About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Post report on "views from Iraq" failed to note poll indicating widespread dissatisfaction

September 14, 2007 7:40 pm ET
image

6 Comments

Washington Post staff writer Joshua Partlow's September 12 article on the "views from Iraq," headlined "Perceptions of Progress Since Buildup Vary Widely," included quotes from only six Iraqis -- two senior Iraqi National government officials, one restaurant owner, one shop owner, a Sunni lawmaker, and a spokesperson for cleric Moqtada al-Sadr -- and failed to mention the findings of a recent BBC/ABC News/NHK survey of more than 2,212 Iraqis that indicates 78 percent believe things are going badly or very badly in the country, up 12 percent since February.

The Post carried an article on the poll September 10, reporting that "the poll reveal[ed] a basic disconnect between U.S. commanders' view of a steadily improving situation in Iraq and a bleaker outlook among Iraqis." The August BBC/ABC News/NHK survey is the fourth such poll, with previous ones conducted in February 2004, November 2005, and February 2007, tracking changes in Iraqi public opinion over time, including changes since President Bush initiated the so-called "surge" in U.S. troops. The Post's September 10 article noted: "In November 2005, shortly before Iraq's historic open elections, 69 percent of residents said they believed life would be better in a year. But in the poll this March, only 40 percent had a positive outlook; now, less than a quarter of Iraqis, 23 percent, expect the country to be better off a year from now."

While Partlow's article reported that "Iraqi citizens and politicians offered their own widely varying assessments of how the troop buildup has progressed, how the government is functioning, and the prospects of withdrawal for U.S. forces," it did not mention the BBC/ABC News/NHK poll, which indicates generally negative opinions in each of those three categories. In fact, the BBC reported that the "poll suggests that the overall mood in Iraq is as negative as it has been since the US-led invasion in 2003, says BBC world affairs correspondent Nick Childs."

From the BBC/ABC News/NHK poll, on how "the troop buildup has progressed":

  • 61 percent believe that in the past six months "the security situation in Iraq" has "become worse"; 28 percent said it has "stayed about the same."
  • 72 percent believe that the "presence of U.S. forces in Iraq is making security" worse.
  • 70 percent believe the "increase of U.S. forces" has made security worse "in the areas where these forces have been sent."
  • 68 percent believe the "increase of U.S. forces" has made security worse "in other areas of Iraq."
  • 70 percent believe the "increase of U.S. forces" has made "[c]onditions for political dialogue in Iraq" worse.
  • 85 percent do "not [have] very much confidence" or "none at all" in "US and UK occupation forces."
  • 87 percent believe the "increase of U.S. forces" has made the "ability of the Iraq government to carry out its work" worse or had no effect.

On how "the [Iraqi national] government is functioning":

  • 61 percent do "not [have] very much confidence" or "none at all" in the national government of Iraq.
  • 65 percent believe the national government of Iraq has done quite a bad job or very bad job of "carry[ing] out its responsibilities."

On the "prospects of withdrawal for U.S. forces":

  • 79 percent somewhat oppose or strongly oppose "the presence of Coalition forces in Iraq."
  • 65 percent believe that if the "United States withdraws from Iraq before civil order is fully restored" that it would make "a full-scale civil war" less likely or have no effect.

From the September 12 Washington Post article:

The day after Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker delivered a report on the war to Congress, Iraqi citizens and politicians offered their own widely varying assessments of how the troop buildup has progressed, how the government is functioning and the prospects for a withdrawal of U.S. forces. If there was any pattern to the responses, it was a street-level disregard for the optimism of officials in Washington and Baghdad.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by cann0nba11 (September 14, 2007 9:16 pm ET)
         

      Does anyone expect anything other than these results? We are talking about a country ravaged by war with limited resources and populated by a widely uneducated population with little to no access to accurate information about the world in general. All they know is that they used to live in fear of being raped or killed by a tyrant, now they live in fear of being blown up by soldiers or their own people. 

      And, they will respond to polls in the manner that their local imams wish, or in a manner that they feel will keep them from retaliation. They are all unhappy, they were this way before we got there and will be so long after we leave.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by funnymanpants (September 15, 2007 1:02 am ET)
           

        >>And, they will respond to polls in the manner that their local imams wish, or in a manner that they feel will keep them from retaliation.

        And your proof of this is?

        I thought Bush was supposed to bring democracy to Iraq, and it would flower through the Middle East. How did that turn out?  

        You might want to check your history. Outside of Israel, Iraq was one of the most educated societies in the region.  

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (September 15, 2007 2:14 am ET)
             

          But you're ignoring Cannonball's point. After several years, a few hundred billion dollars, thousands of American lives and, what is it now, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, things are just as they were before we went in.

          What would it take to make you America-haters happy? Slight improvement?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by redking75687 (September 15, 2007 6:43 pm ET)
           

        Iraqis have far better access to news and information than Americans. They have over 20 arabic-language news channels to choose from on sat, and only ONE, Al-Hurri, parrots the US line (it's run by the US government). The rest show a wide range of international news, from many perspectives. The idea that they are ignorant of their surroundings is just a glimpse of someone's personal racism.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (September 16, 2007 1:48 am ET)
           

        Propagandistic BS. The Iraqi people before the first Gulf War were the best educated and most cosmopolitan people in the Islamic middle east. Do you EVER know what you are talking about?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (September 16, 2007 10:11 am ET)
         

      just watching meet the press.  with john kerry and john  "stroll in the market with my bullet proof vest" mccain.   kerry made the very true point that the iraqi government will never make any changes as long as we say we will stay there forever.  they have no incentive to, because their constituencies don't want them to, and as kerry said we have no leverage to make them do so.  he also asked how many times will the republicans be allowed to move the goal posts when it comes to saying the iraqis are going to have to "stand up" militarily.  we've heard time after time in the past that x number of troops would be ready at a certain time and that never happens.   mccain also fudged the truth when he said that we have had success against al qaeda in anbar, because patraeus got the "4000 troops" he requested.   but bush noted in his january speech [see link] that leaders in anbar were already turning against al qaeda, and that was before the 4000 troops, which bush specifically mentioned.  

       and that supports exactly what kerry said, which is that the major groups in iraq want nothing to do with al qaeda.   if iraq wants itself to be controlled by outside countries or groups, they would be the first country in the world to do that.   mccain's answer to everything was the usual "democrats want failure", and that we've failed to learn the lessons of "the last 40 years".   that's rather odd, because i thought the lesson of the last 40 years is that we should only be in countries that want us there and leave the countries, like the philippines, that ask us to leave.   the world was supposed to end if vietnam became communist, but that did not happen.  seems mccain forgot that lesson.   and the two biggest communist powers, the soviet union and china, had missiles aimed at each other as well as against us in the 60's.   and then there was a little round table discussion about the moveon.org ad, which was plainly stupid.   why hand the war cheerleaders ammunition when there is really nothing to be gained by it?

      http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070110-7.html

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • The Washington Post
    The Washington Post
    The Washington Post
    1150 15th St. NW
    Washington, DC 20071