About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Discussing Collins' complaint, CNN's O'Brien cast campaign tracking "phenomenon" as new

August 20, 2007 5:06 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: While discussing objections raised by Sen. Susan Collins' chief of staff to a tracker hired by the Maine Democratic Party, CNN's Miles O'Brien suggested that political tracking became widespread only after the 2006 midterm elections. In fact, CNN and other news organizations have noted campaigns' use of trackers since at least 1996.

17 Comments

On the August 17 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, while discussing objections raised by Sen. Susan Collins' (R-ME) chief of staff to a tracker hired by the Maine Democratic Party to record Collins' campaign appearances, guest host Miles O'Brien suggested that political tracking became widespread only after the 2006 midterm elections: "Former Senator George Allen's [R-VA] 'macaca' moment [in 2006] changed the political game. Now, it seems every candidate is being dogged by so-called 'trackers,' hoping to catch that fatal mistake on video." O'Brien later asked CNN Internet reporter Abbi Tatton: "[T]hese days, there's always a camera out there, isn't there?" But contrary to O'Brien's suggestion that tracking is a relatively new phenomenon, CNN and other news organizations have noted campaigns' use of trackers since at least 1996.

In a public letter to Rep. Tom Allen's (D-ME) Senate campaign, Steve Abbott, Collins' chief of staff, complained about the tracker hired by the Maine Democratic Party: "Tactics such as tracking demean the political process, contribute to voter cynicism, and have no place in the type of substantive issues-oriented campaigns that our voters deserve."

During the Situation Room segment, O'Brien said that Collins is "particularly upset about this whole phenomenon." Tatton added that "[a]n aide to Senator Collins ... call[ed] this intrusive and demeaning to the political process."

CNN and several other news organizations have noted the widespread use of tracking dating back at least 10 years:

  • On the February 16, 1996, edition of CNN's Inside Politics, then-CNN senior Washington correspondent Charles Bierbauer noted the videotaping of Republican candidates by Joe Elcock, a researcher hired by the New Hampshire Democratic Party: "The DNC bought two Hi8 cameras and sent one to Iowa, where it showed up at a [then-Sen.] Phil Gramm [R-TX] rally. Joe Elcock got the other. His job, paid for by the state committee, is known in the political trade as opposition research. Since January, Elcock says he's tracked every Republican candidate in New Hampshire."
  • On the August 29, 2000, edition of Inside Politics, while discussing the New York Senate race between Hillary Rodham Clinton and then-Rep. Rick Lazio (R), then-CNN national correspondent Frank Buckley noted: "The full-court press even includes a video tracker from state Democrats, who follows the candidate, even as Lazio aides attempt to block his shot."
  • On October 3, 2002, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported: "The gubernatorial campaign of Independence Party candidate Tim Penny called the St. Cloud police recently and was considering seeking a restraining order against a Republican tracker who they said was deliberately in Penny's face after his speeches."
  • In a November 23, 2003, article (subscription required), The New York Times reported: "Behind every candidate is an army of foot soldiers, some more visible than others, whose job is to monitor and undermine the opposition. ... They include 'trackers' who monitor and record rival candidates. ... Candidates also distance themselves from the use of trackers, although they are common and have been for years. ... Democrats are not the only ones out there. Though President Bush faces no primary opposition, the Republicans have been paying trackers for months to keep tabs on the Democrats."
  • As noted on The New Republic's The Plank blog, the Rapid City Journal reported on August 14, 2004, that Dick Wadhams, campaign manager to then-GOP Senate candidate John Thune, approached then-Sen. Tom Daschle's (D-SD) tracker and said: "Your boss is a chickens**t. You know that, right?"
  • On October 12, 2006, CNN's Political Ticker AM linked to an October 12, 2006, Los Angeles Times article in which Michael Cornfield, adjunct professor of political management at George Washington University, was quoted as saying, "In the past, people were assigned to shadow campaigns and had cameras or tape recorders, but they never had a way to instantly post what it is they came up with."
  • On the October 24, 2006, edition of CNN International's Insight, then-Fishbowl DC blogger Garrett Graff told host Jonathan Mann: "[N]one of these trackers that we've seen on the [Jon] Tester [D] race in Montana or the [George] Allen race in Virginia, that's not new."

From the August 17 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

O'BRIEN: Former Senator George Allen's "macaca" moment changed the political game. Now, it seems every candidate is being dogged by so-called "trackers," hoping to catch that fatal mistake on video.

And, as you can imagine, some of them are none too happy about it.

Internet reporter Abbi Tatton is here. Abbi, let's talk about Senator Susan Collins. She is particularly upset about this whole phenomenon.

TATTON: Miles, it's her campaign. An aide to Senator Collins saying this week -- calling this intrusive and demeaning to the political process. Take a look at this video. A tracker for the Maine Democratic Party, hired recently to gather intelligence on opponents, seen here videotaping Senator Collins at a parade last weekend.

Now, a spokeswoman for the Maine Democratic Party called these accusations hyperbole. They have posted on YouTube the tracker's own video to, in their words, show how innocuous it is.

[begin video clip]

COLLINS: So, are you my tracker, Rick?

RICK REDMOND (Maine Democratic Party tracker): Yes, ma'am.

COLLINS: OK. Well, I'll be seeing you on the campaign trail.

[end video clip]

TATTON: "I'll be seeing you on the campaign trail," she says.

And no doubt, we'll be seeing a lot of trackers on the campaign trail. Tracking is becoming a more visible component of campaigning -- its most famous victim, of course, former Senator George Allen.

And since that "macaca" moment, the National Republican Senatorial Committee has been giving some how-to advice. In their Internet guidebook that they put out earlier this summer for Republican campaigns, they're saying to these campaigns, it's likely that Democrats are going to be filming your candidate's every move. Their advice: Act accordingly, and think about filming your opponents as well -- Miles.

O'BRIEN: Yeah, these days, there's always a camera out there, isn't there?

TATTON: There's always a camera, and it's all posted online.

O'BRIEN: Abbi Tatton, thank you very much.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by jeter2 (August 20, 2007 5:25 pm ET)
         

      ...calling this intrusive and demeaning to the political process

      Hahahaha oh man that's rich.

      The way the political game has progressed, especially in the past 15 years, is already intrusive & demeaning.

      All frills, smears, & attacks.

      No substance.

      Here's a hint Senator Collins [and all the rest] stay on your best behavior & don't give them a "macaca" moment & all will be well ;-)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (August 20, 2007 5:58 pm ET)
           

        I agree.  Now if these guys were acting like papparazi, then I could understand, but it seems they are simply documenting these public political events, which I think is fair game.

        What I think politicians on both sides would object to is being caught telling one audience one thing and another audience another thing.

        If this monitoring makes it harder for the candidates to pander without accountability, then I am all for it.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (August 20, 2007 5:34 pm ET)
         

      I see the reference in the item to "campaign tracking", and then to a "tracker"; but those terms are not in parenthesis as I put them, but seem to be used as though that's what we'll call it, and them:

      "Campaign tracking" and "trackers".

      I don't know who it is who invents these terms, and them gives them a shove, out into our discourse (frank luntz?), but these words "tracking" and "tracker", they sound an awful lot like "stalking" and "stalker"...

      I mean, if I was trying to make what it is we are talking about here, sound sneaky and devious and covert and clandestine, and illegal even, then sure... I'd call it something that sounded like "stalking" and "stalker"; I'd call it "tracking" and "tracker".

       

      But I wouldn't think I'd really need a single word of any kind, to simply refer to someone who records the things a candidate does and says, while campaigning...

      As a matter of fact, I thought we already had a single word for that: Reporter. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (August 20, 2007 7:10 pm ET)
         

      For me, this is another rare journey in the WITH Patrol boat.  

      I fail to see what O'Brien's apparently lacking historical knowledge of campaign tracking has to do with the political agenda of Senator Collins or any other conservative.  I don't see O'Brien saying that this practice is limited to trackers working on behalf of Democrats, only that the 'macaca' moment "changed the political game" and that it seems every candidate is dogged by tracking.

      WTH???

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (August 20, 2007 7:29 pm ET)
           

        Why this here?

        I like the image of the WITH patrol boat , Pete. Picturing Tommy at the bow with a Napoleon hat, his leg kicked up on the gunwale, scanning the horizon for nits.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (August 21, 2007 10:40 am ET)
             

          Everything has to be somewhere.

          Adm. T, Ware the Ise. of ST. Helena.

          They've got some mean amebas

          Report Abuse
    • Author by johnrtorres638 (August 20, 2007 7:49 pm ET)
         

       [link to www.youtube.com] title="http://mediamatters.org/rd?'macaca'">[link to www.youtube.com]

      The so-called "macaca" moment was pretty bogus from the start - considering that the "tracker" was of Indian ancesty and the "slur" was used in Europe to demean people from North Africa.  More than likely, Allen made a verbal slip that is of no consequence.  Unfortunately for Allen, the liberal Washington Post made this a HUGE issue during the campaign.  I also cite this example as one of the most biased liberal moments in recent history.

      However, the lesson needs to be learned and I hope that conservatives begin to track every ultra-libs (such as HRC and Obama) and "get" the video. This is politics.

      One thing I don't understand is why MM is bothered by the fact that the reporter said that was a tactic that was widespread after the 2006 campaign?

      It's relatively new, in any event. And certainly the unfortunate issue with Allen (who by all accounts does not have a racist bone in his body) has become a relatively new method of attacking people - and the Repubs had better learn how to play this game.

       

      I'm beginning to wonder if MM ever posts serius stuff on this site?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (August 20, 2007 10:19 pm ET)
           

        Actually I think you have a decent point.  I agree that the Allen race should have never been influenced to the degree it apparently was by the Macaca issue or the novels written by Webb.  That race should have been about the issues.  Shame on both campaigns for how it turned out.

        Of course, turnabout is fairplay and I look forward to conservatives keeping the Democrats honest by filming their public campaign events.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by left of center (August 20, 2007 10:29 pm ET)
           

        First of all, George Allen has a long history of racist comments and actions that are well documented in too many sources for me to list here.  But, more importantly your labeling of Obama and Hillary Clinton as "ultra libs" simply reveals your utter bias.  Neither of these candidates is what I consider to be liberal, and, particularly for Hillary, have a long centrist history.  If you want to accuse Dennis Kucinich of being "ultra liberal" then maybe that label fits, but certainly not Clinton and Obama.  These are very mainstream, centrist candidates.  Would you label Romney, Giuliani, or Thompson as ultra-cons?  If not, then you have zero credibility as far as I'm concerned.  

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Craig (August 20, 2007 10:39 pm ET)
           

        ...Allen (who by all accounts does not have a racist bone in his body) ...

        No. You're wrong. So wrong.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (August 20, 2007 11:38 pm ET)
             

          This has been covered before and I think it was agreed that the second bone in the little finger on his left hand is non racists. That is the single non-racist bone in his body.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (August 21, 2007 1:53 am ET)
           

        'The so-called "macaca" moment was pretty bogus from the start - considering that the "tracker" was of Indian ancesty and the "slur" was used in Europe to demean people from North Africa.'

        Good point. Like if you yell "Go back to Africa!" to a black guy, but he's from the Dominican Republic, you get a Mulligan.

        How can you be accused of attacking somebody for their specific ethnic background when they all look alike? ;0)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 21, 2007 7:28 am ET)
             

          Yeah, apparently the guy filming said moment was of Indian descent. I mean, he wasn't even PART of the ethnic/racial group that he was meaning to offend, how dare this get so much play?

          I believe though that we have another troll on board to espouse, in nicer words no less, the right wing talking points. Sort of like how yesterday on another thread he talked about how something was in dispute, and then posted a press release from a lawyer for the woman who was being investigated for violating the Hatch Act and all.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by skye12 (August 21, 2007 7:47 am ET)
               

            I don't see this practice as being of any consequence at all--except to sour-grapes Republicans who don't like being beaten at their own game.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (August 21, 2007 9:30 am ET)
                 

              Now this is true. But going back to the original article and all, I don't think that Collins has much to worry about. She's a pretty straight shooter (I'm formerly from Maine), and our Senators are more like real Republicans in their actions and votes, which is probably why the good folks of Maine (blue State that it is) keep re-electing them to office. But if you are running a campaign, and don't have someone from your campaign following around your opponent, you're just silly.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (August 21, 2007 10:50 am ET)
           

        No it wasnt you racist appologists are just sad. What does it MATTER about his anscestry? The racist slur is STILL what it is and he also told the guy to go back where he came from even though he was BORN in Virginia. He rightfully got called on his racist BS and you conservatives just LOVE to turn the fact that actions have consequences into some persecution complex where you can pretend you are martyrs for being held accountable for your actions how DARE someone call a racist comment a racist comment?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 21, 2007 11:26 am ET)
             

          You know, it all just PC run amok is all that it is... At least in the worlds of some.

          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.