About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NY Times cited RNC release on Clinton health plan, but did not identify the RNC's "commentators and analysts"

September 19, 2007 6:45 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A New York Times article on Sen. Hillary Clinton's proposed health care plan noted that "the Republican National Committee [RNC] sent an e-mail message challenging Mrs. Clinton's promise that her plan would not be government-run or produce new bureaucracy, quoting eight commentators and analysts who assert that government would inevitably expand." But the article didn't identify the RNC's "commentators and analysts" -- a group that included Tucker Carlson, the Orange County Register editorial page, right-wing think tank analysts, and former Republican officials.

12 Comments

In a September 19 article on Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) proposed health care plan, New York Times reporters Patrick Healy and Robin Toner wrote that on September 18 "the Republican National Committee [RNC] sent an e-mail message challenging Mrs. Clinton's promise that her plan would not be government-run or produce new bureaucracy, quoting eight commentators and analysts who assert that government would inevitably expand." However, Healy and Toner did not identify who was on the RNC's list of "commentators and analysts," which, in fact, consists of conservative pundits, right-wing think tank analysts, and former Republican officials.

The September 18 RNC press release -- "Hillary's Bureaucratic Hike: Just Like 1993, Hillary's Health Care Proposal Creates More Government And More Entitlements" -- cited eight "commentators and analysts:"

  • Michael F. Cannon, a former "domestic policy analyst at the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee," who currently serves as the director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute.
  • A September 18 editorial by The Orange County Register, a California newspaper that says its opinion pages are committed to "emphasiz[ing] respect for the individual, limited government, free markets, free trade, self-responsibility, voluntaryism and property rights." The Register is the flagship newspaper of Freedom Communications, Inc., which describes itself as having a "legacy based on the principles of voluntaryism and the libertarian philosophy."
  • Paul Howard, a senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute's Center for Medical Progress, which it says is "dedicated to articulating the importance of medical progress and the connection between free-market institutions and making medical progress both possible and widely available throughout the world."
  • Robert E. Moffit, a former Reagan administration official who currently serves as the director of the Center for Health Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation, "whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense."

Four of the eight comments the RNC cited came from a September 18 symposium published at the conservative National Review Online.

Clinton said in a September 17 speech on her health care plan: "Now I know my Republican opponents will try to equate health care for all Americans with government run health care. Well don't let them fool us again. This is not government run. There will be no new bureaucracy. You can keep the doctors you know and trust. You keep the insurance you have if you like it. But this plan expands personal choice and increases competition to keep costs down."

Washington Post reporter Dan Balz noted in a September 18 post for the Post's political blog The Trail: "Clinton proposed no new government entities to administer the plan, although her aides acknowledge that some additional people would have to be hired within the existing bureaucratic structure to handle some aspects of it."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (September 19, 2007 6:56 pm ET)
         

      Who cares who said it.  You libs only care about institutional players and never about the message itself.

       

      The fact is that her socialized plan is dangerous and requires conditions on employment.  That would be disastrous.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (September 19, 2007 7:02 pm ET)
           

        aOOOOga! aOOOOga! Baiting alert! I say again, baiting alert! Man your battle stations! aOOOOga! aOOOOga!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (September 19, 2007 7:41 pm ET)
           

        You CONS never know what you are talking about. Are addicted to baseless assertions usually completely WRONG and unfounded and LIE way too much. OF COURSE it matters if a response is a partisan one. Even pretending that isnt true is either disengenuous or just plain dumb

        Report Abuse
        • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (September 19, 2007 11:32 pm ET)
             

          Prove to me that her plan is not using taxpayer money to pay for other people's heathcare.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (September 20, 2007 12:06 am ET)
               

            Sure immediatly following YOU proving to ME that you dont molest small furry animals. YOU made the accusation the burden of proof is YOURS. Your tired red baiting is a dated and useless cliche. Grow up

            Report Abuse
          • Author by redking75687 (September 20, 2007 1:01 am ET)
               

            The plan is not to use taxes, but to force people to buy private plans from the insurance companies. It's not socialized medicine, it's armed robbery.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (September 20, 2007 12:58 pm ET)
                 

              It definitely isn't socialism, but it is probably the most practical approach.  If universal healthcare is ever achieved in the US, this will be the model that is eventually successful with a tweak here or there.

              I find it pretty funny that conservatives are reacting in such a kneejerk fashion as to call this "socialism".  Do they even bother to think on their own anymore?  It doesn't look like it from here.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by redking75687 (September 21, 2007 1:00 pm ET)
                   

                Forcing people to buy health care insurance? You think a family of four with the parents on two $8 an hour jobs can afford a private family rate insurance plan? This is why they don't have it now! Hillary wants to force people into plans that will BANKRUPT them. It's a horrible plan. Only Kucinich is pushing for universal health care outside the insurance industry profit margins. Hillary is just pandering for doantions from the industry.

                Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (September 19, 2007 7:09 pm ET)
         

      I'm going off topic as it relates to the story but not as it relates to the Republican party. As the rate they are going the only people who will be voting for them are evangelicals and strict party loyalist.

      I just read this article and I'm still speechless http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/18/AR2007091801781_pf.html

      Copiousdissent you gotta a lot more to worry about than libs.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (September 19, 2007 9:11 pm ET)
         

      She's right CD. Don't know if even splitting California's electorial vote would help, even once.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (September 19, 2007 10:18 pm ET)
         

      Somebody takes Tucker Carlson seriously?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by monknj80 (September 20, 2007 9:06 am ET)
         

      Did anyone happen to catch John Stewart nail Tucker last night on his fake outrage over HRC's healthcare plan?

       Go to the comedy central page and watch todays OJ and Hillary clip.

      and just for kicks:

      http://mediamatters.org/items/200410160003

       

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace