Coulter: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president"
An October 2 New York Observer blog post featuring excerpts of an interview with right-wing pundit Ann Coulter quoted her as saying: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat [sic] president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women." Coulter went on: "It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?' "
Additionally, a separate October 2 Observer article printing excerpts of the interview quoted Coulter as saying during a discussion of terrorism: "Now this isn't the Cold War, these aren't sane but evil white men -- these are crazy Islamists. This country -- people are under the impression that it could never change, that this can be taken for granted, it can't be taken away, and this is a terrifying time. I mean, it's terrifying to think what could happen with a one-term Democrat, any of those Democrats." Coulter made her comment as part of her response to interviewer George Gurley's question, "How much blame does Bill Clinton deserve for 9/11?"
The New York Observer website states that Coulter's interview "was published in the October 8, 2007, edition of THE NEW YORK OBSERVER."
From Gurley's October 2 New York Observer article headlined "Tea With Miss Coulter":
How much blame does Bill Clinton deserve for 9/11?
"A lot. Jimmy Carter got the whole thing started, Bill Clinton let it build, build, build, build, build. He wouldn't deal with it, because he had no credibility on deploying the military. He was a pot-smoking draft dodger, and so when he was presented with credible evidence that this or that country was behind a terrorist attack, he'd just have to look the other way: 'No, don't let me hear that. Call in Monica!'... Jimmy Carter gave Islamic craziness its first real foothold. There was no state-sponsored-they were just living in the dirt hating us until they had Iran. How did that happen? Because Americans forgot what it's like to put a Democrat in charge of national security. Then we have eight years of Bill Clinton ignoring, ignoring, ignoring, ignoring-they're ginning themselves up, Osama is saying, 'You have six dead in Somalia and you pull out? We have boys lining up.' Now this isn't the Cold War, these aren't sane but evil white men-these are crazy Islamists. This country-people are under the impression that it could never change, that this can be taken for granted, it can't be taken away, and this is a terrifying time. I mean, it's terrifying to think what could happen with a one-term Democrat, any of those Democrats."
From the October 2 New York Observer post headlined "Coulter Culture" on its blog The Daily Transom:
Ann Coulter's new book, If Democrats Had Any Brains They'd Be Republicans, hits bookshelves today, and as is his wont, George Gurley sat down with the self-proclaimed right-wing polemicist for a long chat [UPDATED: read the complete interview here].
George gave us a few bits of wit and wisdom from his interview, while the television is going wild about the beminiskirted babe.
[...]
On women:
If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.
It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'
Coulter wants to ban women from voting!!! Now, there is no doubt she is serious here, this is no joking matter. I mean really, when is this woman going to be stopped?
(here come the "well, since she's really a man, she will still be able to vote" jokes)
I suppose she'll be stopped when conservatives like you stop defending her misogynistic, overblown fascist, rhetoric. . . or at least stop declaring that it's all a joke. "Humor" with the sole aim of dehumanizing is not humor, but cruelty.
Yes, this is incredibly cruel and inhumane to boot.
And she will most likely stop when liberals stop blowing gaskets every time she opens her mouth.....it's what makes her, quote > "feel alive", unquote.
who knew it could be that easy to get her to stop? i guess the fact that she gets rich off this crap has nothing to do with it.
She'll stop when the GOP sugardaddies stop subsidizing her, stop buying her books in bulk, stop paying ghostwriters to make her look literate...did I miss any? Oh, yeah...when the knuckledragging GOP base stops believing her bullsh*t.
Thank You! When Tommy's conservative brethren stop buying her books and reading her columns for her delightful witty commentary then she'll shut up because her publishers will shut her up. But as long as the dough keeps rolling out of the pockets of those conservatives who crave her kind of evil and into Ann’s and her publisher’s pockets she'll remain unstoppable just like Michael Myers.
Tommy,
I can barely find the energy to bother even posting on this topic. Kudos to you for putting up with this silliness. But here's my contribution:
Ann Coulter was joking.
I mean for cryin out loud, does this really need to be explained?
Unmitigated, bleach blond, dry bones evil is pretty hilarious ;-) Go Annie, you gop slop. Slay us with some more of your indescribable wit and volumninous humor you veritable fount of hilarity.
Okay, that clinches it. Wingnuts don't even know what humor is, God bless em.
Julia my sweet I said she was joking, I did not say she was all that funny. Hey at least nothing she said was mean :-)
Hey at least nothing she said was mean :-) J2
Now THAT was funny.
Yeah women are stupid and that's why we vote for Democrats; and the Democrats are wussies for courting the votes of stupid irrelevant women unlike the macho Republican men who only court the vote of the manly Conservative man. It's amazing how they are continuing to blow off large portions of the American electorate. They don't want the Black vote, the Hispanic vote, and now women. I also have to conclude that if Ann want's to take the vote from women because they vote for Democrats she would also like to rescind the franchise from Blacks because of our “stupid” voting pattern. If they continue down this path of "reasoning", after a while the Republican Party is going to consist solely of mean White Guys and the women that love them. They're going to marginalize themsleves.
You forgot a few. They are now blowing off the disagreeing soldiers vote and have lost a portion of the corporate vote. But at least the Redneck, kkk and reich wing christian vote are locked in.
Thanks for explaining this. Now everything makes so much sense: Coulter doesn't specialize in political polemics, but in jokes that no one finds funny. She's actually an absurdist performance artist. Brilliant!
And that line about how the Cold War was characterized as a strategic battle against sane evil white people as opposed to the War on Terror as a fight against crazy evil nonwhites... fabulous! It's like a racist joke with no punchline! Will she be performing at the Laugh Factory or Zany's anytime soon?
And yet Ann constantly says she means EVERYTHING she says. So you dont mind if I dont take your mind reading attempt as the final word on the matter. And exactly WHAT is the joke? Taking away a womans right to vote is funny HOW? Then again there is no such thing as a Democrat President only a DemocratIC president or a ReNAMBLAcan president. Gangleskank is toxic. You guys really shouldnt be making excuses for her.
I gotta' agree with you on this one, Jeter.
She's the funniest, most hilarious, gut-busting right wing wit since Joe McCarthy.
Ahhhh... good times.
No it shouldn't need to be explained. Who here TRULY thinks Ann or anyone is for taking away the right of women to vote?
Look at the big picture here. There's an enemy out there and in our country who has already attacked us, killed thousands of American civilians and has contantly been telling us they're going to do it again. Ann's just one of many trying to drive this point home.
I have blown no gaskets. AC is a propagandist of the right who gets rich saying what she says. There are similar examples on the left. I am saddened that her propaganda serves to discourage dialogue, since flamethrowing is so much easier - we have real problems that need attention. I am intensely discouraged that the MSM rarely calls her out as the propagandist she is and I thank MMFA for continuously pointing this out.
AC is in the business of AC. She is under no obligation to address or solve the world's problems, or act nice to liberals, or anyone else. She is an entertainer and an invective throwing propagandist who makes money off of her hyperpartisan opinions and those that want to buy her books, etc.
I know her success drives liberals nuts, and she feeds off it even more, writing offensive book after offensive book to get under the skin of liberals.....she does it masterfully, like her or not.
She is basically irrelevant to me since I agree with only about half her opinions, the rest are nasty and vile comments to rile up those she doesn't like, or just acts that way to make a buck.
Keep pretending it's her supporters only who give her lifeblood, when in actuality it's those that embolden her more by lashing back at her that give her voice more than she is really worth.
in other words, no criticism of her and she just disappears? can you come over this way? i have this lovely property. ignore the water.
You can call her every name in the book - just admit that the more you do it, the more she likes it.
what she "likes" is not the point. she is not going to stop saying what she's saying just because there is no criticism of her. it's naive in the extreme to think that.
What's naive is to dismiss what she "likes".
Because what she "likes", emboldens her, makes her more screechy and offensive, ingratiates her to her loyalists, gets her booked on shows to promote and sell her books, gives her far more relevance than she deserves..........and the circle continues. She spews, you react, she "likes" and on and on.
Check out the link here from the first AC thread a few days ago, and look at the first few lines of her book - and you will see what she "likes".
so, in other words, she and her sycophants are such flaming idiots, that they believe what they believe based on how other people react to her? oh.
Actually Tommy, virtually ALL of Gangleskank's opinions are nasty and vile.
You just happen to AGREE with half of them.
Sure because that is the way it worked out the decade or so we ignored Rush.
It's not even humor. It's not even satire. It's foul mudslinging from an imbecilic child.
A male child at that!
Coulter: ".......Bill Clinton let it build, build, build, build, build. He wouldn't deal with it, because he had no credibility on deploying the military. He was a pot-smoking draft dodger........"
This is one of Coulter most used, worn out lines about Clinton.......yet she sees nothing wrong with President Bush dodging the war, using drugs, AOL from military duty for months, years of alchohol abuse, drunk driving......did I miss anything?
George W.
Crack addict AWOL spoiled rich "pilot," and C-Student. Now the C-Student thing wouldn't get me so much, since as a sophmore in college I know how hard college can be, but the fact that he did crack and couldn't fulfill simple obligations really sucks. I don't remember George W. Bush doing anything about terrorists before 9/11. He largely ignored Al Qaeda and the Taliban even after 9/11. His logic: The terrorists are in Afghanistan, harbored by the government. Let's invade Iraq! They're in Pakistan? Let's invade Iran!
Best to just KNOW this woman is a hate-filled person, has no ability to make appropriate comments and just let it go at that. Amazing how much she hates her own gender. Brings up all sorts of issues for a woman. I have had lots of clients very similar to her. We should not consider this comment as being political. The comment reflects her conflicted ideas about her own femininity and her status as a woman. Poor thing is to be pitied.
All the Republicans have left are bad jokes (Coulter), outright lies (Limbaugh), and self-haters who project their own issues on others (Justice Thomas).
Oh, sorry: I forgot free market jihadists and plastic-soldier cowboys.
She can't debate the issues at hand. She only preaches to the choir and will never "sway" voters one way.
A hate filled person? Do you not see satire in her comment? It's a sarcastic statement designed to get our attention that there's a larger problem at hand...
There are true terrorists who want nothing more than to kill Americans and others, and they're proving it. They're telling us their intentions constantly.
AC has a strong belief in core principals that are FAR from removing rights of anyone to vote. Indeed her principals are 100% in favor of keeping that and other freedoms for everyone in this country. We need to wake up.
Ann Coulter's "jokes" are about as harmless as a smiley face painted on the heel of a jackboot. the fact that you can see it means it's already too late. "godwin's law" does not apply to her.
Um, Ann? You do know that there was a president or two between Carter and Clinton, right? What was it they did about Iran and other Middle Eastern breeding grounds for fanatic terrorist elements?
Oh yeah, they armed Iraq and Iran both and trained this guy you may have heard of, Osama something or other.
And then there's that Rumsfeld guy shaking hands with Sadaam. And that "War Stories" guy convicted in the Iran-Contra scandal. Hmm. Who was president then?
To be fair, PJ, he was only convicted of perjury, rather than of treason. He LIED to Congress about selling arms to Islamic terrorists & using the proceeds to arm Salvadoran terrorists.
On the other hand, it DID qualify him for a high paying job with Faux News.
CORRECTION
North used the proceeds to purchase weapons for Nicaraguan terrorists.
Yes one can immediately recognize those who will end up using our bullets and tanks and planes to attack us. Think of those we have armed. Sadaam (remember Rumsfeld's hug of Sadaam after gassing his own people), the Taliban in Afghanistan, the bad guys in Central and South America, on and on. It may take a while but they all end up using our own guns to not only hurt their own people, but eventually they get around to biting the hand that feeds them all the armament.
Coulter, once again, has selective memory as it pertains to, you know, history. She seemed to forget Regan, and him pulling the troops out of Lebannon after the Marine barracks were bombed, and many of our young men came home in body bags. Oh, and remember when Clinton was President. There was an attack on the World Trade Center, and sure enough, the men who perpetrated that attack were caught, tried, and sent to prison for a long long time. Also, McVeigh and his buddy were busted as well. Where is Osama again Ann?
The woman puts down her own race to try and make herself sound witty and smart. She does realize that if women couldn't vote, she couldn't vote either? I'm sure that she'd make some sort of exception for women such as herself. Does anyone really take Coulter seriously any longer?
You think she cares? She's gotten stinking rich off of this crap. Loosing the right to vote means nothing to her cause she got what she wanted - money.
What should be harped on over and over though is one of the spokespersons of the right just admitted she wants the vote rigged to ensure Democrats never lead. She wants to deny us a voice in government and permanently marginalize us. Funny that is what they claim we are trying to do... but like I said, she is a spokesperson for the republicans, she represents what republicans of today believe and want.
If Annie actually got the world she wishes for, she'd only be able to make a living on her back.
As what Nerzog, a bike rack?
Hey, there may be a book idea here..."101 Uses for Ann Coulter".
Ha, looky here jeter, a self identifying liberal wrote something funny!!
That is funny ;-)
But can you guys laugh at yourselves?
That's the measure of a real sense of humor...
Jeter, I probably laugh at myself as much as anything else in the world. It just has to be funny.
BTW, Angels 0-1 postseason.Damn you, BoSox!
cmon, where's everyone's sense of humor. being portrayed as endangering the country because you vote democratic, voting to placate osama, that's just downfight hilarious.
Sure I often find South Parks satiricial take on liberals funny. Two things FIRST they often have a point and second they are CLEVER. Neither of which apply in ANY way to Coulter.
Are you kidding? I'm an old, fat, white man with the Irish curse. We are the most self deprecating people ever. I've actually said in public showers, "Yes, but look how big my feet are"
Yaaaawn...
Good try, Ann. You're so child-like: Okay, everybody I'm gonna say something really bad, so everybody look at me...and buy my book.
Ann, if you are so starved for attention perhaps you should work on getting a man.
Ann needs to be outrageous to sell books, and herself. And to keep her momentum, she always has to set the bar higher and higher.
This is an extreme example. But not the last. Watch for her to advicate the slaying of the "Democrat first-born" one day soon.
Actually she doesnt since for the most part her books are bought in bulk by Richard Mellon Schiafe and other conservative billionares and clubs. Usually within a month they are being given away with a five dollar signup fee for this or that conservative club.
Don't forget, years ago, Annthrax said on Bill Maher's "Politically Incorrect"
"I think [women] should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote. No, they all have to give up their vote, not just, you know, the lady clapping and me. The problem with women voting -- and your Communists will back me up on this -- is that, you know, women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it. And when they take these polls, it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care."-- Ann Coulter, Politically Incorrect, Feb. 26, 2001
And Coulter said she was "not a big fan of the 1rst Amendment."
What a bimbo.
Gee, if women should not be allowed to vote, they most certainly should not be allowed to hold office. maybe that explains Ann's irrational hatred of Hillary. After all, what right does a mere woman have to believe she should be President? Let's be glad that Coulter is not a minority. In her desperate attempt to say outrageous things to get noticed, I am sure that she would say really offensive things against whatever minority that she was a member of in an effort to curry favor with white male Republicans.
Annie "dry bones" is a scribe
Virulent evil is her major vibe
Decomposing, corrupt
Putrid, evil erupts
From her mouth, when she spews her jibes
You would think a con with respect
Would be particularly bereft
To have Ann represent
Their poor party's decent
Into hell (for dignity theft)
A writer's STYLE deserves a look.
With Ann, it's carrion on a hook.
She gorges sup
Then pukes it up
Et, VIOLA! Yet another book!
Kudos to Julia & Tex. they've summed up the situation nicely...and pithily too.
REFRAIN to these and subsequent replies in this vein:
SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!
Proof positive it's Trannie Annie! Selfloathing homophobe in reverse!
As (currently) a registered Democrat, I don't limit my view to the party line. Party politics runs akin to Washington politics and worthy of the famous comparison: "If you are a law abiding citizen and a lover of sausage, never observe either one of them being made."
In the 2004 race, I believe that the best candidate (Howard Dean) was taken out by dirty (electronic voting) tricks in Iowa, whose loss there and a hyped, completely-appropriate-in-context campaign scream snow-balled into getting lackluster Kerry as the front-runner, someone who wouldn't even defend himself against the Swiftboat smears... or recently who wouldn't defend a college student from a tasering merely for asking why Kerry didn't contest the election results when there were clear grounds for it.
That being said, Dr. Ron Paul is the best candidate on either party's platter at the moment. I've given him (and Edwards and Obama) money.
Why? Read his platform. His plans to radically re-align our federal government with the Constitution seems like good and prudent medicine. More power to the states to determine things, like education, and cutting of the wasteful federal agencies.
Do I believe that the pendulum should swing to the extreme that Dr. Paul would suggest? No. He'd never get it there on his own, anyway, without support from Congress. Nonetheless, swing that direction we must.
Most of the Democratic candidates would probably not undertake the big operations required to bring true long-term health and vigor to our republic. Most would be more of the status quo with only tentative steps and lip-service to repairing the damage of the Bush (war) criminals & profiteers.
Alas, Paul, like Kucinich, is being run the course dredged for Dean. MSM gives him little coverage and downplays his rabid support. Why? He clearly hasn't (and won't) don his kneepads and give homage to the phallic... err... fallacies of corporate masters.
Don't believe me? Why is Sen. Clinton crowned as the Democratic front-runner by all MSM commentators, when Edwards and Obama articulate better solutions for America? Even if that statement is debatable, it is clear that Clinton -- right or wrong -- would be a divisive head of state and have massive problems getting anything on her agenda done, so why not go with someone having a cleaner slate? Nope. Powers that be want Clinton precisely due to the puckering-on-behinds that she has done or promises to perform and due to Clinton-anger derailing her ability to accomplish goals that might be counter to their profits.
The wingnuts are probably chuckling over this bit of "wit" from Ann, but politically it's a loser. The folks who love her were going to vote GOP anyway, so all it does is offend people who may have been undecided. However, it should help her sell some more books, so it's interesting to see where her priorities are. Entice her fans to buy her book? Sure. Help the GOP? Not so much.
Deus: I have said this before and I still wonder if it is true--does Ann really sell books, or does some corporations buy a lot of them so that she can be paraded around to all the talk shows as "best selling authoress" to throw out her garbage on TV. I always see her trash books in the dollar rack a short time after they come out, and I have never actually spoken to anyone who has bought one of her books. It does not take many sales to be a "best-seller" in non-fiction, so I do not think this would be hard to do for the right-wing in an effort to legitimize her. After all "best selling authoress" sounds a lot better than "fired TV hack" doesn't it?
I checked one out from the library once. In just 6 more weeks my recovery program will be over and I'll be able to return to work the doctors tell me.
In the fifteen minutes she gets on the NY Times bestseller lists for each of her "books," they always have a †by them, indicating bulk sales.
The Heritage Foundation uses them as fuel to heat their hot tub.
I don't like this idea at all. Maybe we can meet her half way though - take away women's right to vote republican? :)
"take away women's right to vote republican? :)"
I'll vote for that!
Another proud spewing of hyperbolic nonsense to cement her never-ending 15 minutes with the media.
The quintessential heroin of white trash never disappoints, does she?
Your search - "quintessential heroin of white trash" - did not match any documents.
I'm still waiting for a Right-Winger to post that Ann was taken out of context, that MM edited the tape, and that she was actually talking about ONE woman. Oh, and that it's all Hillary's fault, with the help of George Soros.
I like how 'we' would take away women's right to vote...
Oh I love this game!!
Your search - "ann coulter makes an intelligent statement" - did not match any documents.
Maybe if "we" got Ann neutered she wouldn't be so aggressive.
"Maybe if 'we' got Ann neutered she wouldn't be so aggressive." - Irony101
Careful. Ann would probably allow herself to vote if she was neutered.
And this gem:
Your search - "ann coulter, what an insightful, thought provoking citizen" - did not match any documents.
Try this search- Liberals have no sense of humor it gets 2,010,000 hits.
blaming bill clinton for 9-11 is a real knee-slapper.
Not hits, results. Hits are unique visits to a website. Like everytime you visit this forumn is counted as a hit, the more hits the more money Hilary and Soros give to Brock.
You're correct Pit, sorry I'm sleepy today. Up late last night. Tons of work on my desk.
BUT still able to tell Coulter is joking, Liberals have no sense of humor and this is all so unimportant.
right, it's so unimportant that the republicans have been selling themselves as the party that protects us from terrorism, when bush was the one, not clinton, who ignored the threat of bin ladin. or to use bush's words, he was "not on point" about bin ladin pre 9-11.
Jeter, do us all a favor. go to the library, check out any book by the late and great Molly Ivans, read it and then tell us that liberals have no sense of humor. She is truely funny as opposed to Ms Coulter who is just sad
sk
sorry. It's Molly Ivins. Not to mention Will Durst, Jon Stewart, Lewis Black, Steven Colbert. Paul Krugman is probably funnier that Ms. Coulter
sk
Boy did I love Molly Ivans, now she was witty. Also, don't forget Al Franken, and Keith Olbermann is funny as well; and I never heard him once talking about supressing folks constituional rights or killing anyone for that matter.
She was great. She said that her type of humor was satire and pointed out that you always direct satire at the people with more power. She said when you direct it at people with less power it is not only cruel but it is vulgar. I think vulgar is a pretty good word for Ms. Coulter.
SK
I'm so sorry Molly is gone now. We really need her right now! Unlike Bush i'm very proud to be a fellow Texan with her.
Molly's humor was healthy and wonderful.
Ann's humor is of a completely different kind. Reminds me of (Is there a sound when a tree falls with nobody there).
Likewise, (Is there humor from Ann if nobody laughs?)
Liberals and Conservatives alike, might not laugh at Hostle, Hateful, Harmful or Hurtful Humor. That is the stock in trade of Ann Coulter. Ann admits it and to loving it when she gets to Libs.
The Liberal sense of humor is just fine ...
Thank You ... Skip and Lynn.
Meanwhile the list of conservative stand up comedians is shorter than the list of Bush's MENSA meetings
If she's joking, does she not mean what she says? If she's explaining who's responsible for 9/11, is it a joke? A funny story, meant to amuse by its improbability and absurdity?
Why do news shows, discussing current events, bring on a comedian?
Do they have Chris Rock on to discuss the housing market?
Do they have Gallagher on to discuss Myanmar?
How about Andrew Dice Clay? what does he think about Gordon Brown? He's controversial!
But somehow, Ann Coulter, teller of jokes (supposedly), entertainer, humorist, clown--why is she on news shows, on political discussion shows, exhibiting her humor?
And what does it say that the Right believes her jokes and agrees with themas if they were spoken seriously?
O'Reilly loves bringing on Dennis Miller to talk about anything and everything.
Last night, Keith Olbermann talked politics with Alex Borstein, former MADtv star and current voice talent on Family Guy.....WHAT????
The last segment of Countdown is just for silly stuff only. It's for pure entertainment, celebrity stuff and gossip and silly talk only. Come on.
I am a liberal with an outstanding sense of humour, way funnier than you
returns in excess of 38,000 RESULTS.
Your search - Pithaughn has an outstanding sense of humor - did not match any documents.
Dang, and after all the money I paid that search rankings consultant.
Go find out how to Google bomb from an organization that really knows how, like Quxitar.
Congratulations Jeter, you win the Most Predictable Post Award. I was wondering how long it would take for someone to post a "lighten up" argument.
I would send you a trophy, but I doubt there's any room left in the case.
jjamele, you really need to lighten up.
Even more predictable. Didn't think that was possible.
He got ya there, J2.
Even more predictable. Didn't think that was possible.
I try to keep things simple for you jammille. Wouldn't want you to tax your brain thinking too much ;-)
THAT was the best you could do? Please, next time give yourself more than a few minutes to come up with a response. That was just sad.
Aw jjamele you just want the last word here don't ya? :-)
Tell ya what, I'll let you post something brilliant and I won't respond.
Ready set...go!
JJam got ya again, J2.
google search: gets 244,000 hits re "Liberals have no sense of humor." At least try to be at least a bit more honest will ya. And most of those are judgmental hits from flaming conservatives. Nothing objective in the entire lot. Go figure.
Jeter, that's nothing. look at what this search result yielded!
Results 1 - 10 of about 2,050,000 for [link to www.answers.com] title="Look up definition of republicans">republicans [link to www.answers.com] title="Look up definition of love">love [link to www.answers.com] title="Look up definition of gay">gay [link to www.answers.com] title="Look up definition of sex">sex
Results 1 - 10 of about 2,050,000 for republicans love gay sex
that was what was supposed to show, darn it!
How many hits does "J2 is a stud get"?
Your search - "J2 is a stud" - did not match any documents.
Ruh Roh, Ri Really Ried, JJ! Woof!
And conservative ignorance got 2,980,000
You HAVE to admit there are several liberal posters on this site who are HILARIOUS.
Although we know that what Coulter said can be demonstrated as false, here's a few thoughts:
If we took away Republican's right to vote, we'd never have a Republican President.
If we all voted the reality of our pocket books, there would never be a Republican in office.
If we had a Fairness Doctrine, right wingers couldn't get away with dishonest arguments.
If I had wings, I could fly.
If people really understood what Republicans stand for, there wouldn't be any Republicans voted into office again.
You should put that on a bumper sticker my clever little Libra/Liberal ;-)
Good idea, handsome.
What do Republicans stand for? ...
We got ours, screw everyone else!
Freedom of choice, except for females!
Running around the planet installing new Democratic countries by force.
This could be a book but I must go now.
Have you heard the latest news from Rush. I'm a "phoney Soldier". OH WELL ?!
Sam, my husband's coworker calls them "I've got mine Republicans".
so bill clinton was sitting in the white house during the summer of 2001, the period when the 9-11 commission said "the system was blinking red"? the 9-11 report says on page 256: "threat reports surged in june and july [2001], reaching an even higher peak of urgency". the response of the bush administration? page 265: "in sum. the domestic agencies never mobilized in response to the threat".
So this is the Republicans big tent, huh? Anti gay gays, anti women women, anti affirmative action affirmative action beneficiaries, etc.
Why would Ann even bring up "women voting stupidly" when she got in trouble for not knowing where to vote in FL? I thought she was smarter than that.
Actually, if we took away womens' right to vote, we would be just like the religious extremist Muslim countries Coulter longs to bomb into oblivion.
Of course, it would come as no surprise she would want to likewise bomb the "liberal" parts of America.
In fact, I think she confessed something to this effect once.
Dagummit, it was joke. Don't you get it, ha ha, bomb anyone you disagree with, it worked with the n1ps and krauts right? We sure as heck did not hold back then, and now we have permanent military bases in both of those countries. She is joking, and it is funny in the same way Dice Clay is funny, at the expense of someone elses dignity. Humour that only works by perpetuating a racial or ethnic sterotype should only be told in small groups after too many beers. When this type of humour makes it to the mainstream you can expect some blowback.
As usual, Coulter's comments go right over your heads.
Ann is simply using hyperbole to make her point that the Democrats are getting elected because more women, especially unmarried women, vote for Democrats.
Her argument is that the Dems pander to women, particularly single women, with promises of health care, tuition, and child care.
Below are a couple of excepts from a report on the unmarried women who voted in the 2004 Presidential election.
• The marriage gap is one of the most important cleavages in electoral politics. Unmarried women voted for Kerry by a 25-point margin (62 to 37 percent), while married women voted for President Bush by an 11-point margin (55 percent to 44ercent). Indeed, the 25-point margin Kerry posted among unmarried women represented one of the high water marks for the Senator among all demographic groups.
Unmarried women are social and economic progressives advancing a tolerant set of values. They believe government should play a role in providing affordable health care, a secure retirement, equal pay, and education opportunities for themselves and their children. They support a woman’s right to choose and gay rights, including marriage.
http://www.wvwv.org/docs/WVWV_2004_post-election_memo.pdfI think we all got the point of Ann Coulter's attention-grabbing comments without the benefit of your explanation. Remember, we're smart...we didn't vote for Bush. Thanks anyway, though...
Um, no, I think we all got Ann's message perfectly: There's a voting group that doesn't vote the way she wants them to, so she has this fantasy that they no longer have the right to vote, so her candidates never, ever lose. I don't think there was anything complicated in what Coulter was saying. Just stupid.
she also said we're in danger if we put a democrat in charge of national security. it was bush that ignored the warnings of an attack. it was clinton who made terrorism a priority.
Well said AA
You'll either be ignored [because you're correct] or viciously attacked by the faithful that still don't get it..
I'll check in later to see how it's going ;-)
GOOD LUCK!
Sorry Jeter. This one isn't about being 'correct' or 'incorrect', it's about right vs. wrong.
You're a republican, so I can understand you're confusion.
Oops, and I may not understand the difference between 'you're' and 'your' but at least I know that when something is 'correct' it doesn't also mean it's right.
Jeter, Do you truly agree with that? Now single women are on the enemies list of the conservatives’ culture war? Well this explains that entire Bush spending of MY TAX DOLLARS on programs to encourage marriage. Everything's a gimmick with these guys. Besides all of the married women I know vote Democratic, but I suspect that Annie’s C would find them particularly stupid since they are not only women but Black women. So now the new hype is it’s not only Blacks who want to live off of the government but single women? I’ll say it again Jeter, if Republicans continue down this path they are going to ruin their own party because they are running off a lot of folks.
Lynn,
What I agree with was AA's explanation of what he believed Coulter was alluding to when she spoke of the way some woman were voting and why. AA wrote: Her argument is that the Dems pander to women, particularly single women, with promises of health care, tuition, and child care.
I do think there are women [and of course men] that are attracted to the Democratic Party because of their promises. Many of which never come to fruition. But they keep promising, & folks keep believing.
Of course I guess we all get suckered in by politicians from both parties.
Yeah, I've grown very cynical.
The Democrats promised Social Security, and now the elderly don't starve. The Democrats promised Workmen's Compansation, unemployment insurance, the 40 hour work weeek, a minimum wage, and all the other things people take for granted.
The Democrats promised we'd beat the Huns.
The Democrats promised we'd beat the Nazis.
The Democrats promised we'd go to the Moon.
The Democrats deliver.
Got anything more current? LOL.
bill clinton made anti-terrorism a top priority of his administration? bush deemphasized it.
The bottom section of this page was the closest thing I could find to a comprehensive list of Bill Clinton's campaign promises and the outcome.
It's dated Janurary 1995, so it only attempts to addresses what Clinton made good on during his first two years in office.
What's good is it contains a listing of his promises as compiled by the Washington Post.
Unfortunately, it's from the Clinton Administration itself, so the "status" of each promise is the Administration's take, not an analysis from an outside media source.
And the the GOP has delivered what more recently?
I mean besides massive deficits that democrats have to clean up, a useless war expensive in blood and money, making the rich richer, making the middle class poorer, and not to mention 7 years of a more corrupt government than Nixon could imagine.
Wahoo! Go GOP.
Try growing heghhogs.;-)
Jeter, Yeah that's pretty cynical J. I understand though because I've grown very cynical about our political system as well. But I must disagree with your assertion that Democrats are pandering to women, (minority groups etc). Tommy says this a lot as well and I've always responded to him that all politicians court voters who they believe share their same vision. And like the poster said below I sure am glad it was the Democrats that had the power for so many years. You may not like them but they did great things for society. I actually fear what the state of our society would be like now if the conservatives had reigned during those years. You might have faired pretty well as you are in a group that was and apparently still is favored by conservatives, as a woman and a minority I don’t think my life would be as great as it is right now.
My wife admitted to me last year. She votes only for people with a (D) next to their name.
Well said? Jeter did you think for one second that WE werent bright enough to get the incredibly obvious point AA made? Here is a wonderfully profound thought. Water is wet. What she said was meaningless unless you are willing to say that women are second class citizens and what THEY think about our country is less important than what men think. Unless you think there is some MERIT in the argument that women ought not to have the vote then even entering into the discussion about what it means that THEY vote Democratic more often than men is not just pointless hyperbole but divisive and frankly ignorant. THAT is why we didnt address it. The inanity of the argument was THOUGHT to be so self evident that it didnt NEED to be addressed. Apparantly AAs post did serve a purpose by showing that some people are dense enough to take such meaningless divisive rhetoric seriously AS IF it actually made a point.
How ironic that an unmarried woman preaches that unmarried women are a scourge to society.
I think I got the message loud and clear. Her message was, "I'm a dimwitted hypocrite."
I seriously DOUBT it went over my head. It was just a NON POINT. So what? If we took the vote away from MEN we would never see another ReNAMBLAcan president. Why hasnt anybody made that point? BECAUSE ITS MEANINGLESS. PEOPLE vote. Breaking down citizens votes in this way makes NO POINT. Either you convince Americans that YOU are the better candidate or you lose, except for a few times like Bush in 2000. How that breaks down doesnt matter unless you are seriously making the point that women are less American than men. Did you really think you were that much smarter than we were? It isnt actually very likely. It was a vapid thing to say. Inane. Gangleskank is without a shred of decency and the world will be a better place when she is ignored as she should be. When even conservatives can no longer stand the STENCH of her bile even if it DOES push their agenda. Actually conservatives ought to look at themselves if her vile spewings are helping them because they sure arent helping America.
..Not to mention that Kerry got 46% of the Male Vote in 2004, and a majority of males voted Democratic for Congress in 2006 makes Coulter's "point" rather pointless, doesn't it? Democrats hardly face a gaping chasm between themselves and the Republicans when it comes to corralling the Male vote. Coulter's just living in a little fantasy world where this pesky Democracy stuff has been tossed on the ashbin of history, and her party gets to do whatever the hell it wants. Of course, that would put Ann out of business, wouldn't it?
JJ,
I think the male vote in the 2004 Presidential election runs counter to your point.
It'll be interesting to see how the gender demographics line up in 2008, especially if Hillary gets the Democratic nod.
Huh? Did you even read my post? Coulter argued that Democrats "have a hard time getting men to vote for them," and I pointed out that actually, the margin of victory for Republicans among male voters was rather small in 2004- and nonexistent in 2004. I could have added that the margin among male voters enjoyed by Republicans was MUCH larger in the 1980s than it has been for the last several election cycles. Coulter's argument that "Democrats have a hard time capturing the male vote" seems outdated.
Did I use too many big words?
Excuse me- nonexistent in 2006.
JJ,
In my opinion, the 8% difference in male voters for Bush over Kerry does not make your point but in fact, runs counter to it. I think a good argument can be made that the large male turnout for Bush being returned to office. It was only a small point. We can agree to disagree.
I did not dispute your assertion that more males voted for Democrats in 2006. However it would be nice to see your statistics.
more women voted democratic, but a majority of men did also.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html
What makes it even more interesting is that the dominance is confined to the white male vote. Non-white males preferred Kerry 67% to Bush's 30%.
Make of that what you will.
WHY? Are women LESS American than men? If not exactly WHY would it matter? Are you interested in how many Blondes vote and which way? How may left handed people vote Dem or GOP? Its meaningless and vapid. Its embarassing to even have to point this out. I THOUGHT that would be obvious.
Unmarried women are social and economic progressives advancing a tolerant set of values. They believe government should play a role in providing affordable health care, a secure retirement, equal pay, and education opportunities for themselves and their children. They support a woman’s right to choose and gay rights, including marriage. AA
My gawd, these hapless harpys just won't stop. Hey, I'm married. I vote the big "D". I want Annie to rail on me.
Julia, The quote was from the report. Are you calling the unmarried women who voted, hapless harpies?
No lighten up, AA. J2,
Okay, it's really me. But I do want my gasket burst. Have Annie's people talk to my people.
Julia,
No need to worry about me. I was just seeking clarification. I thought your reference to harpies was a bit ambiguous.
Besides, I like Ann. She makes me laugh. Her appeal is that she uses hyperbole, humor and her argumentative skills better than any other pundit on the national scene.
She also writes some funny, scathing, poison-pen, books. You may not agree with her but she does make some interesting points. Her books may be playing to the choir as I doubt anyone here besides me has read them, but they are a fun read for this conservative.
I thought only brain dead liberals engaged in attack poliitcs and smears.
her "points" are nonsense.
Her points are nonsense but she is attempting to drive home a point. Republicans are real men who will build more bombs and have more wars because Islam is out to get us. Democrats are "womanly" because they want things like education and healthcare and maybe don't want the richest country in the world to have the highest infant mortality rates in the world.
The foundation for this "point" is the continued exploitation of the fear and anger that came out of 9/11. How many people died post 9/11 of cancer, of heart disease, of auto accidents, industrial accidents, crime, drug abuse and so on, compared to dying from terrorist attacks? The math does not support the war of civilizations BS. 9/11 has been exploited for personal gain by snakes like little Annie much too effectively for much too long.
So we get a bunch of "We hate Ann" type stuff, and some apologists saying, "Oh, it's a joke, get over it". All expected...
However, is she right? If women didn't vote, would Democrats ever win? Women make up a large portion of the Democrat's voting base. In 2004, voters were roughly 54% women. And of that, less than half (about 48%) voted for Bush (up from around 43% in 2000). So that's a huge chunk of voters. More men voted for Bush (about 55% of men) over Kerry (only about 45%).
I haven't looked back at too many past elections, but I do think Ann is actually probably factually correct in this instance.
no one is arguing the statistics of how women vote. it's what she's basing it on. part of which is that democrats won't protect us from terrorist threats. get it?
Well, the issue (I think) is less about her facts and more about her thinly veiled "dems-are-effeminate-weak-gay-girlie-men" angle. No one responds well to that sort of thing. If she were trying to objectively state the facts about voting demographics, she might have stated her case in the same way you did....but she didn't.
Well, then, she's just being ignorant.
Has she ever seen Jim Webb?! That is one mean, bad-ass dude. Honor to have him in the Senate.
Yep. He and Pelosi can take any one. :-)
ps. Feel free to insert Hillary, Kucinich, Obama, Reid, Frank, or any other Dem next to Webb. They're all baad.
kevino,
If she stated it the way you suggested, nobody would have noticed.
Ann is categorically wrong. If EVERBODY voted, Wingnuts (tm J2) would never get voted into office.
To borrow a phrase from The Dude:
You're not wrong, Ann, you're just an A--HOLE!
I assume she's barefoot at home, but I doubt she's pregnant.
Anyway, she won't have to worry about voting in Florida...something about fraud there, Miss Annie..?
I'll say it again - she's just saying this stuff to distract and hack off you lefties. Apparently it's working.
well, then that would make the people who pay to see here, the college republicans who pay her to speak, the real fools?
You got that right - but thry're young - still learning to separate policy from pundantry.
The other day Hannity was reacting to the rush fuss and playing the crybaby conservative victim role. Much of his rant had to do with how the libs engage in the politics of personal destruction and use attacks because they have no message (bla bla bla...)
He even mentioned all those poor victims of clinton's sex scandles in the middle of his politics of personal destruction speech.
So am I to continue to believe when AC calls libs traiters and worse and proposes that women be removed from politics that this only for amusement? I guess we should just understand that this is how she is (and Rush and Hannity and BO and Beck...? They are just pundits after all.
Yet Media Matters is the number one enemy in the country for quoting and analyzing conservative media.
Oh no, she's says it because it delights people like the poster AA who buy her books and keep her rich. It’s not Liberals keeping her famous. It’s the Conservatives who crave mean humor that keep’s the queen of the mean girls in the limelight. Conservatives are solely responsible for Ann Coulter’s evil presence.
I take offense at that remark - I'm conservative and have never bought into her drivel. Take it back!!
It's amusing to see all the attention she gets though - I'ts like those people who slow down to look at highway wrecks - all they do is tie up traffic to amuse their curiosity.
I said the Conservatives that crave mean humor, I assume that's just a subset of Conservatives. I certainly hope so anyway.
"It’s the Conservatives who crave mean humor"
OK Lynn - I'll by your explanation - but by the (ill)logic that has been flying aroung this website for the past week - you just defined all conservatives as those who craves mean humor - therefore the opposite of a conservative - a liberal - does not.
prdon me if I wasn't clear most of the regulars no I don't globally attack conservatives. I should have been specific and said the right wingers that crave her brand of humor. I've learned those guys are a another animal.
and some people with her same mindset go out and vote based on that. now do you think they would be liberals or conservatives?
I think we get that. What is funny is it isn't us who's making her rich cause we ain't buying her books. She may be skewering us, but she is milking the right for all their money. Ironic, isn't it?
No she is saying this stuff to throw red meat to knuckledragging neandrathal morons. Apparantly THAT is working
I think if Ann had said "more men vote Republican than Democratic, and if we can get that number up a little bit, we can get a Supermajority for the Republicans in Congress, arrest all the Democrats and send them to Concentration Camps until they are no longer useful at slave labor, and then execute them all and burn their remains in specially-constructed ovens" we'd have at least a few posters here writing "hey, All Ann said was that more men vote Republican than Democratic! What's the problem?"
Now that is just hilarious in wingnutese. You may cause a wingnut to wet his drawers.
AAAAAnd you would have a bunch of posters here saying, "It's a man, baby!" "MAnn Coulter has an adam's apple." "What a transvestite." "She could only make a living 'on her back' if she wasn't so corrupt" etc., etc., etc. Nothing on-topic. Ad hominem attacks used to distract from what she is actually saying.
So you're saying Ann Coulter COULDN'T make a living as a prostitute? Wow, that was a pretty low dig. I would have to agree with you, though.
Of course, somebody like Ann would never use an ad-hominem attack, or call somebody names. Nope, she's way too classy for that. Classy dame, she is. And she deserves to be treated with the same respect she gives B. Hussein Obama, Hillary Cankles, and F*g Edwards. And F*g Gore.
No, I agree... she uses vicious language too. But by saying, "well, she uses bad attacks, so I'll use them back" is not effective debate. And frankly, very unbecoming a liberal.
Must rise above the attacks and win the arguments based on facts.
Oooh, you mean I get to use facts!!!! OK, I didn't know Republicans counted facts as arguments, I thought they only used black humor and lies.
Here's a fact: Women are human.
Here's another fact: Voting is a basic human right
And don't give me this BS about 'well, technically she's correct' - that doesn't mean anything to me. She's arguing that women should not be allowed to vote. She's wrong. Women SHOULD be allowed to vote.
Anyone care to support Coulter now? Without any name-calling?
I disagree. I think there is a time for everything under the sun and the season for fighting fire for fire has come. Thats how I see it. I get the other side of the argument but I dont think acting that way has done liberals a lot of good the last couple of decades.
Well said. Even though I do appreciate Media Matters battling these guys by simply putting a mirror up to their faces, I feel it's time to understand politics are personal. Fools I don't mind, fools that affect me and my family, I mind.
So, this does not mean getting angry or wanting to get even with these misanthropes, but instead administer without hesitation enough hurt in return to have them consider alternative political options.
Well not NOTHING but. There were substantive posts but really, there was NO CONTENT. She made NO POINT. So exactly WHY would she deserve careful, cogent and respectful arguments in return to flamethrowing ignorance. Personally, I dont like the transgender jokes. I just dont have a leg to stand on calling OTHER people on flamethrowing with my record.
You win most stupid post of the day!
Thanks for playing. :-)
oops. lots of replies beat me.. My response was intended for JJ.
Thanks for the compliment, person that thinks vile, nasty AC is hilarious. Really dude, you should check your own credentials.
We know Ann's an idiot. We don't give her any courtesy if you've been reading here. But she does give us some fun by giving us fodder to mimick her stupidity. Just have to plug your nose to get over the smell.
The problem is she's an idiot - don't give her nonsence the courtsey of your thought.
sorry - that's courtesy of your thought
WC,
I thought your first comment was simply low-bow.
on that low note I'll take my leave.
Fun discussion!
would definately NOT want to see that!
JuliaJayne, I sure hope you're alright- you've just been called stupid by 2 posters
one who thinks it possible for Coulters comments to go over anyones head,and considers her a good writer,
and somebody else who thinks she makes liberals really mad, and thinks that's a worthwhile profession. ;0)
HBL, I guess I get the due dilengence award for hacking off some Annie loving cons. And you'd think you couldn't offend these people. ;-)
On second thought, he's been calling Jjam JJ and me Julia, so I don't know if it was me or not. Maybe I'm not "hacking" anybody off after all. Ah, who cares, but I was wondering why AA and wkrp were high fiving above?
JuliaJayne,It's hard to tell where their comments are directed at times, I know.Sometimes it doesn't really matter, they're still funny and don't make any sense. ;0)
Those guys definately live on their own cloud.But they can be "deperately"funny sometimes.
Be nice if I could spell.
I'll be nice even if you couldn't spell.Now let's work on our tenses and syntax.
I think it's hilarious. Of course, she's right, but the funny thing is how thin skinned all the libs are. It doesn't take much to get them to go bananas.
The funny thing is what some people think is funny. Yeah thinskinned. Nothing like a joke about disenfranchising more than HALF of America to really get the belly laughs going.
Are you the ONLY sane person in here?
Ask Ann anything and her stock answer is "But, but but Bill...! Bill Clinton is as fault for everything that has been done wrong and gone wrong with this administration since before 9-1-1. He screwed up the economy, the government, the military, law enforvement etc. George W. has been completly block in his fight for social and political and diplomatic justice by the legacy of 42nd President of the USA, William Jefferson Clinton. George W. has not had enough time to fix the mess the last Democratic President made in Washington, The United States of America and the World. With any sort of luck, bad, worse worser worsst luck we will prevail against WJ Clinton, even if it take another eight years to do that.
Heh. I'm glad Coulter would trust her man to take care of her, politically, since she's happy to give up her right to vote. I can't even get mine to register.
I don't doubt she's right, though - If the Democrats were to lose their female voting block en masse, they'd be up the creek. Imagine if we took away the right of women to vote, the right of minorities to vote. We head back about a century in time and return to that political culture where every white male - or perhaps we could restrict it to landowners, since the poor are too stupid to make their own political decisions - decides the future of the country. I'm not entirely sure what the political landscape would look like at that point, but I'm sure the guys who are left to vote would find enough to argue about to still have two major parties.
Despite the fact that Coulter writes in SATIRE (which most liberals apparently don't understand), the claims she makes are true.
I see. I have had an epiphany, the witty and brilliant biting humor has won me over. Now THAT was satire.
My God, this woman is just ridiculous.....
Rampant Sexism is point 5 of the 14 points that identify a fascist regime. Fascist regimes are male-dominated. Under fascist rulers traditional gender roles are rigidly enforced, homophobia runs rampant, and opposition to abortion and gay-rights is very strong. [link to www.oldamericancentury.org] comments show she has little grasp of history: When voting was an exclusively male privilege, men elected some very liberal Presidents. Liberals elected President before women's suffrage include Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and William Howard Taft. Two of these were Republicans. In the 19th and early 20th century the Republican Party was the home of progressives and liberals while the Democrats was the home of the conservatives. The Republican Party was once radically different. It was founded as the party opposed to slavery or at least its extension into the western territories (a liberal ideal) and it was the party of the strong Federal government.
Ann's funny, and is always right on the mark when describing the left. Poor Hillary, she will never be president, the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" will see to that! I can hardly wait :)
The woman is a brainless harpy without a shred of decency. I am shocked anyone can stand the stench of her atrophied and decomposed soul
Seeing as how Democrats WON in 2006, I'm sure plenty of men voted them in, since men statistically vote more than women. Not by much, but a very small margin.
Ms ( ? ) Coulter is just another right - wing windbag who between her hateful statements makes more hateful statements. Why do consevative thrieve on hate and murder ? - Beyonce Welch - An African - American Catholic Who Prays For the End of Hate.
if it were not for the 19th amendment, do you this person would be having the right to state such outrageous diatribes?
She really needs to read a book. She can start with "All the Shah's Men". She has no credentials, she is completely ignorant. My dog knows more about the history of the middle east than her. Does she ever debate anyone? I only ever see her selling books to her television friends, or giving one woman speeches. She knows she is intellectually bankrupt and could never afford to debate anyone. Raging homophobes always seem to be closet gays, and folks who claim others are brainless are usually just hiding their own terrible fear that they will be found out to be the intellectual fruads they really are.
PS I really liked her "pot smoking, draft dodger comment. Kind of like a OxyContin pill popper, draft dodger. At Least Bill was in England on a Rhodes scholarship. What was Rush exscuse? Oh yeah he had a pimple on his ass.
PSS As a active duty military member, please I implore all of you to help get Rush off of Armed Forces Radio! That's YOUR tax money keeping him there.
She debated Franken twice. He mopped the floor with her.
Most of these comments lend credibilty to what Anne says, beside providing her free advertising! What a concept is MediaMatters. I love it.
You obviously did not read the comments, since most do not support her credentials or credibility or support her in any way, making you a liar.
These comments lend credence to her inane, vapid rantings? I think the five year old that reads the posts to you is playing a trick on you.
It is funny to me that the very Lib folks and the NOW gang failed to call attention to the fate of WOMEN in Iraq & Iran, heck in all the Arab world... These women are suppose to be taken as leaders, as role models. They stand up faor FAR LEFT COMMUNIST style leadership, Hilary. Where were they when Monika, or the other women Bill mistreated > No where, but look at the outrage now. When the WOW gang and Lib women in general are called to answer for strange erratic behavior that is not rational to most of us, we get hate speach.
The women Ann refers to are the same ones who believe the follow logic:
Can I please ask you "give-away", "womb to tomb" Libs a real honest question ? Since when did a 25 year old person become a child ? Hilary and the Dems plan would include "children" to the age of 25 !
And, since when does a household making $80,000.00 a year qualify as POOR ? You have got to be kidding me, this program originaly was designed to help POOR, UNINSURED CHILDREN, not 25 year olds making $80k...
When will the give aways stop.
The Libs / Dems say they will "partialy" pay for this EXPANSION of the program by invreasing the cig tax... Wait, aren't we trying to ban cigs in every part of our Nation... New York has banned smoking in your car, most States have all kinds of non-smoking rules. More and more Americans ARE quitting, so the math dictates that we will NOT be raising the money needed to fund this expansion because the number of folks getting / paying the new higher tax will decrese, so where do you think the money will come from... ??? ME & YOU, as always...
When is enough enough ? Help poor kids & families I get that, ok.
But 25 year olds or folks making $80k... ???
The mind reels.
"When the WOW gang and Lib women in general are called to answer for strange erratic behavior that is not rational to most of us, we get hate speach."
WOW? Women of Wrestling? When did they get involved in politics?
And Hillary Clinton is far from far-left, hell she's a Goldwater Girl!
Rosie, Keith etc. don't stoop to ANN's level ...
Why do you suppose there's no Republican Media Matters? Because Democrats don't have clones for Ann, Bill, Rush, etc.etc. Dems can't compete with such whale poop.
I knew MMFA is making fantastic progress when I heard Fox News attacking over and over again. They lash out with ugly labels such as Media Gestapo Smear WebSite. Bill O'Reilly called Media Matters "A Far Left Swamp Pit" and a Smear WebSite.
A Republican Media Watchdog Group will begin when News Outlets begin reporting the truth. They of course would then take that truth, spin the hell out of it and deliver it to Fox News for re-broadcasting.
Actualy, that's being done now! A huge Republican conspiritorial Gestapo Group & Far-Wrong Swamp Pit Smear Joint was fully operational long before Media Matter was.
It's known as the Republican Party.
Corrections to last post ...
Democrats don't stoop to Ann Coulters level ...
Why do you suppose there's no Republican Media Matters? Because Democrats don't have clones for Ann, Bill, Rush, etc.etc. Dems can't compete with such outrageous behavior.
I knew MMFA was making fantastic progress when I heard Fox News attacking over and over again. They lash out with ugly labels such as Media Gestapo Smear WebSite. Bill O'Reilly called Media Matters "A Far Left Swamp Pit" and a Smear WebSite.
A Republican Media Watchdog Group will begin when News Outlets begin reporting the truth. They of course would then take that truth, spin the hell out of it and deliver it to Fox News for re-broadcasting.
Actually, that's being done now! A Vast Republican Conspiratorial Gestapo Group & Far-Wrong Swamp Pit Smear Joint was fully operational long before Media Matter was.
It's known as the Republican Party.
I approve of this message!
Sorry ... Here's my corrections ...
Democrats don't stoop to Ann Coulters level ...
Why do you suppose there's no Republican Media Matters? Because Democrats don't have clones for Ann, Bill, Rush, etc.etc. Dems can't compete with such outrageous behavior.
I knew MMFA was making fantastic progress when I heard Fox News attacking over and over again. They lash out with ugly labels such as Media Gestapo Smear WebSite. Bill O'Reilly called Media Matters "A Far Left Swamp Pit" and a Smear WebSite.
A Republican Media Watchdog Group will begin when News Outlets begin reporting the truth. They of course would then take that truth, spin the hell out of it and deliver it to Fox News for re-broadcasting.
Actually, that's being done now! A Vast Republican Conspiratorial Gestapo Group & Far-Wrong Swamp Pit Smear Joint was fully operational long before Media Matter was.
It's known as the Republican Party. I approve of this message. Thanks.
Sorry about that! Here's my Corrections:
Democrats don't stoop to Ann Coulters level ...
Why do you suppose there's no Republican Media Matters? Because Democrats don't have clones for Ann, Bill, Rush, etc.etc. Dems can't compete with such outrageous behavior.
I knew MMFA was making fantastic progress when I heard Fox News attacking over and over again. They lash out with ugly labels such as Media Gestapo Smear WebSite. Bill O'Reilly called Media Matters "A Far Left Swamp Pit" and a Smear WebSite.
A Republican Media Watchdog Group will begin when News Outlets begin reporting the truth. They of course would then take that truth, spin the hell out of it and deliver it to Fox News for re-broadcasting and other outlets.
Actually, that's being done now! A Vast Republican Conspiratorial Gestapo Group & Far-Wrong Swamp Pit Smear Joint was fully operational long before Media Matter was.
It's known as the Republican Party. I approve of this message!
OH NO, ANN COULTER SAID SOMETHING SHOCKING!!!
Come on, people. It's Ann Coulter. The only people that still take her seriously are living is a shed in the woods, working on their 466723th draft of their Manifesto.
Maybe - on a smaller scale - she has a point. After all, she's a single woman that votes stupidly. Sometimes, she doesn't even vote is the right place. Pretty stupid if you ask me!
Sam's Computer is too stupid to make a single post, he posts 5 times, rofl.
Sam, Dingy Harry and Nancy are as horrible as Rush and Ann. All of them should be throw out and we can start again and maybe get back to real honest debates and disagreements and COMPROMISES.
Bot as long as you believe only your side is right, then we have no starting point.
I hate what Rush & Ann stand for, but I also hate what Reid, Pelosi, Hilary stand for.
You side is along way from perfect. So is mine.
CLEAN HOUSE OF THEM ALL !
At least Sam knows that 4 comes after 3, not 5.
Sam is the man a hundred times over. He cares about getting it right. Your comparison on the hand is illegitimate to the core.
One last time! Play it again SAM!
Don't worry ... Just Jesting! ... Hi! Jay-Jay!
I heard if you keep repeating, it will sink in and become true. Just kidding again!
I got on a prehistoric computer and the operating system has bugs. Kept telling me the posts didn't go thru. So I tried again etc.etc. Then I said UH-OH, what if they ARE being posted? That's when I finally stopped.
Garnett ... I agree about both sides but not as bad as Rush and Ann.
Jimmy ... Thanks for the reply.
See you later Birthday Lady.
See Sam, I meant to say on the other hand above. At least you got your stuff right all 3 times! Thanks for the B-day greet.
Your Very Welcome ... and ... I translated what you meant without any major damage to my brain. After all those posts you might say, What brain?
See Ya Later! -Sam I Am-
Well, I've made one post and have already been referred to as 'liar'.I was, after all, kicked out of DU 3 years ago(or so)for asking someone a question about Al Gore. Wrong person? Wrong question?
Here, though, I have to agree with a previous poster (mgarnett251924) that a house cleaning is in order. Things aren't good when the U. S. Congress and presidential front runners have to rant for a couple of days over talk radio host(s) and commentators, who make their money by the very controversey that they and the politians create. Go figure. If we can get the Senate Majority Leader to be scared of Ted Schultz, maybe enough people will become aware of him to raise his market share a point or two. Peace.
Mr. Coulter is an embarressment to Cross Dressers.
She is so boring & predictable (yawn)
She is the personification of a media whore and will say anything for publicity. She, as others, simply see 9/11 as an opportunity to divide the country and profit.
Ann never tires of the free pass she has been given by the MSM (from meaningful criticism) to wallow in her own filth,like a 2 year old whose parents think its cute to find her covered in her own poo.She even exhibits the same "aren't I naughty?" grin after she "does something bad". *snicker*
If we took away a woman's right to think, we would have Ann Coulter.
Does this woman simply hate every ideal this country stands for?
Where did they not allow the woman a right to vote? The Taliban in Afghanistan. Perhaps Ann would have been more comfortable there than here where civil rights are protected.
I couldn't agree more with her. I mean, take a look at where we were before 1920! This country was heading in a much better direction than it is now. Liberalism is much kinder to women than it is to men - unless you're a mentally-diseased homosexual. Of course most single women are prone to vote for Democrats because they promise to give them what they can't get on their own in a country built and dominated by men. Married women are more likely to do what their husbands tell them to...unless their husbands are closet homosexuals that let their wives wear the pants.
Amen - U couldn't have said it better - No Women for President
I guarantee Coulter could still vote if women lost the right.....