George Will: GOP voters "have learned" that Giuliani "doesn't flip-flop"
SUMMARY: On ABC's This Week, The Washington Post's George Will asserted "What they [Republican primary voters] have learned about Giuliani is that he doesn't flip-flop. ... [H]e's taken exactly the un-Romney approach to his problem, which was to say, 'Look, this is me. Take it or leave it.' " But as NPR senior news analyst Cokie Roberts said, "[H]e equivocated on guns. He equivocated on abortion."
On the October 14 edition of ABC's This Week, during a discussion of the Republican presidential primary field, Washington Post columnist George F. Will said of candidates Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney: "What they [Republican primary voters] have learned about Giuliani is that he doesn't flip-flop. ... [H]e's taken exactly the un-Romney approach to his problem, which was to say, 'Look, this is me. Take it or leave it.' " ABC News correspondent Sam Donaldson then asked, "Did you hear what he said to the NRA?" while National Public Radio senior news analyst and ABC News political commentator Cokie Roberts added, "[H]e equivocated on guns. He equivocated on abortion." Host George Stephanopoulos later said, "[H]is basic point is, 'I'm not going to change my principles, but I'm not going to do anything to harm you.' " Media Matters for America has documented numerous inconsistencies in Giuliani's positions on both gun control and abortion.
As Media Matters documented, as mayor of New York City, Giuliani supported federal gun control laws that affected all 50 states, including the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 and the national assault weapons ban signed by President Clinton in 1994, which has since expired. On the January 27, 1994, edition of CBS' This Morning, when asked if he endorsed the proposed ban, Giuliani responded: "Doing away with assault weapons? Absolutely." However, earlier this year, Giuliani suggested on his campaign website that he does not support federal gun control laws and that guns should instead be regulated on a state-by-state basis. On June 26, the issues section of his website (accessed through the Internet Archive) read:
Rudy Giuliani is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. When he was Mayor of a city suffering an average of almost 2000 murders a year, he protected people by getting illegal handguns out of the hands of criminals. As a result, shootings fell by 72% and the murder rate was cut by two-thirds. But Rudy understands that what works in New York doesn't necessarily work in Mississippi or Montana.
The gun control section of Giuliani's website has since been revised. As of October 14, the issues section of his website reads:
Rudy Giuliani is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. He understands that every law-abiding American has an individual right to keep and bear arms that is guaranteed by the Constitution. To deal with a city where crime was out of control, Mayor Giuliani worked to get guns out of the hands of criminals -- resulting in a 66% drop in the murder rate and 72% reduction in criminal related shootings. The best way to deal with gun crime is to prosecute the criminals and enforce the laws already on the books. Rudy Giuliani will make sure that if someone commits a crime with a gun, they will go to prison for the mandatory sentence.
To watch Rudy's comments on every citizen's Constitutional right to bear arms, please click here.
Additionally, in a September 22 article on Giuliani's speech at the National Rifle Association's "Celebration of American Values Conference," the Los Angeles Times reported that "[i]n Giuliani's clearest break from his mayoral record, he renounced the lawsuit that he ordered the city to file against gun makers in 2000." The article added:
"I think that lawsuit has gone in a direction that I probably don't agree with at this point," Giuliani told several hundred gun-rights supporters at the conference.
The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, cast a new light on 2nd Amendment rights, he said, and "maybe it highlights the necessity for them more."
Giuliani described the suit as part of his aggressive approach to crime.
"Some people call it excessive," Giuliani said. "I thought it was intense. But the reality is I was trying to achieve a result, which is to reduce crime in New York. That is not necessarily what is needed now. It certainly isn't the interpretation that I think is the correct interpretation of the 2nd Amendment."
Further, as Media Matters has documented, Giuliani has vacillated on the abortion issue at various points in his career as a public official, and this year alone, he has wavered on the desirability of the Supreme Court's overturning Roe v. Wade. On the February 5 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity asked Giuliani, "Where does Rudy Giuliani stand on abortion?" Giuliani responded that he "believe[s] in a woman's right to choose," but then encouraged "conservatives" to find similarities in "the way we think," specifically on "the appointment of judges." When asked about Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who has stated that he would overrule Roe, Giuliani replied that he is "somebody I consider to be a really great judge. ... I do think you have sort of a general philosophical approach that you want from a justice, and I think a strict constructionist would be probably the way I'd describe it." Additionally, during a May 3 Republican presidential debate, Giuliani said that "[i]t would be OK to repeal" Roe, but that "[i]t would be also if a strict constructionist judge viewed it as precedent."
On the May 10 edition of National Public Radio's All Things Considered, introducing a report about Giuliani's then-upcoming speech at Houston Baptist University by national political correspondent Mara Liasson, co-host Robert Siegel stated: "Giuliani is the only one of the Republican presidential candidates who supports abortion rights. Recently, his answers to questions about abortion, such as in last week's debate, have caused some confusion." Liasson reported that Giuliani would be making an effort to clarify his position, if not change the topic all together." Liasson then reported: "Tomorrow, Giuliani will speak at Houston Baptist University, where, his aides say, he will reiterate his support for abortion rights, and say that, although there are disagreements about the issue, all sides should respect each other."
Additionally, at the beginning of his 1989 mayoral campaign, Giuliani was a professed opponent of abortion rights, as well as of Roe. By the end of that campaign, however, Giuliani had reportedly shifted his position to one favoring abortion rights, saying, according to the Associated Press, that "he supports abortion rights, and would not seek to reduce funds or services, even though he remains personally opposed." As blogger Greg Sargent noted, in a June 18, 1993, article, The New York Times reported that Giuliani campaign leaflets "said that he opposes restrictions to Federal Medicaid financing for abortions and opposes the Hyde Amendment, which is intended to deny support for that financing." During an April 4 CNN interview, in response to a video from a November 3, 1989, campaign event in which he called for public funding for abortion -- "We cannot deny any woman the right to make her own decision about abortion because she lacks resources" -- Giuliani suggested that he holds the same position today, asserting that he would support "public funding" if its denial "would deprive someone of a constitutional right" to an abortion.
However, his director of policy, spokesperson, and campaign aides said -- before the April 4 interview -- that Giuliani's position is that he would not change current law on abortion funding, which prohibits federal funding for abortion except in cases of incest, rape, or life endangerment.
From the October 14 edition of ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos:
ROBERTS: We've been having this conversation. The Republicans have a real problem. But Romney did invite all kinds of attacks, and he's gotten them now from Giuliani -- and Giuliani remains the surprise. We have to say that. I mean, the fact that he is still running so well among Republicans, even after they've gotten to know him better, and know some of his positions and his oddities, he's --
DONALDSON: I would argue with you but I got to take a cell phone call from my wife, Jan. "Hi, honey. Say hello to George Stephanopoulos."
WILL: What they have learned about Giuliani is that he doesn't flip-flop. That it's -- he's taken exactly the un-Romney approach to his problem, which was to say, "Look, this is me. Take it or leave it."
ROBERTS: Well, to some degree. To some degree, he did equivocate on --
DONALDSON: Did you hear what he said to the NRA?
ROBERTS: Yeah, he equivocated on guns. He equivocated on abortion.
DONALDSON: Sure, he didn't completely renounce his gun control past, but boy, he wanted -- he tried to make it sound like that was kind of in the past, had nothing to do with --
ROBERTS: Had to do with New York.
DONALDSON: -- anything except New York City, and nationally, you can trust him on the Second Amendment.
STEPHANOPOULOS: No, but -- yeah, his basic point is, "I'm not going to change my principles, but I'm not going to do anything to harm you."

















Why is he called "Rotten Rudy?
'cause he's arrogant, selfish and moody
His views on abortion
Require much contortion
Like ending 2nd marriage for Judy.
Haven't we learned by now? Republicans do not flip-flop or pander for votes, they change their minds after serious and heart felt consideration of the issues, sometimes multiple times in any given day.
I love the sarcasm Moon......
Unfortunately I get George Will's opinion columns in my local paper and have read them all since I moved here.....
Once in a blue moon I agree with some of what he says but he almost always ruins it by showing his obvious slant to the right-wing ideals.
Mr Will is one of those that may not always toe the line but to put much trust in his words, you might as well believe that the illegal occupation is going well and the economy is strong.
Rudy flip-flops on everything. He learns what the people want then changes to that stance....typical politician...
I would love to hear not only RUDY's comments, but ALL PRES. candidates, DEMO, And REP. specific plan on what they will do , (on tape) to the # 1 problem to all americans at this time, and that is WHAT IS YOUR SPECIFIC PLAN, on what or how, You will handle this problem of deportation of illegals before it totally bankrupts America ??? AMNESTY being out of the question ?
What is it about this Question that commentators refuse to ask this specific question , and give each candidate 1 minute to state their position...!!! ( so we have it on tape )
Yes, and when are they going to complete the walls arround our country so we can keep people we don't like out and contain the parts of our population who might disagree with assumed authority. They must be properly punished and not allowed to escape before our righteous wrath can find them. Water boarding our not-quite-patriotic-enough citizens. An idea whose time cannot be soon enough. Push this so the hate filled parts of our population can find good work before its time for them to be thinned out as well.;-)
>>how, You will handle this problem of deportation of illegals before it totally bankrupts America ???
I don't think anyone is advocating mass deportations, except for a lunatic fringe.
As for Guiliani.....
Anyone that would so blatantly use 9/11 as a political tool to further an agenda would fit in perfectly with this new breed of corporate right-wing idealogs.
I truely do hope that Guiliani get the nomination, it will be the biggest landslide victory for a Democrat, if not ever, certainly recently!
I take that back...... run ANY Republican and even Mike Gravel would be the next prez!
I truely do hope that Guiliani get the nomination, it will be the biggest landslide victory for a Democrat, if not ever, certainly recently!
I double that hope
Jlyons, I triple that.
Ronald "the Communicator" Reagan
George "the Decider" Bush. Cause he said so.
Rudy "the Equivocator" Giuliani.
Somehow these monikers are becoming less impressive as the GOP digs deeper and deeper into the barrel of rotten apples.
George Will is full of it. Rudy did try to double talk his way out of abortion and gay rights when he first started running. The only reason Rudy didn't 'change his mind' completely is there was already so much documentation on where he stood on issues like gay rights and abortion in the public domain. He would have competed with Mitt for the 'flip-flopper/change my mind' award!.
George Will better watch Perkins/Dobson & Co. They say no to Rudy and if Rudy gets the nomination they will start a third party.
Doesn't flip flop my ass.
Is it me or does it just seem like everyone is really pushing Rudy on us as the best of the Republican candidates?
Me thinks the Republicans are gonna hold their noses & vote for this twit because they think he's the only one that can defeat Hillary.
I won't vote for the guy. I'd rather sit out the election if it's Rudy vs Hillary.
That's bad news for you, Jeter, because the MSM has essentially already proclaimed a Hillery vs Rudy election... all before the first primary vote has been cast. The Punditocracy is hardly going to wait for mere voters to decide anything with the high-end financial potential as national elections. They (& the corporate community that they represent) fully intend to tell US what's what & who's acceptable in Washington's power centers.
As for myself, I share your repugnance at the 'choice' that they seek to present us with. If the election is close, I will hold my nose & vote for Hillery. If its clear that the neocon-dominated Republicans are going down in flames, I will join our friend Redking in voting for the Green candidate.
That at least reminds them that not everybody is on board with their connivinces.
One of the luxuries of living in the Pacific time zone, Mescal. Waiting until 10:30 Eastern to decide if I can vote based on principle or damage control.
And I think the only thing GOP voters learn, contrary to Will's opinion, is whatever they've been told most recently by the media.
So Will is a Rudy tooter? I guess he'll get the nom, but all this flip-flop talk willreally come to light when Hillary gets the dem nom.
Her vote for war, then against.
She wants to end the war, but when?
She used to wear dresses, and now goes with pantsuits.
She wanted to give every new-born $5,000, now she doesn't.
She's against corruption, then hires a convicted thief (Burgler) for "advice."
etc., etc....
MORE, Can't use the flip-flopping ploy this time around. It was used in the last election. The Cons better find something new. And none of the D voters will care.
The Cons showed America what it is like to vote for liars. I'll take a FFer anytime.
MSM is pushing both Rudy and Hillary but I heard someone say that there is an back door effort by Junior & Co. to help McCain get back in the picture in a big way. I believe Dobson and Perkins when they say no Rudy period and I truly don't think Republicans want to commit political suicide by splitting the party, so they will probably prop Thompson up, fill him with NoDoz and pray he comes to life.
they will probably prop Thompson up, fill him with NoDoz and pray he comes to life.
That made me almost choke on my coffee Pearlene...too funny!
Hey I got an e-mail with a link to this test... for some fun take this short Select a Candidate Quiz to find out which one your views most align up with.
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460
Hey Jeter- I got Richardson, Kucinich and Edwards to show. Except that I had a bunch of further questions for most of the items. ;0)
McCain is dead in the water: it's between Rudy and Thompson.
Hillary's got it wrapped up on the RAT side, unless they want to bring in that ( ooo, I'm scared!!!!) man-made global warming fraud, AL GORE.
Amazing what campaigning is vs. governing is, eh?
Hold your nose, please, and vote for Hillary. The difference is more than odour, mon cher.
"Umm... no, sorry, we're NOT invaing Iran. I'm going shopping."
"NOT invading Iran" (sorry)
Don't worry, Hose.
This was a lesson that we ALL should have learned from the 2000 debacle.
Anyone who can't see the differences between the catastrophic fandangos that the Bush Misadministration has committed against our nation... and, of course, the rest of the world..., and whatever errors a Gore Administration MIGHT have presented us with, is (to paraphrase Solon) a complete moron, & lacking in higher brain functions.
Whatever issues that I have with the Democrats, I do realize that our first obligation is to sweep these greedy, lying, sociopathic neocon murderersout of power.
Once Rudy is nominated the dirt from NY will come out.
He couldn't beat Hillary in NY and can't nationally either when his NY record, including very negative 9/11 things come out.
Don't kid yourself, there's plenty of dirt to go around for both Rudy and Hillary: wait and see.
LES,
Your probably right on that one, however, Rudy is the one that is using a national tragedy (9/11) as a political tool to try and run for the presidency.
As a citizenry (and VERY contrary to the wacky right-wingers) we haven't forgotten about that horrible day, in fact I would hope that a Rudy nod might perhaps bring 9/11 to the fore-front.....
It's an issue (like a family with problems that needs to be talked about for that family to be happy again) that needs to be brought up again in detail.....
I for one am sick and tired of the Bush crime family and all their cohorts in supressing the real truth of 9/11.
Like I said, a Rudy nod could or should bring 9/11 up for discussion??
Rudy doesn't "flip-flop" ... except when he does.
When it comes to flip-flopping, Rudy was for it before he was against it.
This is kinda cool. Will is being held captive by his own Republican frames. He must simply be unaware that merely negating a frame only serves to reinforce that frame in the mind of the listener.
Giuliani created a police state in NY, and will create one across the U.S. His poll numbers are been artificially inflated as a "front runner"...Mitt too...according to every exit poll and straw poll. Who is behind this sinister manipulation of the truth, these invisible forces scare me. I am a registered republican, but I won't vote for either of them. Somebody else is pulling their strings, I'm tired of it all.