NY Times again omitted Bush's 2000 pledge to "properly recognize[]" "genocidal campaign" against Armenians
SUMMARY: An October 12 New York Times article about a House of Representatives resolution labeling the killing of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire from 1915-1923 as genocide reported that the Bush administration opposed the resolution. However, the article did not mention that as a presidential candidate in 2000, Bush sent a letter to the Armenian National Committee of America, in which, according to a press release on the organization's website, he wrote that "[t]he Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension" and that if elected president, he "would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the Armenian people." An October 11 Times article also did not mention the letter.
An October 12 New York Times article about the resolution approved by the House Foreign Affairs Committee on October 10 -- labeling the killing of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire from 1915-1923 as genocide -- reported that the Bush administration opposed the resolution without mentioning that as a presidential candidate in 2000, Bush sent a letter to the Armenian National Committee of America, in which, according to a press release on the organization's website, he wrote that "[t]he Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension." According to the excerpt of the letter posted on the website, Bush also said that if elected president, he "would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the Armenian people," as Media Matters for America documented. The New York Times also did not mention Bush's pledge in an October 11 article about Bush's objection to the House committee's resolution. Similarly, two separate reports on the October 11 edition of CNN's The Situation Room noted the administration's objections to the resolution without mentioning Bush's reported promise in 2000 to "properly recognize[]" the Armenian people's "tragic suffering." During the 5 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room on October 10, CNN senior Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre noted:
At issue, a House resolution labeling the killings of hundreds of thousands of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War I genocide.
President Bush used that word himself as a candidate back in 2000, but says now the timing couldn't be worse.
McIntyre did not note Bush's 2000 pledge, and CNN has not mentioned the fact that Bush had previously used the term "genocidal campaign" to describe the Ottoman Empire's treatment of the Armenians since McIntyre's report on the October 10 edition of The Situation Room.
In an October 10 statement, Bush urged members of the House "to oppose the Armenian genocide resolution":
On another issue before Congress, I urge members to oppose the Armenian genocide resolution now being considered by the House Foreign Affairs Committee. We all deeply regret the tragic suffering of the Armenian people that began in 1915. This resolution is not the right response to these historic mass killings, and its passage would do great harm to our relations with a key ally in NATO and in the global war on terror.
From the October 12 New York Times article:
The committee vote in the House, though nonbinding and largely symbolic, rebuffed an intense campaign by the White House and earlier warnings from Turkey's government that such a vote would gravely strain relations with the United States.
In Washington, the Bush administration tried to ease the hard feelings between the countries, and vowed to try to defeat the resolution on Capitol Hill.
"One of the reasons we opposed the resolution in the House yesterday is that the president has expressed on behalf of the American people our horror at the tragedy of 1915," said Dana Perino, President Bush's chief spokeswoman. "But at the same time, we have national security concerns, and many of our troops and supplies go through Turkey. They are a very important ally in the war on terror, and we are going to continue to try to work with them. And we hope that the House does not put forward a full vote."
[...]
For his part, Ross Wilson, the United States ambassador to Turkey, also tried to calm relations, issuing a statement on Thursday saying that the partnership between Turkey and the United States was strong and would remain so. He added that he, President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice regretted the committee decision.
During the 4 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room, anchor Wolf Blitzer stated that "the Bush administration is warning of some major consequences, ramifications, if the full House moves forward with this legislation." In the 5 p.m. ET hour of the program, CNN State Department correspondent Zain Verjee reported that Rice will be "be reaching out to top House leaders, trying to convince them not to let the resolution go through in the full House." Neither Blitzer nor Verjee mentioned the pledge Bush reportedly made in 2000.
According to the Armenian National Committee of America's press release, Bush called the Turkish killing of Armenians a "genocidal campaign" and vowed that the United States would "properly recognize[]" the event. The blog Think Progress highlighted the press release on October 10. Despite his pledge as a candidate to "ensure" this recognition, as president, Bush does not appear to have used the term "genocide" -- or a variant thereof -- to describe the killings, according to a search of the White House website. From the "partial text" of Bush's letter on the Armenian National Committee of America website:
The twentieth century was marred by wars of unimaginable brutality, mass murder and genocide. History records that the Armenians were the first people of the last century to have endured these cruelties. The Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension and commands all decent people to remember and acknowledge the facts and lessons of an awful crime in a century of bloody crimes against humanity. If elected President, I would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the Armenian people.
From the 4 p.m. ET hour of CNN's The Situation Room on October 11:
BLITZER: Turkey recalling its ambassador to the United States. The announcement coming after a House panel approved a bill describing mass killings of Armenians during World War I as genocide.
Our congressional correspondent Dana Bash is on the Hill. She's watching this story for us.
Dana, the Bush administration is warning of some major consequences, ramifications, if the full House moves forward with this legislation.
BASH: They sure are, Wolf. But you know, a small but very vocal Armenian-American community, they have been lobbying Congress for decades to call the mass killings actually genocide.
In the past, congressional leaders simply have not voted for it because of that kind of pressure from the Turks and from presidents, Democrats and Republicans, and the intense lobbying from high-powered lobbyists that the Turks hired in order to do that. But that pressure is not swaying the Democratic leaders now running Congress.
[begin video clip]
BASH: Mass killings of Armenians by the Turks took place nearly a century ago. So why is the House moving to label it genocide now?
HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI (D-CA): Because now -- there's never a good time. And all of us in the Democratic leadership have supported -- are making -- reiterating Americans' acknowledgement of a genocide.
BASH: Defiant Democratic leaders say they view this as part of their mandate, restoring America's moral authority around the world.
REP. TOM LANTOS (D-CA): When the Turkish government says there was no genocide of Armenians, we have to set them straight.
BASH: For Foreign Affairs chairman Tom Lantos, fighting for human rights is personal.
BASH: You escaped two labor camps in Hungary?
LANTOS: Yes, yes.
BASH: And you were how old?
LANTOS: Well, by that time, I was 16.
BASH: He is the only Holocaust survivor in Congress.
LANTOS: I feel that I have a tremendous opportunity as a survivor of the Holocaust to bring a moral dimension to our foreign policy.
BASH: Lantos pushed the symbolic resolution calling Armenian killings genocide despite intense pressure against it from the Bush administration. He dismisses Turkish warnings this could jeopardize U.S. relations with Turkey, a critical Mideast ally that insists the Armenian deaths were not genocide.
BASH: What if it says, "You're not going to be able to use our air space anymore," or, "You're not going to be able to use our country to get critical supplies to the men and women who are fighting in Iraq"?
LANTOS: Well, with all due respect to the Turkish government, the Turkish-American relationship is infinitely more valuable to Turkey than it is to the United States. The Turkish government will not act against the United States because that would be against their own interests. I'm convinced of this.
[end video clip]
BASH: But the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee disagrees, and that Democratic chairman, Ike Skelton [D-MO], Wolf, wrote this letter to the speaker, Nancy Pelosi, which CNN has obtained. And in it, he warns that the Armenian resolution could actually hinder the Democrats' chief goal in this Congress, and that is bringing troops home from Iraq. He says that is because Turkey, of course, is a key transfer port -- point, I should say, for getting troops home from Iraq.
BLITZER: Dana Bash on the Hill for us. Thanks, Dana, very much.
From the 5 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room on October 11:
BLITZER: A strong reaction from Turkey right now. The Turkish government pulling its ambassador from the United States. That after a House committee passed a resolution saying Turkey committed genocide in World War I against Armenians.
Our State Department correspondent, Zain Verjee, is following this story for us, and it's escalating literally by the hour, Zain. What's going on?
VERJEE: It is, Wolf. Here at the State Department, officials are doing a lot of damage control. The big worry here today at the State Department is that could Turkey turn from a friend into an enemy.
[begin video clip]
VERJEE: Turks take to the streets, tired of supporting the U.S. and having little to show for it. Turkish officials say they just don't trust the U.S., which they thought was their closest ally. They feel betrayed by a congressional committee vote calling the killing of Armenians by Turks in World War I genocide. Turkey warned of consequences, and now it's making good on its threat, recalling its ambassador the U.S. for consultations.
TOM CASEY (State Department spokesman): That is their decision. I think that it certainly will not do anything to limit our efforts to continue on reach out to Turkish officials.
VERJEE: Turkey is threatening more action if the resolution passes the full House.
EGEMAN BAGIS (foreign policy adviser to Turkish prime minister): Despite our warnings, U.S. Congress wanted to play hardball. We now have to play hardball, as well.
VERJEE: Like cutting off its air space to the U.S. military, like it did with France and Canada, who passed similar measures. It could also end access to Incirlik Air Base, which the U.S. military uses to transport critical cargo and fuel supplies to Iraq.
RICE: The passage of this resolution at this time would, indeed, be very problematic for everything that we are trying to do in the Middle East.
VERJEE: And might open a dangerous new front in the Iraq war. Turkey wants to destroy Kurdish rebels, called the PKK, that have launched cross-border attacks from northern Iraq, killing Turks.
BAGIS: PKK for us is what Al Qaeda is to you.
VERJEE: And Turkish officials say if the U.S. won't go after the PKK, Turkey will. Turkish helicopters crossed into Iraqi airspace Thursday, and troops are dangerously poised along the border.
[end video clip]
VERJEE: And secretary of state, Wolf, Condoleezza Rice is reaching out to the top Turkish leadership, trying to assure them that the U.S. is a strong friend and a very good ally and that Turkey is important to the U.S. She's also going to be reaching out to top House leaders, trying to convince them not to let the resolution go through in the full House. Wolf.
BLITZER: Zain, lots at stake right now.
From the 5 p.m. ET hour of The Situation Room on October 10:
BLITZER: The Bush administration right now is in a tense standoff with Congress over a resolution that would pin the genocide label on Turkey for mass killings carried out during the First World War. The White House and military commanders are deeply worried about the impact on the current war in Iraq by what's happening in the House of Representatives right now.
Let's go to live to our senior Pentagon correspondent, Jamie McIntyre. He's watching this story. Why is the Pentagon, in particular, Jamie, so concerned?
McINTYRE: Well, it's coming at a really bad time. Turkey sent warplanes and attack helicopters into northern Iraq today to pound Kurdish rebel positions, a possible prelude to an incursion. The U.S. is urging restraint on Turkey, and, at the same time, the Bush administration is accusing Congress of making things worse.
[begin video clip]
PELOSI: The House will be in order.
McINTYRE: As if to underscore her defiance of the Bush administration, Speaker Nancy Pelosi gaveled the House to order with a prayer by an Armenian chaplain.
CATHOLICOS KAREKIN II (Armenian Apostolic Church): With a solemn burden of history, we remember the victims of the genocide of the Armenians.
McINTYRE: That historical note has become a testy confrontation with the White House. At issue, a House resolution labeling the killings of hundreds of thousands of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War I genocide.
President Bush used that word himself as a candidate back in 2000, but says now the timing couldn't be worse.
BUSH: This resolution is not the right response to these historic mass killings, and its passage would do great harm to our relations with a key ally in NATO.
McINTYRE: The Pentagon argues the resolution would anger Turkey and hamper the war effort in Iraq. Seventy percent of air cargo, including armored MRAP vehicles, as well as 30 percent of fuel, fly by way of the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey.

















Well look at this lonely thread. Seems that no one really gives a hoot about the Armenians.
My wife is Armenian, so I was going to abstain from commenting....but changed my mind.
While some might wonder about the timing of this, it's my opinion that it is long overdue. And quite frankly I find it disingenuous to use the excuse that this might piss our so called ally Turkey off. We've been pissing the entire Arab population of the Middle East off for decades by our support of Israel, but no one ever suggests we should change that policy.
One set of my wife's Grandparents escaped the genocide & came to this country. They saw other family members murdered by the Turks.
Ah hell, nobody is gonna read this anyway.
I agree with you. The Armenian genocide has long been ignored. I dont care either if it pissed Turkey off. They need to take responsibility for this egregious attrocity
This is just one more example of Bush saying one thing, then doing another. We should never be held *hostage* by another country, ally or not, to do the right thing & keep our promises.
Yeah Jeter someone reading this.
I struggled with this last night. I read the other topic from yesterday, actually went to the website and read the letter that 'Junior for President' sent Mr. Edgar Hagopian & Mr. Vasken. I was thinking about responding to another poster Lostlogic, she was questioning the timing of the vote and the possible harm our soldiers may face if Turkey went to war with the Kurds in Iraq. I will be honest and say that I didn’t respond because I thought my response would seem harsh. I care about the loss of American lives but I'm sorry to say that the conflict between Turkey and the Kurds has been simmering for years. This administration when planning this war should have been aware of this possible conflict. A promise is a promise period!. We are suppose to be a nation that stands by it’s word. We are suppose to stand for 'what’s right always' not 'whats right when it’s convenient'. We should acknowledge the past genocide of Armenians as well as the current genocide taking place in Darfur. What kind of ‘christian’ only addresses a wrong when it’s convenient?
I'm finding as I get older than we all have much more in common than we realize. Suffering does not belong to any one race of people. Acknowledging it will go along way toward helping us all.
We are suppose to stand for 'what’s right always' not 'whats right when it’s convenient'.
Nailed it right there Pearlene. Thank you for your very thoughtful response. I've been away all weekend & it made me smile to see that folks had taken the time to read this thread.
I read it, Jeter, and happy birthday.
Thanks for taking the time to read my post Beach & thanks for the Happy Birthday shout out :-)
I'm another year older & hopefully wiser ;-)
How can you not question the timing of this? The dems can't stop the war on their own, they can't stop the funding, they can't bring the troops home, so why not piss off one of our most strategic allies to make it harder for our troops, to make more people get upset and clamor for our troops to come home, and to maybe try to make it so much more difficult that the president calls it quits in the middle east.
What pisses me off more is that there are SO MANY other things that congress could be working on besides labeling the events of 80 years ago. I don't know, how about tax reform, border security, health care, energy alternatives and reform? WHY is this worth legislating? What's next, acknowledgment that slavery was a horrible thing? Recognition that Russia did some bad stuff 100 years ago? A verbal slap on the wrist for atrocities in Africa 200 years ago?
What a waste of legislative energy.
Cannon,
I understand where you're coming from. However this President made a pledge [as others did before him] & should be expected to keep his word. Turkey's *real estate* has given them a great deal of leverage over the US...but that's a piss poor excuse to continue to allow them a pass here.
If Bush was so terribly worried about Turkey's reaction, why make the pledge to recognize the Armenian genocide in the first place? And please don't say things have changed because of Iraq. Turkey has been fighting this acknowledgement long before Iraq.
The US also opposes allowing the Kurds their own sovereign nation because the Turks are opposed to that too. Quite frankly, I'm tired of being held hostage by Turkey...aren't you?
I think, as of a few days ago, there is no controversy here. didn't they just rule that lying while campaigning is protected? So King W can't be held responsible for what he said. (not like he ever is anyways)
So, tossing the Amenians into a ditch is just fine! And as to the Turks? A whole other can of worms...Don't mind the 'fairly' stable northern part of Iraq. Just get in there with a stick and stir it up like so many hives of bees. Bad!
ultra,
Turkey is threatening to invade Kurdish territory in Iraq. Seriously with allies like this...who needs enemies?
It was a genocide. Why can't Turkey acknowledge that? What do they think they're hiding? Sorry, Jeter to your wife and relatives.
Hey Julia, thanks. I showed my wife these responses & she was truly touched :-)
I'm not sure why Turkey can't just acknowledge this and move on...
I don't consider Turkey true ally. The only reason we tip toe around them is because they are situated on a prime piece of real estate. And they use that fact to hold us hostage.
Let's be clear: Bill Clinton ALSO gave the same pledge when running for President. And there should be no doubt that Hillary, who is an original co-sponsor of S.Res.106 (the Senate equivalent of the genocide resolution) would also backtrack on this issue if she wins next November.
Loose,
Yes others have also dragged their feet on fulfilling this pledge. Again, as I've already written here, we allow ourselves to be held *hostage* by Turkey because they are a strategically located piece of real estate.
You could be correct about Hillary, though I'd hope she'd stand up to the Turks & keep her word.
Lotta ground to cover Jeter. Condolences to your dear families loss. This looks realy ughly and more losses to come. The security of the Amenians was I thought very important and one of our responsibilities. Are we about to fail them?
Eweston, my wife thanks you & the others for your kind words. Her Grandparents have passed away, but the rest of her family were grateful upon hearing that a resolution might finally come to fruition.
Bush should keep his word, but I suppose we shouldn't expect that he would....