About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media ignored Mississippi's use of waivers to redirect funds designated for low-income Katrina victims

August 30, 2007 7:39 pm ET

SUMMARY: Despite widespread reporting on the reconstruction in the Gulf Coast, the media have largely ignored reports that Mississippi Republican Gov. Haley Barbour has used waivers to redirect funds designated for low- to moderate-income Katrina victims.

19 Comments

On the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina's August 29, 2005, landfall, the media have largely ignored reports that Mississippi Republican Gov. Haley Barbour, leading the recovery effort in the state, has repeatedly sought, and obtained, waivers from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) allowing the state to spend federal funds that would normally be reserved for low- to moderate-income residents on other projects. As a consequence, just 20 percent of the $5.4 billion in Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) awarded to the state has been earmarked for programs designed to benefit Mississippi's low- to moderate-income Katrina victims -- less than half of the 50 percent requirement mandated by Congress, according to a recent report by the Steps Coalition, an organization that monitors the Mississippi Homeowners Assistance Program. Moreover, the $1.1 billion in federal funds that have been earmarked for programs benefiting lower income residents have been distributed very slowly. As the Biloxi Sun-Herald reported on August 26, the Steps Coalition said the program has been deficient in "helping people of low-to-moderate incomes." Furthermore, investigative journalist Tim Shorrock wrote in an August 29 Salon.com article that the distribution of federal funding in Mississippi under Barbour "has been badly skewed toward wealthy homeowners."

Despite widespread reporting on the reconstruction in the Gulf Coast, however, the media have essentially ignored Mississippi's use of waivers to redirect funds designated for low-income Katrina victims. Aside from the Sun-Herald and Salon, Mississippi's use of CDBG waivers and the Steps Coalition's findings about the state's distribution of funds to low-to-moderate income residents have gone largely unnoticed by the media. A Media Matters for America search* of the Nexis database for newspaper articles and transcripts from the past two years found only two articles covering these issues and revealed that even those reports afforded them scant attention.

The Associated Press reported on August 20 that Mississippi had obtained CDBG waivers:

[The Mississippi Development Authority's] Web site shows how many grant applications have been received and how many grants have been paid, but those details are too general, said Debby Goldberg, director of the Hurricane Relief Project at the Washington-based National Fair Housing Alliance.

"It doesn't give you any indication of who is it that's included in those numbers," said Goldberg. "Are these low income people? Are they moderate income people? Which communities is the money not flowing into," she said.

Goldberg said because the state is using federal Community Development Block Grants for the program, the funds must be used to promote fair housing. The original federal requirement for the CDBG funds was that at least 50 percent of the money go to low- to moderate-income people, but Mississippi received a waiver for that requirement in phase one, Goldberg said.

The Chicago Tribune reported in an August 29, 2006, article:

Critics, including Derrick Johnson, president of the Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP, said the state has lost sight of other serious concerns that resulted from the storm, such as low-income housing. More than 39,000 people still live in government trailers.

A report issued last week by the Mississippi NAACP and the Initiative for Regional and Community Transformation at Rutgers University said the working class is being left out of the recovery because the state requested a waiver allowing $5.1 billion in federal Community Development Block Grants to be diverted to uninsured or underinsured homeowners who want to rebuild. Meanwhile, the 47 percent of Gulf Coast residents who lived in rental housing are left out.

An April 25, 2006, Congressional Research Service report noted that "Congress included $11.5 billion in supplemental CDBG disaster recovery assistance for the five states affected by the Gulf Coast hurricanes in the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2006." The CRS also noted that the CDBG "program's authorizing statute requires each state and entitlement community to allocate 70% of its CDBG funds to activities that primarily benefit low- and moderate-income persons," but that the Defense Appropriations Act "lower[ed] the income targeting requirement for activities benefiting low- and moderate-income persons from 70% to 50% of the state's allocation." According to the report, the act also allowed HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson to "grant waivers of program requirements" -- including the already reduced requirement that 50 percent of CDBG funds go to low- to moderate-income people.

According to the text of the supplemental, from its "Community Planning and Development" section:

Provided further, That in administering the funds under this heading, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall waive, or specify alternative requirements for, any provision of any statute or regulation that the Secretary administers in connection with the obligation by the Secretary or the use by the recipient of these funds or guarantees (except for requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor standards, and the environment), upon a request by the State that such waiver is required to facilitate the use of such funds or guarantees, and a finding by the Secretary that such waiver would not be inconsistent with the overall purpose of the statute, as modified: Provided further, That the Secretary may waive the requirement that activities benefit persons of low and moderate income, except that at least 50 percent of the funds made available under this heading must benefit primarily persons of low and moderate income unless the Secretary otherwise makes a finding of compelling need.

Since the supplemental was passed, Mississippi has sought and obtained four waivers to the 50 percent CDBG requirement. According to a March 9 memo from the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Mississippi has sought and failed to obtain a blanket waiver for the requirement but has instead obtained three "piecemeal" waivers from HUD going back to June 2006, at the request of Barbour:

On March 6, HUD published its third set of waivers allowing Mississippi and Louisiana to spend Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Supplemental funds with less focus on low income people. Louisiana will be able to give salary bonuses to scientists lured from other states, and Mississippi won't have to worry about benefiting lower income people when giving grants to businesses.

Mississippi continues to seek a blanket waiver of the obligation to spend its $5.48 billion CDBG Disaster Supplemental funds without regard to benefiting lower income people. Although HUD has twice denied such a blanket waiver, Mississippi first avoided the requirement to spend at least half of the money to benefit lower income people when HUD granted a waiver related to projects included in the state's initial, partial Action Plan (see Memo, 6/16/06). HUD has repeatedly waived the low income benefit requirement on a piecemeal basis as Mississippi submits incremental, partial Action Plans. The latest HUD action again denies a blanket waiver, but grants the waiver for Mississippi's most recent partial Action Plan which will provide $340 million for business grants and loans and $160 million for downtown commercial revitalization.

When creating the CDBG Disaster Supplemental, Congress allowed HUD to waive the usual requirement that 70% of the money benefit lower income people, but set a floor of 50% benefit to lower income people. HUD quickly ditched the 70% lower income benefit requirement. Congress also enabled HUD to waive the 50% benefit floor if a governor demonstrated to HUD that there was a compelling need to not aid low income people.

On August 24, HUD granted yet another CDBG waiver to Mississippi, which went into effect on August 29.

As noted in an August 26 entry on the Daily Kos blog, the Steps Coalition released a report on August 24 detailing the amount of CDBG funds earmarked for low- and moderate-income people in Mississippi. According to the report, $1.1 billion in federal aid has been earmarked for three programs designed to benefit lower-income residents. Of those programs, the Phase II homeowner assistance grant program has been allocated the most funds -- $700 million. However, the Sun-Herald reported that, as of August 26, just $55 million in grants had been paid through the Phase II program. The Mississippi Development Authority, as of August 29, reported that $70 million in grants have been paid. The Steps Coalition recommended that "at least" $834 million "more be set aside for programs for low-moderate income residents."

From Tim Shorrock's August 29 Salon article:

Two years later, some of these areas are still distressed. One reason for the lack of attention paid to the Gulf Coast may be the massive investments made in the region by casino, hotel and real estate interests. That has created the appearance of a recovery that business promoters say has brought, and will continue to bring, enormous growth to the area. But many locals say that the casino-led development has done little to alleviate post-disaster conditions for most residents, including the 37 percent of the population -- approximately a half million people -- who earn below what federal guidelines deem low to moderate income. Moreover, maneuvering in Washington by the state's Republican leaders has diverted aid money away from some of the people who need it the most.

Hurricane Katrina "leveled everybody" on the Gulf Coast, says Reilly Morse, a civil rights lawyer from Biloxi who works for the Mississippi Center for Justice, a statewide organization that provides legal assistance to low-income residents. "For a very short while, everybody had the same experience, and that spawned a sense of community that I don't think ever existed before." But since the aid money began flowing, said Morse, "there's really been two recoveries here: one that generally favored homeowners with resources, and another one that basically priced the poor out of the housing market."

[...]

The $23.5 billion in federal funding that Mississippi's governor and its two Republican senators managed to obtain was unprecedented in scope for a state recovering from a natural disaster. But the distribution of the $4 billion the state obtained specifically to help residents rebuild their housing, thanks to Barbour, has been badly skewed toward wealthy homeowners.

Under the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community Development Block Grant program, 70 percent of the funds are supposed to be allocated to low- and moderate-income people. But the governor successfully lobbied to waive that requirement, undercutting its impact on Katrina survivors. As a result, only 25 percent of the money has reached the poorer segments of the population. Renters, who make up 40 percent of the population in some sections of the coast, have received nothing. "Only a minuscule fraction has actually gotten into the hands of those that need it most," said Morse.

*Media Matters searched for "katrina and (mississippi or barbour) w/30 (community development or cdbg) w/20 waiv!"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (August 30, 2007 7:46 pm ET)
         

      this is like another scam in alabama where tax breaks meant to go to katrina victims went to luxury condos built at the university of alabama in tuscaloosa, 200 miles from the coast.  see link.

      http://blog.nola.com/nola/2007/08/katrina_aid_goes_toward_posh_c.html

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ben (August 31, 2007 12:24 pm ET)
           

        Well T Town was included in the region so I don't see anything wrong with using that to spur growth.

        People will rebuild when the market is right. There is just so much more growth further north in the state so natually builders are going to focus there.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (August 31, 2007 6:44 pm ET)
             

          was that supposed to argue with my point?  if builders in the north of the state are building anyway, why should they need a tax break to do it?  especially for million dollar condos.  and by t-town i assume you mean tuscaloosa.  yes it was included in the rebuild "region", but if you read the link, that was because alabama gop senator richard shelby had it included when it did not seem to be an area that suffered significant damage.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (August 30, 2007 8:07 pm ET)
         

      I hope both Mississippi and Alabama voters get this information. A dogey prospect these days.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by j4sonl33 (August 30, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
         

      Headline: Media (and Media Matters) focuses on red state (Mississippi) shortcomings concerning Hurricane Katrina relief and rebuilding and decides NOT to document the THOUSANDS of examples of corruption and political money-shuffling going on in blue state (Louisiana).

      http://sigmundcarlandalfred.wordpress.com/2006/08/29/hurricane-relief-part-one/

      33 BILLION in unspent relief in Louisiana!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by j4sonl33 (August 30, 2007 8:40 pm ET)
           

        Oh, sorry, that was written a year ago. I'm sure they've straightened everything out by now. Right.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by onionhead (August 30, 2007 10:16 pm ET)
           

        Actually Lousiana went to Bush twice.  But I guess you are refering to the fact that the gov. and the mayor of N.O. are Dems.

        But it is a "Red State" because the terms "Red" and "Blue" state are only used in reference to the national elections.

        And BTW, there are corrupt dems (like Nagin) and their corruption has been covered in the media.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by j4sonl33 (August 30, 2007 11:28 pm ET)
             

          Has MMFA documented Nagin's corruption?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (August 31, 2007 12:08 am ET)
               

            Read the mission statement. Snivelling that THIS site just like MRC and AIM is not balanced is wasting the time of everyone who has the ability to READ

            Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (August 31, 2007 10:52 am ET)
               

            It's not up to MMFA to document the corruption of ANY elected official - Democratic OR Republican.  MMFA's function is to document those instances where the media is not being factual, or is twisting the facts to advance a political agenda.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (August 31, 2007 12:20 am ET)
             

          I don't recall reading that Nagin was corrupt. i do recall claims made he was a little slow in responding to the disaster prior to the hurricane hitting the coasy, waiting for federal government leadership, but not corruptness.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by onionhead (August 31, 2007 11:15 am ET)
               

            Now that you mention it, I don't recall any corruption by Nagin either.  But I guess I was refering to him being criticized by the media. 

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (August 31, 2007 9:50 am ET)
           

        I thought you guys were color blind.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by onionhead (August 31, 2007 11:23 am ET)
             

          I have a dream...

          that someday children from Red states will join hands with children from Blue states.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (August 31, 2007 8:17 am ET)
         

      Let's be serious: Republicans and their friends THRIVE on disaster. When average folks are suffering, when the children of average folks are sent to war, this is seen as a GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY for wealthy Republicans to further raid the Treasury.

      How many good folks have responded to the pleas of Pat Robertson, the Bakers back in the day, Falwell and other "evangalists" as they show pictures of people (usually kids) suffering in 3rd world countries? Responded with gifts of CASH to the organizations run by these "men of God"? And how is that cash REALLY used? Oh, for mansions for directors, a fortune for the figurehead, investment capital to, for example, exploit diamond mines in South Africa, and of course myriad donations to Republican politicians. Do the poor and suffering get the relief promised? Only enough that will provide film for the fundraising drives. Percentage-wise, they get diddly.

      Halliburton's profits track on a graph identically to American soldiers' deaths in Iraq. Each soldiers' death translates to MILLIONS in Halliburton profit. Does Halliburton want MORE American soldiers to DIE? Their "bottom line" DEMANDS it. It's not that they WANT the deaths, it's that they WANT the profits, and the deaths are a necessary by-product.

      Rightwingers whined incessantly about "WELFARE" that went to "line the pockets" of poor people. Where did most welfare dollars end up? At the corner grocery store, at the neighborhood gas station, to landlords. That's right: welfare didn't "enrich" the poor; it just enabled them to live with less suffering. The MONEY went into the economy, into the pockets of business owners.

      But that sort of "redistribution of wealth" is not good enough for Republicans. It's too indirect. It's better to simply lay claim (through "waivers" or "no bid contracts") to the piles of money up front. That way, the cash is not diluted by "do gooderism" ... it just goes DIRECTLY into the pockets of the wealthy. As Karl Sagan would have said, "Billions and Billions".

      That is the legacy of the Bush Administration and the GOP majority Congress. Massive REDISTRIBUTION of wealth ... TO the already very wealthy, and FROM the rest of us. A dandy bit of Class Warfare. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bootsy (August 31, 2007 2:06 pm ET)
         

      Isn't it more important that there are still people suffering 2 years after the hurricane has hit, and things like this are happening?  Who cares about red or blue states, these people in Mississippi NEED help.  I find it to be very unsettling that something like this could happen.  A natural disaster could happen to most any of us, and to think i'd have to go through something like this just to get help is unbelieveable. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (August 31, 2007 3:39 pm ET)
           

        Hey according to most ralk show hosts on the radio, the only reason these folks are suffering is because they're too lazy to either move or get a job. Sort of like how they were not responsible enough for themselves to get out of the way of the storm when it came through (never mind that the vast majority of poor people you know, don't have cars and things like that).

        I've actually heard talk show hosts talking about this this week, mostly because of the anniversary, and universally on the radio, it's all about how these folks are living off the government, and just waiting for the government to bail them out, or give them more money. Apparently these dunderheads have never had their entire city under water for a week or so, and lost everything they ever had. While I wouldn't really wish that on anyone, there are few on the radio who I would love to see this happen to.

        Report Abuse