aren't bringing anything new to the table and are just repeating the tired right wing lies of the past decade you aretrolling and, worse than that, you're boring too.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnrtorres638 (August 17, 2007 3:24 pm ET)
         

      Hannity attacking HRC is similar to Joe Conason or anyone at Air (err?) America radio attacking GWB.  We all know the bias and we can judge the message and the messenger.

      However, I believe that there were - in fact - some very credible reports of Bill Clinton raping a woman during his time as Gov. in Ark.

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (August 17, 2007 4:00 pm ET)
           

        Credible reports? You mean like the credible report of GWB raping a woman in Texas? If they were that credible why wasnt he ever charged with the crime of rape? You believe that because you WANT to, no other reason.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (August 17, 2007 5:11 pm ET)
           

        Bias doesn't excuse ignorance. Joe Conason is a well read and established author who uses facts to form his opinions. Hannity uses rumor and hyperbole. Your comparison is disingenuous.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bingvangorden (August 17, 2007 5:13 pm ET)
           

        Ken Starr would love your proof. No other president was investigated more thoroughly. If he was a serial rapist someone would have come forward. A womanizer and cad for sure, but rapist? He didn't have a daddy working in the highest levels of government to bail him out and hide things of this magnitude.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 17, 2007 4:58 pm ET)
         

      You can't compare Conason to Hannity unlesss you can show Conason is an ouright liar just like Hannity is.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 17, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
         

      "However, I believe that there were - in fact - some very credible reports of Bill Clinton raping a woman during his time as Gov. in Ark."

      And I believe -in fact-there are some credible reports the moon is made of green cheese.

      I think I'm starting to get the hang of this game.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnrtorres638 (August 17, 2007 5:51 pm ET)
         

      Juanita Broaddrick 

      I found her testimony very compelling.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKLII43613 (August 17, 2007 7:58 pm ET)
         

      Instead of responding to troll comments people should be pointing out how Hannity says he is all about "Innocent until proven guilty". He was on his high horse over the Duke rape case and yet he's quick to accuse any person left of him of even the most insane accusation. Not only is Hannity a total hack he's a god awful American and an even worse Christian.

       _

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.