About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Henry uncritically aired Bush's claim that "violence has sharply decreased in Baghdad"

August 29, 2007 6:29 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: In airing President Bush's assertion that "[s]ectarian violence has sharply decreased in Baghdad. The momentum is now on our side," CNN's Ed Henry gave no indication that he attempted to verify Bush's assertion. By contrast, recent articles by the Associated Press and McClatchy Newspapers have challenged claims about decreases in violence in Iraq.

19 Comments

On the August 28 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN White House correspondent Ed Henry uncritically aired President Bush's assertion from his August 28 speech to the American Legion that "[s]ectarian violence has sharply decreased in Baghdad. The momentum is now on our side." Henry gave no indication that he attempted to verify Bush's assertion. By contrast, the Associated Press reported on August 25 that while violence is down in Baghdad "from peak levels ... the death toll from sectarian attacks around the country is running nearly double the pace from a year ago." Moreover, McClatchy Newspapers reported on August 15 that while U.S. officials have said civilian casualties have decreased in Baghdad, they have "declined to provide specific numbers, and statistics gathered by McClatchy Newspapers don't support the claim."

Reporting on Bush's speech, Henry said that Bush "seemed to claim that the U.S. is turning a corner" in Iraq, which is "the closest he has come to actually saying the U.S. is winning in a long time." CNN then aired a video clip of Bush claiming that "[s]ectarian violence has sharply decreased in Baghdad. The momentum is now on our side. The surge is seizing the initiative from the enemy and handing it to the Iraqi people."

However, in an August 25 article headlined "Violence appears to be shifting from Baghdad," the AP reported:

This year's U.S. troop buildup has succeeded in bringing violence in Baghdad down from peak levels, but the death toll from sectarian attacks around the country is running nearly double the pace from a year ago.

Some of the recent bloodshed appears the result of militant fighters drifting into parts of northern Iraq, where they have fled after U.S.-led offensives. Baghdad, however, still accounts for slightly more than half of all war-related killings -- the same percentage as a year ago, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press.

[...]

The AP tracking includes Iraqi civilians, government officials, police and security forces killed in attacks such as gunfights and bombings, which are frequently blamed on Sunni suicide strikes. It also includes execution-style killings -- largely the work of Shiite death squads.

In addition, the August 15 McClatchy article reported that U.S. officials have not provided any statistics to back up assertions that civilian casualties are down in Baghdad by half since February. The article added that those numbers conflict with statistics compiled by McClatchy and that "[n]o pattern of improvement is discernible for violence during the five months of the surge":

And while top U.S. officials insist that 50 percent of the capital is now under effective U.S. or government control, compared with 8 percent in February, statistics indicate that the improvement in violence is at best mixed.

U.S. officials say the number of civilian casualties in the Iraqi capital is down 50 percent. But U.S. officials declined to provide specific numbers, and statistics gathered by McClatchy Newspapers don't support the claim.

[...]

The number of Iraqis killed in attacks changed only marginally in July when compared with December -- down seven, from 361 to 354, according to McClatchy statistics.

No pattern of improvement is discernible for violence during the five months of the surge. In January, the last full month before the surge began, 438 people were killed in the capital in bombings. In February, that number jumped to 520. It declined in March to 323, but jumped again in April, to 414.

Violence remained virtually unchanged in May, when 404 were killed. The lowest total came in June, the first month U.S. officials said all the new American troops were in place, with just 190 dead, but then swung back up in July, with 354 dead.

From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the August 28 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Other important news, though, that we're following here in The Situation Room. Just a short time ago, President Bush told a veterans' convention in Nevada there's been a shift in momentum in the war in Iraq. The timing of this claim comes at a key time politically for the president.

Our White House correspondent, Ed Henry, is traveling with the president -- Ed.

HENRY: Wolf, here in Reno at the American Legion Convention, Part Two in the president's series of speeches meant to shape public opinion heading into that critical mid-September progress report on Iraq. Last week's speeches, you know, may have backfired a bit. That speech to the VFW, it focused on comparing Iraq to Vietnam.

This time the president focused on how winning in Iraq is pivotal to stopping both Al Qaeda and Iran and really bringing more stability to the Mideast. The biggest development was that the president seemed to go further than just saying the surge is working. He seemed to claim that the U.S. is turning a corner, the closest he has come to actually saying the U.S. is winning in a long time.

BUSH [video clip]: Sectarian violence has sharply decreased in Baghdad. The momentum is now on our side. The surge is seizing the initiative from the enemy and handing it to the Iraqi people.

HENRY: This is all about the president laying the groundwork for seeking more time for the surge in September. Interestingly, Mr. Bush has repeatedly urged lawmakers not to prejudge this mid-September progress report, even though he seems to be doing that himself with his own words about forging ahead with essentially the same strategy and line of attack.

Mr. Bush, of course, gets to shape that September report. But he has two major challenges that lie ahead. He, himself, acknowledged in this speech, political reconciliation not happening quick enough in Iraq. And he also has the added political pressure of senior Republicans like [Sen.] John Warner [VA] saying they want to start seeing troops come home -- Wolf.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (August 29, 2007 6:45 pm ET)
         

      then we can leave, because bush said this was only a "temporary surge". 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (August 29, 2007 6:57 pm ET)
         

      How long before Rush Limbaugh assures us that the death rate in Baghdad is no worse than any major American city...?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (August 29, 2007 8:17 pm ET)
           

        Even if Rush did start citing statistics they would pale in comparison to some other scarier numbers. More people were killed in America by illegal aliens in 2006 than our soldier death toll in Iraq.

        • In 2006, twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens (4,380 in 2006).
        • Thirteen Americans were killed every day by drunk illegal alien drivers (4,745 in 2006)
        • Eight American children were victims of sexual abuse by illegal aliens every day (2,920 in 2006)
        But we never hear about this because we don't want to offend anyone. Where's the outrage about this? 

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jawill11 (August 29, 2007 9:44 pm ET)
             

          Ladies and Gentlemen:

          The quintessential strawman!

          Just for the record, those 4,300 murders made up 0.00146% of the population of the U.S. in 2006.  On the other hand, the 950 killed in Iraq made up 0.86% of U.S. forces in the country, nearly 600 times your big stat. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by funnymanpants (August 30, 2007 12:31 am ET)
             

          That's a strawman argument, as the previous poster pointed out. Moreover, you completely omitted the deaths of Iraqis (You know, the people we are supposed to be saving--bringing democracy to), who are being killed in horific numbers. The violence is up in Iraq, not down, which shows the surge is note working. 

          Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 30, 2007 5:09 am ET)
             

          The momentum is now on our side,"

          Yeah, not according to this

          "Strikingly Negative" Iraq Report Leaked To Preempt White House Doctoring

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by monknj80 (August 30, 2007 9:08 am ET)
               

            Just caught that this morning. IT's going to be fun watching them explain away the differences in the two reports.

             

            Watch'em squirm.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 30, 2007 9:06 am ET)
             

          Where'd you pull those numbers from? Probably from World Net Daily I'm sure. I highly doubt those numbers on any level, and your argument, well, means nothing. More people are killed by slipping and falling in their bathtub than they are by terrorists in the US every year, but that doesn't prevent us from our government using them as a boogeyman (let me just state, my argument, also a strawman, just showing 2 can play at the same game).

          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 30, 2007 9:28 am ET)
             

          Even though I doubt the numbers you post, let's post the REST of the numbers that are actually real:

          2006 Values:

          93934 rapes reported in the US (probably many more go un-reported as get reported). Where is your outrage about this? By your own assertion are you only outraged about possible illegal immigrants raping people or are you concerned about rape altogether? Again, where is your outrage over the 91000 other rapes you didn't quote?

          16692 murders reported in the US for 2006 or recorded I should say. Are you trying to tell me that a full 25% of murders are committed by illegal aliens? That's not even statistically possible considering that amount of the population that they comprise in the US. They are NOT 25% of our entire population. Your numbers are not valid. And again, where is your outrage over the other 12000 murders in the US not carried out by illegal aliens, if your numbers are correct?

          Drunk driving deaths US total in 2006 were 13470 people. Again, you're saying that out of a possible population of 4% (estimated illegals in the US) that they are involved in a whopping 35% of the drunk driving deaths that happen in the US? Again, it is virtually statistically impossible for this to happen. Where is your outrage, if your numbers are correct, about the other 9000+ drunk driving deaths not involving an illegal (if your numbers are correct, which they're not)?

          Your whole argument is a xenophobic racist tirade against illegal immigrants/aliens. That is what your whole post was about. The statistics don't show that your numbers are even remotely correct, or that they could be correct, but keep trying to scare people into thinking that illegal immigrants are going to run you off the road, kill you in your bed while you sleep, and molest your children. This has heppened time after time when a new immigrant populations comes to the US over the entire course of our history. It happened with the Italians, happened with the Irish, happened when we moved the Indians to the reservations, and so on and so forth. You are putting out the same old tired, and un-true arguments that nativists and racists have been using since there WAS a United Staes, just with different twists. Get over it.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by sundog (August 30, 2007 12:41 pm ET)
             

          Illegal aliens?!?  Oh my, that does sound scary.  Do they look and sound different than me?  Oh dear oh dear.  Something must be done.  America is after all for Americans.  Just like your ancestors.  Keeping this country Pure, that's what made us great.  Thank God we stopped all those Irish and Germans and Italians from polluting our shores with their alienness.  Yucky. 

          Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (August 29, 2007 7:33 pm ET)
         

      This looks to be a variation on the perennial "The Iraq Insurgency is in its Last Throes" speech.

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=aQEMxYf9b5w

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ellington (August 29, 2007 7:35 pm ET)
         

      Is it too much to ask CNN to actually take a look at Bush's claims and see if they have a basis in reality? Is it too much to mention reports that contradict Bush?

      CNN "truth-squaded" Michael Moore with far more vigor than they have ever attempted to verify Bush's claims. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 29, 2007 8:44 pm ET)
         

      God, he looks constipated in that picture!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (August 29, 2007 10:27 pm ET)
         

      "The momentum is now on our side. The surge is seizing the initiative from the enemy and handing it to the Iraqi people." GWB

      Yup everything is hunky-dory. Coming up roses. So let's stay the course & all that crap.

      Bush. Like a rock. Only dumber.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hcoppola (August 30, 2007 11:06 am ET)
         

      Mr. Bush continues to claim success in Iraq as well as in New Orleans in spite of and contrary to all of the available reporting.

      Lying to the American public is what the Bush Administration does best and will continue to do until they leave office

      http://coppolacomments.blogspot.com/ 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave_chicago (August 30, 2007 12:11 pm ET)
         

      Henry: "Mr. Bush, of course, gets to shape that September report. But he has two major challenges that lie ahead."

      Three-- if we could only count on correspondents like Henry to verify Bush's claims.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace