Coulter: "[I]f you attack the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends know that you are not planning suicide"
SUMMARY: Apparently referring to conservative allegations that the Clintons were somehow
involved in the death of Vincent Foster, Ann Coulter asserted: "[I]f you attack
the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends know that you are not planning
suicide, that you're not careless when you drive a car." However, numerous
investigations have determined that Foster's death was a suicide.
On the August 23 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, right-wing pundit Ann Coulter asserted: "[I]f you attack the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends know that you are not planning suicide, that you're not careless when you drive a car." Coulter was apparently referring to conservative allegations that the Clintons were somehow involved in the death of Clinton deputy White House counsel Vincent Foster. As Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented (here, here, and here), numerous investigations have determined that Foster's death was a suicide. The Office of the Independent Counsel -- then headed by Republican Kenneth Starr -- completed its inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Foster's death with a report issued on October 11, 1997, which concluded that "based on investigation and analysis of the evidentiary record ... Mr. Foster committed suicide by gunshot in Fort Marcy Park."
Coulter made her comments following co-host Sean Hannity's assertion that Michelle Obama, Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) wife, and former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) have recently attacked Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) but "won't admit it." Hannity then asked, "Why are they all afraid to mention Hillary Clinton by name when they have, you know, differences with her?"
Media Matters has documented numerous instances of conservative allegations that the Clintons were behind Foster's death. Specifically, nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh has repeatedly suggested (here, here, here, here, and here) that the Clintons were involved in Foster's death, often invoking the location of Foster's suicide, Fort Marcy Park in Northern Virginia, in his allegations. Additionally, on the July 22 edition of Fox News' Hannity's America, Hannity teased a segment on "the mysterious death of Vince Foster" by asking: "Did a close friend of Hillary Clinton commit suicide, or was it a massive cover-up?"
Responding to Hannity's question about "[w]hy [political opponents] are ... all afraid to mention Hillary Clinton by name," Coulter also stated: "Because if you attack Ann Coulter, you don't end up with your cat killed or your tires slashed," adding: "Of course they're afraid." Coulter was apparently referring to allegations made by Kathleen Willey that were documented in the final report on the Monica Lewinsky matter by independent counsel Robert W. Ray. In the report, Ray, a Republican, wrote of Willey's deposition in the case Jones v. Clinton, in which Willey testified about allegations that President Clinton made sexual advances toward her:
Willey also alleged that in the period immediately preceding her January 1998 Jones deposition, her cat disappeared, her tires were punctured, and a male jogger who she did not recognize approached her at her rural home, called her by name, and asked about her tires, cat (which he named), children (whom he named), attorney, and her attorney's children (whom he also named), saying 'I hope you're getting the message' or 'You're just not getting the message, are you?' ... At her Jones deposition, however, Willey testified no one had tried to discourage her from testifying.
Moreover, Hannity, apparently referring to remarks Michelle Obama made in an August 16 speech, stated: "Michelle Obama attacks Hillary Clinton. We all know who she's talking about. They won't admit it." As Media Matters has noted, numerous media figures have asserted that Obama was attacking Clinton when she said, "Our view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House." However, immediately after her comment about the ability to "run your own house," Obama went on to discuss measures her family was taking to keep their children "grounded" while campaigning and the efforts the Obamas are making to ensure that their children will continue to "come first." From her August 16 remarks:
MICHELLE OBAMA: That one of the most important things that we need to know about the next President of the United States is, is he somebody that shares our values? Is he somebody that respects family? Is a good and decent person? So our view was that, if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House. So, so we've adjusted our schedules to make sure that our girls are first, so while he's traveling around, I do day trips. That means I get up in the morning, I get the girls ready, I get them off, I go and do trips, I'm home before bedtime. So the girls know that I was gone somewhere, but they don't care. They just know that I was at home to tuck them in at night, and it keeps them grounded, and, and children, the children in our country have to know that they come first. And our girls do and that's why we're doing this. We're in this race for not just our children, but all of our children.
As Media Matters has also noted, the Obama campaign has denied that Michelle Obama was attacking Clinton or anyone else.
From the August 23 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:
HANNITY: You know, one of the things I find amazing: Edwards, in a speech -- finally, he wrote a new speech after five years. It's an amazing thing. We got away from the "Two Americas" speech. But in the new speech, he attacks Hillary Clinton. It's clear he attacks Hillary Clinton, but he won't admit it. Michelle Obama attacks Hillary Clinton. We all know who she's talking about. They won't admit it. Why are they all afraid to mention Hillary Clinton by name when they have, you know, differences with her?
STEVE MURPHY (Democratic strategist): You got me. I don't know what you get out of -- go ahead. You answer it, Ann, because I have no idea.
COULTER: Because if you attack Ann Coulter, you don't end up with your cat killed or your tires slashed. Or being audited by the IRS, as happened to, oh, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, all the other ones who attacked the Clintons. Of course they're afraid.
MURPHY: All these -- all of these -- all of these attacks, these like nameless attacks don't get anybody anything. This country is in a total mess right now.
HANNITY: But wait a minute. Here's the thing --
MURPHY: We're in terrible shape. Here and abroad, the voters want the candidates to address how they're going to get out of that mess.
HANNITY: All right, Steve --
MURPHY: That is why John Edwards is dropping. He's not dropping because he's attacking you, Ann. He's dropping because he's not attacking the issues.
HANNITY: Let me throw this to Ann Coulter. Ann, the AP had a story last week. They interviewed 40 prominent Democrats, every region of the country. And they all said that their internal polling shows that Hillary Clinton, if she's the nominee, is going to be a drag on the ticket. They're all scared to death. Only one guy from Indiana, a guy by the name of Crook, would speak out and go on the record. The other 40 Democrats, the AP cited, for fear of retribution, they don't want to attack Hillary Clinton or the Clinton machine publicly. I mean, they seem -- they seem to instill real fear in people.
COULTER: Right, and if you attack the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends know that you are not planning suicide, that you're not careless when you drive a car.
COLMES: By the way, Ann, how do you know Obama was -- Michelle Obama was not attacking Rudy Giuliani when she talked about family values? She said nothing about Bill Clinton. You have no evidence that that's who she was attacking --
COULTER: Because we're in the primary now, Alan.

















I wonder, at this point, if Coulter hasn't become a liability. Her material has gone from sophomoric to infantile.
Yuk-yuck...
With this material, I'm pretty sure she won't be putting out a comedy album anytime soon.
Maybe FOX will ask her to replace one of their recent Gee-Ain't-We-Funny flops.
Last night I dreamed that I got drunk and started bad mouthing the Clinton's. After passing out (in my dream/nightmare) I woke up next to the vile sleazy Coulter. I promptly held my breath until I died.
When I woke up for real, my wife had to keep me from killing myself.
Greek,
She only becomes a liability to herself and her relevance if her hyperbolic rhetoric is left alone to wither and die.
However, this website, by giving her relevance and continuing to highlight her, ensure that won't happen anytime soon.
so the only reason she was on hannity and colmes is because of this web site?
No, but if liberals stop jumping and down and getting all huffy over her idiotic crap, she wouldn't be so eager, or asked, to keep at it by the likes of Hannity and Colmes, perhaps.
She gets a rise out of people, thereby ratings go up, advertisers pay more, and it goes around again.
Tommy the only thing playing devils advocate is Hannity and Colmes is the number one rated show at 9pm on cable news. How many undecided people watch her lies? And his?
MMFA is not giving her legitimacy, the media is. That's the problem.
And so is John Edwards when he publically refers to her as a "She-Devil"
"We know these people. We know their game plan. They're going to attack us personally," Edwards said. "They attacked Elizabeth personally, because she stood up to that she-devil Ann Coulter. … I should not have name-called. But the truth is -- forget the names -- people like Ann Coulter, they engage in hateful language."
Nobody is saying this site should ignore Coulter & she'll go away...but Edwards engaged her by throwing mud at her.
That's guaranteed to get her wired.
Jeter,
remember how you keep telling me what happens to bad doggies? I've been a bad, bad doggy!
Gee Snoop I would have recognized you anywhere ;-)
How'd you find that My Space page...I've heard of My Space of course, but know almost nada about it, except that it's popular with kids. And political candidates :-O
Jeter,
I have got to admit. I bought one o' those shirts years ago! Right around the same time I bought one o' these shirts! Still got both of them, but they fit a little tight... ;)
Jeter, nobody is saying to ignore her and she'll go away? Did you read a couple of post's above yours?
"She only becomes a liability to herself and her relevance if her hyperbolic rhetoric is left alone to wither and die.
However, this website, by giving her relevance and continuing to highlight her, ensure that won't happen anytime soon. "--Tommy
Rick,
I realize that's Tommy's opinion, & he's entitled to argue it... but I don't think I've ever seen anyone else here [from either side] suggest anyone should ignore Coulter, Rush, Hannity etc. I probably shouldn't have generalized though & simply have said I'd never suggest ignoring her.
But that still doesn't mean Edwards should have engaged her by calling her a "she-devil" [ I'd like to hear your opinion on that]
Call her out for what she says, fine. Get in the mud with her, she'll come out swinging back.
That would be the only mud fight I'd pay to see. M'ann Coulter Vs. Madonna. I must be in the front row!
Yeah. I think it does Edwards no good to acknowledge her at all. However, even if we here at MMFA ignore her, she still won't go away.
It's disgusting that vile people are allowed to spread this type of sh*t on TV, and I get tired of hearing from right wingers how we should deal with vile right wingers.
The left has nothing that compares with this, and although I'm glad we haven't sunk to this level, I wonder why so many on the right only understand this type of rhetoric.
Jeter, nobody is saying to ignore her and she'll go away? Did you read a couple of post's above yours?
"She only becomes a liability to herself and her relevance if her hyperbolic rhetoric is left alone to wither and die.
However, this website, by giving her relevance and continuing to highlight her, ensure that won't happen anytime soon. "--Tommy
Maybe this is Jeter's way of saying that Tommy is a nobody.....
:-)
"Nobody is saying this site should ignore Coulter & she'll go away"--jeter
Actually, I think that is precisely what tommy is saying in a nutshell. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I basically meant myself & most everyone else. Except Tommy.
Could anyone of you comment on Edwards calling her a "she-devil"?
When was she called a "she-devil"?
Here's the story Casey:
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Edwards_calls_Ann_Coulter_shedevil_0818.html
Jeter, I think Edwards has made a decision to continue this feud to make his base happy.
You all are laughable. She is a one woman attack machine and when a Dem returns fire in kind they are accused of "continuing a feud" Have you no shame madam? At long last, have you no shame!? Get a grip!
Kroecom, I do not disagree with you , Ann Coulter is a disgusting person.
You all are laughable. She is a one woman attack machine and when a Dem returns fire in kind they are accused of "continuing a feud"
Return fire? No Coulter has been relatively quiet about Edwards lately.
This time he decided to re-start the war. Maybe he figures it will help him with fundraising?
But Coulter is sure to "fire back" to his "she-Devil" remark.
Maybe she has been quiet about Edwards directly, but she continues to tell wicked lies about liberals and for that she deserves to be exposed.
Now, if Ann doesn't like that the Edwards campaign highlights her invective to raise funds, she should reconsider handing out ammunition.
Roundhouse,
I originally brought up John Edwards "she-devil" remark in reference to this statement made by Dave [1st page]:
MMFA is not giving her legitimacy, the media is. That's the problem.
My reply was simply that John Edwards was also giving her legitimacy by bringing her into the conversation, especially since it was not in retaliation to anything she'd said about him recently. You may or may not agree with that, but if one is going to blame the media for continuing to feature her on various programming, then Edwards [or anyone] bringing her into the conversation, without any reason, are in a sense giving her legitimacy.
When she says something outrageous...attack. But if she's being relatively quiet, why poke at her? It only provokes her. Unless that is exactly what Edwards is hoping to do?
Why not go on offense, put her on defense?
I don't agree that out and out name calling is the way to go, but it's easy enough to tear her down without insults. She's a dirty extremist, that's no insult. It's just the truth.
She's a petulant child and if she were my daughter she'd be put in the corner, for about five years, to think about what she's done.
Besides, she's an easy and deserving target and just because she is quiet at any given time doesn't mean she'll reamain so. You can rest assured knowing she's just formulating her next smear.
Thanks Jeter, I was not aware of this, why would this story not get more play in the media?
I don't really think name-calling is ever a good idea. But outside of that I think Edwards was able to turn the tables on Coulter to fundraise off of her remarks.
I think John Edward's description of Ann Coulter is extremely accurate. And once again, the righties can't stand to hear the truth, so they attack Edwards rather than acknowledging that they are worshipping a she-devil.....
Actually I think Edwards has handled Coulter pretty well. He has used her attacks to his advantage. Coulter thought she was damaging Edwards, but Edwards turned it around and made money from it from fundraising letters mentioning the event. Smart. I think every politician should do that. It may someday bring an end to the type of discourse Ann engages in.
So you believe Edwards was right in referring to Coulter as a "She-Devil"?
I would have thought that after Elizabeth's & Coulter's dustup on Hardball & the few extra bucks it brought in for Edwards that he would have ignored Coulter after that.
Is this all Edwards has left? Exchanging smears with Coulter? Sad.
So you believe Edwards was right in referring to Coulter as a "She-Devil"?
You don't believe Coulter is a devil?
I think it's the "she-" part that has Jeter confused.
Well Loontz, she can be controversial to say the least. And there have been many occasions when what she's written or said has made me cringe. Or just out & out left me disgusted. On the other hand, some of what she says & writes makes me chuckle. Sometimes even causes me to laugh out loud.
She-Devil? Well I can see where some might think that. Certainly anyone who has been on the receiving end of one of her smears or jokes.
Some refer to Hillary Clinton as "Hilda-Beast". I suppose they have their reasons.
To me, it's just childish name-calling by so called adults.
I think Edwards, and every otehr candidate should be calling her "she-devil", "Liar", "shrill muckracker" and any other name tey can think of. I think everyone should be saying these things about her, not just the candidates. It may take a few years, but eventually her name will be associated with these terms to where she can't run away from them. Just ask "invented the internet"Gore, or "Shrill and Cold" Hillary, or "Coward" Kerry, or "Scream" Dean. I think you get my point.
To answer Jeter's question about the she devil remark - Satan, beelzebub, Lucifer, princess of darkness or Old Nick would also be appropriate. You may genderize as you see fit.
Well Stated Pete. I think we all truly need to consider disengaging Tommy WHEN he writes such off-topic posts. This is your work-a-day republican tactic: deflect and obfuscate. That's also why the despise academia so much because their logic is flawed and professors call them on it. All arguments are not necessarily valid or equivalent. These guys and girls are desperately in need of a basic primer in logic and argumentation.
So you're basically telling us there are an audience of reich wing haters who thrive off of her vitriol. Whenever she opens her mouth and we respond, they open their wallets. Just one problem with that - since when did rednecks have a job long enough to have something in that wallet?
Now I know some Conservatives like to blame Liberals for all of the world'`s ills but WE don't buy Coulter books or read her columns. Oh no the vast right wing media machine and that brand of Conservative that consumes it's products are solely to blame for Coulter's presence on political scene. I hope MMFA keeps highlighting her wild craziness as long as the right keeps highlighting her wild craziness as serious political commentary. And she still looks like she's melting.
so it's all the fault of the liberals sez tommy. she wouldn't be so "eager" to spew her nonsense if there wasn't all this "jumping up and down". what would we do without the genius of tommy?
have anything to back that up or is this another smear of a fellow poster ? You are getting as bad as sue. Remember people have different views than you.
do i have anything to "back that up"? since i offered his own words, what else would you like? and while you're at it, maybe you could explain when you became the defender of everything tommy?
I believe it was the day they both were claiming us libruls were turrist sympathizers.
You, boy, are an illiterate.
You accurately paraphrase Tommy and you get questioned about where you're getting your information from? You're using his own words against him. JLyons somehow thinks that using someone's words against themselves is an unreasonable way to attack them. She pulled that same objection when I pointed out her own words last week when we all wanted a terrorist slimeball to be released just so it would make Bush look bad.
Hey, John Kerry. Just IGNORE those SwiftBoat vets. Don't give any response. Take the high road. Let FOX and every other rightwing pundit in the media guest these guys, give them legitimacy by not challenging their claims, run interviews with them night and day, hawking their book, let them voice their claims as if gospel, and with NO REFUTING VOICES ... because, hey, if you NOTICE them, you're giving them the attention they want from opponents.
Sadly, Kerry TOOK this approach to not responding to smears and lies and orchestrated media propaganda which echoes throughout every media outlet ... and Kerry got steamrolled.
So, OF COURSE rightwing sycophants like Tommy would "advise" that rightwing pundits be "ignored"... so they can get their "message" out unopposed, unrebutted, and without any alternative information. THIS is what the biased partisan Rightwing Media WANT: a monopoly. And Tommy wants them to have it.
When the devil advises you that it would really be best if you just ate the apple ... consider the source. The devil is NOT your friend.
Amen, Tex.
SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!
No, but if liberals stop jumping and down and getting all huffy over her idiotic crap, she wouldn't be so eager, or asked, to keep at it by the likes of Hannity and Colmes, perhaps.
She gets a rise out of people, thereby ratings go up, advertisers pay more, and it goes around again. // Tommy
To say you miss the point is to observe your body lifeless after the bus ran you over to say 'Watch out for that Bus!' Why did'nt you listen!
The fact that the Fox Noise Machine stil goes to this type of punditry of hate, lies, distortions, not to mention just vile behavior as political discourse on the public airways means it's incumbent on a rational mind to push back, to offer the alternative view to unvail them for what they really are!!
If we do not push back, and allow them to go unanswered then they make their own truth for some to accept no matter how distorted!
Example: "Compassionate Conservatism," "Uniter, not a Devider," "Iraqi WMD's, Al Quada in Iraq, 9-11 = Iraq," Social Security Privatization, Medicare Drug Benefits, man how much time do I have? Let's just say that Harry Reid had it right when he said if the President or Vice President said it you can bet the opposite is true!
Imformation is Power, so maybe we should expect the Truth?
Happy Thoughts;
Dan Grady
Fox and the "right wing" continue to trot out the Coulters, the hannitys, the savages, the laura inghrahams, the limp baughs, the blithering idiots. Do they not understand that these "faces" of the GOP are going to totally kill thier party? who in the hell would join a political party that does nothing but blindly follow "W" and get heated up about the 3 "issues" they love to talk about. 1. Hate Mexicans. 2. Hate gays. 3. Hate prochoice americans. All the things we should focus on get the short shrift, but god forbid two gay lovers want to get married. The world would end.
It's starts with the media, genius. Then the media is called out for it by MMFA. That's how it has always worked.
Really? Let me ask you, since she has "been called out" by this website and others for what she says, has her rhetoric been toned down or gone up? I say up. So, it's all for naught.
Does she show up weekly anymore? No?
And it's all because of MMFA. I see.
For half the articles here, we get either of "This doesn't belong here" or "you should ignore it and it'll go away" from you. Of course, your regressive brethren here will fill in on the other articles and say "Hey, if (s)he's so wrong, then why do they have such high ratings?"
So, again, I'll just point out that if we need advice from regressives like yourself on how to deal with the Coulters of the world, we'll ask for it.
But please! You're free to disagree even though you're wrong!
Her rhetoric and outright BS has always been consistent as far as amplitude, but the frequency has spiked because the media keeps giving her a platform. Just because somebody says stupid S*** that makes people mad, it doesn't obligate any media outlet to give that person airtime.
Are you saying to ignore her and she'll go away?
..al I know Tommy is she looks like she's melting.
However, Fox News, by giving her relevance and continuing to highlight her, ensure that won't happen anytime soon.
Good turnaround, Pete.
FoxNews and similar media outlets are the ones responsible for her behavior having an outlet.
Ah, and there it is: "Just ignore them and it'll go away." The response of bully-appeasers and wingnuts alike.
"She only becomes a liability to herself and her relevance if her hyperbolic rhetoric is left alone to wither and die."--tommy
Hitherto referred to as Tommy Argument #1. You need some new material. Do you pick this argument off of some gameshow style pinwheel or is it a dartboard?
You are welcome to ignore her. I can only speak for myself, but I find Coulter threads pretty amusing at times. I can't believe anyone takes her seriously despite her seeming popularity on the right.
I have to disagree with you here,
Tommy Argument #1 is most certainly Why Is This Here (WITH). His 'just ignore them & they'll go away' is more properly dubbed Tommy Argument #2.
Although, now that I think of it, MOST of Tommy's arguments could properly be referred to as #2!
I've been noticing alot of Tommy's Argument #3: "it's just their opinion and they're entitled to it"
Coulter is a side show - a freak - a train wreck - a political extremist. Putting her on the air to comment on politics is akin to putting Bozo the Clown on the air to comment on politics.
The consequences for Coulter's smears appear to be more book sales and television appearances.
And that is the sad thing, her smears and hate equal dollars , it is blood money, she is as bad as OJ.
I'm no Ann Coulter fan, but that is just ridiculous. I guess I draw the line at a comparison with OJ. That is way over the top. Ann deals with words - not actions. We need to keep a clear head here.
I agree, OJ is the worst type of person killing the mother of his children and that innocent kid. Ann Coulter is not a nice person, she divides people but she is not a murderer and her money is not "blood money". That is silly.
I see her black dress has faded so much it almost looks white. Or is that her testicle strap?
Why is Coulter even ON any networks at all?
She has nothing to say, no matter how much she says.
She could easily be marginalized to the Barns & Noble bargain heap if the media would stop giving her the legitimacy and the platform that she simply hasn't displayed or earned. She has nothing remotely interesting to say, just the inane drivel you see displayed here. She owes her fortune to raw, gratuitous, verbal sewage, nothing else.
Agreed.
Even the Jerry Springer Show is high-class in comparison.
Why is Coulter even ON any networks at all?
Simple. She is a right wing looney prop designed to make the regular right wing host look like a centrist.
-ML
BULLS EYE, Middleleft!!!
Spot on analysis, dude.
Right, and if you're ann coulter, and you go out in public without a turtleneck on, make sure all your friends know that you are not taking hormones in preparation for gender reassignment.
(sorry, but it's Friday, and coulter is too ridiculous to refute logically anyway...)
C'mon Annie, updated your routine. This is old hat for you. We expect better from you as we get closer to the election. Being an integral spokesperson for your party, or so it seems, the D's will need your words to continue to rally the troops as they did last year. And Sean, why do you you hate half of the people in this country? You know, hate is not only used to describe D's who dislike the President. I actually listened to 30 minutes of your radio show today(actually, replay because in Pittsburgh you are on at 4:00pm on FM) and the hate you spew towards Liberals, Democrats, Senators ( the Senator duJour was Warner today) and basically anyone who will not agree with you is not within the realm of sanity. You hate too too much. Take a break, take Annie to dinner and chill out.
P.S. Only dinner.....And once again, thanks to both of you for giving the D's the picture of what your type of Con really believes. It is a shame what you have done to the Grand Old Party....for nothing but money. Shame on you.
Hey! Taking ann out to dinner! How much could that possibly cost? $1.29? including dessert and tip?
Hannity tip anyone? He probably asks to see if they are registered R after he asks for their proof of citizenship. By then they throw the jerk out of the restaurant.
It's two box tops and 1, thin, dime!
Your showing your age (and I'm showing mine by understanding)
Who's this "Democratic strategist" Steve Murphy? A true Democratic strategist would assert this is a media manipulated hypefest and there is NO WAY that it was aimed at the Clintons. He would not talk about the Democrats being in terrble shape. Colmes looks like a he-man warrior compared to this typical Fox toady.
I'm dubious of this Steve Murphy guy too. I guess he's a two time campaign loser, once with Michael Dukakis and once with Dick Gephardt. But that's not why I doubt the guy. I doubt him for saying Edwards isn't attacking the issues, that's just crazy talk. Every Democratic candidate is attacking the issues, whatever that means.
He also started his career with Joe Biden, so maybe the guy has his own agenda.
It would not surprise me at all if Fox is asking Democrats who are supporting a single candidate on to discuss the other Democratic candidates in order to make it seem like even Democrats don't like their own.
I think MMFA should look into this. I think there is an agenda in doing this. It is to damage Democratic candidates.
She really offers nothing of value to any conversation, and that is why FOX makes her such a headline event.
Jlyons, I think your posts are often brilliant in their accuracy and brevity. Keep up the good work.
Maybe she ought to work on her act at the Comedy Store.
It's definitely not fit for prime time cable.
She'd have to give up her day job as a model for tinker-toy.
Or...
She had to give that up because the comics kept mistaking her for a mic stand...
Or...
She's only unfit for cable because she's not insulated...
Or - she ain't funny because someone crossed her wires.
...
Hello? ... Hello? ...
<tap><tap><tap>Is this thing on?
Getting nothing but static, right? ;)
I always smack the box up side o' the head, it makes the picture come in clear for a moment.
The Coultergeist is rattling around again. Call an exorcist.
Alert to Annie,
Bill Clinton has just declared on National TV that he considers you a "GOOD" friend....BYE BYE
There was a bag of bones, Annie
Who pulled her thoughts from her fanny
Garbage cans must be mad
That her stink is so bad
Her likeness to sewage uncanny
MMFA take Coulter wayyyyy too seriously. She is a comedienne not a serious political commentator!!! And if I might say so, she is quite funny. Not captured in this clip was "[c]oming from a trial lawyer, 'she-devil' is a compliment." When are you guys going to start appreciating her humor--I'm in no way a liberal but I appreciate the political humor of Al Franken, Bill Maher, George Carlin, Lewis Black--all of these guys can keep me in stitches for hours.
But those guys are funny.
Yeah, because lawyer jokes are so original. Coulter is about as funny as the 1/2 Hour "Comedy" Hour and Dennis Miller. I don't think you guys can do comedy.
So Ann Coulter is on Hannity and Colmes giving political commentary because she is a comedian? Now Lewis Black is an excellent comedian with a political bent yet I never seem to see him on CNN or MSNBC giving political commentary. And HE is funny.
Hold on IO, I've never seen Coulter do a stand up act ANY comedy club (okay Fox news ma be the sole exception). Apples and oranges dodo.
I know I'll never be as good as JuliaJane, but she inspires me.
There once was a shrill she-devil named Annie
With locks of gold but no fanny
When it comes to the mud that she slings
The left wing politically she stings
There’s no truth to be found in her tales
Just more lies and eardrum busting wails
Because it’s true a devil she seems
At least in THERICKS dreams
If the Clintons are such efficient killers, as Ann would have us believe, then why oh why is she still drawing breath? The very fact that she slams the Clintons daily and yet continues to live seems to put lie to her entire schtick here?
Good point, Iowa, you'd think she'd be a marked woman (?) by now.
In response to AC's joke about "she-devil" being a compliment coming from a trial lawyer, I think "she-devil" would probably be a compliment to her coming from any source.
Going by my recent informal survey of righty media. "trial lawyer" seems to be in line for the same Pavlovian-conditioning as Liberal, Secular Progressive, Illegal Immigrant and Militant Gay.
I wonder if hannity, after having Coulter on to accuse the Clintons of murder, had any time left to talk about the hate coming from the unhinged left.
Thanks Julia and SFCRETIRED. Here's one:
A milld mannered fellow named Alan
Teamed up with Sean "always-be-yellin'"
'Sted of reasoned discourse
They have Coulter the coarse
Alan can't stop the lies she is tellin.'
Coultergeist Ann is a fright
A ghostly apparition so slight
Her bones are a creakin'
Her eyeballs are freakin'
She's the Annorexria of the right
I don't know about the rich part, but you can be too skinny. Dang, this broad looks as awful as she sounds. She apparently regurgitates more than right wing pathology.
Geez, you are so funny! You already had me with the sewage uncanny...thanks JJ
Now don't encourage me, Mary. There's really nothing to say about this icky person, so the limerick is the only device I have to comment on her strangeness, How 'bout another from you?
Old Ann is as strange as strange can
Some people think she's a man
She isn't too bright
Her writings are trite
On her black dress, there should be a ban
Julia , can I try a poem?I wonder if good ole Ann
Is really a man
I doubt she can
Whatever she is she is a scam
How did I do? ;-)
Sean and Bag-of-Bones Coulter are tools,
spouting bogus death stories like gouls
They continue their pile
of preposterous bile
For their fan base of gullible fools.
Sean is in love with the Gipper
And Ann's an incompetent quipper
He's a thick lout
and when she sticks her tongue out
Annie looks just like a zipper
"Win one for the gipper," cried Sean,
Ann the zipper droned phonily on--
someone's dead? blame 'ole Hil
Bad war news? Get more shrill
Forget dubya and cheney's Big Con.
John Edwards is such a sissy
Ann proclaimed while having a hissy
But the Edwards' are right
Ann's as black as the night
She-devil's too nice for this missy
Mary and HBL are much better at this than I. I'm not worthy!!
Not so, Julia...you are our M.M. poet laureate. I love that you introduced the limerick into these threads, as it requires stretching the mind to create a pithy set of verses to make a point.
Yes, pithy is a good word, needing to distill and be concise is hard. But Ann is just so much fun to limerickize:
Annie doth protest too much
She considers Bill Clinton nonesuch
Her breasts fairly heave
As Bill's picture she cleaves
To her chest in a breathless clutch
I'm late to this party of rhyme,
but Annie? She's hardly sublime.
If it's pithy you want
It's not Ann you should taunt
Just watch sean pith on truth all the time.oh no, Neon, don't keep us hanging...what's the last line?
"Just watch sean pith on truth all the time"
Neondesert, on fire again!
If you write a book critical of Chimpy McShortbus or accuse him of rape you might want to tell people you arent going to commit suicide as both the guy who wrote Fortunate Son AND the woman who accused Bush of rape went out that way.
Hurray Ann!
I've heard Coulter's books actually get "bought in" (buying thousands of copies then giving them away) by some of her right wing supporters. Hence her "New York Times Bestseller" status. That gives Fox and other consevative outleat a reason to put her on the air.
I think we need to take a step back here. I think Ms. Coulter is just looking out for us. After all, while I will certainly support Hillary if she is the Democratic nominee, I would prefer either John Edwards or Al Gore, and things can sometimes get a bit nasty in the primary season.
So, just so everyone is clear, I would not, under any circumstances, commit suicide.
Well, if after a night spent consuming too many adult beverages I woke up next to Ann Coulter. If that happens, it WAS suicide. Just so all my friends know.
Guess whose Bentley payment is due?
Advocte for low power FM, let's end the rule of mass media!!
...seems to me , and to my friend Bob (isn't that right Bob?..he says right)
1.By definition Anne Coulter is not a pundit.
2. By _Mr. Hannity's_ apparent own standards of political/journalistic analysis (considering his recent take on Obama' s comments on Afgahanistan war policy) Anne Coulter is a slanderer. I am surprised (not) that he did not call her on her claims that the Clintons murdered Vince Foster.
3. I do not know what to say about the definition of "trolling" ...seems a bit of a slippery precipice ...perhaps _any_ commentary made on the net could be contrued as a form of trolling
P.S. I made up the thing about the friend Bob...lighten up people...
Why does this hag still get air time? What a joke.
I know this thread is getting a bit old , but in case someone is interested:
Many people I speak with do not watch or listen to any of the Cable/Radio idealogues...so my question is just how influential are these folks?
... I would appreciate any links or referrals to statistics, or polls on how may people actually are paying serious attentions to these, for want of a better term, loud-mouths of "fixed noise"
I guess if Hillary Clinton does get the presidental nomination, the neoclowns will start reviving the old Clinton Body Count smears--that she and her husband "killed" Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and dozens of other people. Sigh.
Some have criticized Edwards for his "Coulter cash." I don't. He is simply turning the tables on her. Coulter is a media whore who profits from cruelly slandering and attacking liberals and anyone who is against the Bush administration. So Edwards profitting his campaign by using Coulter's own cruelty against her is completely justified to me.