About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox & Friends on Michelle Obama's comments: "The Claws Come Out"

August 22, 2007 2:05 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Fox News' Gretchen Carlson asserted that Michelle Obama was "taking off the gloves and letting loose the claws" in making what "some say ... is a personal attack on Hillary Clinton." Later, co-host Brian Kilmeade stated that Obama "said ... 'If you can't run your own house, then you can't run the White House.' " Kilmeade then asserted, "Many people are saying that she's talking about Hillary Clinton." And on-screen text said, "The Claws Come Out: Mrs. Obama Aims at Sen. Clinton." But Kilmeade and Carlson did not provide the rest of Obama's quote, in which she talked about herself and her family -- not any other candidate -- referring to their efforts to balance campaigning and family life and ensure that their children will continue to "come first."

34 Comments

During the August 22 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, while teasing a segment on recent comments by Michelle Obama, wife of Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (IL), during a campaign stop, co-host Gretchen Carlson asserted that Michelle Obama was "taking off the gloves and letting loose the claws" in making what "some say ... is a personal attack on [Sen.] Hillary Clinton [D-NY]." Later, co-host Brian Kilmeade stated that Michelle Obama "said ... 'If you can't run your own house, then you can't run the White House.' " Kilmeade then asserted, "Many people are saying that she's talking about Hillary Clinton." During the segment, the on-screen text said, "The Claws Come Out: Mrs. Obama Aims at Sen. Clinton"; "Mrs. Obama vs. Sen. Clinton: Cheap Shot or Fair Territory?"; and finally "Darts Flying: Michelle Obama Heats Up the Campaign Trail." But Kilmeade and Carlson did not provide the rest of Obama's quote. In fact, after making the statement that Kilmeade quoted, she immediately went on to discuss her own family -- not other candidates -- and the efforts she and Barack Obama were making to ensure that their children will continue to "come first," as Media Matters for America has previously noted.

Kilmeade asked Democratic strategist and Fox News contributor Susan Estrich whether Michelle Obama's remarks were "something that Barack Obama is happy about? Do you look at this as an attack on Hillary Clinton?" Estrich responded: "[T]he funny thing is that the day started with [Internet gossip Matt] Drudge saying 'Obama's wife slams Clinton,' question mark, and by midday it was clear that this was a line from her stump speech. She'd been using it for a long time, and it referred to the fact that the two Obamas are trying to put their two daughters first ... even in the context of a campaign."

Indeed, as Media Matters has noted, after stating, "Our view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House," Michelle Obama continued: "[S]o we've adjusted our schedules to make sure that our girls are first, so while he's [Barack Obama] traveling around, I do day trips" in order to be "home before bedtime." Marc Ambinder, associate editor of The Atlantic, wrote that one "recurring theme of her stump speech" is "the hard choices she and Sen. Obama have had to make about their work/family balance." The Obama campaign has since denied that Michelle Obama was attacking Clinton in her remarks.

Nevertheless, Kilmeade followed up on Estrich's comments by turning to Republican strategist Jennifer Millerwise Dyke and stating: "Right, but Jennifer, the words say a lot, don't they?" Millerwise Dyke claimed that "it sounded like very coordinated words by Mrs. Obama. ... I wouldn't be surprised at all if you saw that they [the Obama campaign] were also using her strategically to do a thinly veiled attack, as you saw yesterday."

Throughout the segment the on-screen text alternated among various statements, all of which suggested or asserted that Michelle Obama was attacking Clinton:

When she was teasing the segment, Carlson stated: "Some say what she said is a personal attack on Hillary Clinton. You have to hear it for yourself, and then make up your own mind." But at no point did Fox & Friends air the full context of Michelle Obama's remarks. The segment ended with Millerwise Dyke asserting: "But I think at the end of the day the question is does someone vote for someone based on who their spouse is, and the answer is no. If that were the case, Bill Clinton would have never been elected to begin with."

Below is the full transcript of Michelle Obama's remarks, according to blogger Greg Sargent:

OBAMA: That one of the most important things that we need to know about the next president of the United States is, is he somebody that shares our values? Is he somebody that respects family? Is a good and decent person? So our view was that, if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House. So, so we've adjusted our schedules to make sure that our girls are first, so while he's traveling around, I do day trips. That means I get up in the morning, I get the girls ready, I get them off, I go and do trips, I'm home before bedtime. So the girls know that I was gone somewhere, but they don't care. They just know that I was at home to tuck them in at night, and it keeps them grounded, and, and children, the children in our country have to know that they come first. And our girls do and that's why we're doing this. We're in this race for not just our children, but all of our children.

From the August 22 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

CARLSON: Also coming up on the show, Barack Obama's wife, taking off the gloves and letting loose the claws. Some say what she said is a personal attack on Hillary Clinton. You have to hear it for yourself, and then make up your own mind.

[...]

KILMEADE: This is what Michelle Obama, Mrs. Barack Obama, said -- well, over in Iowa on August 16, says, "If you can't run your own house, you can't run the White House." Many people are saying she is talking about Hillary Clinton, the person leading the Democratic race for the nomination. Susan Estrich, Democratic strategist, Fox News contributor. Jennifer Millerwise Dyke, former Bush-Cheney communications director. Susan, is this something that Barack Obama is happy about? Do you look at this as an attack on Hillary Clinton?

ESTRICH: Well, you know, the funny thing is that the day started with Drudge saying "Obama wife slams Clinton," question mark. And by midday, it was clear that this was a line from her stump speech. She'd been using it for a long time, and it referred to the fact that the Obamas are trying to put their two daughters first --

KILMEADE: But Jennifer, the words --

ESTRICH: -- even in the context of a campaign.

KILMEADE: Right, that's fine. Jennifer, but the words say a lot, don't they?

MILLERWISE DYKE: They do. And the fact is, good campaigns do not put spouses out there without determining exactly what they're going to say. And in this case, it sounded like very coordinated words by Mrs. Obama. And this isn't the first time that the Obama campaign has used her very strategically, and I think they've used her very smartly to say things about her husband. You know, a lot of people are talking about this great Barack Obama, but I live with a guy who leaves socks on his floor and I'm wondering if it's the same person. She can give an insight and add some personality to him that no one else can, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if you saw that they were also using her strategically to do a thinly veiled attack, as you saw yesterday.

[...]

KILMEADE: Jennifer, did Teresa Heinz Kerry hurt John Kerry? Did it help your campaign?

MILLERWISE DYKE: She certainly did not help him, and I do think she actually gave us some real openings, some of the things that she would say. You never actually saw our campaign ever talking about Teresa Heinz Kerry in any way but a positive, and I don't think that you're going to find any of the campaigns today going out and attacking, for example, Elizabeth Edwards. But the fact is, you can strategically use a spouse, and we were able to strategically use Mrs. Bush to say things in a way, in a very lighthearted but very strategic way that no one else could say. And it really can get to the heart of the matter. But I think, at the end of the day, the question is, does someone vote for someone based on who their spouse is? And the answer is no. If that were the case, Bill Clinton would have never been elected to begin with.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by lostlogic (August 22, 2007 2:15 pm ET)
         

      Kilmead-"right thats fine"

      Facts are fine but please let's move on and make the story more interesting...forget the facts they're boring.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wesley (August 22, 2007 3:29 pm ET)
           

        Great point...it's done all the time and is very irritating. Most of the talking heads claim that they are promoting public debate in order to more fully inform the public.

        The reality is just as you stated "please let's move on and make the story more interesting"...they just keep casting around until they find someone who supports their position and then beat it to death.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by JimmyCraghorn (August 22, 2007 5:40 pm ET)
             

          Who really typed the above post? and what have you done with Wesley?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by stevensm (August 22, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
           

        Nevermind that Michelle Obama said the remarks were not directed at Hillary. The F&F clowns pull a "John Gibson" (see yesterday's Big Story segment with K. Powers) and desperately try to create a cat fight.

        And why didn't any of the F&F clowns think that what Michelle Obama said could apply more to Rudy's home life than it does Hillary? From all reports, Chelsea is a fine young woman who loves and supports her parents. That's more than one can say for Rudy's kids and ex-wife (wives?). I smell partisan politics....

        Report Abuse
    • Author by JLyons (August 22, 2007 2:18 pm ET)
         

      Shame on Fox and Friends for having some fun, shame on them.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by onionhead (August 22, 2007 3:41 pm ET)
           

        Are sexist remarks your idea of good clean fun?

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (August 22, 2007 4:15 pm ET)
             

          Where would you get that idea from? 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by onionhead (August 22, 2007 11:37 pm ET)
               

            Well, they are talking about women and using the term "cats claws".  I think they were trying to make it look like a cat-fight between two "irrational" women (and at the same time suggesting that women aren't capable of governing rationally).  If this were two men, it would be called a "disagreement" and not a cat-fight.

            And also it is some Fox News version of the networks' pseudo-news morning shows. And of course it is Fox News' secret mission statement to make the dems look bad and wallow in any dirt they pick up on them.

            I guess my point is that when Fox News does it, they are not "just having fun".  It is meant to demean the dems and even suggest that these two women should be nowhere near the Whitehouse. 

             I am aware that I am some guy explaining sexism to a woman.  But I will say this: if my argument doesn't convince you, then I withdraw the sexism charge. 

            Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (August 22, 2007 3:45 pm ET)
           

        Especially with this witty zinger: 

        "Many people are saying she is talking about Hillary Clinton"

        Exsqueeze me???

        You just gotta love that Fixed Noise mainstay source: "people" that say things. 

        Yes, this is "real journalism" at its absolute finest, isn't it?.

        When you have a political talking point to push, you need to look no further than that mysterious group of nameless, faceless people who say things.  Fixed Noise has a long legacy of sourcing "people" that say things.

        You can excuse this as "having fun" all you want, but there are examples of serious journalistic credibility problems to be seen here if you read between the lines. 

         

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (August 22, 2007 4:16 pm ET)
             

          You can excuse this as "having fun" all you want, but there are examples of serious journalistic credibility problems to be seen here if you read between the lines.

          But its FOX and Friends, they are not a real news show or a real news organization?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (August 22, 2007 4:31 pm ET)
               

            They relentlessly market themselves as "real journalism". 

            Being the most blatantly biased and spurious news source on Television is one thing, but constantly denying it in your marketing is another thing entirely. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by night-n-day (August 22, 2007 2:31 pm ET)
         

      How long do you think it took for the caption "Spears Flying" to be changed to "Darts Flying"? The transparency of the origin of Republican slurs is astonishing. Not that "Darts Flying" wouldn't just as easily be used as Guiliani vs Clinton, except of course it never would in a million years. It would never cross their racist .. sorry, I mean "fair and balanced" .. minds if it involved only white candidates.

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (August 22, 2007 2:35 pm ET)
         

      Also heard this *story* on the ABC Morning show before I left for work today.

      Apparently it's spreading like wildfire...& nobody is bothering to play Mrs. Obama's remarks in full.

      But why would they? If they did that there'd be no story & they couldn't concoct this controversy.

      Mrs. Obama is talking about her own family. If you hear the entire remark there is NO doubt of that.

      The press is obviously itching for a fight between the Obama & Clinton camps.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (August 22, 2007 2:36 pm ET)
           

        oops...I meant CBS Morning Show.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (August 22, 2007 2:42 pm ET)
             

          I can't wait for HBL to come along and tell us what you really said Jeter.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (August 22, 2007 2:47 pm ET)
               

            Probably that I love Hillary.

            Well...it's just a crush actually ;-)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (August 22, 2007 3:04 pm ET)
                 

              So it's true then. Hillary wore that low plunging neckline top for you!

              huh-huh, huh-huh-huh, that reporter's last name is Dyke...

              Report Abuse
        • Author by Craig (August 22, 2007 8:29 pm ET)
             

          You're now a MediaMatters tipster!

          Report Abuse
      • Author by monknj80 (August 22, 2007 3:26 pm ET)
           

        Snippets work just find on Fox. Do you believe that the veiwers would understand the context anyway.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (August 22, 2007 3:44 pm ET)
             

          I saw the Obama controversial stump speech on the Today Show this morning.  I think she makes a very good point. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (August 22, 2007 3:59 pm ET)
             

          Monk,

          Not to stick up for FOX, but this snippet is being featured all over the boob tube. I heard it today on the CBS Morning show. And MMFA has already featured it being done on CNN twice.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by monknj80 (August 22, 2007 4:49 pm ET)
               

            I have seen it all over as well. It's bad the whole way round.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (August 22, 2007 3:50 pm ET)
           

        And in the meantime anything the Repub candidates say get unreported, until they end up on YouTube.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Timmee (August 22, 2007 3:20 pm ET)
         

      Watching Fox & Friends makes me want to kill someone...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by roundhouse (August 22, 2007 3:41 pm ET)
         

      Jeter makes a good point, media would love to report on a fight between Michelle and Hillary. Media is simply biased toward conflict, maybe the cheerleading in the run-up to the war had as much to do with self-serving inclinations toward ratings as it did any political agenda?...but I digress.

      A natural question arises from the some people say focus of the Foxies on the Hillary v. Michelle muck. Isn't it just as likely that Mrs. Obama was taking a swipe at the Bush family? I mean the Bush family is a family that can't run the White House or their own house without running afoul of the law or morality.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (August 22, 2007 3:48 pm ET)
           

        Interesting hypothesis. But since Bush is not running, I seriously doubt she's referring to his him. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (August 22, 2007 4:03 pm ET)
             

          It goes to bigger picture of the fallacy that is conservative family values. I mean why not emphasize the failures of Bush as the failures of conservatism? The two are inextricable. Bush is a very effective conservative, he pushed through a huge conservative agenda. It just happens that conservatism doesn't work.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (August 22, 2007 4:12 pm ET)
               

            I do not think of Bush as conservative in the same vein as say Reagan. Bush has gone against the base more than once.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by roundhouse (August 22, 2007 4:25 pm ET)
                 

              So? Reagan didn't maintain fidelity to the Republican base. No President ever does what the base wants 100% of the time.

              Bush pushed through No Child, Clear Skies, appointed two right-wing Supreme Court Justices, has broken unions, furthered the cause of market deregulation, aggregated Executive authority, disassembled seperation of church and state...that's quite a list of conservative accomplishmnets. Unfortunately, none of it has generated broad prosperity or greater national security. It's done just the opposite, hence the failure of Bush is the failure of conservatism.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 22, 2007 3:55 pm ET)
         

      But at no point did Fox & Friends air the full context of Michelle Obama's remarks.

      The other day on a thread regarding Hillary and the "working" surge, Tommy ask why Dems have to continue to explain their statements.  I took his comment to mean Dems were either incapable of expressing themselves or the purposely left "wiggle" room in making statements. There is nothing wrong with the statements Dems make it's the reporter or in this case Fox who never in a million years will quote any Dem correctly. They don't make any effort to report facts just what will help in their bias news.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (August 22, 2007 9:45 pm ET)
         

      Interesting hypothesis. But since Bush is not running, I seriously doubt she's referring to his him.

      That makes no sense. The Obamas have been quite critical of the Bush administration and their handling of many policies. Michelle's statement--IF it were an intentional swipe at someone--is not restricted to only those who are running for president. Like Roundhouse, those same words could have also applied to him.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 23, 2007 12:37 pm ET)
         

      See how this works?

      First they say "some say" without quoting sources .

      Then they ask you to watch and decide.

      Then they cut the quote off where it makes their point.

      Then they discuss the truncated quote as if it's accurate.

      They use a lie to frame the discussion.

      Josef Goebels never did it better.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by drsfinance20034900 (August 23, 2007 4:42 pm ET)
         

      ALL mrs. obama needs to do is go on fox and call out allllllll the right wing nuts and tell them what she said and scold everyone of them mention them by name and tell them how iresposible they are.only then will they maybe stop. dont lets them get away with changing the subject and stay on point.UNTIL THESE FOOLS ARE CONFRONTED ALL OF THEM THIS WILL CONTINUE.MICHELLE TAKE OF THE GLOVES AND GO AFTER FOX /LIMBALLS/OREILLY/F AND F NUT HANNITY.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.