About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

LA Times reported Bush's Iraq trip was "to see" progress with "own eyes," but didn't note he never left base

September 05, 2007 6:09 pm ET
image

46 Comments

In a September 3 article on President Bush's trip to Al Asad Air Base in Iraq, Los Angeles Times staff writer Julian E. Barnes uncritically reported Bush's statement that "[t]he secretaries and I have come here today to see with our own eyes the remarkable changes that are taking place in Anbar province." But Barnes did not note, as The Washington Post reported in a September 3 article, that "[a]lthough Bush touted the substantial political and security progress made in Anbar, he did not leave the safety of the base Monday to see those changes firsthand."

In a September 4 washingtonpost.com column, Dan Froomkin described the base as an "enormous, heavily fortified American outpost for 10,000 troops that while technically in Anbar Province in fact has a 13-mile perimeter keeping Iraq -- and Iraqis -- at bay." Froomkin also reported that Marines and soldiers refer to the base "as 'Camp Cupcake,' for its relatively luxurious facilities."

Full text of the Los Angeles Times article, headlined "Bush hints at troop reduction":

President Bush made an unannounced visit to Iraq on Monday and held out the possibility that some U.S. troops might be withdrawn if security gains made in one part of the country could be spread to other areas.

However, the president offered no timetable on a withdrawal and did not suggest how many troops might be involved. And he insisted that decisions on force levels should not be driven by "a nervous reaction by Washington politicians or poll results." The text of the president's remarks is available here.

Bush, who had been expected to leave Washington on Monday for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in Australia, instead flew in secrecy to this air base in Iraq's Anbar province Sunday night to meet with top U.S. and Iraqi officials, including Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, and American troops. He later flew to Australia.

The six-hour visit gave Bush, who was joined by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a high-profile opportunity to argue that conditions in Iraq were improving. It came not long before Congress is to receive long-awaited reports on Iraq and intensively debate whether to push for a withdrawal timetable.

The president hailed what U.S. officials say is the improving security situation in Anbar, once one of the most violent regions in Iraq. He praised Sunni tribal leaders in the province who are fighting alongside U.S. forces against the group Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker "tell me if the kind of success we are now seeing continues it will be possible to maintain the same level of security with fewer American forces," Bush said.

The two officials are scheduled to report to Congress next week on the Bush administration's buildup of 28,500 additional troops in Iraq this year and are expected to argue that the changes in Anbar are evidence the strategy is working.

Outside the administration, many diplomats, Iraqi officials and other observers are more skeptical. They say violence in Anbar is down in large part because militants have simply moved to other parts of the country, where attacks have increased sharply this year.

Iraqi leaders also worry that Sunni Arab tribes fighting alongside U.S. forces eventually will turn against Iraq's central government, which is dominated by Shiite Muslims.

U.S. officials said they had brought Maliki and the other Iraqi leaders to Anbar in part to show the Sunni tribes that the central government was supportive of them.

"There are those inside the Maliki government who might want to characterize this as arming a Sunni opposition," a senior Defense official. "That is why we have said time after time after time that we need to get Maliki out there."

The Bush administration also has been pushing Maliki's government to pass legislation that the Americans hope will encourage political reconciliation in Iraq, such as a measure to divide the country's oil revenue among key ethnic and sectarian groups. The Iraqi parliament is scheduled to reconvene today.

Aboard Air Force One on the way to Australia, Bush said Maliki was "evolving as a leader" and had "a lot of work to do," but was a friend who had made progress.

For weeks, senior administration officials have said they expect Petraeus to recommend that the U.S. troop presence in Anbar be reduced, though that might not mean pulling those forces out of Iraq entirely.

Officials traveling with Bush noted that his statement about overall troop reductions was conditioned on security improving in Iraq. And later, speaking before a room with several hundred cheering troops, Bush said any drawdown would not be driven by politics.

"Those decisions will be made by calm assessments of military commanders, not a nervous reaction by Washington politicians or poll results in the media," he said. "When we begin to draw down from Iraq, it will be from a position of strength and success, not from a position of fear and failure."

Asked later about Bush's comments, Gates said that a troop drawdown was "one of the central issues everyone is examining." He said that military leaders were looking to see whether changing conditions would provide a chance to begin bringing troop levels down.

Gates said the military leaders were looking at all the areas of Iraq individually.

"Clearly there is hard work that remains in some [areas], but the situation in others is in pretty good shape," Gates said.

Just before meeting with the Sunni tribal leaders, Bush emphasized that the U.S. would not leave Iraq anytime soon.

"I am going to reassure them that America does not abandon our friends, and America will not abandon the Iraqi people," Bush said, flanked by Gates and Rice. "That is the message all three of us bring."

"The secretaries and I have come here today to see with our own eyes the remarkable changes that are taking place in Anbar province," Bush said.

Last year, 356 American troops were killed in Anbar, according to the website icasualties.org, 43% of the U.S. fatalities in Iraq. This year, 146 U.S. troops have been killed there, 20% of the total in Iraq.

The tribal leaders' decision to cooperate with the U.S. has come at a price. Scores of Iraqis have died in bombings blamed on insurgents bent on revenge. The attacks have targeted civilians as well as the burgeoning new police force built with young recruits willing to work alongside U.S. and Iraqi forces. Attacks also have been aimed at tribal sheiks, including several who died in a June 25 bomb attack at the Baghdad hotel where they were meeting.

Bush aides said the sheiks were willing to align with the U.S. because insurgents with Al Qaeda in Iraq had overplayed their hand, enforcing a strict Islamic law that the Sunnis in Anbar did not want.

Aboard Air Force One, Bush said the sheiks "made the decision that they don't want to live under Al Qaeda. . . . They got sick of them."

Al Qaeda in Iraq is one of several Sunni militant groups fighting in the country. Its ranks include a significant number of non-Iraqi fighters, mostly Saudis, U.S. officials said. The extent of its links to Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda network is unclear.

Under the agreements worked out in Anbar and other parts of Iraq, the tribes have pledged to support the central government in exchange for having their members brought into the security forces. American officials hope that such agreements can lead to broader reconciliation between Sunni and Shiite factions.

Defense officials described the gathering of U.S. officials at this air base about 120 miles northwest of Baghdad as a meeting of Bush's war council. In addition to Petraeus, Gates and Rice, Bush was joined by Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Navy Adm. William J. Fallon, the top commander in the Middle East; and Stephen J. Hadley and Army Lt. Gen. Douglas E. Lute of the National Security Council.

"This is the last big gathering of the president's top military advisors and Iraqi leadership before the president decides on the way forward," said Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell.

In a news conference after Bush's speech, Gates said that in addition to Petraeus' assessment, Fallon and Pace were doing their own analyses.

Pace and other members of the Joint Chiefs are said to favor significantly reducing U.S. troop levels by the end of next year.

But Gates said the separate presentations did not necessarily mean there was disagreement between the Joint Chiefs and Petraeus. Gates also said that he had formed an opinion on whether there could be troop reductions in the coming months, but he declined to share it.

The upcoming assessments are crucial because they may determine whether Congress will try to force the Bush administration to alter its strategy and begin reducing the military presence in Iraq, which numbers about 20 combat brigades and about 164,000 troops.

The American delegation met with Maliki and five other Iraqi leaders representing the main sectarian groups, including President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd. Talabani, whose support for a unified Iraq is crucial to American officials, arrived to the meeting late, and Bush rose to greet him.

"Mr. President, Mr. President," Bush said. "The president of the whole country."

The two then exchanged a traditional triple kiss.

Bush's last trip to Iraq was in June 2006, when he left a Camp David retreat, flew to Iraq and surprised Maliki with a visit. In 2003, he had traveled to Iraq during Thanksgiving, a trip remembered for a photograph of the president presenting U.S. troops in a dining hall with what turned out to be a decorative turkey.

Although this visit was equally short, officials sought to characterize it as more than just a photo opportunity.

"The president, having to make some important decisions, felt it was important for him to come firsthand," said Hadley.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (September 05, 2007 6:14 pm ET)
         

      What a load of crap. What could he "see" there that he couldn't find out from his commanders, from pictures, or from embedded reporters? Did he have to SMELL the truth for himself? Does anybody believe that enlisted personnel are going to tell the President that his war sucks while he's posing with them for pictures?

      This was a PR stunt...period.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (September 05, 2007 6:19 pm ET)
           

        Absolutely agree Nerzog, makes you wonder why this is highlighted at all?  Anyone who doesn't think this is a photo-op manufactured PR ploy is pretty naive.  

        This postively warrants a "WITH"

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bittermarv (September 05, 2007 7:30 pm ET)
             

          Oh, I see.  So now when the subject at hand is an obvious PR stunt, and the newspaper goes along with it, that paper shouldn't be called to the carpet for playing along with a PR stunt.

          Who's in charge of keeping the list of Tommy's Rules for MMFA?  We need to amend it to include more stuff biased stuff they shouldn't write about. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Sams Computer (September 05, 2007 11:59 pm ET)
               

            NERZOG, yes it was just a big stunt...

            And Bush gave his Republican General the script for his upcoming report on the Surge. It will proclaim "Mission Accomplished" and a continuation of the occupation and the Surge.

            BUT, to answer your question. Yes an enlisted man stood up to Bush face to face...

            I was so proud of this one enlisted who grilled Girlie Man Bush on the tour durations of our troops and the sacrificing they are being subjected to. Wasn't shown on Fox Liar's Channel of course.

            If the Bush Iraq War Legacy is so damned important then why not share the burden of sacrifice by sending the huge number of ChickenHawk supporters of this War.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (September 06, 2007 10:39 am ET)
                 

              Exactly. They keep referring to this as a struggle for civilization, the conflict of our generation, yada yada yada...yet they can't give up their billionaire tax cuts to help pay for it?

              Another thing occurred to me while watching a baseball game the other night. During WWII, baseball had to be suspended, because so many players were fighting in the war. How many professional athletes have given up their sweet paychecks to fight in Bush's war? Pat Tillman comes to mind...are there others?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Sams Computer (September 06, 2007 1:21 pm ET)
                   

                I'ts not the Sweet Money!

                What it is, is a very unpopular invasion of a sovereign country that had nothing to do with the War On Terror. That's why enlistments are way down even with huge incentives.

                Pat Tillman? God bless and rest his soul for having the pride and guts to serve our country in this mess the Republicans have created.

                Report Abuse
        • Author by clams casino (September 05, 2007 8:20 pm ET)
             

          Oh brother. Even when you agree with an article, you still find a way to criticize MMFA for posting it. So now, "Why is this here?" is good for any occasion, whether you disagree with the article or not. If you disagree, it shouldn't be here, and if you agree, then that means it's too obvious, so it shouldn't be here.

          The L.A. Times actively participates in a propagandistic p.r. stunt--something which you apparently agree that they have done--and yet you still can't figure out why MMFA highlights it?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by smittymatt16 (September 06, 2007 9:56 am ET)
             

          Why is it so impossible to believe that he wanted to visit with some of the soldiers and military leaders over there, and show them he thought enough about them to visit while they are fighting?  Do you really think Bush is still making PR moves and special PR trips?  He has nothing to gain from this other than some respect from some soldiers.  I just don't simply write him off as making the trip for selfish reasons.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (September 06, 2007 10:42 am ET)
               

            Mostly because he's a liar...plus, he's already said that he's going to rake in the dough making speeches when he leaves office. He's working on his legacy now. He needs to keep this war going until he leaves office, so that the next president has to take the blame for "losing" it.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by kromecom48 (September 06, 2007 12:12 pm ET)
               

            Smitty, as a PR exec with an advanced degree in PR management from Syracruse, let me confirm that this is clearly classic PR. But more to your point, that doesn't mean its dishonest. Almost everything done by politicians, corporations, etc., has a PRelement to it. So claiming Bush is looking for good PR is 100% correct. More correctly it is a very expensive photo-op, which is a traditional PR tactic.

            Now to clarify further, PR helps with reputation managment. Bush is in the crapper and has no positive legacy to speak of. This is classic crisis PR. It's a reaction to his low poll numbers and the liklihood that the upcoming report on progress in Iraq will be looked at dubiously, given previous administation assertions.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by smittymatt16 (September 06, 2007 12:24 pm ET)
                 

              Good words.  I understand what you're talking about.  However, I don't think it's all about PR.  I'm not saying he isn't gaining favor by visiting, because he is, but I truly think he wanted to visit with those who are on the front line.  Call me naive, but I think he truly wants to be there to observe things with his own eyes.  Not that he doesn't trust his generals and military leaders, but that he simply wants to be there. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by kromecom48 (September 06, 2007 1:15 pm ET)
                   

                I can accept your position Smitty. Just be cautious in extending trust to those who MAY not have earned it.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (September 07, 2007 8:55 am ET)
                   

                Its possible. I think attacking motives when we cant really know one way or another is weak so perhaps you are right. I am willing to give him the benifit of the doubt. Getting back to the topic. He couldnt really SEE Iraq with his own eyes if he never left the base so the criticism of the claim is legitimate.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by smittymatt16 (September 07, 2007 10:35 am ET)
                     

                  True, however, being the president of the US (whether you like him or not), there wasn't a chance they were going to let him off the base into hostile territory.  That's my theory anyway.

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by clams casino (September 06, 2007 12:17 pm ET)
               

            "He has nothing to gain from this other than some respect from some soldiers."

            That's not true at all. Just look at the timing. He and Petraeus are about to give their sales pitch to tell us how terrifically the surge is working, and why we need to stay and "get 'er done." And then it's on to Iran before his time as Chimperor runs out.

            He has everything to gain and only more soldiers' lives to lose.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (September 05, 2007 6:38 pm ET)
           

        Bush wouldn't know the truth is it slapped him upside the head.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Sams Computer (September 05, 2007 11:40 pm ET)
           

        Right NERZOG, it was just a big stunt...

        BUT, to answer your question. Yes I was so proud of this one enlisted who grilled Girlie Man Bush on the tour durations of our troops and the sacrificing they are being subjected to. Wasn't shown on Fox Liar's Channel.

        If the Bush Iraq War Legacy is so damned important then why not share the burden of sacrifice by sending the huge number of ChickenHawk supporters of this War.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (September 05, 2007 6:18 pm ET)
         

      Why would Bush leave the base? If he did he may get shot at like the men and women he commands. The most outrageous President we have ever had.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (September 05, 2007 6:51 pm ET)
           

        He looked into the Iraqi's eyes and saw their souls. That's enough for him!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (September 05, 2007 7:33 pm ET)
           

        I personally don't want my President stumbling around in an area he's likely to get shot.  Too much of a PR coup for those looking to score some points with a sniper rifle.

        But this idea of flying into Iraq in the middle of the night, unannounced, squeezing a few carefully selected palms,  getting the hell out of Dodge, and then saying everything is hunkydorey is just as silly as it appears.

        At least he didn't put on a flak helmet like Lieberman. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (September 05, 2007 8:40 pm ET)
             

          I have a lot of respect for a president who takes risks in the name of the american people. Bush isn't taking any risks, this was so scripted it may as well have been the nutcracker suite. Reagan getting shot, that was definitely risk. Clinton chatting with ordinary souls in McD's, same thing. Bush - call him bubble boy.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by sundog (September 06, 2007 10:38 am ET)
               

            Snoop, Reagan getting shot wasn't him taking a risk unless you're just referring to the risk of being President in the first place.  Why do people always go out of their way to give credit to Ronnie?  The great risk he was taking was getting into a car surrounded by Secret Service guys.  Giving him creds on that just kind of rankles because I remember clearly watching him go from being pretty unpopular to being The Gipper during that episode.  Him being victimized by that dumb nut pretty much saved his presidency which pretty much opened the door to this generation of Rightwing lunacy.  Hinkley was his 9-11 except that unlike Bush who was warned about Bin Laden, only Jody Foster had been warned about Hinkley. ;)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (September 06, 2007 11:02 am ET)
                 

              The risk I'm referring to is being in public walking among the masses. In that regards you could say Raegan was a man of the people. I should have been a little clearer on what I was driving at.

              Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 06, 2007 1:23 pm ET)
             

          I personally don't want my President stumbling around in an area he's likely to get shot. 

          He shouldn't hang out with Cheney, then.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by sundog (September 05, 2007 6:18 pm ET)
         

      "The remarkable changes in Anbar province." Yes, there are quite a few people missing. This is so pathetic anyway. Even if they could show an area where something is going ok, it's clearly coming at the expense of allowing chaos somewhere else. This propaganda campaign is just as perverse as the original one selling the invasion. They really have zero respect for human life.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (September 05, 2007 6:22 pm ET)
         

      What I saw on my summer trip...

      Duhhbya sez: "The secretaries and I have come here today to see with our own eyes the remarkable changes that are taking place in Anbar province,"

      Translation: "Last time we visited Camp Cupcake, they only had a Taco Bell, a McDonalds and a Burger King.  Now they got TWO McDonalds, a Dennys, a Wendys, a Cinnabon and four, count 'em, FOUR Starbucks!"

      "Remarkable" indeed.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (September 05, 2007 6:29 pm ET)
         

      I wonder if he wore his codpiece on this trip?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (September 05, 2007 6:34 pm ET)
           

        I doubt one needs one when one visits Camp Cupcake.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (September 05, 2007 6:53 pm ET)
             

          Next stop Kennebunkport...

          Put away the pitchfork, Georgie.  Be your real self.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (September 05, 2007 9:20 pm ET)
               

            I - raq is the place to be

            Bombing ragheads is the life for me

            Death spreading out,

            so far and wide

            Keep wearing that burkha,

            just give me that cunny hide.

             

            Bagh - dad

            is where I'd rather stay

            Or, Journalism will get in the way!

            No, one wants to hear the real facts,

            Darling, I love you,

            but fire off some ack - ack!

             

            The wars!

            The whores!

            Napalm!

            Lip balm!

             

            You are my Bi@tch, good bye, neocon itch!

            I-raq we are there!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (September 05, 2007 10:36 pm ET)
                 

              Snoopy you get an Emmy, Oscar and standing ovation!!!!!

              Report Abuse
            • Author by onionhead (September 06, 2007 12:03 am ET)
                 

              Bombing Ragheads?

              Did Toby Keith and Charlie Daniels write that song?

              Report Abuse
            • Author by MHK (September 06, 2007 9:22 am ET)
                 

              "but fire off some ack - ack!"

              Ha  ha ha!

               You're too funny little dog.  How long did it take you to come up with that song?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by MHK (September 06, 2007 9:25 am ET)
                   

                The sad part is that the entire Bush Cabinet has an eerie similarity to the cast of Green Acers.

                 

                 

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by onionhead (September 06, 2007 10:10 am ET)
                     

                  That is an insult to the good people of Hooterville.

                  I bet Arnold Ziffel wouldn't have invaded Iraq and Vice President Drucker wouldn't have shot anyone in the face.

                  Although, I do believe that Mr. Haney might be working for Haliburton.

                   

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (September 06, 2007 10:38 am ET)
                     

                  Like Mr. Haney and Hank Kimball.

                  I bet Cheney would make pork out of Arnold!

                  Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (September 06, 2007 10:31 am ET)
                   

                As soon as I saw "put away the pitchfork, georgie" I immediately thought of green acres. It was all downhill from there!

                Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (September 05, 2007 7:13 pm ET)
         

      i love the part at the end about bush in 2003 presenting u.s. troops with a "decorative turkey".  the american people got the real turkey, his iraq policy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (September 05, 2007 7:39 pm ET)
         

      Imagine for one(1) minute looking at the world through the eyes of President Bush. Yikes!!!!! Can't imagine what one would see. Maybe as a wise poster always says...Happy Thoughts

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (September 05, 2007 9:44 pm ET)
         

      Maybe when he does those extensive speaking engagements after he leaves office (oh such a beautiful thought) for big bucks (because he so f**king poor) he can talk about that brave plastic turkey.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (September 06, 2007 10:43 am ET)
         

      Doh! Check this out.

      [link to www.salon.com]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by clumberfeet (September 06, 2007 12:13 pm ET)
         

      "He never left the base" in the middle of the thousands of square miles of the Syrian Desert in western Iraq. They could have staged a moon landing there.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace