About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Iraq war supporter Clifford May fails in media appearances to disclose State Dept. grants to organization he heads

September 10, 2007 6:02 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Former Republican National Committee official Clifford D. May has appeared in the media several times to defend the administration's conduct of the Iraq war, but in none of his columns or on-air appearances has May disclosed that the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, an organization of which he is the president, has received at least $1.2 million in State Department grants since 2004, or that May himself is a member of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion.

19 Comments

Since 2004, Clifford D. May, former Republican National Committee communications director and president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), has appeared in the media several times to defend the administration's conduct of the Iraq war -- most recently in his September 5 Scripps Howard News Service column, where he listed as "Al Qaeda's hope[s]" that "Congress will save them by legislating America's retreat from Iraq" and "that lawmakers in Washington will vote to stop fighting al Qaeda in Iraq and to abandon those Iraqis who have been fighting with us and relying on us." However, in none of his columns or on-air appearances has May disclosed that FDD has received at least $1.2 million in State Department grants since 2004, or that May himself is a member of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion.

The FDD is a nonprofit, 501(c)3 organization that claims to be "the only nonpartisan policy institute dedicated exclusively to promoting pluralism, defending democratic values, and fighting the ideologies that drive terrorism." According to the group's website: "As a result of our proven effectiveness, the State Department awarded FDD grants to run training conferences on democracy with Iraqi women leaders in Hilla [Iraq] in 2003 and Amman [Jordan] in 2005, and to sponsor a network of university professors to give lectures on democracy to hundreds of university students in Baghdad, Hilla, Mosul, Najaf and Tikrit."

According to the State Department website, FDD was awarded an $800,343 grant for fiscal year 2005 to "support[] a new generation of activists in the Middle East through training, technical assistance and mentoring." FDD received a separate $426,457 grant for fiscal 2005 to "provide[] advanced personalized, practical campaign training to female candidates in the Middle East and North Africa region running in elections in 2006 and 2007."

Additionally, the State Department announced on November 3, 2006, the inaugural meeting of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion, of which May was listed as a member.

According to a Media Matters for America Nexis search of all news for "(cliff! w/2 may) and (may w/30 iraq) and ((may w/50 (state w/5 department)) or (may w/50 democracy promotion))," May has not disclosed his connections to the State Department -- financial and other -- during his on-air appearances or in items published in print.

May has, however, vociferously defended the Bush administration's conduct of the Iraq war. On the August 23 edition of MSNBC's Tucker, May defended the "surge" strategy and Gen. David Petraeus' execution of it:

MAY: And on the present, if we start to say we're leaving on this timetable no matter what the conditions are, we lose all power to facilitate reconciliation. Understand -- and I think you both do understand this -- you must have security in place before you can have a process of political development. They're not going to be simultaneous and you can't have political development without military progress. We are having military progress. Now Petraeus needs some more time.

And he has said two things. One is, he is turning power over to Iraqis more and more. And two, by next summer, he can draw down -- not eliminate our troops. We'll need to keep their backs.

May was also quoted praising Petraeus and the "surge" in an August 10 Washington Times article:

"There is no question that there have been very substantial and significant changes since the new strategy has been implemented by General Petraeus," said Clifford May, president of the nonpartisan Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on counterterrorism.

"A lot of people think it's merely a surge, more troop numbers; that's very far from reality. It's 180 degrees from what Petraeus' predecessors were doing in Iraq and is much more a classic counter-insurgency strategy and it is having a huge impact. ... Al Qaeda is being crushed," Mr May said.

From May's September 5 Scripps Howard News Service column:

We now have a chance to seriously degrade AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] -- which American intelligence calls the "most visible and capable (al Qaeda) affiliate and the only one known to have expressed a desire to attack the (U.S) homeland." We now have a chance to deliver a painful physical, psychological and intellectual blow to global al Qaeda -- to demonstrate who the "strong horse" really is.

Al Qaeda's hope: that Congress will save them by legislating America's retreat from Iraq; that lawmakers in Washington will vote to stop fighting al Qaeda in Iraq and to abandon those Iraqis who have been fighting with us and relying on us.

Six years after 9/11, in the midst of a global conflict against al Qaeda and its enablers, is there a more serious mistake we could make?

May has appeared in the media several other times to defend Iraq strategy, such as on the August 24 edition of CNN Newsroom, the May 23 edition of Tucker, the April 11 edition of Tucker, and the November 29, 2006, edition of CNBC's Kudlow & Company.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (September 10, 2007 6:20 pm ET)
         

      wouldn't be the first time the bush administration has used public money to buy propaganda.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (September 10, 2007 6:29 pm ET)
         

      "if we start to say we're leaving on this timetable no matter what the conditions are, we lose all power to facilitate reconciliation."

      We have the power to kill people, but do we have any power to facilitate reconciliation?  The majority of Iraqis feel the U.S. presence is a danger.  Just what the heck is the ace in the hole that this crony speaks of?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (September 10, 2007 6:41 pm ET)
         

      i just watched patraeus say on nbc news that we could draw down to presurge levels by next summer.   back to square one.  this is progress how?   i was also reading that we were paying shopkeepers to keep stores open in that market in iraq that mccain took his stroll through. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (September 10, 2007 6:43 pm ET)
         

      Sounds like we and the Iraqis hold that in comon. One thing we have been distracted from is that this surg wasn't supposed to be about incrimental sucesses. Not credibly arguable results. Easily seen progress was the object, just clean up on isle 6 afterwards. Taint happenned and thanks to Dr. Maddows of Air America for bringing it up. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (September 10, 2007 6:43 pm ET)
         

       - the inaugural meeting of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion, of which May was listed as a member - mmfa

      Additionally, Kenneth Wollack of the National Democratic Institute is a member of this committee. His group has received at least $1,060,000 in federal grants. This is group is represented by Madeleine Albright,  Walter Mondale,  Michael Dukakis, and Richard Gephart as board members and advisors...among many other liberals.

      The committee is a veritable who's who of partisans and political organizations:

       - The ACDP members include:  Anne-Marie Slaughter, chair (Princeton University), Lorne Craner (International Republican Institute), Chester Crocker (Georgetown University), Bernard DeLury (formerly of Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service), Aaron Friedberg (Princeton University), Carl Gershman (National Endowment for Democracy), Mary Ann Glendon (Harvard Law School),  Donald Horowitz (Duke University), Clifford May (Foundation for the Defense of Democracies), Michael Novak (American Enterprise Institute), Mark Palmer (Council for a Community of Democracies and Freedom House), Richard Soudriette (International Foundation for Election Systems), Vin Weber (National Endowment for Democracy), Jennifer Windsor (Freedom House), Richard Williamson (Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw), and Kenneth Wollack (National Democratic Institute). - 

      I've never heard Albright disclose her workings as chairman of the board at NDI...a member of the committee. 

      We sure spend a lot of federal money supporting partisans like May and Albright...that's the real story. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (September 10, 2007 6:52 pm ET)
           

        i don't think albright has a column.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (September 10, 2007 8:13 pm ET)
             

          and you left out the last part, i'm sure unintentionally.   it's the national democratic institute for international affairs.   they promote democracy in third world countries.  nothing to do with promoting the democratic party.  

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (September 10, 2007 6:57 pm ET)
           

        "Madeleine Albright,  Walter Mondale,  Michael Dukakis, and Richard Gephart"

        Wow, there's a prominent group of media regulars if I ever saw one. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by H-Man (September 10, 2007 7:48 pm ET)
           

        The real question should be is this comittee non partisan. Given the democratic people involved I would assume it is. However, I don't know the politics of everyone on the list. If it is non partisan then MMFA should have left it out.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (September 11, 2007 12:23 am ET)
             

          No they shouldnt because THAT is not the conflict of interest we are talking about. That is not a PARTISAN conflict. IF he is taking money from the STATE DEPT, then anything he says ABOUT policies the STATE DEPT has a hand in is an apparant conflict of interest.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wesley (September 11, 2007 7:14 am ET)
               

            Thanks for the heads up...I'll be alert for conflicts of interest from the following group concerning State Dept. matters...they all receive money from the State Dept.

            Richard Gephardt, Norm Coleman, William Frist, Lee Hamilton, Madeleine Albright, Geraldine Ferraro, Walter Mondale, Mario Cuomo, Michael Dukakis...whew!...the list goes on and on.

            And don't forget Cliff May. 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (September 11, 2007 12:00 am ET)
         

      You're comparing the accomplishments of Albright, Dukakis, Mondale and Gephart to those of May?

      Don't be silly.

      Without a government handout for his foundation he'd be a nobody much less a right wing nut job talking head fit only for cable news.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (September 11, 2007 12:13 am ET)
         

      The point is when a "nonpartisan" spokesman defending this administration is actually receiving money from the State Department and has ties to the Secretary of State the American people deserve to know.

      Who but the most rabid of the rabid right could disagree with that?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mercado (September 11, 2007 8:36 am ET)
         

       What I want to know : If May trying to grow a beard, he show forget it? He's had that same, dirty, snuggle up to daddy, child-molester look, most of this year!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (September 11, 2007 10:13 am ET)
         

      That's it.  If this idiot has a "foundation", I'm starting one too.

      I'll call it "Patriots for Democracy", or something like that.

      Come on Condi - send me a big fat check.  The more zeroes it has, the more I'll carry water for your administration.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by laserpotato (September 11, 2007 12:01 pm ET)
           

        FoghornLeghorn: howzabout a deceptively-named front group? I'd call mine the Foundation for Patriotic All-American Freedom Heritage and claim its goal is to make mega-profit$ for the oil industry, but all we'd really be doing is replanting forests and re-habilitating wildlife! Ha ha ha, I'm a scoundrel!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 11, 2007 3:49 pm ET)
         

      has this lapdog ever volunteer for military service ?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.