Beck falsely claimed Reid letter called for Limbaugh's firing
SUMMARY: On his CNN Headline News show, Glenn Beck falsely claimed that Sen. Harry Reid wrote a letter to Clear Channel Communications CEO Mark P. Mays "calling for Rush's firing" in response to Rush Limbaugh's "phony soldiers" comment. In fact, Reid's letter to Mays called on him to publicly repudiate Limbaugh's statement -- not fire him.
On his October 22 CNN Headline News show, Glenn Beck falsely claimed that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) wrote a letter to Clear Channel Communications CEO Mark P. Mays "calling for Rush's firing" in response to Rush Limbaugh's characterization of service members who advocate U.S. withdrawal from Iraq as "phony soldiers." As Media Matters for America documented, Reid's letter to Mays -- whose company owns Limbaugh's syndicator, Premiere Radio Networks -- actually called on him to publicly repudiate Limbaugh's statement.
The letter stated:
Although Americans of goodwill debate the merits of this war, we can all agree that those who serve with such great courage deserve our deepest respect and gratitude. That is why Rush Limbaugh's recent characterization of troops who oppose the war as "phony soldiers" is such an outrage.
[...]
Thousands of active troops and veterans were subjected to Mr. Limbaugh's unpatriotic and indefensible comments on your broadcast. We trust you will agree that not a single one of our sons, daughters, neighbors and friends serving overseas is a "phony soldier." We call on you to publicly repudiate these comments that call into question their service and sacrifice and to ask Mr. Limbaugh to apologize for his comments.
Also, during a discussion between Beck and conservative radio host Dan Patrick, who is also a Republican state senator in Texas, on-screen text read: "The letter criticized Limbaugh for a 'phony soldier' comment."

As Media Matters has repeatedly and exhaustively documented, Limbaugh used the phrase "phony soldiers" -- the plural, not the singular -- on his September 26 show, and Limbaugh did not mention Jesse MacBeth -- who pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for pretending to be an injured Iraq war veteran -- on that show until almost two minutes after using the phrase "phony soldiers." In his discussion with Patrick, Beck contradicted the screenshot by citing "the controversy over [Limbaugh's] 'phony soldiers' comment."
As Media Matters noted, on the October 2 edition of his Headline News show, Beck claimed that the "liberal hit squad Media Matters has twisted [Limbaugh's] words to make it seem like he called all soldiers who might disagree with him, 'phony soldiers.' " Beck added: "The whole truth of his statement is that he was specifically referring to one soldier and a group of soldiers called on by the DOJ [Department of Justice] in the Pacific Northwest."
From the October 22 edition of CNN Headline News' Glenn Beck:
BECK: But first, welcome to "The Real Story." Seems that Rush Limbaugh has had the last laugh in the controversy over his "phony soldiers" comment. Instead of just tossing out the letter that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wrote calling for Rush's firing, Rush decided to auction the letter on eBay, match the winning bid, and donate all of the money to the Marines. Well, the auction ended on Friday, and the net gain to the Marines is just over $4 million.
"The Real Story" is, the political and media elite have colored this just another volley between a conservative talk-radio host and a liberal establishment. Well, what the mainstream would like to have you believe is that Rush and his listeners are just a bunch of kooks on the fringe, but the numbers tell quite a different story.
Listen to this. New York Times, the nation's paper of record, reaches about five and a half million people every week. USA Today is the most widely read newspaper in the country. They reach 11 million people a week. You toss in Newsweek magazine just for good measure; they reach an additional 3 million per week. That means The New York Times, USA Today, and Newsweek reach just under 20 million people every week. So how many crazy white right-wingers are, you know, listening to talk radio and Rush Limbaugh? Just over 20 million.
When Rush Limbaugh is reaching roughly the same number of people every week as an episode of American Idol -- and, by the way, more than those that read the three biggest news outlets in media history -- nobody should really tell those 20 million Americans that their opinion makes them political outsiders or second-class citizens.
The New York Times sets the agenda for every news outlet in this country, and Rush Limbaugh gets painted as a kook. Maybe it's time the liberal media realized you can't marginalize the mainstream. It seems to me things are changing, and maybe the mainstream is the new fringe.
[...]
PATRICK: Absolutely. They don't like criticism. As soon as you criticize Republicans from the media, you know, they step back. The truth is that the elite don't understand that the backbone of America is the hard-working man and woman who listens to talk radio.
I've always said, Glenn, that a phenomenon came along when Rush came along, and that was cell phones. Cell phones came along at the time that Rush -- I was one of the first people to put him on in a major market in the country back in the late '80s -- and cell phones allowed middle-class America to tap into Rush and allowed people to call in with their thoughts and allowed them to say, "Hey, you're not alone, Rush, and I'm not alone."
And there have been many Rush-alikes around the country since, and like Babe Ruth built Yankee Stadium, Rush built AM radio. But he is not on the fringe. It's The New York Times that's on the fringe. Harry Reid is on the fringe. Hillary Clinton is on the fringe. And a few Republicans are on the fringe. This is what America's about.
BECK: I will tell you that I'm proud to say that, unlike some talk-show hosts on the left and -- mainly on the left, but some on the right, as well -- our guy -- and I think this is a really good thing -- as a conservative, when our guy started selling us out, we were done. We're like, "OK, wait a minute, you're not the guy who promised" -- but so many people will just keep going in and pitching for their guy. That's not representative of the American people. They just want somebody to tell the truth.















Leave it to Beck to make up his own facts. The man offers nothing on that show, I am wondering when CNN will pull the plug?
They're waiting until Weiner is available.
I don't care if Reid asked for a firing or just a slap on the wrist, a U.S. Senator has no business wasting his time grandstanding and inserting himself into some talk show host's opinions.
I guess everything in Washington is hunky dory with nothing to worry about except this, if that is the case Senator, then resign your position and go home.
Do you mean grandstanding like the GOP did on the moveon.org ad?
For the umpteenth time, Yes. Neither are worthy of our elected officials time.
Well you don't need to get snitty pal.I've never once see you criticize any GOP pol.
You haven't? Well, I have, often.
Great. Please point me to where you wrote that Mitch McConnell or John Boehner should "resign your position and go home." I'd love to read it.
When that is brought up here, fine. If you want to keep veering off topic, do it by yourself.
speaking of veering. the topic was beck saying that the reid letter called for bush to be fired. your comment was the senate should not be wasting time on this. so you started the veering.
"rush" to be fired.
LOL! Either works for me, but I liked it better the way you had it!
I brought it up. Still waiting for you to point where you have ever called for McConnell and Boehner to resign, as you indicated you did. Or was that mere spin? A pretense of moderation?
How rich. You call me on an inconsistency that is not there, yet have you condemned Reid for wasting Senate time on Limbaugh? Please show me where that is, because we all know you cannot get yourself to criticize any Democrat.........so look in the mirror before you criticize someone else.......hypocrite.
Why should I condemn Reid? I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy.
(Chist, I love exposing partisan hacks who pretend to be moderate!)
>>so look in the mirror before you criticize someone else.......hypocrite
Says the man who thinks Reid should resign and go home. Keep shootin' yerself in the foot there, Tomster!
I have seen tommy slam GOP wingnuts when they make bigoted statements about gays. Tommy sees thing differently but I wouldnt call him a hypocrite
Tommy,
I would like to HBL's sentiments and hope that you are safe from the fires.
I agree with you on Reid's actions, but does that excuse Beck here?
Thank you Fried, I am not near the fires, thankfully. However I know several who are affected and it is incredibly sad. Tomorrow should bring better weather conditions and we pray for improvement, for everyone.
I agree with you on Beck, but I was more interested in this being covered at all by our elected leaders. That is a bigger story for me.
Fair enough, I was just curious as to your thoughts on Beck. Be safe!
Are the fires "off topic"? Why is it OK for you to "veer off topic" but not anyone else?
I agree its a waste of time for this or the Moveon thing. The Senate ought to stop grandstanding and do some darn work. Having said that THIS THREAD is about Beck LYING...AGAIN.
U.S. Senator has no business wasting his time grandstanding and inserting himself into some talk show host's opinions.
No Business? It is his job to represent the opinions and desires of his constituents.
Boy, the wingers are really trying to draw this out, aren't they?
Exactly. If you'll notice, it is Rush and his acolytes in the Right Wing Lie machine keeping this story alive, not the "drive by media".
Good catch, N. This is definitely, suspiciously being drawn out. Such victims, oy!
And while they're dragging it out, SOMEONE in the media needs to ask Rush to explain that minute-and-a-half gap in the audio of his program, and how the transcript on his web site was also edited. And why Rush keeps calling that the "true and accurate record of what I said", despite the fact that those of use who read MMFA know better.
And Rush - I'm still waiting for you to come clean about the time you were arrested with that male prostitute when you were working as a DJ in Pittsburgh under the pseudonym "Jeff Christie".....
That's not gonna happen. As evidenced by some of his supporters here, they think they won this battle and exposed Reid and the dems as some sort of sore losers who only did it to get even for the betrayus ad.
My guess is that Beck just doesn't know what the word "repudiate" means.
"... Harry Reid is on the fringe. Hillary Clinton is on the fringe... "
Let's concede that because Rush is popular his views should not be considered the "fringe" or outside the "mainstream." So then how can Beck's guest then turn around and marginalize the popularly elected Democratic leadership or the candidate who wins in almost every national poll in head-to-head contest?
Why are some pundits on the Right so illogical? (,i>it is a rhetorical question, but anyone who wishes to answer the question, please feel free!)
The answer is usually of book lenth. There are a few written examinations, David Brock's The Republican Noise Machine, is a good and comphehensive about the situation.
Researching your show is apparently unpatriotic. HIYOOO
Yeah mr Beck. get it right, it was me who called for limbaugh's firing.
I think Beck just doesn't know what the word "repudiated" means.
For once I understand MMFHRC's beef. They're right. The letter DIDN'T call for Rush to be fired. But I'm sure that won't discourage them. They'll keep blowing everything he says out of proportion and gee, maybe the next letter to PRN won't be such a "soft threat". Maybe they'll call PRN's integrity into question, now that they know how the U. S. Senate feels about their talk show host. How long before the Senate flexes a little muscle and starts to DEMAND apologies (which, BTW, they haven't called for "repudiation and apologies" for John Kerry's comments, or Murtha, or Durbin, etc.)?
Let me translate from the wingnut language. WWAAHHHHH I admit Beck LIED but I want to put out a gratuituous LIE of my own about Hillary running MMFA since us lying ignorant hiveminders like to LIE in packs. WWAAAHHHHH I think exposing LIES is blowing things out of porportion and I am going to use my amazing mind reading powers to accuse the Senate of something my weak mind says they WILL do in the future. WWAAHHHH its so MEAN of MMFA to expose the wingnut lies and bloviating without also distorting what Dems like Kerry said too, it doesnt further my hivemind agenda WAAAHHHHH.
BeckyBoy made a huge mistake here. He should have congratulated Reid for helping to raise $ for a worthwhile charity and challenged him (Reid) and the co-signers together to match the winning bid (would have been about $50,000 each).
Why? The cause, while worthy, only supports families of veterans killed in war. Why didn't he pick one that has all soldier's backs?
And the families of Law Enforcement Agents killed in the line of duty, if I understand correctly. What the Hey. Let Reid and the 40 pick their charity if they can't support this charity. They helped raise $4+ million, kick in another 2!!!!
great... now we are criticizing the CHARITY that Rush picked out? Give it a rest.
Limbaugh makes a very public, self-serving act of charity as a public relations ploy to rehabilitate his image and you think Reid and others should kick in too? When does Limbaugh get to decide to which charities a person should contribute? Like religion, charity should be a personal thing and not a public display for self-aggrandizement.
Heard snippets of Reid's comments in response to this flap and it sounded a little like he was taking some credit for the success of the "auction". Just thought he (and the others) would like to kick in. But I understand that liberals really like to do good when it involves other people's money.
CNN get over it, you will never be Fox News, get rid of this guy. The lonely "liberal press" needs a network.
That’s an interesting comment, GG. CNN was once THE news channel. How could Fox have displaced them in this regard? Content? What?
Packaging news as entertainment, avoiding complex issues and appealing to the lowest common denominator. Popularity does not equal quality or accuracy.
Also those who want REAL news with balance and integrity have a lot of options. Those who only want their delusions stroked have ONLY Fox Noise.
yep... for those of you that want tree hugging NPR television you can have CNN. Fox offers a counter to the liberal slanting networks... why is that such a bad thing? It will only get worse if Dems pass the 'fairness' doctrine.
Dead-on right, Moon.
Solon, I would disagree that the bedwetters have only Fox, there's plenty of crappy right-wing pseudo=journalism all over the radio, cable, internet and print. Fox is just the highly concentrated and easy to score crack cocaine of propaganda.
Okay. I think I get the drift. But how would you explain the popularity of Rush Limbaugh who's been around for about twenty years, much longer than Fox, and whose audience continues to grow?
"Packaging news as entertainment, avoiding complex issues and appealing to the lowest common denominator. Popularity does not equal quality or accuracy."
Like Moonbatyoubet said.
The letter was character smear by a public official of an influential, but private citizen. The letter carried the weight of the Democratic Party. Randi Rhodes' website once had a pic of Rush following the Imus incident with the caption under Rush's pic saying "Next", as if I, a conservative, visiting her site, didn't understand the threat. Note: I didn't say I was Republican. I said I was Conservative. I used to visit Randi's site and Rush's site. I believe I should have the freedom to do so. When an extremely high ranking gov't official and his coherts attempt to shut down a commentator I like to hear on the radio, I'm concerned because I would not want to see that happen in the left leaning shows either. When I can hear it from both sides, I can form my own opinions. When either is shut down, then it's just not as simple as tuning the dial. Anyway, yes, when 41 United States Senators sign on to the destruction of a radio host, that's quite serious. What if 41 Republican Senators signed on to an attempt to smear the character of any of YOUR favorite hosts? I do believe you'd get bit excited. Was hoping you had spellcheck on here. Anyway, Respectfully submitted to you for consideration, okay? Not a slam. Thank you for allowing me to share in the post. Dave
You Dem hacks hate Rush and will never stop trying to get him off the air. The last attempt was a joke and it raised $4million for the Marines. I'm trying to make political org. pay there fair share of taxes. You can't be for 1/2 the people and claim you are all the people. The next Republican who has anyone going after them to try and Boycott their show. I will Boycott that company Sponsors and will help raise money and get people to buy more than they need to keep them on the air. The Un-fairness Doctrine can cut both ways,. Any attempt at this and we will have no other choice but to drag in the Big 3 and ever Liberal show into the fray. I don't think you have the Gopnades to let this on you Bipartisan web-page. But will see. Your probably a worm and will give out me email. I don't care I have others.
Rush Limbaugh's "phony soldiers" comment was said about People like Senator Tom Harkin who really is a phony Soldier. Harkin claimed that he was a Combat Pilot in Nam. He only flew fixed Air Craft in Japan and in Cuba. He never was a Combat Pilot so that makes him a Phony Soldier. Like Jessie McBeth who has never been to Iraq. He to is a liar.
Why is MMFA pointing out the "singular" tense of the "phony soldier" comment in the news crawl? Talk about nit picking. If you read the whole sentence you can see that the phony soldier term was used in reference to a group of people, thus implying "plural". I guess MMFA will do anything to create a headline and gripe about those it hates.